FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Evaluating Animal-Assisted Interventions: An Empirical Illus...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2019; 9(9); 645; doi: 10.3390/ani9090645

Evaluating Animal-Assisted Interventions: An Empirical Illustration of Differences between Outcome Measures.

Abstract: Multiple authors have called for strong empirical evaluations to strengthen the foundation of Animal-Assisted Interventions. Carefully choosing the outcome measures of these studies is important, as choosing the wrong outcomes may lead to a failure to detect effects. The current study therefore compares and contrasts the use of several outcome measures, to assess the effect of an equine-assisted intervention for a child with Autism Spectrum Disorder: (1) a semi-structured interview with both parents, specifically designed for children with cognitive disabilities, (2) a general screening instrument filled out by both parents separately, which can be used to assess children's psycho-social problems, and (3) systematic observations of social and communication skills during the equine-assisted sessions. All instruments indicated an improvement in the participant's social and communication skills. We found differences between the interview and questionnaires with regard to parents' perception of aggression regulation and interacting with peers. Differences with regard to parental reports and observations were found for play development and anxiety. The observations provided a detailed view of the child's development during the intervention, which yielded an interesting hypothesis in terms of the current dose-response discussion in AAI for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2019-09-03 PubMed ID: 31484309PubMed Central: PMC6770002DOI: 10.3390/ani9090645Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper aims to highlight the importance of choosing appropriate measures in evaluating the effectiveness of Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAIs), specifically in this study’s case, an equine-assisted intervention for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Different outcomes revealed differences in parents’ perception and observed behaviors pertaining to aggression regulation, interaction with peers, play development, and anxiety.

Objective and Methodology

  • The main goal of this research was to establish a strong empirical basis for studying Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAIs) such as equine-assisted therapies for children diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder and to emphasize the importance of appropriately selecting outcome measures.
  • The research was designed to measure the impact of AAIs on a child with autism using three different methods: a semi-structured interview with parents, a general screening questionnaire filled out by both parents separately, and systematic observations of the child during the equine-assisted therapy sessions.

Detailed Analysis and Findings

  • All three instruments used in the study indicated an improvement in the participant’s social and communication skills after the intervention.
  • There were observed differences between the parental interview and questionnaires regarding perceptions of the child’s ability to regulate aggression and interact with peers. These differences draw attention to the different insights gleaned from structured interviews compared to questionnaires, even when these assessments are gathered from the same source.
  • Discrepancies were also observed between parental reports and systematic observations regarding the child’s play development and anxiety levels. This underlines the importance of complementing parental reports with independent observations to provide a complete and objective picture of the child’s progress.
  • The systematic observations provided valuable insights into the child’s development during the course of the intervention. They generated significant data that could aid in understanding the dose-response relationships between AAIs and behavioral outcomes in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Conclusion and Implications

  • This study firmly establishes the need for carefully selecting outcome measures in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAIs). It shows that different methodologies can yield different perspectives and therefore, researchers should consider multiple tools when assessing the impacts of AAIs.
  • The differences in the outcomes of the various tools used also point towards the importance of merging various forms of input, such as parental reports and independent observations, to get a more holistic and reliable view of a child’s development.

Cite This Article

APA
van der Steen S, Heineman MMP, Ernst MJA. (2019). Evaluating Animal-Assisted Interventions: An Empirical Illustration of Differences between Outcome Measures. Animals (Basel), 9(9), 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090645

