Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2026; doi: 10.1002/evj.70197

Embryo developmental kinetics and vitrification in relation to pregnancy outcome, foaling percentage and foal sex.

Abstract: While fast in vitro embryo development has been associated with improved outcomes, the relationships of slow in vitro embryo development and vitrified versus fresh in vitro produced (IVP) embryo transfer to foaling percentage and foal sex are less explored. Objective: To determine the relationships of (1) day of blastocyst formation (D7-11 after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)) and (2) vitrification and warming method (one- and three-step) versus fresh transfer with pregnancy, early pregnancy loss (EPL), foaling percentage and foal sex. Methods: Retrospective clinical study. Methods: Blastocysts (n = 201) were collected on days 7-11 after ICSI of in vitro matured oocytes from Warmblood mares and transferred either fresh or vitrified-warmed into recipient mares on day 4 after ovulation. Pregnancy, EPL, foaling percentage, and foal sex were compared using multivariable generalised linear mixed-effects logistic regression models. Results: Day of blastocyst formation was significantly associated with pregnancy outcome at D14 (p = 0.048), D42 (p = 0.046) and foaling percentage (p < 0.001). The odds of foaling decreased with developmental age, with significantly lower odds after D11 blastocyst transfer (OR = 0.0045, 95% CI 0.00034-0.061; p < 0.0001). Slow embryo development was associated with a significantly higher proportion of female offspring. The odds of obtaining a filly versus a colt were 5.6-fold higher for D10 blastocysts than D7 (95% CI 1.14-25.0; p = 0.034). Transfer of fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocysts, using a one- or three-step protocol, did not significantly affect pregnancy or foaling outcome. Conclusions: Small sample size per day of blastocyst formation. Conclusions: Slow in vitro embryo development is associated with decreased pregnancy and foaling outcomes following transfer of D11 IVP blastocysts. Transfer of D10 IVP blastocysts yields acceptable foaling percentages and is associated with a higher proportion of female offspring. Vitrification is effective for preserving equine embryos and allows the use of a simplified one step warming protocol.
Publication Date: 2026-05-31 PubMed ID: 42219243DOI: 10.1002/evj.70197Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Objective Overview

  • This study investigated how the timing of embryo development and the method of embryo preservation affect pregnancy success, live birth rates, and the sex ratio of foals produced through in vitro fertilization in horses.

Background and Purpose

  • Previous studies suggested that rapid embryo development in vitro correlates with better pregnancy outcomes.
  • Less is known about how slower embryo development and the use of frozen (vitrified) versus fresh embryos influence pregnancy success, early pregnancy loss, foaling rates, and foal sex.
  • The study sought to analyze:
    • The relationship between the day embryos reached the blastocyst stage (days 7 to 11 after fertilization via ICSI).
    • The effects of embryo preservation methods, comparing fresh embryos with those vitrified and then warmed using either a one-step or three-step warming process.

Methods

  • This was a retrospective clinical study involving 201 equine blastocysts produced by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of in vitro matured oocytes from Warmblood mares.
  • Embryos were collected on days 7 to 11 post-ICSI.
  • Embryos were transferred to recipient mares four days after ovulation either fresh or after being vitrified and warmed.
  • Pregnancy outcomes were measured at days 14 and 42 post-transfer.
  • Outcomes assessed included pregnancy rate, early pregnancy loss (EPL), foaling percentage (successful live birth), and foal sex.
  • Data analysis was performed using multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects logistic regression models to control for variables.

Key Findings

  • Day of blastocyst formation:
    • The timing of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage was significantly linked to pregnancy outcomes at days 14 and 42 and to foaling rates.
    • Embryos that reached blastocyst stage later (especially at day 11) had markedly lower odds of resulting in live foals.
    • For example, embryos transferred on day 11 had an odds ratio of 0.0045 for foaling compared to earlier-developed embryos, indicating minimal chance of live birth.
  • Embryo development speed and foal sex:
    • Slower developing embryos (e.g., day 10 blastocysts) were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of producing female foals (fillies).
    • The odds of having a filly versus a colt were 5.6 times higher for day 10 blastocysts than for day 7 blastocysts.
  • Vitrification versus fresh transfer:
    • No significant differences in pregnancy rates or foaling percentages were found between fresh embryo transfers and those involving vitrified-warmed embryos.
    • The vitrification warming method (one-step vs. three-step) did not impact these outcomes either, emphasizing the effectiveness and flexibility of the vitrification protocols.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Slow in vitro embryo development, especially embryos reaching the blastocyst stage on day 11, correlates with lower pregnancy success and foaling rates.
  • Embryos developing around day 10 still provide acceptable chances of live birth but tend to produce more female offspring.
  • Vitrification is a reliable method for embryo preservation in horses and simplified one-step warming methods are as effective as more complex protocols.
  • These findings have practical implications for optimizing embryo transfer timing and preservation strategies in equine assisted reproduction.
  • The study notes limited sample sizes for each developmental day, suggesting cautious interpretation and a need for further research.

