Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2026; 12; 1738766; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1738766

Effects of a rehabilitative whole-body resistance band wrap on equine gait, posture, cortisol, and muscular function.

Abstract: Resistance bands used while horses are exercised with their handlers have shown benefits, but it is unknown if whole-body resistance bands used independently have therapeutic benefits. This study hypothesized that horses with varying gait asymmetries would experience improvements in lameness, muscular function, range of motion, posture, and cortisol following short-term use of a whole-body resistance band wrap (RBW). In this study, nine lame adult horses were evaluated with and without the RBW. The assessment included: objective gait analysis, acoustic myography, postural analysis, gait kinematics, and salivary cortisol concentrations. Statistical analyses included: Shapiro-Wilk Test, Paired Student T-Tests or non-parametric Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests (significant at  < 0.05). There was no difference in lameness, velocity, or stride length. Cortisol levels were lower while wearing the RBW ( = 0.03). The RBW decreased semitendinosus muscle efficiency (EST Score,  = 0.008), and increased carpal ( = 0.03), tarsal ( = 0.03), and shoulder ( = 0.03) joint range of motion (ROM). Back angle increased when wearing the RBW ( = 0.04). These findings indicate the RBW has short-term effects on decreasing cortisol, improving joint ROM, and decreasing semitendinosus muscle function. Future studies exploring the use of the RBW with different exercise protocols are needed to further clarify its use for equine rehabilitation.
Publication Date: 2026-01-28 PubMed ID: 41684718PubMed Central: PMC12892970DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1738766Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

Resistance band wraps applied to the whole body of horses show short-term benefits by reducing stress hormone levels, improving joint range of motion, and altering muscle function, although they did not affect lameness or stride parameters in this study.

Study Purpose and Hypothesis

  • The study aimed to test whether wearing a whole-body resistance band wrap (RBW) independently provides therapeutic benefits to horses with gait asymmetries and lameness.
  • The researchers hypothesized that using the RBW would improve lameness, muscular function, range of motion (ROM), posture, and stress hormone (cortisol) levels after short-term use.

Study Design and Methods

  • Participants: Nine adult horses exhibiting varying degrees of lameness and gait asymmetries.
  • Intervention: Evaluation performed both with and without the horses wearing the RBW to determine changes attributable to the wrap.
  • Assessments performed:
    • Objective gait analysis to quantify lameness, velocity, and stride length.
    • Acoustic myography to measure muscle efficiency, focusing on semitendinosus muscle function.
    • Postural analysis including back angle to detect changes in posture.
    • Joint kinematics measuring the range of motion at carpal (front wrist), tarsal (hock), and shoulder joints.
    • Salivary cortisol levels to assess physiological stress.
  • Statistical analysis using appropriate tests based on data distribution:
    • Shapiro-Wilk Test for normality of data.
    • Paired Student’s T-Tests or Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests to compare measurements with and without RBW use.
    • Significance threshold set at p < 0.05.

Key Findings

  • Lameness, velocity, and stride length: No significant differences were detected with the use of the RBW, indicating it did not immediately alter obvious gait abnormalities or basic locomotion parameters.
  • Cortisol levels: Cortisol, a marker of stress, was significantly reduced while horses wore the RBW (p = 0.03), suggesting a calming or stress-relieving effect.
  • Muscle function: There was a significant decrease in semitendinosus muscle efficiency as measured by the EST score (p = 0.008), indicating altered muscular activity potentially due to the added resistance or sensory input from the wrap.
  • Joint range of motion: Wearing the RBW resulted in significant increases in ROM at several joints:
    • Carpal joint increased motion (p = 0.03)
    • Tarsal joint increased motion (p = 0.03)
    • Shoulder joint increased motion (p = 0.03)
  • Posture: Back angle was significantly increased while wearing the RBW (p = 0.04), indicating a change toward an altered or possibly improved spinal posture.

Interpretation and Implications

  • The RBW does not appear to immediately improve visible lameness or basic gait parameters within the short period tested, but it affects underlying physiological and biomechanical factors.
  • Reduced cortisol levels suggest that the RBW might have a stress-reducing or calming effect on horses, which is beneficial for rehabilitation settings.
  • Increased joint range of motion indicate that wearing the RBW may assist in improving flexibility or mobility in certain joints, potentially supporting rehabilitation and comfort.
  • The decrease in semitendinosus muscle efficiency suggests that the resistance provided by the bands influences muscle activity, which might be useful for conditioning or muscular training, though it should be further investigated.
  • The observed changes in back angle highlight an impact on posture, which is important for overall equine biomechanics and health.

Recommendations for Future Research

  • Longer duration studies to see if benefits on lameness or gait can develop over time with regular RBW use.
  • Investigations combining the RBW with specific exercise or rehabilitation protocols to better understand therapeutic potentials.
  • Exploration of different resistance intensities or band designs to optimize muscle engagement and recovery outcomes.
  • Wider sample sizes including various breeds, ages, and lameness severities for generalizability of findings.