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 9
PII: 645

Researcher Affiliations

van der Steen, Steffie
  • Department of Pedagogical and Educational Sciences, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands. s.van.der.steen@rug.nl.
Heineman, Merel M P
  • Department of Pedagogical and Educational Sciences, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ernst, Marloes J A
  • Department of Psychology, Open University The Netherlands, Heerlen 6400, The Netherlands.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 52 references
  1. Jegatheesan B, Beetz A, Ormerod E, Johnson R, Fine A, Yamazaki K, Dudzik C, Garcia RM, Winkle M, Choi G. The IAHAIO Definitions for Animal Assisted Intervention and Guidelines for Wellnes of Animals Involved in AAI. .
  2. Nimer J, Lundahl B. Animal-assisted therapy: A meta-analysis. Anthrozoos 2007;20:225–238.
    doi: 10.2752/089279307X224773google scholar: lookup
  3. Kruger KA, Serpell JA. Animal-Assisted Interventions in Mental Health: Definitions and Theoretical Foundations. Handb. Anim. Ther. 2010:33–48.
    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381453-1.10003-0google scholar: lookup
  4. López-Cepero Borrego J, Rodríguez Franco L, Perea Mediavilla MA, Blanco Piñero N, Tejada Roldán A, Blanco Picabia A. Animal-assisted Interventions: Review of Current Status and Future Challenges. Int. J. Psychol. Psychol. Ther. 2014;14:85–101.
  5. Serpell J, McCune S, Gee N, Griffin JA. Current challenges to research on animal-assisted interventions. Appl. Dev. Sci. 2017;21:223–233.
    doi: 10.1080/10888691.2016.1262775google scholar: lookup
  6. O'Haire M. Research on animal-assisted intervention and autism spectrum disorder, 2012-2015.. Appl Dev Sci 2017;21(3):200-216.
    doi: 10.1080/10888691.2016.1243988pmc: PMC6510492pubmed: 31080343google scholar: lookup
  7. Johnson RA, Odendaal JS, Meadows RL. Animal-assisted interventions research: issues and answers.. West J Nurs Res 2002 Jun;24(4):422-40.
    doi: 10.1177/01945902024004009pubmed: 12035914google scholar: lookup
  8. O'Haire ME. Animal-assisted intervention for autism spectrum disorder: a systematic literature review.. J Autism Dev Disord 2013 Jul;43(7):1606-22.
    doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1707-5pubmed: 23124442google scholar: lookup
  9. Martin F, Farnum J. Animal-assisted therapy for children with pervasive developmental disorders.. West J Nurs Res 2002 Oct;24(6):657-70.
    doi: 10.1177/019394502320555403pubmed: 12365766google scholar: lookup
  10. Esposito L, Mccune S, Griffin JA, Maholmes V. Directions in human-animal interaction research: Child development, health, and therapeutic interventions. Child. Dev. Perspect. 2011;5:205–211.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00175.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  11. Redefer LA, Goodman JF. Brief report: pet-facilitated therapy with autistic children.. J Autism Dev Disord 1989 Sep;19(3):461-7.
    doi: 10.1007/BF02212943pubmed: 2793790google scholar: lookup
  12. Nathanson DE, De Castro D, Friend H, McMahon M. Effectiveness of short-term dolphin-assisted therapy for children with severe disabilities. Anthrozoos 1997;10:90–100.
    doi: 10.2752/089279397787001166google scholar: lookup
  13. Keino H, Funahashi A, Keino H, Miwa C, Hosokawa M, Hayashi Y, Kawakita K. Psycho-educational Horseback Riding to Facilitate Communication Ability of Children with Pervasive Developmental Disorders.. J Equine Sci 2009;20(4):79-88.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.20.79pmc: PMC4013963pubmed: 24833971google scholar: lookup
  14. Kršková L, Talarovičová A, Olexová L. Guinea pigs-the “small great” therapist for autistic children, or: Do guinea pigs have positive effects on autistic child social behavior?. Soc. Anim. 2010;18:139–151.
  15. Sams MJ, Fortney EV, Willenbring S. Occupational therapy incorporating animals for children with autism: A pilot investigation.. Am J Occup Ther 2006 May-Jun;60(3):268-74.
    doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.3.268pubmed: 16776394google scholar: lookup
  16. Holm MB, Baird JM, Kim YJ, Rajora KB, D'Silva D, Podolinsky L, Mazefsky C, Minshew N. Therapeutic horseback riding outcomes of parent-identified goals for children with autism spectrum disorder: an ABA' multiple case design examining dosing and generalization to the home and community.. J Autism Dev Disord 2014 Apr;44(4):937-47.
    doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1949-xpmc: PMC4136476pubmed: 24091469google scholar: lookup
