Analyze Diet
PLoS neglected tropical diseases2015; 9(3); e0003609; doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003609

Effective equine immunization protocol for production of potent poly-specific antisera against Calloselasma rhodostoma, Cryptelytrops albolabris and Daboia siamensis.

Abstract: Snake envenomation has been estimated to affect 1.8 million people annually with about 94,000 deaths mostly in poor tropical countries. Specific antivenoms are the only rational and effective therapy for these cases. Efforts are being made to produce effective, affordable and sufficient antivenoms for these victims. The immunization process, which has rarely been described in detail, is one step that needs to be rigorously studied and improved especially with regard to the production of polyspecific antisera. The polyspecific nature of therapeutic antivenom could obviate the need to identify the culprit snake species. The aim of this study was to produce potent polyspecific antisera against 3 medically important vipers of Thailand and its neighboring countries, namely Cryptelytrops albolabris "White lipped pit viper" (CA), Calleoselasma rhodostoma "Malayan pit viper" (CR), and Daboia siamensis "Russell's viper" (DS). Four horses were immunized with a mixture of the 3 viper venoms using the 'low dose, low volume multi-site' immunization protocol. The antisera showed rapid rise in ELISA titers against the 3 venoms and reached plateau at about the 8th week post-immunization. The in vivo neutralization potency (P) of the antisera against CA, CR and DS venoms was 10.40, 2.42 and 0.76 mg/ml, respectively and was much higher than the minimal potency limits set by Queen Soavabha Memorial Institute (QSMI). The corresponding potency values for the QSMI monospecific antisera against CA, CR and DS venoms were 7.28, 3.12 and 1.50 mg/ml, respectively. The polyspecific antisera also effectively neutralized the procoagulant, hemorrhagic, necrotic and nephrotoxic activities of the viper venoms. This effective immunization protocol should be useful in the production of potent polyspecific antisera against snake venoms, and equine antisera against tetanus, diphtheria or rabies.
Publication Date: 2015-03-16 PubMed ID: 25774998PubMed Central: PMC4361046DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003609Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study focuses on producing a powerful antidote that can counteract the venom of three specific types of medically important vipers common in Thailand and surrounding regions. Researchers achieved this by immunizing horses with venom from these snakes and observing effective results.

Key Objectives of Research

  • Rendering venom from specific species harmless using “poly-specific antisera” is a critical research aim. Poly-specific antisera are results of targeted immunization and can neutralize multiple species-specific toxins.
  • This offers a significant advantage during treatment as it eliminates the necessity of identifying the species of snake involved in the envenomation incident.
  • Particular focus is on the venom from three medically important snake species – Cryptelytrops albolabris, Calloselasma rhodostoma, and Daboia siamensis.

Methodology and Process

  • The immunization protocol implemented involved injecting horses with a mixture of venom derived from the three aforementioned vipers.
  • The protocol was described as ‘low dose, low volume multi-site’ – indicating the administration of smaller doses across multiple locations.

Research Results and Findings

  • The scientific team observed a fast increase in ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) titers post-immunization.
  • The presence of these suggests that a robust immune response was indeed triggered by the immunization process.
  • The ‘in vivo’ neutralizing power of the antisera was notably higher than minimal potency limits set by the Queen Soavabha Memorial Institute.
  • Key venom activities, ranging from procoagulant and hemorrhagic to necrotic and nephrotoxic, were effectively disabled by the poly-specific antisera.

Conclusion and Future Applications

  • This comprehensive research indicates significant potential in the production of highly effective anti-venom to combat toxins released by venomous snakes during bites or attacks.
  • The overall success of the immunization protocol suggests its potential implementation in producing equine antisera against other ailments such as tetanus, diphtheria, or rabies.

