Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(1); doi: 10.3390/ani11010074

Effects of In Vitro Interactions of Oviduct Epithelial Cells with Frozen-Thawed Stallion Spermatozoa on Their Motility, Viability and Capacitation Status.

Abstract: Cryopreservation by negatively affecting sperm quality decreases the efficiency of assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs). Thus, we first evaluated sperm motility at different conditions for the manipulation of equine cryopreserved spermatozoa. Higher motility was observed when spermatozoa were incubated for 30 min at 30 × 106/mL compared to lower concentrations (p < 0.05) and when a short centrifugation at 200× g was performed (p < 0.05). Moreover, because sperm suitable for oocyte fertilization is released from oviduct epithelial cells (OECs), in response to the capacitation process, we established an in vitro OEC culture model to select a sperm population with potential fertilizing capacity in this species. We demonstrated E-cadherin and cytokeratin expression in cultures of OECs obtained. When sperm-OEC cocultures were performed, the attached spermatozoa were motile and presented an intact acrosome, suggesting a selection by the oviductal model. When co-cultures were incubated in capacitating conditions a greater number of alive (p < 0.05), capacitated (p < 0.05), with progressive motility (p < 0.05) and with the intact acrosome sperm population was observed (p < 0.05) suggesting that the sperm population released from OECs in vitro presents potential fertilizing capacity. Improvements in handling and selection of cryopreserved sperm would improve efficiencies in ARTs allowing the use of a population of higher-quality sperm.
Publication Date: 2021-01-03 PubMed ID: 33401609PubMed Central: PMC7823615DOI: 10.3390/ani11010074Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study examines how artificial manipulation of frozen-thawed stallion sperm interacts with oviduct epithelial cells in vitro and its effects on their viability, mobility and ability to fertilize an egg (capacitation). The research suggests that improved handling and selection of cryopreserved sperm could enhance assisted reproduction techniques by providing a population of higher-quality, potentially fertilizable sperm.

Study of Stallion Sperm Motility under Different Conditions

  • The researchers first evaluated how the motility of cryopreserved sperm changes under different conditions. These conditions were tested at various sperm concentrations and at varying speeds of centrifugation.
  • The results demonstrated that sperm motility was highest when the sperm were incubated for 30 minutes at a concentration of 30×10 sperm per milliliter.
  • They also found that performing a shorter centrifugation at 200x speed yielded higher motility rates compared to lower speeds/longer times.

Establishing an In Vitro Oviduct Epithelial Cell Culture Model

  • Since sperm which are suitable for fertilizing an oocyte (egg) are released from oviduct epithelial cells (OEC) during the process of capacitation, the researchers established an in vitro culture model of OEC.
  • Through this model, they aimed to select a population of sperm with potential fertilizing capacity specific to this species.
  • The OEC cultures demonstrated E-cadherin and cytokeratin expression, which are markers of healthy epithelial cells.
  • When the sperm were co-cultured with OECs, it was found that the attached sperm were both motile and presented an intact acrosome – the cap-like structure in sperm that houses enzymes needed for fertilization.

Effects on Sperm Capacitation

  • The researchers incubated the above-mentioned co-cultures under conditions favorable for capacitation. They observed a greater number of living, capacitated sperm with progressive motility and an intact acrosome.
  • These results suggested that the sperm released from the OECs in vitro potentially have a higher fertilizing capacity. This implies that the right conditions and methods could help select a higher-quality population of cryopreserved spermatozoa.

Implications for Assisted Reproductive Technologies

  • The study concluded that better management and selection of cryopreserved sperm could increase the efficiency of assisted reproductive technologies.
  • By using sperm populations with a high likelihood of fertilization, these techniques could enable more successful pregnancies, particularly in cases where the use of high-quality sperm is a limiting factor.

