Effects of various wound dressings on microbial growth in perfused equine musculocutaneous flaps.
Abstract: To compare the effect of multiple wound dressings on microbial growth in a perfused equine wound model. Methods: Abdominal musculocutaneous flaps from 16 equine cadavers. Methods: 8 full-thickness skin wound covered were created in each flap. Tissues were perfused with saline (0.9% NaCl) solution. Wounds were inoculated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa (106 CFUs), incubated, and covered with a dressing containing activated charcoal, boric acid, cadexomer iodine, calcium alginate, manuka honey, nanoparticle silver, or polyhexamethylene biguanide or with a control (nonadherent gauze) dressing. Muscle biopsy specimens were obtained at baseline (immediately prior to dressing application) and 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours later for mean bacterial load (MBL) determination. The MBLs at each subsequent time point were compared with that at baseline within dressing types, and MBLs at each time point were compared among dressing types. Results: MBLs in MRSA-inoculated wounds covered with cadexomer iodine dressings were significantly decreased from baseline at the 6- and 12-hour time points. For P aeruginosa-inoculated wounds, MBLs were significantly increased from baseline in all wounds at various times except for wounds with cadexomer iodine dressings. The MBLs of wounds with cadexomer iodine dressings were lower than all others, although not always significantly different from those for wounds with boric acid, manuka honey, nanoparticle silver, and polyhexamethylene biguanide dressings. Conclusions: In this nonviable perfused wound model, growth of MRSA and P aeruginosa was most effectively reduced or inhibited by cadexomer iodine dressings. These results and the effect of the dressings on wound healing should be confirmed with in vivo studies.
Publication Date: 2021-02-26 PubMed ID: 33629894DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.82.3.189Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research compares the effects of various wound dressings on the growth of bacteria in an experimental wound model using equine models. It found that cadexomer iodine dressings were the most effective at reducing bacterial growth.
Methodology and Approach
- The study used abdominal musculocutaneous flaps from 16 equine cadavers (dead horses). Full-thickness skin wounds were developed in each flap.
- The tissues of these wounds were perfused (infused) with a saline solution.
- The wounds were then inoculated with specific bacteria (methicillin-resistant (MRSA) or another bacterium) and covered with various dressings. The dressings used contained constituents like activated charcoal, boric acid, cadexomer iodine, calcium alginate, manuka honey, nanoparticle silver, polyhexamethylene biguanide or a control of nonadherent gauze.
Procedure for Data Collection
- Measurements were taken at baseline (immediately before dressing application) and then at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours afterward. These measurements were used to determine the mean bacterial load (MBL) in the wounds, evaluating the effectiveness of the microbial growth control by the dressing types.
- The MBLs at each subsequent time point were compared to the baseline within each dressing type, and comparisons were also made between dressing types at each time point.
Results and Findings
- The results showed that MBLs in wounds inoculated with MRSA and covered with cadexomer iodine dressings significantly decreased from the baseline at the 6- and 12-hour points.
- For wounds with different bacteria, MBLs significantly increased from baseline in all wound types at various points, except in wounds covered with cadexomer iodine dressings.
- The MBLs in wounds covered with cadexomer iodine dressings were reported to be lower than all others. However, these results were not always significantly different from those for wounds covered with dressings of boric acid, manuka honey, nanoparticle silver, and polyhexamethylene biguanide.
Conclusions
- It was concluded that, in this experimental wound model, growth of MRSA and another bacteria was most effectively reduced or inhibited by cadexomer iodine dressings.
- The authors suggest that these results and the effect of the dressings on wound healing should be confirmed with in vivo studies (experimental studies within live organism).
Cite This Article
APA
De Clercq E, Den Hondt S, De Baere C, Martens AM.
(2021).
Effects of various wound dressings on microbial growth in perfused equine musculocutaneous flaps.
Am J Vet Res, 82(3), 189-197.
https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.82.3.189 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Bandages
- Horse Diseases
- Horses
- Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
- Myocutaneous Flap
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa
- Wound Healing
- Wound Infection / veterinary
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists