Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2010; 24(6); 1503-1508; doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0634.x

Efficacy and safety of sound wave treatment of recurrent airway obstruction in horses.

Abstract: One proposed nonmedical therapy for recurrent airway obstruction (RAO) in horses is a handheld acoustic device that propels sound waves from the nose down the tracheobronchial tree where it is intended to dislodge mucous and relax bronchospasm, permitting clearance of mucoid secretions. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this device when used as per the manufacturer's recommendations as a treatment for RAO. Methods: Nine adult horses previously diagnosed with RAO. Methods: Prospective, cross-over clinical trial. Horses were exposed to a dusty environment until airway obstruction developed as defined by standard lung mechanics (SLM). Horses were randomly assigned to receive either acoustic therapy or a sham treatment for 4 weeks while being maintained in this environment. Horses were evaluated by clinical scores, SLM, and forced expiration regularly for 4 weeks. The opposite treatment was administered after a washout period. Results: Seven horses received the treatment; 9 received the sham. There were no changes (P>.05) in clinical score, maximal change in transpulmonary pressure (ΔPLmax), lung resistance (RL), or the forced expiratory flow rate averaged over the last 75-95% of expiration (FEF75-95%) over the study period. The device was determined to be safe, although several minor adverse effects were noted, including head tossing, coughing, and chewing during treatment. Conclusions: Treatment with this device did not improve clinical signs or lung function in horses with RAO kept in a dusty environment. Currently accepted treatments, including environmental management and medical therapy, should be recommended.
Publication Date: 2010-11-09 PubMed ID: 21054545DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0634.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article presents an examination of the effectiveness and safety of using a handheld acoustic device for treating recurrent airway obstruction in horses. Unfortunately, the study concluded that despite the device’s safety, it did not show any significant improvement in the horses’ clinical signs or lung function.

Objective & Method

The research was primarily aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of a handheld acoustic device proposed for nonmedical therapy for recurrent airway obstruction (RAO) in horses. This tool propels sound waves from the horse’s nose down into its tracheobronchial tree with the intention of dislodging mucus and relaxing bronchospasm to help clear mucoid secretions.

  • The study was designed as a prospective, cross-over clinical trial involving nine adult horses previously diagnosed with RAO.
  • The horses were exposed to a dusty environment till they developed airway obstruction as defined by standard lung mechanics.
  • They were randomly assigned to receive either acoustic therapy or a placebo treatment for a four-week duration in the same environment.
  • The effects of treatments were measured using clinical scores, standard lung mechanics, and forced expiration.
  • After a washout period, the opposite treatment was administered.

Results

Seven horses received the actual acoustic treatment while nine received the placebo. However, there were no significant changes, as per the p-values, in any of the factors measured for evaluating the effects, including:

  • Clinical score
  • Maximal change in transpulmonary pressure (ΔPLmax)
  • Lung resistance (RL)
  • Forced expiratory flow rate averaged over the last 75-95% of expiration (FEF75-95%)

Despite tests showing the device to be safe, minor adverse effects like head tossing, coughing, and chewing during treatment were observed.

Conclusion

The study concluded that this type of treatment with the device did not lead to any improvement in the clinical signs or lung function of horses suffering from RAO, kept in a dusty environment. Hence, as per the conclusion of this study, it is advised to stick to the standard and currently accepted treatments for RAO in horses, which include proper environmental management and medical therapy.

Cite This Article

APA
Goncarovs KO, Miskovic Feutz M, Perez-Moreno C, Couetil LL. (2010). Efficacy and safety of sound wave treatment of recurrent airway obstruction in horses. J Vet Intern Med, 24(6), 1503-1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0634.x

Publication

ISSN: 0891-6640
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 24
Issue: 6
Pages: 1503-1508

Researcher Affiliations

Goncarovs, K O
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Miskovic Feutz, M
    Perez-Moreno, C
      Couetil, L L

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Horse Diseases / therapy
        • Horses
        • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / therapy
        • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / veterinary
        • Vibration / therapeutic use

        Citations

        This article has been cited 0 times.