Cite This Article

APA
Gimeno BF, Bariani MV, Laiz-Quiroga L, Martínez-León E, Von-Meyeren M, Rey O, Mutto AÁ, Osycka-Salut CE. (2021). Effects of In Vitro Interactions of Oviduct Epithelial Cells with Frozen-Thawed Stallion Spermatozoa on Their Motility, Viability and Capacitation Status. Animals (Basel), 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010074

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 1

Researcher Affiliations

Gimeno, Brenda Florencia
  • Laboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.
Bariani, María Victoria
  • Laboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.
Laiz-Quiroga, Lucía
  • Laboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.
Martínez-León, Eduardo
  • Signaling and Cancer Laboratory, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Inmunología, Genética y Metabolismo, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Hospital de Clínicas "José de San Martín", Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), CP 1120, Argentina.
Von-Meyeren, Micaela
  • Laboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.
Rey, Osvaldo
  • Signaling and Cancer Laboratory, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Inmunología, Genética y Metabolismo, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Hospital de Clínicas "José de San Martín", Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (CABA), CP 1120, Argentina.
Mutto, Adrián Ángel
  • Laboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.
Osycka-Salut, Claudia Elena
  • Laboratorio de Biotecnologías Reproductivas y Mejoramiento Genético Animal, Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Campus Miguelete, Avenida 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Buenos Aires, CP 1650, Argentina.