Cite This Article

APA
Boger B, Naraian M, Hernandez E, Eaton A, Rockburn R, Tillman I, Payne S, Yob C, Panek C, Manfredi JM. (2026). Effects of a rehabilitative whole-body resistance band wrap on equine gait, posture, cortisol, and muscular function. Front Vet Sci, 12, 1738766. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1738766

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Pages: 1738766
PII: 1738766

Researcher Affiliations

Boger, Brooke
  • McPhail Equine Performance Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Naraian, Maegha
  • McPhail Equine Performance Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Hernandez, Emily
  • McPhail Equine Performance Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Eaton, Alexis
  • McPhail Equine Performance Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Rockburn, Ruby
  • McPhail Equine Performance Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Tillman, Isabella
  • McPhail Equine Performance Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Payne, Stesha
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Yob, Chelsey
  • Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Panek, Char
  • McPhail Equine Performance Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Manfredi, Jane M
  • McPhail Equine Performance Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 33 references
  1. Baccarin RYA, Seidel SRT, Michelacci YM, Tokawa PKA, Oliveira TM. Osteoarthritis: a common disease that should be avoided in the athletic horse’s life.. Anim Front (2022) 12:25–36.
    doi: 10.1093/af/vfac026pmc: PMC9197312pubmed: 35711506google scholar: lookup
  2. Zaneb H, Kaufmann V, Stanek C, Peham C, Licka TF. Quantitative differences in activities of back and pelvic limb muscles during walking and trotting between chronically lame and nonlame horses.. Am J Vet Res (2009) 70:1129–34.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.70.9.1129pubmed: 19719429google scholar: lookup
  3. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, Jordan P, Auer JA. Compensatory load redistribution of horses with induced weight-bearing forelimb lameness trotting on a treadmill.. Vet J (2006) 171:135–46.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.09.004pubmed: 15974567google scholar: lookup
  4. Veronese N, Cooper C, Bruyère O, Al-Daghri NM, Branco J, Cavalier E. Multimodal multidisciplinary management of patients with moderate to severe pain in knee osteoarthritis: a need to meet patient expectations.. Drugs (2022) 82:1347–55.
    doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01773-5pmc: PMC9512723pubmed: 36112341google scholar: lookup
  5. Atalaia T, Prazeres J, Abrantes J, Clayton HM. Equine rehabilitation: a scoping review of the literature.. Animals (2021) 11:1508.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061508pmc: PMC8224607pubmed: 34067449google scholar: lookup
  6. Wilson JM, McKenzie E, Duesterdieck-Zellmer K. International survey regarding the use of rehabilitation modalities in horses.. Front Vet Sci (2018) 5:120.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00120pmc: PMC6004390pubmed: 29942811google scholar: lookup
  7. Miri H, Tabatabaeineghad M, Sharifi S, ardakanizadeh M, Rangraz E. The influence of eight weeks resistance training with triband on the motor function, the severity of pain, strength in elderly women with knee osteoarthritis.. J Sports Biomotor (2023) 15:108–16.
  8. Ellis KL, Goldberg MR, Aguirre GE, Moorman VJ. The effect of a 4-week elastic resistance training regimen in horses with non-performance limiting hindlimb lameness.. J Equine Rehab (2023) 1:100003.
  9. Pfau T, Simons V, Rombach N, Stubbs N, Weller R. Effect of a 4-week elastic resistance band training regimen on back kinematics in horses trotting in-hand and on the lunge.. Equine Vet J (2017) 49:829–35.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12690pubmed: 28432739google scholar: lookup
  10. Shaw K, Ursini T, Levine D, Richards J, Adair S. The effect of ground poles and elastic resistance bands on longissimus dorsi and rectus abdominus muscle activity during equine walk and trot.. J Equine Vet Sci (2021) 107:3772.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103772pubmed: 34802619google scholar: lookup
  11. Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Kramer J, Reed SK, Yonezawa Y, Maki H. Comparison of a body-mounted inertial sensor system–based method with subjective evaluation for detection of lameness in horses.. Am J Vet Res (2013) 74:17–24.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.74.1.17pubmed: 23270341google scholar: lookup
  12. Harrison AP. A more precise, repeatable and diagnostic alternative to surface electromyography – an appraisal of the clinical utility of acoustic myography.. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging (2018) 38:312–25.
    doi: 10.1111/cpf.12417pubmed: 28251802google scholar: lookup
  13. Ahmed W, Elbrønd VS, Harrison AP, Hart JO, Williams RE. An investigation into the short-term effects of photobiomodulation on the mechanical nociceptive thresholds of M. Longissimus and M. Gluteus medius, in relation to muscle firing rate in horses at three different gaits.. J Equine Vet Sci (2021) 98:3363.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103363pubmed: 33663728google scholar: lookup
  14. Zsoldos RR, Voegele A, Krueger B, Schroeder U, Weber A, Licka TF. Long term consistency and location specificity of equine gluteus medius muscle activity during locomotion on the treadmill.. BMC Vet Res (2018) 14:126.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1443-ypmc: PMC5889605pubmed: 29625573google scholar: lookup
