Analyze Diet

Effects of blood contamination on cerebrospinal fluid analysis.

Abstract: Data were obtained from 190 cerebrospinal fluid samples collected from both clinically normal and diseased dogs, cats, cows, and horses. Red blood cells, indicating blood contamination, were identified in 115 samples. White blood cells were a rare finding in normal animals. Blood contamination appeared to have little effect on white blood cell numbers even though, in several samples, thousands of red blood cells were identified. An accepted formula to correct for blood contamination was found to be an unreliable method to determine "uncontaminated" values for white blood cells, total protein, or creatine phosphokinase.
Publication Date: 1977-08-01 PubMed ID: 893207
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the impact of blood contamination on the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in various animal species including dogs, cats, cows, and horses, and finds that, despite heavy contamination, it has little effect on the enumeration of white blood cells and that common correction formulas are not reliable.

Methodology and Key Findings

  • The study used 190 samples of cerebrospinal fluid collected from a diverse set of animals including dogs, cats, cows, and horses. These animals were both clinically normal and diseased.
  • Out of these 190 samples, 115 were found to have contamination by red blood cells, which are indicative of blood contamination. However, white blood cells were rarely found in normal animals.
  • The researchers observed that the presence of blood contamination, even in large amounts, had negligible influence on the count of white blood cells. This is counterintuitive as one might expect contamination to alter the count.
  • An accepted method of correcting for blood contamination was tested on the samples to determine its reliability. This formula is used to determine “uncontaminated” values for several factors including white blood cells, total protein, and creatine phosphokinase.
  • Contrary to the widely accepted belief, the study found this correction formula to be unreliable. Hence, its results might lead to inaccurate estimations for the aforementioned factors.

Implications and Conclusions

  • The findings of this research can have significant implications in clinical settings where testing cerebrospinal fluids is common. Practitioners should be aware that blood contamination may not affect white blood cell counts as much as previously believed.
  • Moreover, the unreliability of the commonly used correction formula suggests that practitioners need to be cautious while interpreting results, especially when there’s blood contamination. It emphasizes the need for further research to develop more reliable methods for accounting for blood contamination in cerebrospinal fluid analysis.

Cite This Article

APA
Wilson JW, Stevens JB. (1977). Effects of blood contamination on cerebrospinal fluid analysis. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 171(3), 256-258.

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 171
Issue: 3
Pages: 256-258

Researcher Affiliations

Wilson, J W
    Stevens, J B

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Blood
      • Cats / cerebrospinal fluid
      • Cattle / cerebrospinal fluid
      • Cerebrospinal Fluid / analysis
      • Cerebrospinal Fluid / cytology
      • Dogs / cerebrospinal fluid
      • Erythrocytes / cytology
      • Horses / cerebrospinal fluid
      • Leukocytes / cytology
      • Methods

      Citations

      This article has been cited 6 times.
      1. Puerto-Parada M, Arango-Sabogal JC, Bilodeau MÈ, Bédard C, Francoz D, Desrochers A, Nichols S, Fecteau G. Interpretation of cerebrospinal fluid analysis from recumbent cows using different thresholds of red blood cell count.. J Vet Intern Med 2022 Sep;36(5):1837-1842.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.16502pubmed: 35906868google scholar: lookup
      2. Early PJ, Munana KJ, Olby NR, Mariani CL. Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid parameters from the cerebellomedullary and lumbar cisterns in 54 dogs.. Can Vet J 2019 Aug;60(8):885-888.
        pubmed: 31391608
      3. Singh M, Foster DJ, Child G, Lamb WA. Inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid analysis in cats: clinical diagnosis and outcome.. J Feline Med Surg 2005 Apr;7(2):77-93.
        doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2004.07.001pubmed: 15771944google scholar: lookup
      4. St Jean G, Yvorchuk-St Jean K, Anderson DE, Moore WE. Cerebrospinal fluid constituents collected at the atlanto-occipital site of xylazine hydrochloride sedated, healthy 8-week-old Holstein calves.. Can J Vet Res 1997 Apr;61(2):108-12.
        pubmed: 9114961
      5. Aktas M, Auguste D, Lefebvre HP, Toutain PL, Braun JP. Creatine kinase in the dog: a review.. Vet Res Commun 1993;17(5):353-69.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01839386pubmed: 8209415google scholar: lookup
      6. Rand JS, Parent J, Percy D, Jacobs R. Clinical, cerebrospinal fluid, and histological data from thirty-four cats with primary noninflammatory disease of the central nervous system.. Can Vet J 1994 Mar;35(3):174-81.
        pubmed: 8055433