Analyze Diet
Theriogenology2003; 59(3-4); 735-742; doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)00941-x

Effects of dead spermatozoa on motion characteristics and membrane integrity of live spermatozoa in fresh and cooled-stored equine semen.

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine if dead spermatozoa reduced motility or membrane integrity of live spermatozoa in fresh and cooled-stored equine semen. Three ejaculates from each of three stallions were centrifuged and virtually all seminal plasma was removed. Spermatozoa were resuspended to 25 x 10(6) spermatozoa/ml with EZ-Mixin CST extender and 10% autologous seminal plasma, then divided into aliquots to which 0 (control), 10, 25, 50, or 75% (v/v) dead spermatozoa were added. Dead spermatozoa preparations contained 25 x 10(6) spermatozoa/ml and 10% seminal plasma from pooled ejaculates of the three stallions, in EZ-Mixin CST extender. Spermatozoa were killed in the pooled ejaculates by repeated freezing and thawing, then stored at -20 degrees C until warmed to 37 degrees C and mixed with aliquots of fresh spermatozoa to be cooled and stored in an Equitainer for 24h. Motion characteristics (% total motility (MOT), % progressive motility (PMOT), and mean curvilinear velocity (VCL)) for fresh and 24h cooled samples were determined using a computerized spermatozoal motion analyzer. The presence of up to 75% dead spermatozoa did not adversely affect MOT or PMOT of live spermatozoa in either fresh or cooled-stored semen. However, VCL and the percentage of membrane-intact spermatozoa were reduced compared to control samples when 75% (v/v) dead spermatozoa were added. Membrane integrity, as assessed by staining with carboxyfluoresein diacetate-propidium iodide, was highly correlated (r>0.8; P<0.001) with MOT and PMOT in both fresh and cooled-stored semen samples. Results of this study have application to the processing of both cooled and frozen equine semen.
Publication Date: 2003-01-09 PubMed ID: 12517377DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)00941-xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research sought to understand if dead sperm in horse semen lessened the movement or compromised the health of living sperm in both fresh and cooled sperm samples. The findings revealed that while the presence of up to 75% dead sperm did not negatively impact total and progressive movement of live sperm, it did reduce velocity and overall membrane health, providing important insights for equine semen processing.

Methodology of the study

  • The study focused on three ejaculates from each of three stallions.
  • Almost all seminal plasma was removed through centrifugation and replaced by resuspending sperm in EZ-Mixin CST extender and 10% autologous seminal plasma.
  • These sperm suspensions were then divided into five aliquots. Dead sperm, created by repeatedly freezing and thawing pooled ejaculates, were then added to four of them in varying percentages (10, 25, 50, 75%), leaving one as a control (0% dead sperm).
  • All aliquots were then heated to 37 degrees Celsius and stored in an Equitainer for 24 hours.

Data collection

  • Using a computerized spermatozoal motion analyzer, the motion characteristics (% total movement, % progressive movement, and average curvilinear velocity) for both the fresh and 24-hour cooled sperm samples were determined.
  • The integrity of the sperm membranes in the samples was also assessed using carboxyfluorescein diacetate-propidium iodide staining. Membrane integrity was found to be highly correlated (r>0.8; P<0.001) with total and progressive movement in both fresh and cooled sperm samples.

Findings and implications

  • The presence of up to 75% dead sperm did not reduce the total or progressive movement of live sperm in either fresh or cooled semen. However, comparisons with the control samples revealed reductions in average curvilinear velocity and percentage of membrane-intact sperm when 75% dead sperm was present.
  • These findings suggest that dead sperm does not adversely affect the motility of live sperm, but may affect their speed and the integrity of their membranes.
  • The results provide valuable insights that are applicable to the processing of equine semen, both cooled and frozen, potentially informing refinement of methods and ensuring the viability of equine sperm used in breeding programs.

Cite This Article

APA
Brinsko SP, Blanchard TL, Rigby SL, Love CC, Varner DD. (2003). Effects of dead spermatozoa on motion characteristics and membrane integrity of live spermatozoa in fresh and cooled-stored equine semen. Theriogenology, 59(3-4), 735-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(02)00941-x

Publication

ISSN: 0093-691X
NlmUniqueID: 0421510
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 59
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 735-742

Researcher Affiliations

Brinsko, S P
  • Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4475, USA.
Blanchard, T L
    Rigby, S L
      Love, C C
        Varner, D D

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Cell Membrane / physiology
          • Cryopreservation / veterinary
          • Horses / physiology
          • Male
          • Semen / cytology
          • Semen Preservation / veterinary
          • Sperm Count / veterinary
          • Sperm Motility / physiology
          • Spermatozoa / physiology

          Citations

          This article has been cited 5 times.
          1. de Zutter BM, de Paula Freitas-Dell'Aqua C, Dell'Aqua-Junior JA, Monteiro GA, Troncarelli T, Papa FO. Optimising Stallion Semen Cryopreservation: Preliminary Insights Into Pre-Centrifugation Extender Effects. Reprod Domest Anim 2025 Oct;60(10):e70135.
            doi: 10.1111/rda.70135pubmed: 41121986google scholar: lookup
          2. Hai E, Li B, Zhang J, Zhang J. Sperm freezing damage: the role of regulated cell death. Cell Death Discov 2024 May 18;10(1):239.
            doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-02013-3pubmed: 38762505google scholar: lookup
          3. Cheng Q, Li L, Jiang M, Liu B, Xian Y, Liu S, Liu X, Zhao W, Li F. Extend the Survival of Human Sperm In Vitro in Non-Freezing Conditions: Damage Mechanisms, Preservation Technologies, and Clinical Applications. Cells 2022 Sep 12;11(18).
            doi: 10.3390/cells11182845pubmed: 36139420google scholar: lookup
          4. Hashem NM, Gonzalez-Bulnes A. State-of-the-Art and Prospective of Nanotechnologies for Smart Reproductive Management of Farm Animals. Animals (Basel) 2020 May 13;10(5).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10050840pubmed: 32414174google scholar: lookup
          5. Falchi L, Khalil WA, Hassan M, Marei WFA. Perspectives of nanotechnology in male fertility and sperm function. Int J Vet Sci Med 2018 Dec;6(2):265-269.
            doi: 10.1016/j.ijvsm.2018.09.001pubmed: 30564607google scholar: lookup