FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Anim Sci / Effects of grazing system, season, and forage carbohydrates ...
Journal of animal science2019; 97(6); 2541-2554; doi: 10.1093/jas/skz103

Effects of grazing system, season, and forage carbohydrates on glucose and insulin dynamics of the grazing horse.

Abstract: Rotational grazing is a recommended practice for grazing livestock, but little is known about its benefits with respect to grazing horses. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of continuous (CON) and rotational (ROT) grazing on forage nutrient composition and whether those concentrations influenced circulating glucose and insulin concentrations in the grazing horse. Twelve mature Standardbred mares were paired by age and weight and randomly assigned to 1 replicate of either a 1.5 ha cool-season grass CON or ROT system for a total of 3 mares in each system. Mares on CON were allowed to graze the entire system at all times, whereas mares on ROT were given access to a 0.4 ha pasture section and stress lot where they were confined during inclement weather and slow forage growth. Blood and feces from horses and forage from each system were sampled over one 24-h period in June, August, and October. Blood was assessed for plasma glucose (GLU) and serum insulin (INS), feces for pH, and forage for nutritional composition. Data were analyzed by ANOVA with repeated measures with significance set at P < 0.05. There were no treatment differences for water and ethanol soluble carbohydrates (WSC and ESC, respectively), starch, ADF, and NDF, but CP was lower in ROT compared to CON (P = 0.04). With respect to month, WSC were highest in June compared to August and October, whereas ESC were highest in June compared to only August. Starch was lower in October than in June and August. Concentrations of ADF and NDF were lowest in October compared to June and August. Crude protein was higher in October than June and August. Plasma GLU and serum INS were affected by season and time of day but not grazing system. For all horses, GLU was highest in August (105.6 ± 1.3 mg/dL), whereas INS was highest in October (0.21 ± 0.02 μg/L; P < 0.0001). Fecal pH only varied by season and was highest in August (7.06; P < 0.0001). Few consistent correlations between grazing systems were found with the exception of INS with ESC (R = 0.32 to 0.39; P < 0.04) and INS and GLU with ADF and NDF in August and October (R = -0.31 to -0.48; P < 0.04). In conclusion, grazing system did not affect the forage carbohydrate concentrations or GLU or INS in horses; however, season did have an effect on both forage nutrient content and glucose metabolism in horses.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2019-03-27 PubMed ID: 30911753PubMed Central: PMC6541809DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz103Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigated the impacts of different grazing systems—continuous and rotational—on the nutrient composition of forage and whether those concentrations influenced glucose and insulin levels in horses. The results revealed no significant differences related to the grazing system used but confirmed seasonal variations in both forage nutrient content and glucose metabolism in horses.

Research Design and Methodology

  • The study involved twelve mature Standardbred mares, which were paired by age and weight. These mares were allocated either to a 1.5 ha cool-season grass continuous grazing system or a rotational grazing system, with three mares in each system.
  • The mares in the continuous system were allowed to graze freely at all time in the entire system. However, those under the rotational system were given access to a 0.4 ha pasture section. They were confined during inclement weather and periods of slow forage growth.
  • Over the course of a year – in June, August, and October – the researchers collected samples of blood and feces from the horses and forage from each system. These samples were then assessed for specific nutritional components and chemical substances.

Key Findings

  • No significant differences were observed in water and ethanol soluble carbohydrates, starch, ADF (Acid Detergent Fiber), and NDF (Neutral Detergent Fiber) between the two grazing systems. However, crude protein was lower in rotationally grazed horses compared to continuously grazed horses.
  • When examining seasonal differences, water soluble carbohydrates were most abundant in June, while ethanol soluble carbohydrates were highest in June compared to August. Starch was lowest in October as compared to June and August. The lowest concentrations of ADF and NDF were recorded in October. The crude protein levels were higher in October than in June and August.
  • Plasma glucose and serum insulin were affected by the season and time of day but not by the grazing system. The concentration of glucose was highest in August, whereas insulin was highest in October. Fecal pH only varied by season and was highest in August.

Conclusions

Based on the results, the study concluded that the type of grazing system did not significantly influence the forage carbohydrate concentrations or glucose or insulin levels in horses. However, seasonal changes did affect both the nutrient content of the forage and the glucose metabolism in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Williams CA, Kenny LB, Burk AO. (2019). Effects of grazing system, season, and forage carbohydrates on glucose and insulin dynamics of the grazing horse. J Anim Sci, 97(6), 2541-2554. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz103

Publication

Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
NlmUniqueID: 8003002
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 97
Issue: 6
Pages: 2541-2554

Researcher Affiliations

Williams, Carey A
  • Department of Animal Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
Kenny, Laura B
  • Department of Animal Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
Burk, Amy O
  • Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Feed / analysis
  • Animals
  • Blood Glucose / analysis
  • Body Weight
  • Carbohydrates / analysis
  • Feces / chemistry
  • Female
  • Horses / physiology
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Insulin / blood
  • Poaceae
  • Random Allocation
  • Seasons
  • Weather