Cite This Article

APA
Peere S, Dewulf M, Van den Branden E, Papas M, Broothaers K, De Coster T, Briote I, Hedia M, Angel-Velez D, Hoogewijs M, Govaere J, Smits K. (2026). Embryo developmental kinetics and vitrification in relation to pregnancy outcome, foaling percentage and foal sex. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1002/evj.70197

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Peere, S
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Dewulf, M
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Van den Branden, E
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Papas, M
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Broothaers, K
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
De Coster, T
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Briote, I
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Hedia, M
  • Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Angel-Velez, D
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad CES, Medellin, Colombia.
Hoogewijs, M
  • BV ReproVets, Oosterzele, Belgium.
Govaere, J
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Smits, K
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.

References

This article includes 18 references
  1. Lazzari G, Colleoni S, Crotti G, Turini P, Fiorini G, Barandalla M. Laboratory production of equine embryos.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;89:103097.
  2. Lewis N, Canesin H, Choi YH, Foss R, Felix M, Rader K. Equine in vitro produced blastocysts: relationship of embryo morphology, stage and speed of development to foaling rate.. Reprod Fertil Dev 2023;35:338–351.
  3. Squires E. Current reproductive technologies impacting equine embryo production.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;89:102981.
  4. Claes A, Cuervo‐Arango J, Colleoni S, Lazzari G, Galli C, Stout TA. Speed of in vitro embryo development affects the likelihood of foaling and the foal sex ratio.. Reprod Fertil Dev 2020;32:468–473.
  5. Ducheyne KD, Rizzo M, Cuervo‐Arango J, Claes A, Daels PF, Stout TAE. In vitro production of horse embryos predisposes to micronucleus formation, whereas time to blastocyst formation affects likelihood of pregnancy.. Reprod Fertil Dev 2019;31:1830–1839.
  6. Claes A, Stout TAE. Success rate in a clinical equine in vitro embryo production program.. Theriogenology 2022;187:215–218.
  7. Barandalla M, Colleoni S, Perota A, Galli C, Lazzari G. Preimplantation genetic testing in horses: biopsy of Piezo‐ICSI embryos for sex, coat color, and disease alleles.. Theriogenology 2025;246:117525.
  8. Choi YH, Hinrichs K. Vitrification of in vitro‐produced and in vivo‐recovered equine blastocysts in a clinical program.. Theriogenology 2017;87:48–54.
  9. Kovacsy S, Ismer A, Funes J, Hoogewijs M, Wilsher S. Successful vitrification of equine embryos >300 microns without puncture or aspiration.. Equine Vet J 2024;56:815–822.
  10. Canesin HS, Ortiz I, Rocha Filho AN, Salgado RM, Brom‐de‐Luna JG, Hinrichs K. Effect of warming method on embryo quality in a simplified equine embryo vitrification system.. Theriogenology 2020;151:151–158.
  11. Papas M, Van den Branden E, Peere S, Gerits I, Angel‐Velez D, De Coster T. Vitrification and direct warming in iso‐osmotic holding medium of equine in vitro embryos supports competitive pregnancy rates.. J Equine Vet Sci 2023;125:104671.
  12. Broothaers K, Pascottini OB, Hedia M, Angel‐Velez D, De Coster T, Peere S. Oocyte holding and in vitro maturation duration between 28 and 34 hours do not affect equine OPU‐ICSI outcomes.. Theriogenology 2025;233:64–69.
  13. Van den Branden E, Salamone M, Broothaers K, Peere S, Polfliet E, Dewulf M. Physiological and behavioral parameters of pain and stress in mares during and after transvaginal ultrasound‐guided follicular aspiration.. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1574351.
  14. Eldridge‐Panuska WD, Caracciolo di Brienza V, Seidel GE, Squires EL, Carnevale EM. Establishment of pregnancies after serial dilution or direct transfer by vitrified equine embryos.. Theriogenology 2005;63:1308–1319.
  15. Cuervo‐Arango J, Claes AN, Stout TA. Effect of embryo transfer technique on the likelihood of pregnancy in the mare: a comparison of conventional and Wilsher's forceps‐assisted transfer.. Veterinary Record 2018;183:323.
  16. Wilsher S, Allen WR. An improved method for nonsurgical embryo transfer in the mare.. Equine Vet Educ 2004;16:39–44.
  17. Morris LHA, Maclellan LJ. A simplified grading system for in vivo and in vitro derived vitrified equine embryos.. J Equine Vet Sci 2024;132:104983.
  18. Couto G, Grippo A, Ismer A, Hoogewijs M, Pedro B, Vasconcelos L. Direct warming of vitrified in vivo equine embryos.. Reprod Domest Anim 2025;60(7):e70092.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.