Cite This Article

APA
Sapsutthipas S, Leong PK, Akesowan S, Pratanaphon R, Tan NH, Ratanabanangkoon K. (2015). Effective equine immunization protocol for production of potent poly-specific antisera against Calloselasma rhodostoma, Cryptelytrops albolabris and Daboia siamensis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 9(3), e0003609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003609

Publication

ISSN: 1935-2735
NlmUniqueID: 101291488
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 3
Pages: e0003609

Researcher Affiliations

Sapsutthipas, Sompong
  • Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Leong, Poh Kuan
  • Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Akesowan, Surasak
  • Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pratanaphon, Ronachai
  • Division of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-industry, Chiang Mai University, Chaing Mai, Thailand.
Tan, Nget Hong
  • Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ratanabanangkoon, Kavi
  • Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Laboratory of Immunology, Chulabhorn Research Institute and Chulabhorn Graduate Institute, Thailand.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Antivenins / biosynthesis
  • Cross Reactions
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
  • Horses
  • Immune Sera / biosynthesis
  • Immunization
  • Lethal Dose 50
  • Mice
  • Thailand
  • Viper Venoms / immunology

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 38 references
  1. Harrison RA, Hargreaves A, Wagstaff SC, Faragher B, Lalloo DG. Snake envenoming: a disease of poverty.. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3: e569.
  2. Chippaux JP. Estimate of the burden of snakebites in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analytic approach.. Toxicon 57: 586–599.
    doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.12.022pubmed: 21223975google scholar: lookup
  3. Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, de Silva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeswaran A. The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths.. PLoS Med 5: e218.
  4. Williams DJ, Gutierrez JM, Calvete JJ, Wuster W, Ratanabanangkoon K. Ending the drought: new strategies for improving the flow of affordable, effective antivenoms in Asia and Africa.. J Proteomics 74: 1735–1767.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.05.027pubmed: 21640209google scholar: lookup
  5. Gutierrez JM, Williams D, Fan HW, Warrell DA. Snakebite envenoming from a global perspective: Towards an integrated approach.. Toxicon 56: 1223–1235.
    doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.11.020pubmed: 19951718google scholar: lookup
  6. Harrison RA, Cook DA, Renjifo C, Casewell NR, Currier RB. Research strategies to improve snakebite treatment: challenges and progress.. J Proteomics 74: 1768–1780.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.06.019pubmed: 21723969google scholar: lookup
  7. Christensen PA. Production and standardization of antivenin. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology Berlin: Springer-Verlag; pp.825–846.
  8. Sriprapat S, Aeksowan S, Sapsutthipas S, Chotwiwatthanakun C, Suttijitpaisal P. The impact of a low dose, low volume, multi-site immunization on the production of therapeutic antivenoms in Thailand.. Toxicon 41: 57–64.
    pubmed: 12467662
  9. Sunthornandh P, Matangkasombut P, Ratanabanangkoon K. Preparation, characterization and immunogenicity of various polymers and conjugates of elapid postsynaptic neurotoxins.. Mol Immunol 29: 501–510.
    pubmed: 1565098
  10. Sunthornandh P, Ratanabanangkoon K. A comparative study of three vehicles on antibody responses against elapid snake neurotoxin immunogens.. Toxicon 32: 561–571.
    pubmed: 8079368
  11. Pratanaphon R, Akesowan S, Khow O, Sriprapat S, Ratanabanangkoon K. Production of highly potent horse antivenom against the Thai cobra (Naja kaouthia).. Vaccine 15: 1523–1528.
    pubmed: 9330463
  12. Chotwiwatthanakun C, Pratanaphon R, Akesowan S, Sriprapat S, Ratanabanangkoon K. Production of potent polyvalent antivenom against three elapid venoms using a low dose, low volume, multi-site immunization protocol.. Toxicon 39: 1487–1494.
    pubmed: 11478956
  13. El-Kady EM, Ibrahim NM, Wahby AF. Assessment of the anti-Naja haje antibodies elicited in a low dose multi-site immunization protocol.. Toxicon 54: 450–459.
    doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.05.007pubmed: 19464310google scholar: lookup