Grant Funding

  • PICT 2016-3138 / Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
  • PICT 2015-1548 / Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 79 references
  1. Tecirlioglu RT, Trounson AO. Embryonic stem cells in companion animals (horses, dogs and cats): Present status and future prospects.. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2007;19:740–747.
    doi: 10.1071/RD07039pubmed: 17714628google scholar: lookup
  2. McCoy AM. Animal Models of Osteoarthritis: Comparisons and Key Considerations.. Vet. Pathol. 2015;52:803–818.
    doi: 10.1177/0300985815588611pubmed: 26063173google scholar: lookup
  3. Bond S, Léguillette R, Richard EA, Couetil L, Lavoie JP, Martin JG, Pirie RS. Equine asthma: Integrative biologic relevance of a recently proposed nomenclature.. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2018;32:2088–2098.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15302pmc: PMC6271326pubmed: 30294851google scholar: lookup
  4. Cong X, Zhang SM, Ellis MW, Luo J. Large Animal Models for the Clinical Application of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.. Stem Cells Dev. 2019;28:1288–1298.
    doi: 10.1089/scd.2019.0136pubmed: 31359827google scholar: lookup
  5. Koch TG, Betts DH. Stem cell therapy for joint problems using the horse as a clinically relevant animal model.. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2007;7:1621–1626.
    doi: 10.1517/14712598.7.11.1621pubmed: 17961087google scholar: lookup
  6. Moore SGG, Hasler JFF. A 100-Year Review: Reproductive technologies in dairy science.. J. Dairy Sci. 2017;100:10314–10331.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13138pubmed: 29153167google scholar: lookup
  7. Hezavehei M, Sharafi M, Kouchesfahani HM, Henkel R, Agarwal A, Esmaeili V, Shahverdi A. Sperm cryopreservation: A review on current molecular cryobiology and advanced approaches.. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2018;37:327–339.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.05.012pubmed: 30143329google scholar: lookup
  8. Treulen F, Aguila L, Arias ME, Jofré I, Felmer R. Impact of post-thaw supplementation of semen extender with antioxidants on the quality and function variables of stallion spermatozoa.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2019;201:71–83.
  9. Ball BA, Vo AT, Baumber J. Generation of reactive oxygen species by equine spermatozoa.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2001;62:508–515.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.508pubmed: 11327456google scholar: lookup
  10. Sieme H, Harrison RAP, Petrunkina AM. Cryobiological determinants of frozen semen quality, with special reference to stallion.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008;107:276–292.
  11. Vidament M, Dupere AM, Julienne P, Evain A, Noue P, Palmer E. Equine frozen semen: Freezability and fertility field results.. Theriogenology. 1997;48:907–917.
    doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00319-1pubmed: 16728182google scholar: lookup
  12. Alvarenga MA, Papa FO, Ramires Neto C. Advances in Stallion Semen Cryopreservation.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2016;32:521–530.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2016.08.003pubmed: 27726989google scholar: lookup
  13. Neuhauser S, Bollwein H, Siuda M, Handler J. Effects of Different Freezing Protocols on Motility, Viability, Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, Intracellular Calcium Level, and DNA Integrity of Cryopreserved Equine Epididymal Sperm.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;82.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102801pubmed: 31732114google scholar: lookup
  14. Allen W. The Development and Application of the Modern Reproductive Technologies to Horse Breeding.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2005;40:310–329.
  15. Leemans B, Gadella BM, Stout TAE, De Schauwer C, Nelis H, Hoogewijs M, Van Soom A. Why doesn’t conventional IVF work in the horse? The equine oviduct as a microenvironment for capacitation/fertilization.. Reproduction. 2016;152:R233–R245.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-16-0420pubmed: 27651517google scholar: lookup
  16. Leemans B, Stout TAE, De Schauwer C, Heras S, Nelis H, Hoogewijs M, Van Soom A, Gadella BM. Update on mammalian sperm capacitation: How much does the horse differ from other species?. Reproduction. 2019;157:R181–R197.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-18-0541pubmed: 30721132google scholar: lookup
  17. Hinrichs K. Assisted reproductive techniques in mares.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2018;53:4–13.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.13259pubmed: 30238661google scholar: lookup
  18. Bedford SJ, Kurokawa M, Hinrichs K, Fissore RA. Patterns of Intracellular Calcium Oscillations in Horse Oocytes Fertilized by Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Possible Explanations for the Low Success of This Assisted Reproduction Technique in the Horse.. Biol. Reprod. 2004;70:936–944.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.021485pubmed: 14656727google scholar: lookup
