Analyze Diet
Journal of animal science2008; 86(12); 3465-3472; doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0374

Effects of crude protein intake from grass silage-only diets on the equine colon ecosystem after an abrupt feed change.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of CP intake from 2 grass silage-only diets, differing in CP concentration, fed at similar DMI on the equine colon ecosystem after an abrupt feed change between the diets. Four adult right ventral colon-fistulated geldings were fed one silage-only diet high in CP (HP, 873 g of CP/d) and one diet providing recommended intakes (RP, 615 g of CP/d). An adaptation period of 15 d on either the HP or the RP diet was followed by 2 experimental periods when the diets were fed for 22 d each in a crossover design. Colon samples were taken before and at 4, 12, and 24 h, and at 7, 14, and 22 d after the feed change. During the first 24 h after the abrupt feed change, the concentrations of total anaerobic bacteria and lactobacilli were greater on the HP than the RP diet (7.1 vs. 6.7 log(10) cfu/mL, P = 0.021, 6.0 vs. 5.5 log(10) cfu/mL, P = 0.021, respectively). During the first 24 h post feed change, VFA concentrations did not differ between the diets. From 7 to 22 d, total VFA concentrations were greater on the HP diet than on the RP diet (51.8 vs. 45.1 mmol/L, P = 0.034), and colon pH was lower on the HP diet than on the RP diet (6.9 vs. 7.2, P = 0.035). After an adaptation period of 22 d, N, ammonia, and urea concentrations and osmolality of the colon fluid did not differ between diets. Fecal pH and colon and fecal DM were unchanged throughout the experiment. The results suggest that, in horses fed at the maintenance level of energy intake, a feed change between silages with different CP content may alter the colon bacterial counts within the first 24 h. Moreover, during the subsequent 3 wk, pH decreased slightly and VFA concentrations increased, but no other major alterations occurred in the composition and activities of the colon ecosystem or fecal DM.
Publication Date: 2008-08-01 PubMed ID: 18676731DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0374Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study focuses on the impact of dietary protein intake on the colon health of horses. Specifically, the researchers explored the influence of two diets that differed in protein concentration on the bacterial balance in the horse’s colon ecosystem, especially after a sudden change in diet.

Objective and Methodology of the Study

  • The study’s main goal was to assess the effects of crude protein (CP) intake from two distinct grass silage-only diets on the health of the equine colon. The diets differed in their CP concentration but were fed at similar dry matter intake (DMI).
  • Four adult horses with a right ventral colon-fistula were included in the study. These horses were fed a high-protein diet (HP, 873g of CP per day), and a diet providing the recommended protein intake (RP, 615g of CP per day).
  • Each diet was fed for an adaptation period of 15 days, followed by two experimental periods where the diets were fed for 22 days each in a crossover design.
  • To monitor the effects of the dietary change on the colon, samples were collected at specific intervals: before changing the diet, 4, 12, and 24 hours after the change, and on the 7th, 14th, and 22nd day following the change.

Results of the Study

  • The concentrations of total anaerobic bacteria and lactobacilli were higher in the horses fed the HP diet as compared to the RP diet during the first 24 hours after the feed change.
  • No notable differences were observed in volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations between the HP and RP diets during the first 24 hours post feed change.
  • However, between day 7 and day 22, total VFA concentrations were higher in the horses fed the HP diet as compared to the RP diet. Additionally, the colon pH of the horses was lower with the HP diet than with the RP diet.
  • There were no significant differences in nitrogen, ammonia, urea concentrations, and osmolality of the colon fluid between the HP and RP diets after an adaptation period of 22 days.
  • The study did not find any noticeable changes in fecal pH and colon and fecal dry matter (DM) throughout the experiment.

Conclusions of the Study

  • The results demonstrate that feed changes between silages with different CP content could alter the colon bacterial counts within the first 24 hours in horses.
  • Moreover, over the following three weeks, there was a slight decrease in pH and an increase in VFA concentrations. However, no other major changes occurred in the composition and activities of the colon ecosystem or fecal DM.
  • This suggests that while a change in diet can affect certain aspects of colon health in the short term, these changes may not have a lasting significant impact over the longer term.

