Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2025; doi: 10.1002/evj.70143

Evaluation of a nutraceutical for prevention of equine ulcer recurrence.

Abstract: The number of horses with equine squamous gastric disease (ESGD) and equine gastric glandular disease (EGGD) recurrence when pharmacological treatment is discontinued is high. Objective: To examine if a commercially available nutraceutical compound containing lecithin, pectin, and meadowsweet could prevent recurrence of both ESGD and EGGD after omeprazole treatment, evaluated by repeated gastroscopic examinations and saliva biomarkers. Methods: Blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Methods: Thirty horses of mixed breeds and sex with a recent diagnosis and treatment of both ESGD and EGGD were included and randomly assigned to a placebo or a nutraceutical group. The horses received 10 mL per 100 kg bodyweight (bwt) of either nutraceutical or placebo orally for the 4-8-week duration of the study and were kept in their home environment and trained as normal. Gastroscopic grading of ESGD and EGGD and saliva were obtained at the initial diagnosis, as well as before and after the trial. Salivary biomarkers were measured by automated chemistry analysers using commercial kits. Due to the non-normal distribution of data, Friedman tests with Wilcoxon post hoc tests were applied to assess changes over time within groups, Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to evaluate difference between groups. Results: Regardless of nutraceutical or placebo assignment, only five horses remained ulcer free after the trial. The nutraceutical was not found to be better than placebo for preventing gastric disease recurrence when evaluated by gastroscopy scores. At the time of the last gastroscopy, the nutraceutical group had lower salivary ADA and higher bicarbonate concentrations compared to the placebo group. Conclusions: Salivary biomarkers need further validation. Conclusions: Although addition of the nutraceutical did not have a significant effect in preventing ESGD or EGGD recurrence, it produced changes in salivary biomarkers suggesting a potential improvement in gastric mucosal health.
Publication Date: 2025-12-30 PubMed ID: 41470044DOI: 10.1002/evj.70143Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Objective Overview

  • This study evaluated whether a nutraceutical containing lecithin, pectin, and meadowsweet could prevent the recurrence of equine gastric ulcers after standard omeprazole treatment.
  • The research involved a controlled clinical trial comparing the nutraceutical to a placebo, with outcomes measured via gastroscopic examination and saliva biomarkers.

Background

  • Equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) comprises two types: equine squamous gastric disease (ESGD) and equine glandular gastric disease (EGGD).
  • Recurrence rates for gastric ulcers in horses after stopping pharmacological treatments like omeprazole are high, creating a need for effective preventive options.
  • Nutraceuticals—natural compounds with potential health benefits—are being explored for ulcer prevention.
  • The studied nutraceutical combines lecithin (a component known for enhancing mucosal protection), pectin (a soluble fiber with protective properties), and meadowsweet (an herb with anti-inflammatory effects).

Study Design and Methods

  • A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled 30 horses diagnosed with both ESGD and EGGD and recently treated with omeprazole.
  • Horses were randomly assigned to receive either the nutraceutical or a placebo, dosed at 10 mL per 100 kg body weight, administered orally daily for 4 to 8 weeks.
  • The horses remained in their home environment and continued their normal training routines during the trial.
  • Assessments were performed via gastroscopy at three points: initial diagnosis, before treatment start, and after the trial period, to evaluate ulcer status and grades.
  • Saliva samples were collected concurrently for analysis of biomarkers using automated chemistry analyzers and commercial assay kits.
  • Statistical analysis included nonparametric methods due to data distribution: Friedman tests with Wilcoxon post hoc for within-group changes over time, and Mann-Whitney U tests for between-group comparisons.

Key Findings

  • Only five horses remained free of ulcers after the study period regardless of whether they received the nutraceutical or placebo, indicating high recurrence.
  • Gastroscopic ulcer scores did not show significant differences between the nutraceutical and placebo groups, suggesting the nutraceutical did not effectively prevent ulcer recurrence.
  • However, at the final gastroscopy, the nutraceutical group exhibited significantly lower salivary adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels and higher bicarbonate concentrations compared to the placebo group.
  • These biomarker changes may indicate some positive effect of the nutraceutical on gastric mucosal health or inflammatory status, though this did not translate into reduced ulcer recurrence under the conditions studied.

Interpretation and Conclusions

  • The study confirms the challenge in preventing ESGD and EGGD recurrence in horses once pharmacologic treatment is stopped.
  • The tested nutraceutical did not significantly reduce recurrence rates based on objective gastroscopy scores, indicating limited clinical benefit in this context.
  • The observed changes in salivary biomarkers (ADA and bicarbonate) suggest potential subtle physiological effects on gastric mucosa or local inflammation that warrant further research and validation.
  • Salivary biomarkers themselves require additional validation to confirm their usefulness and accuracy as non-invasive indicators of gastric health in horses.
  • Future studies might explore different dosages, combinations, durations, or larger sample sizes to better understand the potential role of nutraceuticals in gastroprotection.

