Analyze Diet

Evaluation of a portable clinical analyzer in a veterinary hospital setting.

Abstract: Evaluation of a portable clinical analyzer for determination of blood gas tensions, electrolyte and glucose concentrations, and Hct in a hospital setting. Methods: Prospective study. Methods: 50 dogs, 50 cats, and 28 horses, all clinically normal. Methods: Blood samples were analyzed on a portable clinical analyzer to determine concentrations of sodium, potassium, chloride, BUN, glucose, and ionized calcium and values of Hct, pH, PCO2, and PO2. Values obtained were compared with those obtained from the same blood samples, using a standard automatic analyzer (serum sodium, potassium, chloride, BUN, and glucose concentrations), a cell counter (Hct), a blood gas analyzer (pH, PCO2, PO2), and a calcium-pH analyzer (ionized calcium). Bias (mean difference between values obtained on the same sample by different methods) and variability (SD of differences) were determined for all values. Data were also subjected to Deming regression analysis. Results: Correlation coefficients were > 0.90 for all values except potassium and ionized calcium concentrations. Bias and variability were within clinically acceptable limits (+/- 2 SD) for all but potassium, ionized calcium, and glucose concentrations and Hct. Species-dependent variability was observed for glucose concentration and Hct. Conclusions: Most differences between values obtained with the portable clinical analyzer and standard clinical laboratory systems could be accounted for by differences in type of sample tested (blood vs serum). The portable clinical analyzer is suitable for point-of-care analysis in critical care situations and for routine blood biochemical analysis when extensive laboratory support is unavailable.
Publication Date: 1998-09-10 PubMed ID: 9731265
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research assesses the accuracy and reliability of a portable clinical analyzer for blood testing in a veterinary hospital. The researchers compared the results obtained from this device to those of standard laboratory instruments and found that the portable analyzer generally produced comparable results, suggesting it’s a potentially valuable tool for point-of-care testing and for settings where extended laboratory support might be lacking.

Methods and Subjects

  • The research was a prospective study in which 50 dogs, 50 cats, and 28 horses were tested. All animals were in a clinically normal state at the time of testing.
  • Blood samples from these animals were analyzed using a portable clinical analyzer to determine levels of several substances and elements including sodium, potassium, chloride, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), glucose, ionized calcium. Hematocrit (Hct), pH, carbon dioxide (PCO2), and oxygen (PO2) were also measured.
  • The results of these tests were then compared against those obtained from the same samples but analyzed using standard laboratory instruments: an automatic analyzer for measuring serum substances, a cell counter for Hct, a blood gas analyzer, and a calcium-pH analyzer.

Results and Findings

  • Findings from the portable clinical analyzer showed a high correlation (> 0.90) to standard lab results for everything except potassium and ionized calcium levels.
  • The bias, which refers to the mean difference between values obtained by different methods, and variability (standard deviation of differences) were found to be within clinically acceptable limits for all factors except for potassium, ionized calcium, and glucose concentrations, as well as Hct.
  • Researchers observed some degree of species-dependent variability for glucose concentration and Hct values, indicating that these may be influenced by different animal species.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The analysis found that most differences between the portable analyzer and standard lab systems were caused by the type of sample tested (blood vs. serum).
  • Given these findings, the researchers concluded that the portable clinical analyzer could be a suitable tool for point-of-care analysis in acute care situations or during routine blood biochemical analysis when extensive laboratory support is not available.

Cite This Article

APA
Grosenbaugh DA, Gadawski JE, Muir WW. (1998). Evaluation of a portable clinical analyzer in a veterinary hospital setting. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 213(5), 691-694.

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 213
Issue: 5
Pages: 691-694

Researcher Affiliations

Grosenbaugh, D A
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.
Gadawski, J E
    Muir, W W

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Bias
      • Blood Chemical Analysis / instrumentation
      • Blood Chemical Analysis / veterinary
      • Blood Gas Analysis / instrumentation
      • Blood Gas Analysis / veterinary
      • Blood Glucose / analysis
      • Cats / blood
      • Dogs / blood
      • Electrolytes / blood
      • Evaluation Studies as Topic
      • Hematocrit / instrumentation
      • Hematocrit / veterinary
      • Horses / blood
      • Point-of-Care Systems
      • Prospective Studies
      • Reference Values

      Citations

      This article has been cited 6 times.
      1. Kirsch K, Sandersen C. Traditional and quantitative analysis of acid-base and electrolyte imbalances in horses competing in cross-country competitions at 2-star to 5-star level.. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Mar;34(2):909-921.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.15708pubmed: 31985090google scholar: lookup
      2. Yildirim E, Karapinar T, Hayirli A. Reliability of the i-STAT for the determination of blood electrolyte (K+, Na+, and CI-) concentrations in cattle.. J Vet Intern Med 2015 Jan;29(1):388-94.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.12526pubmed: 25619525google scholar: lookup
      3. Jensen JA, Brice AK, Bagel JH, Mexas AM, Yoon SY, Wolfe JH. Hypervitaminosis D in guinea pigs with α-mannosidosis.. Comp Med 2013 Apr;63(2):156-62.
        pubmed: 23582422
      4. Zaldivar-Lopez S, Chisnell HK, Couto CG, Westendorf-Stingle N, Marin LM, Iazbik MC, Cooper ES, Wellman ML, Muir Iii WW. Blood gas analysis and cooximetry in retired racing Greyhounds.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2011 Feb;21(1):24-8.
      5. Snider CL, Dick EJ Jr, McGlasson DL, Robbins MC, Sholund RL, Bommineni YR, Hubbard GB. Evaluation of four hematology and a chemistry portable benchtop analyzers using non-human primate blood.. J Med Primatol 2009 Dec;38(6):390-6.
      6. Glaus TM, Hässig M, Baumgartner C, Reusch CE. Pulmonary hypertension induced in dogs by hypoxia at different high-altitude levels.. Vet Res Commun 2003 Dec;27(8):661-70.
        doi: 10.1023/a:1027380614534pubmed: 14672455google scholar: lookup