References

This article includes 44 references
  1. Archer M. The species preferences of grazing horses. Grass Forage Sci. 28:123–128.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1973.tb00732.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  2. Bowden D M, Taylor D K, Davis W P. Water-soluble carbohydrates in orchardgrass and mixed forages. Can. J. Plant Sci. 48:9.
  3. Burk A O, Fiorellino N M, Shellem T A, Dwyer M E, Vough L R, Dengler E. Field observations from the University of Maryland’s equine rotational grazing demonstration site: a two year perspective. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 31:302–303 (Abstr.).
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2011.03.132google scholar: lookup
  4. Chatterton N J, Harrison P A, Bennett J H, Asay K H. Carbohydrate partitioning in 185 accessions of graminae grown under warm and cool temperatures. J. Plant Physiol. 143:169–179.
  5. Chatterton N J, Watts K A, Jensen P A, Harrison P A, Horton W H. Nonstructural carbohydrates in oat forage. J. Nutr. 136:2111–2113.
    doi: 10.1093/jn/136.7.2111Spubmed: 16772513google scholar: lookup
  6. Daniel A D, McIntosh B J, Plunk J D, Webb M, McIntosh D, Parks A G. Effects of rotational grazing on water-soluble carbohydrate and energy content of horse pastures. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 35:385–386 (Abstr.).
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.03.014google scholar: lookup
  7. DeBoer M L, Hathaway M R, Kuhle K J, Weber P S D, Reiter A S, Sheaffer C C, Wells M S, Martinson K L. Glucose and insulin response of horses grazing alfalfa, perennial cool-season grass, and teff across seasons. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 68:33–38.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.04.008pubmed: 31256885google scholar: lookup
  8. Evans J L. Forages for horses. In: Barnes R. F., Miller D. A., and Nelson C. J., editors, Forages: the science of grassland agriculture. 5th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Iowa City, IA: p. 303–311.
  9. Fales S L, Fritz J O. Factors Affecting Forage Quality. In: Barnes R.F., Nelson C.J., Moore K.J., and Collins M. (eds.) Forages; The Science of Grassland Agriculture. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA. p. 574–577.
  10. Fleurance G, Duncan P, Mallevaud B. Daily intake and the selection of feeding sites by horses in heterogeneous wet grasslands. Anim. Res. 50:149–156.
    doi: 10.1051/animres:2001123google scholar: lookup
  11. Foulk D L, Mickel R C, Chamberlain E A, Margentino M, Westendorf M. Agricultural management practices for commercial equine operations. Rutgers Cooperative Extension, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
  12. Frank N, Elliott S B, Chameroy K A, Tóth F, Chumbler N S, McClamroch R. Association of season and pasture grazing with blood hormone and metabolite concentrations in horses with presumed pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 24:1167–1175.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0547.xpubmed: 20666984google scholar: lookup
  13. Frank N, Geor R J, Bailey S R, Durham A E, Johnson P J. Equine metabolic syndrome. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 24:467–475.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0503.xpubmed: 20384947google scholar: lookup
  14. Garner H E, Moore J N, Johnson J H, Clark L, Amend J F, Tritschler L G, Coffmann J R, Sprouse R F, Hutcheson D P, Salem C A. Changes in the caecal flora associated with the onset of laminitis. Equine Vet. J. 10:249–252.
    pubmed: 738266doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1978.tb02273.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  15. Geor R J, Harris P A. How to minimize gastrointestinal disease associated with carbohydrate nutrition in horses. Am. Assoc. Equine Pract. Proc. 53:178–185.
  16. Goodson J, Tyznik W J, Cline J H, Dehority B A. Effects of an abrupt diet change from hay to concentrate on microbial numbers and physical environment in the cecum of the pony. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:1946–1950.
    pmc: PMC202784pubmed: 3178206
  17. Harris P A, Sillence M, Inglis R, Siever-Kelly C, Friend M, Munn K, Davidson H. Effect of Lucerne chaff on the rate of intake and glycaemic response to an oat meal. Proc. Equine Nutr. Phys. Symp. 19:151–152.
  18. Heady H F. Continuous vs. specialized grazing systems: a review and application to the California annual type. J. Range Mngmt. 14:182–193.
  19. Heady H F. Grazing systems: terms and definitions. J. Range Mngmt. 23:59–61.
  20. Henning J, Lacefield G, Rasnake M, Burris R, Johns J, Turner L. Rotational grazing. Univ. Kentucky, Coop. Exten. Service. ID-143.
  21. Hoffman R M, Wilson J A, Kronfeld D S, Cooper W L, Lawrence L A, Sklan D, Harris P A. Hydrolyzable carbohydrates in pasture, hay, and horse feeds: direct assay and seasonal variation. J. Anim. Sci. 79:500–506.
    pubmed: 11219461
  22. Holt D A, Hilst A R. Daily variation in carbohydrate content of selected forage crops. Agron. J. 61:239.
