Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2024; 105194; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105194

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SHOEING CONDITIONS ON EQUINE CERVICAL AND BACK KINEMATICS DURING WALKING AND TROTTING ON A SOFT SURFACE.

Abstract: There is a paucity of scientific data on the effect of shoeing on equine neck and back kinematics during locomotion over commonly used sand training surfaces. A better appreciation of how alterations at hoof-ground interface influence equine upper body movements is relevant for improving horse's health and performance. Our objectives were to determine the effects of different shoeing conditions on equine neck and back kinematics at walk and trot in straight line over sand. Two-dimensional kinematic video analysis was performed under seven shoeing conditions: front feet shod with aluminum shoes and hind feet with steel racehorse shoes (REFSHOD), front aluminum shoe and hind feet unshod (FORESHOD), front feet unshod and hind steel race shoes (HINDSHOD), all four feet unshod (UNSHOD), front feet shod in combination with hind egg bar shoes (hEGGBAR), hind wide toe shoes (hTOE) and hind reverse shoes (hREVERSE). Data indicated that joint angles in the cervicothoracic junction were four times more likely to be significantly affected by the shoeing condition than in the back and sacrum. FORESHOD largely modifies the kinematics in comparison to REFSHOD or UNSHOD, with respectively a 6-11±1-2° (P<0.001) increased cervicothoracic extension at walk and trot, and a 3-4±1° (P<0.05) increased thoracolumbar flexion at trot. In comparison to REFSHOD, hEGGBAR, hTOE and hREVERSE induce a 5-7±1-2° (P<0.05) increased cervicothoracic extension at trot and walk respectively, and UNSHOD induced cervicothoracic flexion at trot (6±2°, P<0.05). In conclusion, shoeing conditions impact equine neck and back position, which should be considered during clinical examination, rehabilitation and training.
Publication Date: 2024-09-12 PubMed ID: 39276952DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105194Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study examines how different horse shoeing techniques affect the movements and posture of a horse’s neck and back. The findings reveal that changes in shoeing conditions lead to changes in a horse’s upper body movements, which could have implications for the horse’s health and performance.

Research Objectives

  • The goal of the study was to determine the impact of different shoeing conditions on equine neck and back kinematics at the walk and trot. The researchers were particularly interested in understanding how these changes occur when a horse is moving on sand, a common training surface.

Methods

  • The researchers employed two-dimensional kinematic video analysis. This method was carried out under seven different shoeing conditions: Four-shoe system with aluminum shoes at the front, steel shoes at the back; front only with aluminum shoes; back only with steel shoes; no shoes; front shoes with hind egg bar shoes, hind wide toe shoes, and hind reverse shoes.

Key Findings

  • The researchers found that joint angles at the junction of the neck and chest (cervicothoracic junction) were four times more likely to be significantly affected by the shoeing condition than in the back and the area of the spine at the level of the pelvis (sacrum).
  • The condition where only the front feet were shod (FORESHOD) was found to notably alter kinematics compared to the standard shoeing (REFSHOD) or going unshod (UNSHOD), causing an increased neck extension (cervicothoracic extension) of 6-11±1-2° at both walk and trot, and an increased chest-lumbar flexion (thoracolumbar flexion) by 3-4±1° at trot.
  • Hind egg bar shoes (hEGGBAR), hind wide toe shoes (hTOE) and hind reverse shoes (hREVERSE) were found to increase cervicothoracic extension by 5-7±1-2° compared to REFSHOD at both walk and trot. When the horse was unshod, an increase in neck flexion was observed during the trot (6±2°).

Implications

  • The study concluded that the shoeing conditions have an impact on equine neck and back position. Knowing this can influence decisions made during clinical examinations, rehabilitation, and training. It can help horse trainers and veterinarians to better understand and address equine movement concerns, ultimately enhancing horse health and performance.

Cite This Article

APA
Caure S, Dendauw P, Thesee L, Villedey E, Malinvaud A, Cousty M, Prie V, Horan K, Weller R. (2024). EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SHOEING CONDITIONS ON EQUINE CERVICAL AND BACK KINEMATICS DURING WALKING AND TROTTING ON A SOFT SURFACE. J Equine Vet Sci, 105194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105194

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 105194
PII: S0737-0806(24)00200-4

Researcher Affiliations

Caure, S
  • Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Equin de Livet, 1497, Route de Castillon, Saint Michel de Livet, 14 140 Livarot-Pays d'Auge, France. Electronic address: caure.sebastien@neuf.fr.
Dendauw, P
  • Cabinet Vétérinaire des Lianes, 421, route de Campagne, 62990 Beaurainville, France.
Thesee, L
  • Clinique Vétérinaire de la Pierre Bleue, 1, rue de la prairie, 35 550 Pipriac, France.
Villedey, E
  • Clinique Vétérinaire du Rectangle, rue de Cornouaille, 56 110 Gourin, France.
Malinvaud, A
  • SELARL Chevallereau Vétérinaire, 16, quai de la Libération, 17430 Tonnay-Charente, France.
Cousty, M
  • Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Equin de Livet, 1497, Route de Castillon, Saint Michel de Livet, 14 140 Livarot-Pays d'Auge, France.
Prie, V
  • Equine Clinic for Surgery, Orthopedics and Ophthalmology, University Veterinary Hospital Heinzelova ulica 55, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Horan, K
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Brookmans Park, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.
Weller, R
  • University of Calgary, Department of veterinary science, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.