Cite This Article

APA
Muhonen S, Connysson M, Lindberg JE, Julliand V, Bertilsson J, Jansson A. (2008). Effects of crude protein intake from grass silage-only diets on the equine colon ecosystem after an abrupt feed change. J Anim Sci, 86(12), 3465-3472. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0374

Publication

ISSN: 1525-3163
NlmUniqueID: 8003002
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 86
Issue: 12
Pages: 3465-3472

Researcher Affiliations

Muhonen, S
  • Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Connysson, M
    Lindberg, J E
      Julliand, V
        Bertilsson, J
          Jansson, A

            MeSH Terms

            • Animal Husbandry / methods
            • Animals
            • Bacteria / isolation & purification
            • Bacterial Physiological Phenomena
            • Colon / metabolism
            • Colon / microbiology
            • Colony Count, Microbial
            • Cross-Over Studies
            • Diet / veterinary
            • Dietary Proteins / metabolism
            • Ecosystem
            • Fatty Acids, Volatile / metabolism
            • Feces / chemistry
            • Feces / microbiology
            • Gastrointestinal Contents / chemistry
            • Gastrointestinal Contents / microbiology
            • Horses / metabolism
            • Horses / microbiology
            • Horses / physiology
            • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
            • Male
            • Poaceae / metabolism
            • Silage
            • Time Factors

            Citations

            This article has been cited 11 times.
            1. Nilsson E, Moazzami AA, Lindberg JE, Jansson A. The metabolomic profile of a high starch versus no starch diet in athletic horses. Sci Rep 2025 Oct 13;15(1):35576.
              doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-23422-zpubmed: 41083709google scholar: lookup
            2. Suolang Q, Basang Z, Silang W, Nima C, Yang Q, Da W. Study on intestinal microbial communities of three different cattle populations on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. PLoS One 2025;20(2):e0312314.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312314pubmed: 39903702google scholar: lookup
            3. Boucher L, Leduc L, Leclère M, Costa MC. Current Understanding of Equine Gut Dysbiosis and Microbiota Manipulation Techniques: Comparison with Current Knowledge in Other Species. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 28;14(5).
              doi: 10.3390/ani14050758pubmed: 38473143google scholar: lookup
            4. Muhonen S, Philippeau C, Julliand V. Effects of Differences in Fibre Composition and Maturity of Forage-Based Diets on the Fluid Balance, Water-Holding Capacity and Viscosity in Equine Caecum and Colon Digesta. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 29;12(23).
              doi: 10.3390/ani12233340pubmed: 36496860google scholar: lookup
            5. Weinert-Nelson JR, Biddle AS, Williams CA. Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems. Anim Microbiome 2022 Jun 21;4(1):41.
              doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00192-xpubmed: 35729677google scholar: lookup
            6. Zhu Y, Wang X, Liu B, Yi Z, Zhao Y, Deng L, Holyoak R, Li J. The Effect of Ryegrass Silage Feeding on Equine Fecal Microbiota and Blood Metabolite Profile. Front Microbiol 2021;12:715709.
              doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.715709pubmed: 34497595google scholar: lookup
            7. Muhonen S, Sadet-Bourgeteau S, Julliand V. Effects of Differences in Fibre Composition and Maturity of Forage-Based Diets on the Microbial Ecosystem and Its Activity in Equine Caecum and Colon Digesta and Faeces. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 8;11(8).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11082337pubmed: 34438794google scholar: lookup
            8. Jansson A, Harris P, Davey SL, Luthersson N, Ragnarsson S, Ringmark S. Straw as an Alternative to Grass Forage in Horses-Effects on Post-Prandial Metabolic Profile, Energy Intake, Behaviour and Gastric Ulceration. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 24;11(8).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11082197pubmed: 34438656google scholar: lookup
            9. Mach N, Lansade L, Bars-Cortina D, Dhorne-Pollet S, Foury A, Moisan MP, Ruet A. Gut microbiota resilience in horse athletes following holidays out to pasture. Sci Rep 2021 Mar 3;11(1):5007.
              doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84497-ypubmed: 33658551google scholar: lookup
            10. Garber A, Hastie P, McGuinness D, Malarange P, Murray JA. Abrupt dietary changes between grass and hay alter faecal microbiota of ponies. PLoS One 2020;15(8):e0237869.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237869pubmed: 32810164google scholar: lookup
            11. Schoster A, Weese JS, Guardabassi L. Probiotic use in horses - what is the evidence for their clinical efficacy?. J Vet Intern Med 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):1640-52.
              doi: 10.1111/jvim.12451pubmed: 25231539google scholar: lookup