  17. Breitenbach E, Stumpf E, Fersen LV, Ebert H. Dolphin-assisted therapy: Changes in interaction and communication between children with severe disabilities and their caregivers. Anthrozoos 2009;22:277–289.
    doi: 10.2752/175303709X457612google scholar: lookup
  18. Gabriels RL, Pan Z, Dechant B, Agnew JA, Brim N, Mesibov G. Randomized Controlled Trial of Therapeutic Horseback Riding in Children and Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder.. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2015 Jul;54(7):541-9.
    pmc: PMC4475278pubmed: 26088658doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.04.007google scholar: lookup
  19. Gabriels RL, Agnew JA, Holt KD, Shoffner A, Zhaoxing P, Ruzzano S, Clayton HG, Mesibov G. Pilot study measuring the effects of therapeutic horseback riding on school-age children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2012;6:578–588.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.09.007google scholar: lookup
  20. Ajzenman HF, Standeven JW, Shurtleff TL. Effect of hippotherapy on motor control, adaptive behaviors, and participation in children with autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study.. Am J Occup Ther 2013 Nov-Dec;67(6):653-63.
    doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.008383pubmed: 24195899google scholar: lookup
  21. Borgi M, Loliva D, Cerino S, Chiarotti F, Venerosi A, Bramini M, Nonnis E, Marcelli M, Vinti C, De Santis C, Bisacco F, Fagerlie M, Frascarelli M, Cirulli F. Effectiveness of a Standardized Equine-Assisted Therapy Program for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.. J Autism Dev Disord 2016 Jan;46(1):1-9.
    doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2530-6pubmed: 26210515google scholar: lookup
  22. Salgueiro E, Nunes L, Barros A, Maroco J, Salgueiro AI, Dos Santos ME. Effects of a dolphin interaction program on children with autism spectrum disorders: an exploratory research.. BMC Res Notes 2012 Apr 26;5:199.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-199pmc: PMC3468398pubmed: 22537536google scholar: lookup
  23. Steiner H, Kertesz Z. Effects of therapeutic horse riding on gait cycle parameters and some aspects of behavior of children with autism.. Acta Physiol Hung 2015 Sep;102(3):324-35.
    doi: 10.1556/036.102.2015.3.10pubmed: 26551748google scholar: lookup
  24. Bass MM, Duchowny CA, Llabre MM. The effect of therapeutic horseback riding on social functioning in children with autism.. J Autism Dev Disord 2009 Sep;39(9):1261-7.
    doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0734-3pubmed: 19350376google scholar: lookup
  25. Kern JK, Fletcher CL, Garver CR, Mehta JA, Grannemann BD, Knox KR, Richardson TA, Trivedi MH. Prospective trial of equine-assisted activities in autism spectrum disorder.. Altern Ther Health Med 2011 May-Jun;17(3):14-20.
    pubmed: 22164808
  26. Silva K, Correia R, Lima M, Magalhães A, de Sousa L. Can dogs prime autistic children for therapy? Evidence from a single case study.. J Altern Complement Med 2011 Jul;17(7):655-9.
    doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0436pubmed: 21689015google scholar: lookup
  27. Lanning BA, Baier ME, Ivey-Hatz J, Krenek N, Tubbs JD. Effects of equine assisted activities on autism spectrum disorder.. J Autism Dev Disord 2014 Aug;44(8):1897-907.
    doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2062-5pubmed: 24526337google scholar: lookup
  28. O'Haire ME, McKenzie SJ, Beck AM, Slaughter V. Animals may act as social buffers: Skin conductance arousal in children with autism spectrum disorder in a social context.. Dev Psychobiol 2015 Jul;57(5):584-95.
    doi: 10.1002/dev.21310pubmed: 25913902google scholar: lookup
  29. Tabares C, Vicente F, Sánchez S, Aparicio A, Alejo S, Cubero J. Quantification of hormonal changes by effects of hippotherapy in the autistic population. Neurochem. J. 2012;6:311–316.
    doi: 10.1134/S1819712412040125google scholar: lookup
  30. Gluud LL. Bias in clinical intervention research.. Am J Epidemiol 2006 Mar 15;163(6):493-501.
    doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj069pubmed: 16443796google scholar: lookup
  31. Van de Mortel TF. Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self- report research. Aust. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008;25:40–48.
  32. McClendon DT, Warren JS, Green KM, Burlingame GM, Eggett DL, McClendon RJ. Sensitivity to change of youth treatment outcome measures: a comparison of the CBCL, BASC-2, and Y-OQ.. J Clin Psychol 2011 Jan;67(1):111-25.
    doi: 10.1002/jclp.20746pubmed: 21046644google scholar: lookup