  15. St. George L, Spoormakers TJP, Smit IH, Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM, Roy SH. Adaptations in equine appendicular muscle activity and movement occur during induced fore- and hindlimb lameness: an electromyographic and kinematic evaluation.. Front Vet Sci (2022) 9:989522.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.989522pmc: PMC9679508pubmed: 36425119google scholar: lookup
  16. Talbert C, Manfredi J, Tomlinson J. Use of acoustic myography in evaluation of biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscle function in nine skijoring dogs. Comp Exerc Physiol. (2024) 20:1031. doi: 10.1163/17552559-00001031
    doi: 10.1163/17552559-00001031google scholar: lookup
  17. Acutt EV, le Jeune SS, Pypendop BH. Evaluation of the effects of chiropractic on static and dynamic muscle variables in sport horses. J Equine Vet Sci. (2019) 73:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.10.016
  18. Clayton HM, van Weeren PR. “Performance in equestrian sports.” Equine Locomotion (2013). https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=dLKFXgYpdqsC&oi=fnd&pg=PA305&dq=Clayton,+H.+M.,+and+P.+R.+van+Weeren.+2013.+Performan (Accessed July 27, 2025).
  19. Santosuosso E, Leguillette R, Vinardell T, Filho S, Massie S, McCrae P, et al. Kinematic analysis during straight line free swimming in horses: part 1 - forelimbs. Front Vet Sci. (2021) 8:2375. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.752375,
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.752375pmc: PMC8553013pubmed: 34722709google scholar: lookup
  20. Santosuosso E, Leguillette R, Vinardell T, Filho S, Massie S, McCrae P, et al. Kinematic analysis during straight line free swimming in horses: part 2 - hindlimbs. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 8:1500. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.761500,
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.761500pmc: PMC8843043pubmed: 35174237google scholar: lookup
  21. Morales JL, Manchado M, Vivo J, Galisteo AM, Agüera E, Miró F. Angular kinematic patterns of limbs in elite and riding horses at trot. Equine Vet J. (1998) 30:528–33. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb04529.x,
  22. Mawdsley A, Kelly EP, Smith FH, Brophy PO. Linear assessment of the thoroughbred horse: an approach to conformation evaluation. Equine Vet J. (1996) 28:461–7. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1996.tb01618.x,
  23. Sénèque E, Morisset S, Lesimple C, Hausberger M. Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics. PLoS One. (2018) 13:4208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204208,
  24. Scheidegger MD, Gerber V, Ramseyer A, Schüpbach-Regula G, Bruckmaier RM, van der Kolk JH. Repeatability of the ACTH stimulation test as reflected by salivary cortisol response in healthy horses. Domest Anim Endocrinol. (2016) 57:43–7. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.04.002,
  25. Paulekas R, Haussler KK. Principles and practice of therapeutic exercise for horses. J Equine Vet Sci. (2009) 29:870–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2009.10.019
  26. Cho HY, Kim EH, Kim J, Yoon YW. Kinesio taping improves pain, range of motion, and proprioception in older patients with knee osteoarthritis : a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. (2015) 94:192–200. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000148,
    doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000148pubmed: 25706053google scholar: lookup
  27. Gellman K, Ruina A. Standing horse posture: a longer stance is more stable. Biol Open. (2022) 11:9139. doi: 10.1242/BIO.059139
    doi: 10.1242/BIO.059139pmc: PMC9115912pubmed: 35545924google scholar: lookup
  28. Shakeshaft A, Tabor G. The effect of a physiotherapy intervention on thoracolumbar posture in horses. Animals. (2020) 10:1–10. doi: 10.3390/ani10111977,
    doi: 10.3390/ani10111977pmc: PMC7693906pubmed: 33126478google scholar: lookup
  29. Diego MA, Field T. Moderate pressure massage elicits a parasympathetic nervous system response. Int J Neurosci. (2009) 119:630–8. doi: 10.1080/00207450802329605,
    doi: 10.1080/00207450802329605pubmed: 19283590google scholar: lookup
  30. Williams NG, Borchelt PL. Full body restraint and rapid stimulus exposure as a treatment for dogs with defensive aggressive behavior: three case studies. Int J Comp Psychol. (2003) 16:226–36. doi: 10.46867/ijcp.2003.16.04.02
  31. Maula MI, Ammarullah MI, Fadhila HN, Afif IY, Hardian H, Jamari J, et al. Comfort evaluation and physiological effects/autonomic nervous system response of inflatable deep pressure vest in reducing anxiety. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e36065. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36065,
  32. Korogod N, Skuza K, Bangerter G, Opsommer E. Physiological effects of therapeutic body wraps in healthy volunteers: an observational study. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. (2022) 41:114–23. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2022.07.020,
    doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2022.07.020pubmed: 36428039google scholar: lookup
  33. Winkler EV, Laurer SK, Steigmeier-Raith S, Zablotski Y, Mille MA. Accuracy of Kinovea-based kinematic gait analysis compared to a three-dimensional motion analysis system in healthy dogs. AJVR. (2024) 85:1–11. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.24.05.0128,
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.24.05.0128pubmed: 39094616google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.