FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2023; 87(2); 85-96;

Effects of concentrated fecal microbiota transplant on the equine fecal microbiota after antibiotic-induced dysbiosis.

Abstract: Bacterial imbalances are observed in intestinal diseases and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been used to restore the intestinal microbiota of horses. However, there is evidence that the current methods proposed for FMT in horses have limited efficacy. The objective of this study was to concentrate the bacteria present in the donor stool by centrifugation, and to test the effect in horses with antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. One healthy 11-year-old horse was selected as a fecal donor and 9 horses were given trimethoprim sulfadiazine (TMS) for 5 days to induce dysbiosis. Horses received either a concentrated FMT (cFMT, n = 3), fresh unconcentrated FMT (fFMT, n = 3), or 10% glycerol solution (vehicle, VEH, n = 3) by nasogastric tube for 3 days. Fecal samples were collected on Days 0, 4, 9, 11, and 21 for microbiota analysis (Illumina sequencing). The TMS significantly changed the bacterial composition of horses' feces (D0 versus D4). The composition of the cFMT and fFMT recipient horses was significantly different after transplantation compared to after antibiotic-induced dysbiosis (D4 versus D11), whereas the microbiota of the vehicle recipients was not, indicating that both protocols induced transient changes. However, preparation of FMT solutions markedly changed the original composition present in the donor's feces, with significant enrichment of Escherichia genus in the cFMT. Individual susceptibility to restoration of the microbiota was observed in horses, similar to what is known for other species. Our results suggest that concentrating bacteria should not be recommended in preparation of FMT solutions and that further research is required to improve current methods recommended to perform FMT in horses. Des déséquilibres bactériens sont observés dans les maladies intestinales et la transplantation de microbiote fécal (FMT) a été utilisée pour la restaurer le microbiote intestinal des chevaux. Cependant, que les méthodes actuelles proposées pour FMT chez les chevaux ont une efficacité limitée. L’objectif de cette étude était de concentrer les bactéries présentes dans les selles du donneur par centrifugation, et de tester leur effet chez des chevaux atteints de dysbiose induite par les antibiotiques. Un cheval sain de 11 ans a été sélectionné comme donneur fécal et 9 chevaux ont reçu du triméthoprime sulfadiazine (TMS) pendant cinq jours pour induire une dysbiose. Les chevaux ont reçu soit une FMT concentrée (cFMT, n = 3), une FMT fraîche non concentrée (fFMT, n = 3) ou une solution de glycérol à 10 % (véhicule, VEH, n = 3) par sonde naso-gastrique pendant 3 jours. Des échantillons fécaux ont été prélevés aux jours 0, 4, 9, 11 et 21 pour analyse du microbiote (séquençage Illumina). Le TMS a significativement modifié la composition bactérienne des matières fécales des chevaux (D0 versus D4). La composition des chevaux receveurs cFMT et fFMT était significativement différente après la transplantation par rapport à la dysbiose induite par les antibiotiques (D4 versus D11), alors que le microbiote des receveurs de véhicules ne l’était pas, indiquant que les deux protocoles induisaient des changements transitoires. Cependant, la préparation des solutions FMT a considérablement modifié la composition originale présente dans les matières fécales du donneur, avec un enrichissement significatif du genre Escherichia dans le cFMT. Une susceptibilité individuelle à la restauration du microbiote a été observée chez les chevaux, à l’instar de ce qui est connu chez d’autres espèces. Nos résultats suggèrent que la concentration des bactéries ne devrait pas être recommandée dans la préparation des solutions FMT et que des recherches supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour améliorer les méthodes actuelles recommandées pour effectuer la FMT chez les chevaux.(Traduit par les auteurs).
Copyright and/or publishing rights held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-04-07 PubMed ID: 37020579PubMed Central: PMC10069150
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the impact of concentrated and unconcentrated fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on the equine intestinal microbiota following antibiotic-induced imbalance. The findings suggest that concentrating bacteria for FMT may not be helpful in restoring microbial balance and urge for further research to refine current FMT techniques in horses.

Study Design and Methodology

  • The research focused on assessing the efficacy of FMT in horses suffering from dysbiosis – an imbalance in their intestinal bacterial population – caused by trimethoprim sulfadiazine, an antibiotic.
  • An 11-year-old healthy horse was chosen as the fecal donor. Nine other horses were induced with dysbiosis by administering trimethoprim sulfadiazine for 5 days.
  • Following this, the horses were given either fresh unconcentrated FMT (fFMT), concentrated FMT (cFMT), or a 10% glycerol solution via a nasogastric tube for three consecutive days.
  • Fecal samples were collected from the horses at different periods of the experiment (Days 0, 4, 9, 11, and 21) for the analysis of their intestinal microbiota using Illumina sequencing, a popular technology for gene sequencing.

