FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Equine Management in UK Livery Yards during the COVID-19 Pan...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(5); doi: 10.3390/ani11051416

Equine Management in UK Livery Yards during the COVID-19 Pandemic-“As Long As the Horses Are Happy, We Can Work Out the Rest Later”.

Abstract: Approximately 60% of the UK's leisure horses are kept at livery yards under the management and oversight of a livery yard owner or manager (LYO/M), yet their role has received little research attention. This study used the COVID-19 pandemic as a lens through which to view LYO/Ms' decisions around equine care and management at a time when changes to usual practice were necessary. Qualitative research methods were used. Up to 3 interviews were conducted with 24 different LYO/Ms over nine months (n = 48). Discussion threads from open-access UK discussion fora were also analysed. All data were anonymised and analysed using a Grounded Theory methodology. Prior to the pandemic, equine care and management practices varied greatly across yards, and yard cultures were a product of LYO/Ms' construction of good equine care, their business model, and the need to balance human and equine contentment. The role of the LYO/M was to maintain an equilibrium between those interlinked factors. During the pandemic, LYO/Ms adopted new measures designed to influence the movement of horse owners and other people on yards to minimise the risk of COVID-19 transmission. During this time, LYO/Ms reported prioritising equine wellbeing by limiting change to equine routines and management wherever possible. Instead of altering equine management, there was an expectation that the lives of humans would be moulded and re-shaped to fit with the government COVID-19 guidelines. These results highlight the importance of routines, traditions and cultures in each individual yard. Maintaining the standard of care for the horse was prioritised regardless of who provided that care.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-05-14 PubMed ID: 34069277PubMed Central: PMC8156832DOI: 10.3390/ani11051416Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study primarily focuses on understanding the role of Livery Yard Owners/Managers (LYO/Ms) in the UK, who are responsible for the care and management of approximately 60% of leisure horses. The study investigates how these individuals adapted their equine management practices in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, prioritizing continued high standards of equine care, whilst following government guidelines to minimize the risk of virus transmission.

Research Methodology

  • The study opted for a qualitative approach to gain in-depth insights into LYO/Ms decision-making amidst the pandemic.
  • Interviews were conducted with 24 different LYO/Ms, with up to three interviews conducted per individual over a nine-month period.
  • Discussion threads from publicly accessible UK discussion forums were also analyzed to gather additional data.
  • All acquired data were anonymized and scrutinized using Grounded Theory methodology, which involves the systematic gathering and analysis of qualitative data to generate theories.

Pre-Pandemic Livery Yard Practices

  • Before the pandemic, the study found that equine care and management practices differed significantly between livery yards.
  • Livery yard cultures emerged from LYO/Ms’ understanding of good equine care, their business model, and the need to maintain a balance between human satisfaction and horse wellbeing.
  • The LYO/M’s role was to sustain this equilibrium between the interlinked factors.

Impact of the Pandemic on Equine Management Practices

  • During the pandemic, LYO/Ms implemented new measures to control the movement of horse owners and others to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission.
  • Despite these measures, maintaining equine wellbeing by limiting changes to horse routines and management was prioritized.
  • Rather than modifying equine management, LYO/Ms sought to adapt human lives to align with government COVID-19 regulations.

Conclusions from the Study

  • The results underline the importance of routines, traditions, and cultures in each livery yard.
  • Regardless of pandemic pressures, maintaining a high standard of care for horses was given priority.
  • The study brings to light the understudied role of LYO/Ms, who play a vital role in equine wellbeing and how resilient these practices can be in the face of external pressures.

Cite This Article

APA
Furtado T, Perkins E, McGowan C, Pinchbeck G. (2021). Equine Management in UK Livery Yards during the COVID-19 Pandemic-“As Long As the Horses Are Happy, We Can Work Out the Rest Later”. Animals (Basel), 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051416

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 5

Researcher Affiliations

Furtado, Tamzin
  • Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Cheshire CH64 7TE, UK.
Perkins, Elizabeth
  • Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK.
McGowan, Catherine
  • Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Cheshire CH64 7TE, UK.
Pinchbeck, Gina
  • Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Cheshire CH64 7TE, UK.