  19. Morris LHA. The development of in vitro embryo production in the horse.. Equine Vet. J. 2018;50:712–720.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12839pubmed: 29654624google scholar: lookup
  20. Squires EL. Integration of future biotechnologies into the equine industry.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2005;89.
  21. Holt WV, Elliott RM, Fazeli A, Sostaric E, Georgiou AS, Satake N, Prathalingam N, Watson PF. Harnessing the biology of the oviduct for the benefit of artificial insemination.. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 2006;62:247–259.
    pubmed: 16866322
  22. Li X, Morris LHA, Allen WR. Influence of co-culture during maturation on the developmental potential of equine oocytes fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Reproduction. 2001;121:925–932.
    doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1210925pubmed: 11373179google scholar: lookup
  23. Suarez SS. Regulation of sperm storage and movement in the mammalian oviduct.. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2008;52:455–462.
    doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072527sspubmed: 18649258google scholar: lookup
  24. Ellington JE, Ignotz GG, Varner DD, Marcucio RS, Mathison P, Ball BA. In vitro interaction between oviduct epithelial and equine sperm.. Arch. Androl. 1993;31:79–86.
    doi: 10.3109/01485019308988384pubmed: 8215695google scholar: lookup
  25. Aldarmahi A, Elliott S, Russell J, Klonisch T, Hombach-Klonisch S, Fazeli A. Characterisation of an in vitro system to study maternal communication with spermatozoa.. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2012;24:988–998.
    doi: 10.1071/RD11268pubmed: 22935160google scholar: lookup
  26. Dobrinski I, Ignotz GG, Thomas PG, Ball BA. Role of carbohydrates in the attachment of equine spermatozoa to uterine tubal (oviductal) epithelial cells in vitro.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1996;57:1635–1639.
    pubmed: 8915444
  27. Dobrinski I, Suarez SS, Ball BA. Intracellular calcium concentration in equine spermatozoa attached to oviductal epithelial cells in vitro.. Biol. Reprod. 1996;54:783–788.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod54.4.783pubmed: 8924497google scholar: lookup
  28. Suarez S, Redfern K, Raynor P, Martin F, Phillips DM. Attachment of boar sperm to mucosal explants of oviduct in vitro: Possible role in formation of a sperm reservoir.. Biol. Reprod. 1991;44:998–1004.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod44.6.998pubmed: 1873399google scholar: lookup
  29. Gualtieri R, Talevi R. In vitro-cultured bovine oviductal cells bind acrosome-intact sperm and retain this ability upon sperm release.. Biol. Reprod. 2000;62:1754–1762.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1754pubmed: 10819780google scholar: lookup
  30. Ardón F, Helms D, Sahin E, Bollwein H, Töpfer-Petersen E, Waberski D. Chromatin-unstable boar spermatozoa have little chance of reaching oocytes in vivo.. Reproduction. 2008;135:461–470.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-07-0333pubmed: 18367507google scholar: lookup
  31. Thomas PGA, Ball BA, Miller PG, Brinsko SP, Southwood L. A Subpopulation of Morphologically Normal, Motile Spermatozoa Attach to Equine Oviductal Epithelial Cell Monolayers.. Biol. Reprod. 1994;51:303–309.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod51.2.303pubmed: 7948486google scholar: lookup
  32. Ellington JE, Samper JC, Jones AE, Oliver SA, Burnett KM, Wright RW. In vitro interactions of cryopreserved stallion spermatozoa and oviduct (uterine tube) epithelial cells or their secretory products.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1999;56:51–65.
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(99)00030-5pubmed: 10401702google scholar: lookup
  33. Thomas PGA, Ball BA, Brinsko SP. Interaction of Equine Spermatozoa with Oviduct Epithelial Cell Explants Is Affected by Estrous Cycle and Anatomic Origin of Explant.. Biol. Reprod. 1994;228:222–228.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod51.2.222pubmed: 7948476google scholar: lookup
  34. Lefebvre R, Suarez SS. Effect of capacitation on bull sperm binding to homologous oviductal epithelium.. Biol. Reprod. 1996;54:575–582.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod54.3.575pubmed: 8835378google scholar: lookup
  35. Fazeli A, Duncan AE, Watson PF, Holt WV. Sperm-oviduct interaction: Induction of capacitation and preferential binding of uncapacitated spermatozoa to oviductal epithelial cells in porcine species.. Biol. Reprod. 1999;60:879–886.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod60.4.879pubmed: 10084961google scholar: lookup
  36. Osycka-Salut CE, Castellano L, Fornes D, Beltrame JS, Alonso CAI, Jawerbaum A, Franchi A, Díaz ES, Perez Martinez S. Fibronectin From Oviductal Cells Fluctuates During the Estrous Cycle and Contributes to Sperm–Oviduct Interaction in Cattle.. J. Cell. Biochem. 2017;118:4095–4108.
    doi: 10.1002/jcb.26067pubmed: 28419524google scholar: lookup
  37. Gervasi MG, Rapanelli M, Ribeiro ML, Farina M, Billi S, Franchi AM, Perez Martinez S. The endocannabinoid system in bull sperm and bovine oviductal epithelium: Role of anandamide in sperm-oviduct interaction.. Reproduction. 2009;137:403–414.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-08-0204pubmed: 19042982google scholar: lookup