Findings and Interpretation

  • The study found that the use of trimethoprim sulfadiazine significantly disrupted the natural mix of bacteria in horse feces.
  • The composition of fecal bacteria in horses receiving cFMT and fFMT demonstrated noticeable changes after transplantation as compared to post-antibiotic dysbiosis. The microbiota of horses given the glycerol solution, however, was largely unchanged.
  • The pre-transplantation preparation of FMT solutions significantly altered the bacterial mix originally present in the fecal donor, with the cFMT notably increasing the genus population.
  • The researchers observed a varying individual susceptibility to microbiota restoration in horses, similar to patterns seen in other species.

Conclusion

  • The results point to a conclusion that the process of concentrating bacteria is not recommended while preparing FMT solutions.
  • They suggest the need for further research to improve the current methods of conducting FMT in horses to effectively restore their gut microbiota after dysbiosis.

Cite This Article

APA
Di Pietro R, Arroyo LG, Leclere M, Costa M. (2023). Effects of concentrated fecal microbiota transplant on the equine fecal microbiota after antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Can J Vet Res, 87(2), 85-96.

Publication

Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire
ISSN: 1928-9022
NlmUniqueID: 8607793
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 87
Issue: 2
Pages: 85-96

Researcher Affiliations

Di Pietro, Rebecca
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences (Di Pietro, Costa), Department of Clinical Sciences (Leclere), Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec J2S 2M2; Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Arroyo).
Arroyo, Luis G
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences (Di Pietro, Costa), Department of Clinical Sciences (Leclere), Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec J2S 2M2; Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Arroyo).
Leclere, Mathilde
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences (Di Pietro, Costa), Department of Clinical Sciences (Leclere), Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec J2S 2M2; Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Arroyo).
Costa, Marcio
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences (Di Pietro, Costa), Department of Clinical Sciences (Leclere), Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec J2S 2M2; Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Arroyo).

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / adverse effects
  • Bacteria / isolation & purification
  • Dysbiosis / chemically induced
  • Dysbiosis / therapy
  • Dysbiosis / veterinary
  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation / methods
  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation / veterinary
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Horse Diseases / chemically induced
  • Horse Diseases / therapy
  • Horses
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Gastrointestinal Microbiome