Significance for Equine Health Management

  • Understanding and managing the recurrence of gastric ulcers is critical due to the detrimental impacts on horse welfare and performance.
  • While nutraceuticals are attractive as natural alternatives, this study demonstrates that not all such products immediately translate into effective ulcer prevention.
  • The research emphasizes the importance of rigorous clinical trials and objective outcome measures when evaluating supplements in veterinary medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
Hansen S, Tecles F, Cerón JJ, From C, Carstensen H, Muñoz-Prieto A. (2025). Evaluation of a nutraceutical for prevention of equine ulcer recurrence. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1002/evj.70143

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Hansen, Sanni
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.
Tecles, Fernando
  • Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (Interlab-UMU), Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Cerón, José Joaquín
  • Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (Interlab-UMU), Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
From, Cecilie
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.
Carstensen, Helena
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.
Muñoz-Prieto, Alberto
  • Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (Interlab-UMU), Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

Grant Funding

  • Statera horsecare

References

This article includes 42 references
  1. Vokes J, Lovett A, Sykes B. Equine gastric ulcer syndrome: an update on current knowledge.. Animals 2023;13(7):1261.
  2. van den Boom R. Equine gastric ulcer syndrome in adult horses.. Vet J 2022;283‐284:105830.
  3. Ward S, Sykes BW, Brown H, Bishop A, Penaluna LA. A comparison of the prevalence of gastric ulceration in feral and domesticated horses in the UK.. Equine Vet Educ 2015;27:655–657.
  4. Pedersen SK, Cribb AE, Windeyer MC, Read EK, French D, Banse HE. Risk factors for equine glandular and squamous gastric disease in show jumping warmbloods.. Equine Vet J 2018;50:747–751.
  5. Sykes B, Lovett A. Can all behavioral problems be blamed on equine gastric ulcer syndrome?. Animals 2025;15:306.
  6. Perron B, Ali ABA, Svagerko P, Vernon K. The influence of severity of gastric ulceration on horse behavior and heart rate variability.. J Vet Behav 2023;59:25–29.
  7. Sykes BW, Hewetson M, Hepburn RJ, Luthersson N, Tamzali Y. European college of equine internal medicine consensus statement‐equine gastric ulcer syndrome in adult horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2015;29:1288–1299.
  8. Sykes BW, Sykes KM, Hallowell GD. A comparison of three doses of omeprazole in the treatment of equine gastric ulcer syndrome: a blinded, randomised, dose‐response clinical trial.. Equine Vet J 2015;47:285–290.
  9. Andrews FM, Sifferman RL, Bernard W, Hughes FE, Holste JE, Daurio CP. Efficacy of omeprazole paste in the treatment and prevention of gastric ulcers in horses.. Equine Vet J 1999;31(S29):81–86.
  10. Reese RE, Andrews FM. Nutrition and dietary management of equine gastric ulcer syndrome.. Vet Clin North Am 2009;25:79–92. vi‐vii.
  11. Mason LV, Moroney JR, Mason RJ. Prophylactic therapy with omeprazole for prevention of equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) in horses in active training: A meta‐analysis.. Equine Vet J 2019;51:11–19.
  12. Shan R, Steel C, Sykes B. The effects of two different withholding periods of omeprazole on the recurrence of equine gastric ulcer syndrome in thoroughbred racehorses.. In: European College of Veterinary Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pula, Croatia; 2022.
  13. Shan R, Steel CM, Sykes B. The impact of two recommended withholding periods for omeprazole and the use of a nutraceutical supplement on recurrence of equine gastric ulcer syndrome in thoroughbred racehorses.. Animals 2023;13(11):1823.
  14. Crystal J, Hoffman BS, Lais R. Survey of feeding practices, supplement use, and knowledge of equine nutrition among a subpopulation of horse owners in New England.. J Equine Vet Sci 2009;29:719–726.
  15. Kranenburg LC, van der Poel SH, Warmelink TS, van Doorn DA, van den Boom R. Changes in management lead to improvement and healing of equine squamous gastric disease.. Animals (Basel) 2023;13(9):1498.
  16. Luthersson N, Bolger C, Fores P, Barfoot C, Nelson S, Parkin T. Effect of changing diet on gastric ulceration in exercising horses and ponies after cessation of omeprazole treatment. J Equine Vet Sci 2019;83:102742.
  17. Murray MJ, Grady TC. The effect of a pectin‐lecithin complex on prevention of gastric mucosal lesions induced by feed deprivation in ponies. Equine Vet J 2002;34:195–198.
  18. Venner M, Lauffs S, Deegen E. Treatment of gastric lesions in horses with pectin‐lecithin complex. Equine Vet J 1999;31(S29):91–96.
  19. Sanz MG, Viljoen A, Saulez MN, Olorunju S, Andrews FM. Efficacy of a pectin‐lecithin complex for treatment and prevention of gastric ulcers in horses. Vet Rec 2014;175:147.