  33. Achenbach TM, McConaughy SH, Howell CT. Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity.. Psychol Bull 1987 Mar;101(2):213-32.
    doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213pubmed: 3562706google scholar: lookup
  34. Duhig AM, Renk K, Epstein MK, Phares V. Total Behavior Problems: A Meta-analysis. Psychol. Sci. 2000;1987:435–453.
  35. Grietens H, Onghena P, Prinzie P, Gadeyne E, Van Assche V, Ghesquière P, Hellinckx W. Comparison of Mothers’, Fathers’, and Teachers’ Reports on Problem Behavior in 5- to 6-Year-Old Children. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 2004;26:137–146.
    doi: 10.1023/B:JOBA.0000013661.14995.59google scholar: lookup
  36. Fogel A, Garvey A. Alive communication.. Infant Behav Dev 2007 May;30(2):251-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.02.007pubmed: 17376534google scholar: lookup
  37. Van Der Steen S, Steenbeek H, Van Dijk M, Van Geert P. A process approach to children’s understanding of scientific concepts: A longitudinal case study. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2014;30:84–91.
    doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.004google scholar: lookup
  38. Van Geert P, Van Dijk M. Ambiguity in child language: The problem of interobserver reliability in ambiguous observation data. First Lang. 2003;23:259–284.
    doi: 10.1177/01427237030233001google scholar: lookup
  39. Kazdin AE. Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA: 2011.
  40. Vandevelde S, Morisse F, Došen A, Poppe L, Jonckheere B, van Hove G, Maes B, van Loon J, Claes C. The scale for emotional development-revised (SED-R) for persons with intellectual disabilities and mental health problems: Development, description, and reliability. Int. J. Dev. Disabil. 2015;62:11–23.
    doi: 10.1179/2047387714Y.0000000062google scholar: lookup
  41. Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997 Jul;38(5):581-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.xpubmed: 9255702google scholar: lookup
  42. Association AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Publishing; Washington, DC, USA: 2013.
  43. Hurks PPM, Hendriksen J, Dek MSc JE, Kooij AP. Wppsi-Iii-Nl. Pearson Assessment and Information BV; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2012. pp. 1–16.
  44. Muris P, Meesters C, van den Berg F. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)--further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents.. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003 Jan;12(1):1-8.
    doi: 10.1007/s00787-003-0298-2pubmed: 12601558google scholar: lookup
  45. . New Trails Learning System ATHENA/Horse Boy Method—E-Book. [(accessed on 31 August 2019)]; Available online: https://ntls.co/equine-therapy.
  46. Noterdaeme M, Amorosa H, Mildenberger K, Sitter S, Minow F. Evaluation of attention problems in children with autism and children with a specific language disorder.. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001 Mar;10(1):58-66.
    doi: 10.1007/s007870170048pubmed: 11315537google scholar: lookup
  47. Parish-Plass N. Animal-assisted therapy with children suffering from insecure attachment due to abuse and neglect: a method to lower the risk of intergenerational transmission of abuse?. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008 Jan;13(1):7-30.
    doi: 10.1177/1359104507086338pubmed: 18411863google scholar: lookup
  48. Griffioen R, van der Steen S, Cox RFA, Verheggen T, Enders-Slegers MJ. Verbal Interactional Synchronization between Therapist and Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder during Dolphin Assisted Therapy: Five Case Studies.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Sep 24;9(10).
    pmc: PMC6826430pubmed: 31554243doi: 10.3390/ani9100716google scholar: lookup
  49. Julius R, Beetz A, Kotrschal K, Turner D, Uvnäs-Moberg K. Attachment to Pets: An. Integrative View of Human–Animal Relationships with Implications for Therapeutic Practice. Hogrefe Publishing; Boston, MA, USA: 2013.
  50. Verheggen T, Enders-Slegers MJ, Eshuis J. Enactive Anthrozolgy: Toward an integrative theoretical model for understanding the therapeutic relationships between humans and animals. Hum. Anim. Interact. Bull. 2017;5:13–35.
  51. Berg EL, Causey A. The life-changing power of the horse: Equine-assisted activities and therapies in the USA. Anim. Front. 2014;4:72–75.
    doi: 10.2527/af.2014-0025google scholar: lookup
  52. Hallberg L. The Clinical Practice of Equine—Assisted Therapy: Including Horses in Human Healthcare. Routledge; New York, NY, USA: 2017.