  23. Jacob S I, Geor R J, Weber P S D, Harris P A, McCue M E. Effect of age and dietary carbohydrate profiles on glucose and insulin dynamics in horses. Equine Vet. J. 50:249–254.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12745pubmed: 28833406google scholar: lookup
  24. Kenny L B. The effects of rotational and continuous grazing on horses, pasture condition, and soil properties. Master Thesis, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
  25. Longland A C, Byrd B M. Pasture nonstructural carbohydrates and equine laminitis. J. Nutr. 136(7 Suppl.):2099S–2102S.
    pubmed: 16772510doi: 10.1093/jn/136.7.2099sgoogle scholar: lookup
  26. Longland A C, Cairns A J, Humphreys M O. Seasonal and diurnal changes in fructan concentration in Lolium perenne: implications for the grazing management of equines pre-disposed to laminitis. In: Proc. 16th Equine Nutr. Physiol. Soc., Raleigh, NC p. 258–259.
  27. McIntosh B. Circadian and seasonal variation in pasture nonstructural carbohydrates and the physiological response of grazing horses. Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
  28. Odberg F O, Francis-Smith K. A study on eliminative and grazing behaviour - the use of the field by captive horses. Equine Vet. J. 8:147–149.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1976.tb03326.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  29. Radicke S, Kienzle E, Meyer H. Preileal apparent digestibility of oat and corn starch and consequences for cecal metabolism. In: Proc. 12th Equine Nutr. Physiol. Symp. p. 43–48.
  30. Siciliano P D. Effect of sward height on grazing preference and pasture NSC concentration. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 35:435.
  31. Siciliano P D, Gill J C, Bowman M A. Effect of sward height on pasture nonstructural carbohydrate concentrations and blood glucose/insulin profiles in grazing horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 57:29–34.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.06.004google scholar: lookup
  32. Staniar W B, Cubitt T A, George L A, Harris P A, Geor R J. Glucose and insulin responses to different dietary energy sources in Thoroughbred broodmares grazing cool season pasture. Livest. Sci. 111:164–171.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.01.148google scholar: lookup
  33. Stull C L, Rodiek A V. Responses of blood glucose, insulin and cortisol concentrations to common equine diets. J. Nutr. 118:206–213.
    doi: 10.1093/jn/118.2.206pubmed: 3276847google scholar: lookup
  34. Undersander D, Albert B, Cosgrove D, Johnson D, Peterson P. Pastures for profit: a guide to rotational grazing. Cooperative Extension Publishing, University of Wisonsin-Extension, Madison, WI.
  35. Urschel K L, Geor R J, Waterfall H L, Shoveller A K, McCutcheon L J. Effects of leucine or whey protein addition to an oral glucose solution on serum insulin, plasma glucose and plasma amino acid responses in horses at rest and following exercise. Equine Vet. J. 42(Suppl. 38):347–354.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00179.xpubmed: 21059029google scholar: lookup
  36. Vervuert I, Coenen M. Factors affecting glycaemic index of feds for horses. In: Proc. 3rd European Equine Nutr. Health Congress Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
  37. Vervuert I, Coenen M, Bothe C. Effects of corn processing on the glycaemic and insulinaemic responses in horses. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl) 88:348–355.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2004.00491.xpubmed: 15387851google scholar: lookup
  38. Virostek A M, McIntosh B, Daniel A, Webb M, Plunk J D. The effects of rotational grazing on forage biomass yield and botanical composition of horse pastures. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 35:386 (Abstr.).
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.03.015google scholar: lookup
  39. Voisin A. Grass productivity. New York Philosophical Library, New York, NY.
  40. Volaire F, Lelièvre F. Production, persistence, and water-soluble carbohydrate accumulation in 21 contrasting populations of Dactylis glomerata L. subjected to severe drought in the south of France. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 48:933–944.
    doi: 10.1071/A97004google scholar: lookup
  41. Waite R, Boyd J. The water-soluble carbohydrates in grasses 1. Changes occurring during the normal life cycle. Sci. Food Agr. 4:197–200.
    doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740040408google scholar: lookup
  42. White L M. Carbohydrate reserves of grasses: a review. J. Range Mngmt. 26:13–18.
  43. Willard J G, Willard J C, Wolfram S A, Baker J P. Effect of diet on cecal pH and feeding behavior of horses. J. Anim. Sci. 45:87–93.
    pubmed: 18431
  44. Williams C A, Kronfeld D S, Staniar W B, Harris P A. Plasma glucose and insulin responses of Thoroughbred mares fed a meal high in starch and sugar or fat and fiber. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2196–2201.
    pubmed: 11518229
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.