Analyze Diet
Theriogenology2013; 79(5); 735-743; doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.10.023

Equine preantral follicles obtained via the Biopsy Pick-Up method: histological evaluation and validation of a mechanical isolation technique.

Abstract: The aims of this study in mares were to: (1) compare preantral follicle parameters between in vitro Biopsy Pick-Up (BPU) and scalpel blade collection methods and between histological and mechanical isolation processing (experiment 1); (2) histologically evaluate preantral follicles (experiment 2); and (3) compare histological analysis with a previously established mechanical isolation technique using a tissue chopper (experiment 3) for ovarian cortical fragments obtained in vivo using a BPU instrument. In experiment 1, preantral follicles were analyzed (N = 220; 90% primordial and 10% primary). Proportions of primordial and primary follicles did not differ (P > 0.05) between tissue collection (BPU vs. scalpel blade dissection) or processing (mechanical isolation vs. histology) methods. Follicle viability and morphology rates were similar (P > 0.05) between tissue collection methods, but mechanical isolation produced more (P < 0.05) morphologically normal follicles than histology. For experiment 2, preantral follicles (N = 332) were analyzed and primordial and transitional (combined) follicles and oocytes were 36.3 ± 0.3 and 26.1 ± 0.3 μm in diameter, respectively, and primary follicles and oocytes averaged 42.9 ± 1.8 and 31.8 ± 2.1 μm. For experiment 3 (188 preantral follicles), within the same animals, the proportion of primordial versus primary follicles was higher (P 0.05) by processing methods. In conclusion, most parameters evaluated for preantral follicles were similar between histological and tissue chopper processing techniques; hence, mechanical isolation efficiently dissociated equine preantral follicles from the ovarian cortex. Therefore, the tissue chopper could be used to isolate large numbers of morphologically normal equine preantral follicles for cryopreservation and/or in vitro culture.
Publication Date: 2013-01-23 PubMed ID: 23352704DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.10.023Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Validation Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research focused on comparing methods for collecting preantral follicles from horses for scientific study. The research team explored the effectiveness and efficiency of the Biopsy Pick-Up (BPU) method, mechanical isolation and histological analysis in retrieving these follicles. The study concluded that mechanical isolation could be a viable method for isolating large numbers of morphologically normal horse preantral follicles for further study and preservation.

Comparison of Collection Methods and Analysis Techniques

  • The first experiment compared the Biopsy Pick-Up (BPU) and scalpel blade methods for collecting tissue. It also compared mechanical isolation and histological techniques for processing the collected tissues. No significant differences were found in the proportions of primordial and primary follicles between collection or processing methods based on analyzing 220 preantral follicles.
  • The experiment concluded that both tissue collection methods had similar rates of follicle viability and morphology. However, the mechanical isolation method produced more morphologically normal follicles than the histological process. This suggested that mechanical isolation might be more effective in producing follicles suitable for further study.

Examination of Preantral Follicles

  • In the second experiment, the team performed a histological evaluation on preantral follicles. The experiment used a larger sample size of 332 follicles and measured the diameter size of primordial and transitional follicles, as well as oocytes.
  • Primary follicles and their oocytes were also measured. This analysis provided the team with more information about the nature of the follicles they were studying.

Comparison of Histological Analysis and Tissue Chopping

  • For the third experiment, histological analysis and tissue chopper techniques were compared using 188 preantral follicles from the same animals. The proportion of primordial versus primary follicles was found to be higher for the histological method compared to the tissue chopper method.
  • This experiment also found that the number of follicles per mg of tissue was unaffected by the processing methods. Therefore, the study concluded that the mechanical isolation technique was effective in separating equine preantral follicles from the ovarian cortex, making it a viable technique for isolating large numbers of morphologically normal equine preantral follicles.

Implications of the Research

  • The research suggests that the tissue chopper mechanical isolation technique could be a useful tool in isolating large numbers of morphologically normal equine preantral follicles for cryopreservation and/or in vitro culture.
  • This technique will allow scientists to study and preserve follicles more effectively, possibly leading to breakthroughs in understanding equine reproductive biology.

Cite This Article

APA
Haag KT, Magalhães-Padilha DM, Fonseca GR, Wischral A, Gastal MO, King SS, Jones KL, Figueiredo JR, Gastal EL. (2013). Equine preantral follicles obtained via the Biopsy Pick-Up method: histological evaluation and validation of a mechanical isolation technique. Theriogenology, 79(5), 735-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.10.023

Publication

ISSN: 1879-3231
NlmUniqueID: 0421510
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 79
Issue: 5
Pages: 735-743
PII: S0093-691X(12)00607-3

Researcher Affiliations

Haag, K T
  • Department of Animal Science, Food and Nutrition, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA.
Magalhães-Padilha, D M
    Fonseca, G R
      Wischral, A
        Gastal, M O
          King, S S
            Jones, K L
              Figueiredo, J R
                Gastal, E L

                  MeSH Terms

                  • Animals
                  • Cryopreservation
                  • Female
                  • Horses
                  • Image-Guided Biopsy / methods
                  • Image-Guided Biopsy / veterinary
                  • Oocyte Retrieval / methods
                  • Oocyte Retrieval / veterinary
                  • Ovarian Follicle / anatomy & histology
                  • Ovarian Follicle / pathology
                  • Ovarian Follicle / surgery

                  Citations

                  This article has been cited 4 times.
                  1. Souza SS, Alves BG, Alves KA, Brandão FAS, Brito DCC, Gastal MO, Rodrigues APR, Figueireod JR, Teixeira DIA, Gastal EL. Heterotopic autotransplantation of ovarian tissue in a large animal model: Effects of cooling and VEGF.. PLoS One 2020;15(11):e0241442.
                    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241442pubmed: 33147235google scholar: lookup
                  2. Alves BG, Alves KA, Gastal GDA, Gastal MO, Figueiredo JR, Gastal EL. Spatial distribution of preantral follicles in the equine ovary.. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0198108.
                    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198108pubmed: 29897931google scholar: lookup
                  3. Alves KA, Alves BG, Gastal GD, de Tarso SG, Gastal MO, Figueiredo JR, Gambarini ML, Gastal EL. The Mare Model to Study the Effects of Ovarian Dynamics on Preantral Follicle Features.. PLoS One 2016;11(2):e0149693.
                    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149693pubmed: 26900687google scholar: lookup
                  4. Araújo VR, Gastal MO, Figueiredo JR, Gastal EL. In vitro culture of bovine preantral follicles: a review.. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014 Aug 13;12:78.
                    doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-78pubmed: 25117631google scholar: lookup