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Moron R, Galvez J, Colmenero M, Anderson P, Cabeza J, Rodriguez-Cabezas ME. The Importance of the microbiome in critically ill patients: Role of nutrition.. Nutrients 2019;11:3002.
    pmc: PMC6950228pubmed: 31817895
  2. den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen AK, Venema K, Reijngoud D-J, Bakker BM. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism.. J Lipid Res 2013;54:2325–2340.
    pmc: PMC3735932pubmed: 23821742
  3. Gensollen T, Iyer SS, Kasper DL, Blumberg RS. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system.. Science 2016;352:539–544.
    pmc: PMC5050524pubmed: 27126036
  4. Baumler AJ, Sperandio V. Interactions between the microbiota and pathogenic bacteria in the gut.. Nature 2016;535:85–93.
    pmc: PMC5114849pubmed: 27383983
  5. Glinsky MJ, Smith RM, Spires HR, Davis CL. Measurement of volatile fatty acid production rates in the cecum of the pony.. J Anim Sci 1976;42:1465–1470.
    pubmed: 931822
  6. Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M. What is the Healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases.. Microorganisms 2019;7:14.
    pmc: PMC6351938pubmed: 30634578
  7. Abutarbush SM, Carmalt JL, Shoemaker RW. Causes of gastrointestinal colic in horses in western Canada: 604 cases (1992 to 2002). Can Vet J 2005;46:800–805.
    pmc: PMC1187790pubmed: 16231649
  8. Stewart HL, Pitta D, Indugu N. Changes in the faecal bacterial microbiota during hospitalisation of horses with colic and the effect of different causes of colic.. Equine Vet J 2021;53:1119–1131.
    pubmed: 33222287
  9. Costa MC, Stämpfli HR, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E, Gomes RG, Weese JS. Changes in the equine fecal microbiota associated with the use of systemic antimicrobial drugs.. BMC Vet Res 2015;11:19.
    pmc: PMC4323147pubmed: 25644524
  10. Di Pietro R, Arroyo LG, Leclere M, Costa MC. Species-level gut microbiota analysis after antibiotic-induced dysbiosis in horses.. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:2859.
    pmc: PMC8533001pubmed: 34679880
  11. Al Jassim RAM, Andrews FM. The bacterial community of the horse gastrointestinal tract and its relation to fermentative acidosis, laminitis, colic, and stomach ulcers.. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine practice 2009;25:199–215.
    pubmed: 19580934
  12. International Equine Colitis Research G. Science-in-brief: Report on the Havemeyer Foundation workshop on acute colitis of the adult horse.. Equine Vet J 2020;52:163–164.
    pmc: PMC7163712pubmed: 32034964
  13. Costa MC, Weese JS. Understanding the intestinal microbiome in health and disease.. Veterinary clinics of North America: Equine practice 2018;34:1–12.
    pubmed: 29402480
  14. Halkjær SI, Christensen AH, Lo BZS. Faecal microbiota transplantation alters gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: Results from a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study.. Gut 2018;67:2107–2115.
    pubmed: 29980607
  15. Quraishi MN, Widlak M, Bhala N. Systematic review with meta-analysis: The efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection.. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2017;46:479–493.
    pubmed: 28707337
  16. Zhang F, Luo W, Shi Y, Fan Z, Ji G. Should we standardize the 1,700-year-old fecal microbiota transplantation?. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1755. author reply p. 1755–1756.
    pubmed: 23160295
  17. Pereira GQ, Gomes LA, Santos IS, Alfieri AF, Weese JS, Costa MC. Fecal microbiota transplantation in puppies with canine parvovirus infection.. J Vet Intern Med 2018;32:707–711.
    pmc: PMC5867004pubmed: 29460302
  18. Ribeiro GO, Oss DB, He Z. Repeated inoculation of cattle rumen with bison rumen contents alters the rumen microbiome and improves nitrogen digestibility in cattle.. Sci Rep 2017;7:1276.
    pmc: PMC5430699pubmed: 28455495
  19. Rager KD, George LW, House JK, DePeters EJ. Evaluation of rumen transfaunation after surgical correction of left-sided displacement of the abomasum in cows.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;225:915–920.
    pubmed: 15485053
  20. Niederwerder MC, Constance LA, Rowland RRR. Fecal microbiota transplantation is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality in porcine circovirus associated disease.. Front Microbiol 2018;9:1631.
    pmc: PMC6064930pubmed: 30083142
  21. McCormack UM, Curião T, Wilkinson T. Fecal microbiota transplantation in gestating sows and neonatal offspring alters lifetime intestinal microbiota and growth in offspring.. mSystems 2018;3:e00134–17.
    pmc: PMC5864416pubmed: 29577087
  22. McKinney CA, Oliveira BCM, Bedenice D. The fecal microbiota of healthy donor horses and geriatric recipients undergoing fecal microbial transplantation for the treatment of diarrhea.. PloS One 2020;15:e0230148.
    pmc: PMC7064224pubmed: 32155205
  23. McKinney CA, Bedenice D, Pacheco AP. Assessment of clinical and microbiota responses to fecal microbial transplantation in adult horses with diarrhea.. PloS One 2021;16:e0244381.
    pmc: PMC7808643pubmed: 33444319
  24. Costa M, Di Pietro R, Bessegatto JA. Evaluation of changes in microbiota after fecal microbiota transplantation in 6 diarrheic horses.. Can Vet J 2021;62:1123–1130.
    pmc: PMC8439339pubmed: 34602643
  25. Mullen KR, Yasuda K, Divers TJ, Weese JS. Equine faecal microbiota transplant: Current knowledge, proposed guidelines and future directions.. Equine Vet Educ 2018;30:151–160.
    pmc: PMC7159401pubmed: 32313396
  26. Kopper JJ, Alexander TL, Kogan CJ, Berreta AR, Burbick CR. In vitro evaluation of the effect of storage at −20°C and proximal gastrointestinal conditions on viability of equine fecal microbiota transplant.. J Equine Vet Sci 2021;98:103360.
    pubmed: 33663713
  27. Kinoshita Y, Niwa H, Uchida-Fujii E, Nukada T, Ueno T. Simultaneous daily fecal microbiota transplantation fails to prevent metronidazole-induced dysbiosis of equine gut microbiota.. J Equine Vet Sci 2022;114:104004.