Citations

This article has been cited 10 times.
  1. Nieforth LO, Schwichtenberg AJ, O'Haire ME. Animal-Assisted Interventions for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 2016 to 2020. Rev J Autism Dev Disord 2023 Jun;10(2):255-280.
    doi: 10.1007/s40489-021-00291-6pubmed: 37313251google scholar: lookup
  2. Kemeny B, Burk S, Hutchins D, Gramlich C. Therapeutic Riding or Mindfulness: Comparative Effectiveness of Two Recreational Therapy Interventions for Adolescents with Autism. J Autism Dev Disord 2022 Jun;52(6):2438-2462.
    doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05136-zpubmed: 34131850google scholar: lookup
  3. Fine AH, Beck AM, Ng Z. The State of Animal-Assisted Interventions: Addressing the Contemporary Issues that will Shape the Future. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019 Oct 18;16(20).
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203997pubmed: 31635430google scholar: lookup
  4. Tsapanou A, Bouka A, Papadopoulou A, Vamvatsikou C, Mikrouli D, Theofila E, Dionysopoulou K, Kortseli K, Lytaki P, Spyridonidi TM, Plotas P. Application of Artificial Intelligence Tools for Social and Psychological Enhancement of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci 2025 Dec 30;16(1).
    doi: 10.3390/brainsci16010056pubmed: 41594778google scholar: lookup
  5. Wong WHS, Chen C, Tso A, So HK, Wong JPY, Tinsley H, Chung CHY, Luk RKW, Ip P. Dog-assisted therapy on Hong Kong children with autism spectrum disorder: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr 2026 Jan 9;185(1):64.
    doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06720-6pubmed: 41511681google scholar: lookup
  6. González-Sala F, Llopiz-Guerra K, Ferri A, Martí-Vilar M. Parents' Perspectives on the Benefits of Animal-Assisted Intervention: A Systematic Review. Behav Sci (Basel) 2025 Dec 2;15(12).
    doi: 10.3390/bs15121663pubmed: 41464006google scholar: lookup
  7. Hong L, Shen X, Hui TK, Luk RK, So HK, Wong WH. Developing a measurement tool for assessing animal-assisted activity effectiveness on children with special educational needs' socialization: A pilot study. SAGE Open Med 2025;13:20503121251363015.
    doi: 10.1177/20503121251363015pubmed: 40862252google scholar: lookup
  8. Giuliano VO, Sacchettino L, Rusu AS, Ciccarelli D, Gazzano V, de Cesare M, Visone M, Mizzoni V, Napolitano F, d'Angelo D. Well-Being Indicators in Autistic Children and Therapy Dogs During a Group Intervention: A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 10;15(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15142032pubmed: 40723495google scholar: lookup
  9. Van Der Steen S, Kamphorst E, Griffioen RE. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of dog-assisted versus robot dog-assisted therapy for children with autism or Down syndrome. PLoS One 2025;20(3):e0319939.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319939pubmed: 40106503google scholar: lookup
  10. Chan HW, Hsu LSJ, Shum KKM. Exploring the Human-Animal Interaction (HAI) for Children with ASD Across Countries: A Systematic Review. J Autism Dev Disord 2025 Mar 3;.
    doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06745-8pubmed: 40029503google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.