Grant Funding

  • G1019 / Horse Trust

Conflict of Interest Statement

There are no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 31 references
  1. Wylie CE, Ireland JL, Collins SN, Verheyen KL, Newton JR. Demographics and management practices of horses and ponies in Great Britain: a cross-sectional study.. Res Vet Sci 2013 Oct;95(2):410-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.05.004pubmed: 23735292google scholar: lookup
  2. Hockenhull J, Creighton E. The day-to-day management of UK leisure horses and the prevalence of owner-reported stable-related and handling behaviour problems.. Anim. Welf. 2015;24:29–36.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.1.029google scholar: lookup
  3. Furtado T. Exploring the Recognition and Management of Obesity in Horses through Qualitative.. .
  4. Schuurman N, Franklin A. In Pursuit of Meaningful Human–Horse Relations: Responsible Horse Ownership in a Leisure Context.. In: Nyman J., Schuurman N., editors. Affect, Space and Animals. 1st ed. Routledge; Oxford, UK: 2016. pp. 40–51.
  5. Franklin A, Schuurman N. Aging animal bodies: Horse retirement yards as relational spaces of liminality, dwelling and negotiation.. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 2017;9365:1–20.
    doi: 10.1080/14649365.2017.1392592google scholar: lookup
  6. Furtado T, Perkins E, Pinchbeck G, McGowan C, Watkins F, Christley R. Hidden in plain sight: Uncovering the obesogenic environment surrounding the UK’s Leisure Horses.. Anthrozoos Multidiscip. J. Interact. People Anim. 2020.
    doi: 10.1080/08927936.2021.1914431google scholar: lookup
  7. Allison K, Taylor NM, Wilsmore AJ, Garforth C. Equine anthelmintics: survey of the patterns of use, beliefs and attitudes among horse owners in the UK.. Vet Rec 2011 May 7;168(18):483.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.d731pubmed: 21502196google scholar: lookup
  8. Horseman SV, Buller H, Mullan S, Whay HR. Current Welfare Problems Facing Horses in Great Britain as Identified by Equine Stakeholders.. PLoS One 2016;11(8):e0160269.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160269pmc: PMC4976980pubmed: 27501387google scholar: lookup
  9. Horseman SV, Buller H, Mullan S, Knowles TG, Barr AR, Whay HR. Equine Welfare in England and Wales: Exploration of Stakeholders' Understanding.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2017 Jan-Mar;20(1):9-23.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2016.1197776pubmed: 27414640google scholar: lookup
  10. Bell C, Rogers S, Taylor J, Busby D. Improving the Recognition of Equine Affective States.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Dec 11;9(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121124pmc: PMC6941154pubmed: 31835886google scholar: lookup
  11. Hemsworth L.M., Jongman E, Coleman G.J. Recreational horse welfare: The relationships between recreational horse owner attributes and recreational horse welfare.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2015;165:1–16.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.019google scholar: lookup
  12. Approved Livery Yards British Horse Society. [(accessed on 7 February 2019)]; Available online: http://www.bhs.org.uk/professionals/become-bhs-approved/approved-livery-yards.
  13. Williams JM, Randle H, Marlin D. COVID-19: Impact on United Kingdom Horse Owners.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 13;10(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10101862pmc: PMC7600939pubmed: 33066021google scholar: lookup
  14. Christley RM, Perkins E. Researching hard to reach areas of knowledge: qualitative research in veterinary science.. Equine Vet J 2010 May;42(4):285-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00074.xpubmed: 20525043google scholar: lookup
  15. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory.. 3rd ed. The Cromwell Press; Wiltshire, UK: 2008.
  16. Silverman D. Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook-David Silverman-Google Books.. 4th ed. Sage; London, UK: 2013.
  17. DEFRA Keeping Horses on Farms. [(accessed on 12 March 2021)];2015 Available online: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/keeping-horses-on-farms.
  18. Chapman M, Thompson K. Preventing and Investigating Horse-Related Human Injury and Fatality in Work and Non-Work Equestrian Environments: A Consideration of the Workplace Health and Safety Framework.. Animals (Basel) 2016 May 6;6(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani6050033pmc: PMC4880850pubmed: 27164148google scholar: lookup
  19. Chapman M, Thomas M, Thompson K. What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Nov 26;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122222pmc: PMC7761269pubmed: 33256171google scholar: lookup
  20. Asa N, Newton A, Sullivan L, Shi J, Wheeler K, Smith GA, Yang J. Horseback riding-related injuries treated in emergency departments: Risk factors and prevention strategies.. J Safety Res 2019 Dec;71:251-257.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.004pubmed: 31862037google scholar: lookup
  21. DEFRA Coronavirus (COVID-19): Advice for People in England with Animals. [(accessed on 13 March 2021)];2020 Available online: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-advice-for-people-with-animals.
  22. Birke L, Hockenhull J, Creighton E. The horse’s tale: Narratives of caring for/about horses.. Soc. Anim. 2010;18:331–347.
  23. Smart C.A. Understanding Social Influence Differently: A Discursive Study of Livery Yards.. 2013.
  24. Cuban L. The Managerial Imperative and the Practice of Leadership in Schools. State University of New York Press; Albany, NY, USA: 1988.
  25. Bush T. From Management to Leadership: Semantic or Meaningful Change?. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 2008;36:271–288.
    doi: 10.1177/1741143207087777google scholar: lookup
  26. Kotterman J. Leadership Versus Management: What’s the Difference?. J. Qual. Particip. 2006;29:13.
  27. Lundberg P, Hartmann E, Roth L.S.V. Does training style affect the human-horse relationship? Asking the horse in a separation–reunion experiment with the owner and a stranger.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020;233:105144.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105144google scholar: lookup
  28. Holland KE, Owczarczak-Garstecka SC, Anderson KL, Casey RA, Christley RM, Harris L, McMillan KM, Mead R, Murray JK, Samet L, Upjohn MM. "More Attention than Usual": A Thematic Analysis of Dog Ownership Experiences in the UK during the First COVID-19 Lockdown.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 19;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010240pmc: PMC7833365pubmed: 33477947google scholar: lookup
  29. Applebaum JW, Tomlinson CA, Matijczak A, McDonald SE, Zsembik BA. The Concerns, Difficulties, and Stressors of Caring for Pets during COVID-19: Results from a Large Survey of U.S. Pet Owners.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 15;10(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10101882pmc: PMC7602525pubmed: 33076475google scholar: lookup
  30. Jones McVey R. An Ethnographic Account of the British Equestrian Virtue of Bravery, and Its Implications for Equine Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 14;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010188pmc: PMC7830721pubmed: 33466901google scholar: lookup
  31. Dogs Trust. The Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown Restrictions on Dogs & Dog Owners in the UK.. London, UK: 2020.

