Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2018; 47(4); 572-577; doi: 10.1111/vsu.12793

Efficacy and dermal tolerance of a novel alcohol-based skin antiseptic in horses.

Abstract: To determine the efficacy and dermal tolerance of a novel alcohol-based skin antiseptic (ABSA) in horses. Methods: Experimental study. Methods: Systemically healthy horses (n = 25) with no history or clinical signs of skin disease. Methods: Four clipped sites on the abdomen were randomly assigned to a skin preparation protocol: saline (negative control; NC), chlorhexidine gluconate followed by isopropyl alcohol (positive control; PC), saline followed by the ABSA (ABSA A), or a commercially available horse shampoo followed by the ABSA (ABSA B). Microbiological swabs were obtained from each site and cultured on MacConkey and mannitol salt agar plates. Colony-forming units were counted 18-24 hours later. All sites were scored for signs of skin reaction before, immediately after, 1 hour after, and 24 hours after skin preparation. Results: The PC, ABSA A, and ABSA B methods reduced skin microbial burden compared with the NC method (P < .001), but no difference was detected between antiseptic products. Preparation time did not differ between ABSA A and ABSA B methods (P = 0.108); both were faster than the PC method (P < 0.001 for both). Skin reactions were most abundant 24 hours after skin preparation (30.5%), but there was no significant association with antiseptic used, and no horses required veterinary treatment. Conclusions: The ABSA preparations tested in this study were as effective and well tolerated as a chlorhexidine gluconate-based method, but required less time in healthy horses. Conclusions: The ABSA tested here provides an efficacious, fast-acting, and well-tolerated alternative to achieve skin antisepsis in healthy horses. These results justify further investigation in clinical cases.
Publication Date: 2018-04-14 PubMed ID: 29655175DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12793Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the effectiveness and skin tolerance of a new alcohol-based skin antiseptic (ABSA) in horses. The study found that this ABSA was as efficient and well-accepted on the horses’ skin as the standard antiseptic method, with the added benefit of requiring less time.

Methodology

  • The study involved 25 healthy horses with no history or signs of skin disease. It was an experimental study conducted to testt the efficacy and tolerability of a new ABSA on the skin of these horses.
  • Four cleaned sites on each horse’s abdomen were randomly chosen and subjected to various skin preparation protocols. These procedures included Saline (negative control), Chlorhexidine Gluconate followed by Isopropyl Alcohol (positive control), Saline with ABSA, and a commercially available horse shampoo followed by ABSA.
  • Microbiological swabs were taken from each site and cultured in a lab. The number of Colony Forming Units was noted after 18 to 24 hours.
  • Each of these sites was inspected for signs of skin reaction at different intervals after skin preparation, including immediately after, after one hour, and after 24 hours.

Results

  • The study found that the skin microbial burden was reduced after using ABSA, similar to the positive control method, indicating the efficacy of the ABSA as compared to the conventional antiseptic methods.
  • The time required for the ABSA-based preparation was the same, irrespective of whether it was preceded with saline or shampoo. However, both were faster than the positive control method, thus suggesting ABSA’s time efficiency benefit.
  • Although skin reactions were observed 24 hours after preparation in some cases, there was no significant correlation with the type of antiseptic used. Moreover, none of the horses required veterinary treatment, implying good skin tolerance of the ABSA.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that the ABSA tested bear comparison with the commonly used Chlorhexidine Gluconate-based method in terms of its antiseptic effectiveness and dermal tolerance, with the added advantage of needing less preparation time.
  • The ABSA examined in this study thus stands as an efficacious, fast-acting, and easily tolerated alternative for achieving skin antisepsis in healthy horses.
  • This finding justifies the need for more focused investigations to further explore the potential benefits of ABSA in clinical use cases.

Cite This Article

APA
Tannahill VJ, Cogan T, Allen K, Acutt E, Busschers E. (2018). Efficacy and dermal tolerance of a novel alcohol-based skin antiseptic in horses. Vet Surg, 47(4), 572-577. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12793

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 47
Issue: 4
Pages: 572-577

Researcher Affiliations

Tannahill, Victoria J
  • School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Cogan, Tristan
  • School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Allen, Kate
  • School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Acutt, Elizabeth
  • School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Busschers, Evita
  • School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

MeSH Terms

  • 2-Propanol / pharmacology
  • Administration, Cutaneous
  • Animals
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local / administration & dosage
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local / adverse effects
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local / pharmacology
  • Chlorhexidine / administration & dosage
  • Chlorhexidine / adverse effects
  • Chlorhexidine / analogs & derivatives
  • Chlorhexidine / pharmacology
  • Colony Count, Microbial
  • Dermatologic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Dermatologic Agents / adverse effects
  • Dermatologic Agents / pharmacology
  • Disinfection / methods
  • Horses
  • Skin / microbiology

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Lioce CG, Davis EC, Bennett JW, Townsend FI, Bloch CP. Scalpel blade contamination and risk of postoperative surgical site infection following abdominal incisions in dogs. BMC Res Notes 2019 Jul 25;12(1):459.
    doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4494-7pubmed: 31345266google scholar: lookup
  2. Ryu SH, Forbes E, Kim BS, Park KT. Injection site abscesses associated with commensal and environmental bacteria following intramuscular vaccination in horses. Vet Anim Sci 2025 Sep;29:100484.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2025.100484pubmed: 40791848google scholar: lookup