Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2026; doi: 10.1002/evj.70217

Effects of flow-controlled expiration on oxygenation and early recovery in horses undergoing general anaesthesia.

Abstract: FLow-controlled EXpiration (FLEX) has been shown to significantly enhance oxygenation in horses under clinical and experimental conditions. Objective: To compare pulmonary gas exchange during early recovery following general anaesthesia in horses ventilated with FLEX compared with conventional intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) and to assess recovery characteristics between ventilation modes. Methods: Randomised, crossover in vivo experiments. Methods: Six adult horses underwent two 2-h anaesthetic episodes in a randomised crossover design (FLEX vs. IPPV), separated by a two-week washout. Arterial blood gases were analysed at 60- and 120-min post-induction. Arterial blood pressure, end-tidal inhalant concentrations, respiratory rate, and haemoglobin oxygen saturation were recorded in 5-min intervals during anaesthesia. The initial recovery period was defined as the first 20 min following return of spontaneous ventilation, during which arterial blood gases, end-tidal inhalant concentrations, and oxygen saturation were recorded in 5-min intervals. Horses were recovered using head and tail rope assistance. The time to sternal recumbency, standing, and the number of standing attempts were recorded. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures and paired tests for recovery outcomes. Results: PaO was higher during general anaesthesia with FLEX (mean ± SD: 422 ± 24 vs. 202 ± 101 mmHg at 60 min; 433 ± 31 vs. 180 ± 59 mmHg at 120 min; p < 0.01). In recovery, PaO remained higher with FLEX (20 min: 114 ± 21 vs. 62 ± 11 mmHg; p < 0.01) and EtIso declined more rapidly (p < 0.01). Time to sternal and standing were shorter and attempts to stand fewer with FLEX (exploratory outcomes). Conclusions: This study enrolled a small sample size, which may limit generalisability. Recovery was recorded from one camera angle, potentially restricting full assessment of recovery behaviour. No respiratory mechanics or regional ventilation distribution were quantified. Conclusions: FLEX improves oxygenation during early recovery and is associated with faster recovery times in healthy horses.
Publication Date: 2026-07-02 PubMed ID: 42392997DOI: 10.1002/evj.70217Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Objective Overview

  • This study investigated the effects of flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) versus conventional intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) on oxygenation and recovery in horses undergoing general anesthesia.
  • The researchers compared pulmonary gas exchange and early recovery characteristics between these two ventilation modes.

Background and Purpose

  • Flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) is a ventilation technique designed to optimize the expiration phase during mechanical ventilation.
  • Previous work indicated FLEX can improve oxygenation in horses under various conditions.
  • The study aimed to directly compare:
    • Pulmonary gas exchange during and after anesthesia
    • Recovery characteristics such as time to stand and number of attempts

Methods

  • Subjects: Six healthy adult horses underwent two separate anesthetic episodes, randomly assigned to ventilation by FLEX or IPPV.
  • Design: A randomized crossover study with a two-week washout period between procedures to reduce carry-over effects.
  • Duration: Each anesthesia session lasted 2 hours.
  • Measurements during anesthesia:
    • Arterial blood gases (oxygen partial pressure, PaO2) at 60 and 120 minutes post-induction.
    • Continuous monitoring every 5 minutes of arterial blood pressure, end-tidal inhalant concentration (EtIso), respiratory rate, and hemoglobin oxygen saturation.
  • Measurements during the initial 20-minute recovery period after return of spontaneous breathing:
    • Arterial blood gases
    • End-tidal inhalant concentration
    • Oxygen saturation
  • Recovery Support: Horses were assisted with head and tail ropes during recovery.
  • Outcome measures during recovery:
    • Time to sternal recumbency (lying on chest)
    • Time to standing
    • Number of attempts to stand
  • Data Analysis: Utilized linear mixed-effects models for repeated measurements and paired tests comparing ventilation modes.

Results

  • Oxygenation:
    • PaO2 values during anesthesia were significantly higher with FLEX compared to IPPV:
      • 60 min: 422 ± 24 mmHg (FLEX) vs. 202 ± 101 mmHg (IPPV)
      • 120 min: 433 ± 31 mmHg (FLEX) vs. 180 ± 59 mmHg (IPPV)
      • p < 0.01 indicating strong statistical significance.
    • During recovery (20 min post spontaneous ventilation), PaO2 remained higher in the FLEX group (114 ± 21 mmHg vs. 62 ± 11 mmHg, p < 0.01).
    • End-tidal isoflurane concentrations (EtIso) decreased faster with FLEX, suggesting quicker anesthetic washout.
  • Recovery Characteristics:
    • Shorter times to sternal recumbency and standing were observed with FLEX ventilation.
    • Fewer attempts were needed for the horses to stand, indicating smoother recovery.
    • These findings were exploratory but suggest clinically relevant improvements.

Limitations

  • Small sample size (only six horses) limits how broadly results can be applied to other populations.
  • Recovery behavior was recorded from a single camera angle, which may not capture all relevant behaviors.
  • No measurement of respiratory mechanics or regional ventilation distribution was performed, limiting mechanistic understanding.

Conclusions and Implications

  • FLEX ventilation significantly improves oxygenation during anesthesia and early recovery in healthy horses compared to conventional IPPV.
  • The higher oxygen levels and faster decline in anesthetic agents likely contribute to:
    • Faster times to regain consciousness and stand
    • Fewer standing attempts, improving overall recovery quality and safety.
  • Though additional studies with larger populations and further measurements would strengthen evidence, FLEX appears to be a promising ventilation strategy in equine anesthesia management.

Cite This Article

APA
Mika A, Brandly J, Frampton A, Douglas H, Starr M, Benchimol H, Hopster K. (2026). Effects of flow-controlled expiration on oxygenation and early recovery in horses undergoing general anaesthesia. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1002/evj.70217

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Mika, Allison
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brandly, Jerrianne
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Frampton, Alycia
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Douglas, Hope
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Starr, Miranda
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Benchimol, Henry
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hopster, Klaus
  • Department of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Grant Funding