  14. Archundia IG, de Roodt AR, Ramos-Cerrillo B, Chippaux JP, Olguin-Perez L. Neutralization of Vipera and Macrovipera venoms by two experimental polyvalent antisera: a study of paraspecificity.. Toxicon 57: 1049–1056.
    doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2011.04.009pubmed: 21530569google scholar: lookup
  15. Ramos-Cerrillo B, de Roodt AR, Chippaux JP, Olguin L, Casasola A. Characterization of a new polyvalent antivenom (Antivipmyn Africa) against African vipers and elapids.. Toxicon 52: 881–888.
    doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.09.002pubmed: 18926842google scholar: lookup
  16. Rungsiwongse J, Ratanabanangkoon K. Development of an ELISA to assess the potency of horse therapeutic antivenom against Thai cobra venom.. J Immunol Methods 136: 37–43.
    pubmed: 1995711
  17. Theakston RD, Reid HA. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in assessing antivenom potency.. Toxicon 17: 511–515.
    pubmed: 516083
  18. Theakston RD, Reid HA. Development of simple standard assay procedures for the characterization of snake venom.. Bull WHO 61: 949–956.
    pmc: PMC2536230pubmed: 6609011
  19. Finney DJ. Probit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
  20. Morais V, Ifran S, Berasain P, Massaldi H. Antivenoms: potency or median effective dose, which to use?. J Venom Anim Tox incl Trop Dis 16: 191–193.
  21. Gutierrez JM, Gene JA, Rojas G, Cerdas L. Neutralization of proteolytic and hemorrhagic activities of Costa Rican snake venoms by a polyvalent antivenom.. Toxicon 23: 887–893.
    pubmed: 3913055
  22. Leong PK, Tan CH, Sim SM, Fung SY, Sumana K. Cross neutralization of common Southeast Asian viperid venoms by a Thai polyvalent snake antivenom (Hemato Polyvalent Snake Antivenom).. Acta Trop 132: 7–14.
  23. Tan CH, Tan NH, Sim SM, Fung SY, Jayalakshmi P. Nephrotoxicity of hump-nosed pit viper (Hypnale hypnale) venom in mice is preventable by the paraspecific Hemato polyvalent antivenom (HPA).. Toxicon 60: 1259–1262.
    doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.08.012pubmed: 22975088google scholar: lookup
  24. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.. J Biol Chem 193: 265–275.
    pubmed: 14907713
  25. Dennis EA. Diversity of group types, regulation, and function of phospholipase A2.. J Biol Chem 269: 13057–13060.
    pubmed: 8175726
  26. Rojas G, Jimenez JM, Gutierrez JM. Caprylic acid fractionation of hyperimmune horse plasma: description of a simple procedure for antivenom production.. Toxicon 32: 351–363.
    pubmed: 8016856
  27. Gutierrez JM, Leon G, Lomonte B. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of immunoglobulin therapy for envenomation.. Clin Pharmacokinet 42: 721–741.
    pubmed: 12846594
  28. Scherrmann JM. Antibody treatment of toxin poisoning—recent advances.. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 32: 363–375.
    pubmed: 8057395
  29. Hunt JD, Jackson DC, Wood PR, Stewart DJ, Brown LE. Immunological parameters associated with antigenic competition in a multivalent footrot vaccine.. Vaccine 13: 1649–1657.
    pubmed: 8719515
  30. Fox JW, Serrano SM. Exploring snake venom proteomes: multifaceted analyses for complex toxin mixtures.. Proteomics 8: 909–920.
    doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700777pubmed: 18203266google scholar: lookup
  31. Chippaux J-P. Snake venoms and envenomations. Florida: KRIEGER PUBLISHING COMPANY 300 p..
  32. Wüster W. The genus Daboia (Serpentes: Viperidae): Russell's viper.. Hamadryad 23: 33–40.
  33. Kanjanabuch T, Sitprija V. Snakebite nephrotoxicity in Asia.. Semin Nephrol 28: 363–372.
  34. Songsumard S. Snake bite in Thailand. Annual Epidemiological Surveillance Report: Ministry of Public Health pp. 324–333.
  35. Viravan C, Veeravat U, Warrell MJ, Theakston RD, Warrell DA. ELISA confirmation of acute and past envenoming by the monocellate Thai cobra (Naja kaouthia).. Am J Trop Med Hyg 35: 173–181.
    pubmed: 3946735
  36. Abubakar SB, Abubakar IS, Habib AG, Nasidi A, Durfa N. Pre-clinical and preliminary dose-finding and safety studies to identify candidate antivenoms for treatment of envenoming by saw-scaled or carpet vipers (Echis ocellatus) in northern Nigeria.. Toxicon 55: 719–723.
    doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.10.024pubmed: 19874841google scholar: lookup
  37. Raweerith R, Ratanabanangkoon K. Immunochemical and biochemical comparisons of equine monovalent and polyvalent snake antivenoms.. Toxicon 45: 369–375.
    pubmed: 15683876
  38. Harrison RA, Wuster W, Theakston RD. The conserved structure of snake venom toxins confers extensive immunological cross-reactivity to toxin-specific antibody.. Toxicon 41: 441–449.
    pubmed: 12657313