    pubmed: 35526726
  28. Greenhaff PL, Snow DH, Harris RC, Roberts CA. Bicarbonate loading in the thoroughbred: Dose, method of administration and acid-base changes.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1990;9:83–85.
    pubmed: 9259813
  29. Walters W, Hyde ER, Berg-Lyons D. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4–5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys.. mSystems 2015;1:e0009–15.
    pmc: PMC5069754pubmed: 27822518
  30. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:7537–7541.
    pmc: PMC2786419pubmed: 19801464
  31. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq illumina sequencing platform.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013;79:5112–5120.
    pmc: PMC3753973pubmed: 23793624
  32. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation.. Genome Biol 2011;12:R60.
    pmc: PMC3218848pubmed: 21702898
  33. Dougal K, de la Fuente G, Harris PA, Girdwood SE, Pinloche E, Newbold CJ. Identification of a core bacterial community within the large intestine of the horse.. PloS One 2013;8:e77660-e.
    pmc: PMC3812009pubmed: 24204908
  34. Moreau MM, Eades SC, Reinemeyer CR, Fugaro MN, Onishi JC. Illumina sequencing of the V4 hypervariable region 16S rRNA gene reveals extensive changes in bacterial communities in the cecum following carbohydrate oral infusion and development of early-stage acute laminitis in the horse.. Vet Microbiol 2014;168:436–441.
    pubmed: 24355533
  35. Costa MC, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses and horses with colitis by high throughput sequencing of the V3–V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene.. PLoS One 2012;7:e41484.
    pmc: PMC3409227pubmed: 22859989
  36. Weese JS, Holcombe SJ, Embertson RM. Changes in the faecal microbiota of mares precede the development of post partum colic.. Equine Vet J 2015;47:641–649.
    pubmed: 25257320
  37. Papanicolas LE, Choo JM, Wang Y. Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?. EBioMedicine 2019;41:509–516.
    pmc: PMC6444077pubmed: 30796005
  38. Martin de Bustamante M, Plummer C, MacNicol J, Gomez D. Impact of ambient temperature sample storage on the equine fecal microbiota.. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:819.
    pmc: PMC8001224pubmed: 33803934
  39. Leclere M, Costa MC. Fecal microbiota in horses with asthma.. J Vet Intern Med 2020;34:996–1006.
    pmc: PMC7096608pubmed: 32128892
  40. Costa MC, Silva G, Ramos RV. Characterization and comparison of the bacterial microbiota in different gastrointestinal tract compartments in horses.. Vet J 2015;205:74–80.
    pubmed: 25975855
  41. Elzinga SE. Comparison of the fecal microbiota in horses with equine metabolic syndrome and metabolically normal controls fed a similar all-forage diet.. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;44:9–16.
  42. O” Donnell MM, Harris HMB, Jeffery IB. The core faecal bacterial microbiome of Irish Thoroughbred racehorses.. Lett Appl Microbiol 2013;57:492–501.
    pubmed: 23889584
  43. Faubladier C, Julliand V, Danel J, Philippeau C. Bacterial carbohydrate-degrading capacity in foal faeces: Changes from birth to pre-weaning and the impact of maternal supplementation with fermented feed products.. Br J Nutr 2013;110:1040–1052.
    pubmed: 23388384
  44. Buffie CG, Jarchum I, Equinda M. Profound alterations of intestinal microbiota following a single dose of clindamycin results in sustained susceptibility to Clostridium difficile-induced colitis.. Infect Immun 2012;80:62–73.
    pmc: PMC3255689pubmed: 22006564
  45. Jernberg C, Löfmark S, Edlund C, Jansson JK. Long-term ecological impacts of antibiotic administration on the human intestinal microbiota.. ISME J 2007;1:56–66.
    pubmed: 18043614
  46. Schoster A, Mosing M, Jalali M, Staempfli HR, Weese JS. Effects of transport, fasting and anaesthesia on the faecal microbiota of healthy adult horses.. Equine Vet J 2016;48:595–602.
    pubmed: 26122549
  47. Vaughn BP, Vatanen T, Allegretti JR. Increased intestinal microbial diversity following fecal microbiota transplant for active Crohn’s disease.. Inflammatory bowel diseases 2016;22:2182–2190.
    pmc: PMC4995064pubmed: 27542133
  48. Ferrario C, Taverniti V, Milani C. Modulation of fecal Clostridiales bacteria and butyrate by probiotic intervention with Lactobacillus paracasei DG varies among healthy adults.. J Nutr 2014;144:1787–1796.
    pubmed: 25332478
  49. Walker AW, Ince J, Duncan SH. Dominant and diet-responsive groups of bacteria within the human colonic microbiota.. ISME J 2011;5:220–230.
    pmc: PMC3105703pubmed: 20686513
  50. Salonen A, Lahti L, Salojärvi J. Impact of diet and individual variation on intestinal microbiota composition and fermentation products in obese men.. ISME J 2014;8:2218–2230.
    pmc: PMC4992075pubmed: 24763370

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Arantes JA, Di Pietro R, Ratté M, Arroyo LG, Leclère M, Costa MC. Changes in bacterial viability after preparation and storage of fecal microbiota transplantation solution using equine feces. PeerJ 2025;13:e18860.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.18860pubmed: 39989751google scholar: lookup
  2. Long AE, Pitta D, Hennessy M, Indugu N, Vecchiarelli B, Luethy D, Aceto H, Hurcombe S. Assessment of fecal bacterial viability and diversity in fresh and frozen fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) product in horses. BMC Vet Res 2024 Jul 10;20(1):306.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04166-wpubmed: 38987780google scholar: lookup
  3. Boucher L, Leduc L, Leclère M, Costa MC. Current Understanding of Equine Gut Dysbiosis and Microbiota Manipulation Techniques: Comparison with Current Knowledge in Other Species. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 28;14(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14050758pubmed: 38473143google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,727 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.