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Li C, Jin Y, Homapour E. A scientometric review of hotspots and emerging trends in sustainable business model. Heliyon 2023 Aug;9(8):e18446.
    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18446pubmed: 37560644google scholar: lookup
  2. Smith R, Furtado T, Brigden C, Pinchbeck G, Perkins E. A Qualitative Exploration of UK Leisure Horse Owners' Perceptions of Equine Wellbeing. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 26;12(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212937pubmed: 36359063google scholar: lookup
  3. McTigue FE, Mansbridge SC, Pyatt AZ. Equine Anthelmintic Resistance: Horse Owner and Yard Manager Perception of the Barriers Affecting Strategic Control Measures in England. Vet Sci 2022 Oct 11;9(10).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9100560pubmed: 36288173google scholar: lookup
  4. Ward A, Stephen K, Argo C, Watson C, Harris P, Neacsu M, Russell W, Grove-White D, Morrison P. The Human Aspect of Horse Care: How the COVID-19 Pandemic Impacted the Wellbeing of Equestrian Industry Stakeholders. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 22;11(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082163pubmed: 34438622google scholar: lookup
  5. White J, Sims R. Improving Equine Welfare through Human Habit Formation. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 21;11(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082156pubmed: 34438614google scholar: lookup
  6. Thompson JM, Kibler ML, Ivey JLZ. Risks and uncertainty associated with prices set by equine boarding facility owners. Transl Anim Sci 2025;9:txaf107.
    doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf107pubmed: 40901356google scholar: lookup
  7. Spence KL, Rosanowski SM, Slater J, Cardwell JM. 'I want to be the sort of owner that he wants me to be': Rationales for biosecurity implementation among British horse owners. Equine Vet J 2025 Jan;57(1):183-192.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14047pubmed: 38177092google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,383 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.