  20. Woodward MC, Huff NK, Garza F Jr, Keowen ML, Kearney MT, Andrews FM. Effect of pectin, lecithin, and antacid feed supplements (Egusin(R)) on gastric ulcer scores, gastric fluid pH and blood gas values in horses. BMC Vet Res 2014;10(S1):S4.
  21. Lo Feudo CM, Stucchi L, Conturba B, Alberti E, Zucca E, Ferrucci F. Effects of a nutraceutical supplement in the management of mild equine squamous gastric disease in endurance horses. Vet Rec 2021;189:e942.
  22. Andrews FM, Camacho‐Luna P, Loftin PG, Gaymon G, Garza F Jr, Keowen ML. Effect of a pelleted supplement fed during and after omeprazole treatment on nonglandular gastric ulcer scores and gastric juice pH in horses. Equine Vet Educ 2016;28:196–202.
  23. Kidd PM. Phospholipids: versatile nutraceuticals for functional foods. Functional Foods Nutraceutical 2002;12.
  24. Ethell MT, Hodgson DR, Hills BA. Evidence for surfactant contributing to the gastric mucosal barrier of the horse. Equine Vet J 2000;32(6):470–474.
  25. Samardžić S, Arsenijević J, Božić D, Milenković M, Tešević V, Maksimović Z. Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory and gastroprotective activity of Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim. and Filipendula vulgaris Moench. J Ethnopharmacol 2018;213:132–137.
  26. Munoz‐Prieto A, Ceron JJ, Rubio CP, Contreras‐Aguilar MD, Pardo‐Marín L, de la Ayala‐ Peña I. Evaluation of a comprehensive profile of salivary analytes for the diagnosis of the equine gastric ulcer syndrome. Animals (Basel) 2022;12(23):3261.
  27. Wang X, Ji X. Sample size estimation in clinical research: from randomized controlled trials to observational studies. Chest 2020;158:S12–S20.
  28. Sykes BW, Sykes KM, Hallowell GD. Efficacy of a combination of a unique pectin‐lecithin complex (Apolectol®), live yeast and magnesium hydroxide in the prevention of egus and faecal acidosis in thoroughbred racehorses: a randomised, blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial. Equine Vet J 2013;45:13.
  29. Wise JC, Wilkes EJA, Raidal SL, Xie G, Crosby DE, Hale JN. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability for 2 grading systems for gastric ulcer syndrome in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2021;35:571–579.
  30. Munoz‐Prieto A, Llamas‐Amor E, Contreras‐Aguilar MD, Ayala I, Martín Cuervo M, Ceron JJ. Automated spectrophotometric assays for the measurement of ammonia and bicarbonate in saliva of horses: analytical validation and changes in equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS). Metabolites 2024;14(3):147.
  31. McClure SR, Carithers DS, Gross SJ, Murray MJ. Gastric ulcer development in horses in a simulated show or training environment. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:775–777.
  32. Clark B, Steel C, Vokes J, Shan JR, Gedye K, Lovett A. Evaluation of the effects of medium‐term (57‐day) omeprazole administration and of omeprazole discontinuation on serum gastrin and serum chromogranin A concentrations in the horse. J Vet Intern Med 2023;37:1537–1543.
  33. Helgadottir H, Bjornsson ES. Problems associated with deprescribing of proton pump inhibitors. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20(21):5469.
  34. Sykes BW. A free ride: is long‐term omeprazole therapy safe and effective?. Equine Vet Educ 2021;33:556–560.
  35. Pagan JD, Petroski‐Rose L, Mann A, Hauss A. Omeprazole reduces calcium digestibility in thoroughbred horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;86:102851.
  36. Sykes BW, Bowen M, Habershon‐Butcher JL, Green M, Hallowell GD. Management factors and clinical implications of glandular and squamous gastric disease in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2019;33:233–240.
  37. Luthersson N, Thornorgrimsdottir UY, Harris PA. Risk factors for equine gastric ulcer syndrome incidence in adult icelandic riding horses. Animals (Basel) 2023;13(22):3512.
  38. Varley G, Bowen IM, Habershon‐Butcher JL, Nicholls V, Hallowell GD. Misoprostol is superior to combined omeprazole‐sucralfate for the treatment of equine gastric glandular disease. Equine Vet J 2019;51:575–580.
  39. Pratt SL, Bowen M, Hallowell GH, Shipman E, Bailey J, Redpath A. Does lesion type or severity predict outcome of therapy for horses with equine glandular gastric disease? ‐ A retrospective study. Vet Med Sci 2023;9:150–157.
  40. Gough S, Hallowell G, Rendle D. Evaluation of the treatment of equine glandular gastric disease with either long‐acting‐injectable or oral omeprazole. Vet Med Sci 2022;8:561–567.
  41. Munoz‐Prieto A, Llamas‐Amor E, Ceron JJ, Hansen S. Changes in saliva analytes in equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) after treatment: a pilot study. Res Vet Sci 2024;176:105346.
  42. Andrews FM, Reinemeyer CR, McCracken MD, Blackford JT, Nadeau JA, Saabye L. Comparison of endoscopic, necropsy and histology scoring of equine gastric ulcers. Equine Vet J 2002;34:475–478.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.