  38. de Lamirande E, O’Flaherty C. Sperm activation: Role of reactive oxygen species and kinases.. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1784:106–115.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.08.024pubmed: 17920343google scholar: lookup
  39. Visconti PE, Westbrook VA, Chertihin O, Demarco I, Sleight S, Diekman AB. Novel signaling pathways involved in sperm acquisition of fertilizing capacity.. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2002;53:133–150.
    doi: 10.1016/S0165-0378(01)00103-6pubmed: 11730911google scholar: lookup
  40. Buffone MG, Wertheimer EV, Visconti PE, Krapf D. Central role of soluble adenylyl cyclase and cAMP in sperm physiology.. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1842:2610–2620.
  41. Hirohashi N, Yanagimachi R. Sperm acrosome reaction: Its site and role in fertilization.. Biol. Reprod. 2018;99:127–133.
    doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioy045pubmed: 29462288google scholar: lookup
  42. Yanagimachi R. The Physiology of Reproduction.. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA 1994. Mammalian fertilization; pp. 189–317.
  43. McPartlin L, Suarez SS, Czaya C, Hinrichs K, Bedford-Guaus SJ. Hyperactivation of stallion sperm is required for successful in vitro fertilization of equine oocytes.. Biol. Reprod. 2009;81:199–206.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.074880pubmed: 19208544google scholar: lookup
  44. McPartlin LA, Littell J, Mark E, Nelson JL, Travis AJ, Bedford-Guaus SJ. A defined medium supports changes consistent with capacitation in stallion sperm, as evidenced by increases in protein tyrosine phosphorylation and high rates of acrosomal exocytosis.. Theriogenology. 2008;69:639–650.
  45. Galantino-homer HL, Visconti PE, Kopf GS. Regulation of Protein Tyrosine Phosphorylation during Bovine Sperm Capacitation by a Cyclic Adenosine 3′, 5′ -Monophosphate-Dependent Pathway.. Biol. Reprod. 1997;719:707–719.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod56.3.707pubmed: 9047017google scholar: lookup
  46. Osycka-Salut C, Gervasi MG, Pereyra E, Cella M, Ribeiro ML, Franchi AM, Perez-Martinez S. Anandamide induces sperm release from oviductal epithelia through nitric oxide pathway in bovines.. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e30671.
  47. Kinger S, Rajalakshmi M. Assessment of the vitality and acrosomal status of human spermatozoa using fluorescent probes.. Int. J. Androl. 1995;18:12–18.
  48. Leemans B, Stout TAE, Van Soom A, Gadella BM. pH dependent effects of procaine on equine gametes.. Biol. Reprod. 2019;101:1056–1074.
    doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz131pmc: PMC6877780pubmed: 31373616google scholar: lookup
  49. Aurich J, Kuhl J, Tichy A, Aurich C. Efficiency of Semen Cryopreservation in Stallions.. Animals. 2020;10:1033.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061033pmc: PMC7341245pubmed: 32545785google scholar: lookup
  50. Höfner L, Luther AM, Waberski D. The role of seminal plasma in the liquid storage of spermatozoa.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2020;2020:106290.
  51. Salazar JL, Teague SR, Love CC, Brinsko SP, Blanchard TL, Varner DD. Effect of cryopreservation protocol on postthaw characteristics of stallion sperm.. Theriogenology. 2011;76:409–418.
  52. Yeste M. Sperm cryopreservation update: Cryodamage, markers, and factors affecting the sperm freezability in pigs.. Theriogenology. 2016;85:47–64.
  53. Brum AM, Sabeur K, Ball BA. Apoptotic-like changes in equine spermatozoa separated by density-gradient centrifugation or after cryopreservation.. Theriogenology. 2008;69:1041–1055.
  54. Ellerbrock RE, Honorato J, Curcio BR, Stewart JL, Souza JAT, Love CC, Lima FS, Canisso IF. Effect of urine contamination on stallion semen freezing ability.. Theriogenology. 2018;117:1–6.
  55. Dobrinski I, Thomas PGA, Ball BA. Cryopreservation Reduces the Ability of Equine Spermatozoa to Attach to Oviductal Epithelial Cells and Zonae Pellucidae In Vitro.. J. Androl. 1995;16:536–542.
  56. Hayden SS, Blanchard TL, Brinsko SP, Varner DD, Hinrichs K, Love CC. The “dilution effect” in stallion sperm.. Theriogenology. 2015;83:772–777.
  57. Moreno-Irusta A, Dominguez EM, Marín-Briggiler CI, Matamoros-Volante A, Lucchesi O, Tomes CN, Treviño CL, Buffone MG, Lascano R, Losinno L. Reactive oxygen species are involved in the signaling of equine sperm chemotaxis.. Reproduction. 2020;159:423–436.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-19-0480pubmed: 31967971google scholar: lookup
  58. Martins HS, Filho OAM, Araujo MSS, Martins NR, De Albuquerque Lagares M. Evaluation of fertilizing ability of frozen equine sperm using a bovine zona pellucida binding assay.. Cryo-Letters. 2018;39:298–305.
    pubmed: 30963161
  59. Al-Essawe EM, Wallgren M, Wulf M, Aurich C, Macías-García B, Sjunnesson Y, Morrell JM. Seminal plasma influences the fertilizing potential of cryopreserved stallion sperm.. Theriogenology. 2018;115:99–107.