  • Thoroughbred Education and Research Foundation
  • Foundation for the Horse

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Moreno‐Martinez F, Mosing M, Senior M. Controlled mechanical ventilation in equine anaesthesia: physiological background and basic considerations (part 1). Equine Vet Educ 2022;34:320–329.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13476google scholar: lookup
  2. Meier M, Kazmir‐Lysak K, Kälin I, Torgerson PR, Ringer SK. The influence of hypoxaemia, hypotension and hypercapnia (among other factors) on quality of recovery from general anaesthesia in horses. Vet Anaesth Analg 2024;51(2):135–143.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2023.10.032google scholar: lookup
  3. Johnston G, Eastment J, Wood J, Taylor P. The confidential enquiry into perioperative equine fatalities (CEPEF): mortality results of phases 1 and 2. Vet Anaesth Analg 2002;29(4):159–170.
  4. Gozalo‐Marcilla M, Redondo JI, Bettschart‐Wolfensberger R, Domenech L, Doménech J, Johnston GM. The confidential enquiry into perioperative equine fatalities: phase 4 (CEPEF4)—a worldwide observational, prospective, multicentre cohort study. Vet Anaesth Analg 2025;52(5):525–538.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2025.06.005google scholar: lookup
  5. Cremer J, Ross J, Paranjape V. Complications in equine anesthesia. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2025;41(3):473–493.
  6. Turner CE, Barker‐Collo SL, Connell CJW, Gant N. Acute hypoxic gas breathing severely impairs cognition and task learning in humans. Physiol Behav 2015;142:104–110.
  7. Dugdale AH, Taylor PM. Equine anaesthesia‐associated mortality: where are we now?. Vet Anaesth Analg 2016;43(3):242–255.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12372google scholar: lookup
  8. Whitehair KJ, Steffey EP, Willits NH, Woliner MJ. Recovery of horses from inhalation anesthesia. Am J Vet Res 1993;54(10):1693–1702.
  9. García‐Sanz V, Aguado D, Gómez De Segura IA, Canfrán S. Individualized positive end‐expiratory pressure following alveolar recruitment manoeuvres in lung‐healthy anaesthetized dogs: a randomized clinical trial on early postoperative arterial oxygenation. Vet Anaesth Analg 2021;48(6):841–853.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2021.03.019google scholar: lookup
  10. Martin‐Flores M, Araos JD, Daniels ZS, Newman A, Nugen SA, Campoy L. Effects of intraoperative positive end‐expiratory pressure and fraction of inspired oxygen on postoperative oxygenation in dogs undergoing stifle surgery. Vet Anaesth Analg 2022;49(3):275–281.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2022.02.002google scholar: lookup
  11. Küls N, Braun C, Moens Y. The use of positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) and alveolar recruitment manoeuvre (ARM) in equine anaesthesia—a review. Pferdeheilkunde 2016;32(5):436–442.
    doi: 10.21836/pem20160503google scholar: lookup
  12. Hopster K, Kästner SB, Rohn K, Ohnesorge B. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation with constant positive end‐expiratory pressure and alveolar recruitment manoeuvre during inhalation anaesthesia in horses undergoing surgery for colic, and its influence on the early recovery period. Vet Anaesth Analg 2011;38(3):169–177.
  13. Nyman G, Hedenstierna G. Ventilation–perfusion relationships in the anaesthetised horse. Equine Vet J 1989;21(4):274–281.
  14. Schumann S, Goebel U, Haberstroh J, Vimlati L, Schneider M, Lichtwarck‐Aschoff M. Determination of respiratory system mechanics during inspiration and expiration by flow‐controlled expiration (FLEX): a pilot study in anesthetized pigs. Minerva Anestesiol 2014;80(1):19–28.
  15. Goebel U, Haberstroh J, Foerster K, Dassow C, Priebe HJ, Guttmann J. Flow‐controlled expiration: a novel ventilation mode to attenuate experimental porcine lung injury. Br J Anaesth 2014;113(3):474–483.
    doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu058google scholar: lookup
  16. Wirth S, Springer S, Spaeth J, Borgmann S, Goebel U, Schumann S. Application of the novel ventilation mode flow‐controlled expiration (FLEX): a crossover proof‐of‐principle study in lung‐healthy patients.. Anesth Analg 2017;125(4):1246–1252.
  17. Hopster K, Hurcombe SD, Simpson K, AR VB, Driessen B. Flow‐controlled expiration improves respiratory mechanics, ventilation, and gas exchange in anesthetized horses.. Am J Vet Res 2022;83(5):393–398.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.21.10.0158google scholar: lookup
  18. Brandly JE, Midon M, Douglas HF, Hopster K. Flow‐controlled expiration reduces positive end‐expiratory pressure requirement in dorsally recumbent, anesthetized horses.. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1135452.
  19. Araos J, Driessen B, Brandly J, Gorenberg E, Heerdt P, Bruhn A. Optimization of lung ventilation and perfusion in anaesthetised horses using a ventilation mode with flow‐limited expiration.. Am J Vet Res 2024;85(3):1–8.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.23.09.0200google scholar: lookup
  20. Hopster K, Soares JHN, Levine D, Ortved K, Driessen B, Araos J. Flow‐controlled expiration improves gas exchange in anaesthetised horses undergoing orthopaedic surgery.. Equine Vet J 2025;58(4):evj.70079.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.70079google scholar: lookup
  21. Clark‐Price SC, Posner LP, Gleed RD. Recovery of horses from general anesthesia in a darkened or illuminated recovery stall.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2008;35(6):473–479.
  22. Douglas HF, Brandly J, Hopster K. Flow‐controlled expiration ventilation using a piston ventilator: effects of expiration time and speed on respiratory and pulmonary mechanics with focus on hysteresis and compliance in healthy horses.. Am J Vet Res 2024;85:1–8.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.24.02.0036google scholar: lookup
  23. Hopster K, Wogatzki A, Geburek F, Conze P, Kästner SBR. Effects of positive end‐expiratory pressure titration on intestinal oxygenation and perfusion in isoflurane anaesthetised horses.. Equine Vet J 2017;49:250–256.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12555google scholar: lookup
  24. Rüegg M, Bettschart‐Wolfensberger R, Hartnack S, Junge HK, Theiss F, Ringer SK. Comparison of non‐assisted versus head and tail rope‐assisted recovery after emergency abdominal surgery in horses.. Pferdeheilkd Equine Med 2016;32:469–478.
    doi: 10.21836/pem20160508google scholar: lookup
  25. Steffey EP, Brosnan RJ, Mama KR. Inhalation anesthetics.. In: Lamont LA, Grimm KA, Tranquilli WJ, Greene SA, Robertson SA, editors. Lumb & Jones' veterinary anesthesia and analgesia. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2024. p. 1211–1307.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.