  60. Macías García B, Morrell JM, Ortega-Ferrusola C, González-Fernández L, Tapia JA, Rodriguez-Martínez H, Peña FJ. Centrifugation on a single layer of colloid selects improved quality spermatozoa from frozen-thawed stallion semen.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009;114:193–202.
  61. Ruiz-Díaz S, Oseguera-López I, De La Cuesta-Díaz D, García-López B, Serres C, Sanchez-Calabuig MJ, Gutiérrez-Adán A, Perez-Cerezales S. The presence of d-penicillamine during the in vitro capacitation of stallion spermatozoa prolongs hyperactive-like motility and allows for sperm selection by thermotaxis.. Animals. 2020;10:1467.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091467pmc: PMC7552178pubmed: 32825582google scholar: lookup
  62. Choi YH, Landim-Alvarenga FC, Seidel GE, Squires EL. Effect of capacitation of stallion sperm with polyvinylalcohol or bovine serum albumin on penetration of bovine zona-free or partially zona-removed equine oocytes.. J. Anim. Sci. 2003;81:2080–2087.
    doi: 10.2527/2003.8182080xpubmed: 12926790google scholar: lookup
  63. Pommer AC, Rutllant J, Meyers SA. Phosphorylation of protein tyrosine residues in fresh and cryopreserved stallion spermatozoa under capacitating conditions.. Biol. Reprod. 2003;68:1208–1214.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.011106pubmed: 12606471google scholar: lookup
  64. Rota A, Sabatini C, Przybył A, Ciaramelli A, Panzani D, Camillo F. Post-thaw Addition of Caffeine and/or Pentoxifylline Affect Differently Motility of Horse and Donkey-Cryopreserved Spermatozoa.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;75:41–47.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.01.003pubmed: 31002091google scholar: lookup
  65. Marzano G, Moscatelli N, Di Giacomo M, Martino NA, Lacalandra GM, Dell’aquila ME, Maruccio G, Primiceri E, Chiriacò MS, Zara V. Centrifugation force and time alter CASA parameters and oxidative status of cryopreserved stallion sperm.. Biology. 2020;9:22.
    doi: 10.3390/biology9020022pmc: PMC7168157pubmed: 32012799google scholar: lookup
  66. Rappa KL, Rodriguez HF, Hakkarainen GC, Anchan RM, Mutter GL, Asghar W. Sperm processing for advanced reproductive technologies: Where are we today?. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016;34:578–587.
  67. Katila T. In vitro evaluation of frozen-thawed stallion semen: A review.. Acta Vet. Scand. 2001;42:199–217.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-42-199pmc: PMC2202319pubmed: 11503365google scholar: lookup
  68. Miller DJ. Review: The epic journey of sperm through the female reproductive tract.. Animals. 2018:1–11.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731118000526pmc: PMC9556260pubmed: 29551099google scholar: lookup
  69. Suarez SS. Formation of a reservoir of sperm in the oviduct.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2002;37:140–143.
  70. Miller DJ. Regulation of Sperm Function by Oviduct Fluid and the Epithelium: Insight into the Role of Glycans.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2015;50:31–39.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.12570pubmed: 26174917google scholar: lookup
  71. Martínez-León E, Osycka-Salut C, Signorelli J, Pozo P, Perez B, Kong M, Morales P, Perez-Martinez S, Diaz ES. Fibronectin stimulates human sperm capacitation through the cyclic AMP/protein kinase A pathway.. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2138–2151.
    doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev154pubmed: 26109618google scholar: lookup
  72. Talevi R, Gualtieri R. Molecules involved in sperm-oviduct adhesion and release.. Theriogenology. 2010;73:796–801.
  73. Suarez SS. Mammalian sperm interactions with the female reproductive tract.. Cell Tissue Res. 2015.
    doi: 10.1007/s00441-015-2244-2pmc: PMC4703433pubmed: 26183721google scholar: lookup
  74. Gervasi MG, Visconti PE. Chang’s meaning of capacitation: A molecular perspective.. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2016;83:860–874.
    doi: 10.1002/mrd.22663pubmed: 27256723google scholar: lookup
  75. Choi YH, Love CC, Love LB, Varner DD, Brinsko S, Hinrichs K. Developmental competence in vivo and in vitro of in vitro-matured equine oocytes fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh or frozen-thawed spermatozoa.. Reproduction. 2002;123:455–465.
    doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1230455pubmed: 11882023google scholar: lookup
  76. Colleoni S, Lagutina I, Lazzari G, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Galli C, Morrell JM. New Methods for Selecting Stallion Spermatozoa for Assisted Reproduction.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2011;31:536–541.
  77. Choi YH, Velez IC, Macías-García B, Riera FL, Ballard CS, Hinrichs K. Effect of clinically-related factors on in vitro blastocyst development after equine ICSI.. Theriogenology. 2016;85:1289–1296.
  78. Gonzalez-Castro RA, Carnevale EM. Use of microfluidics to sort stallion sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2019;202:1–9.
  79. Gonzalez-Castro RA, Carnevale EM. Association of equine sperm population parameters with outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injections.. Theriogenology. 2018;119:114–120.