FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Rec Open / Evaluation of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device ac...
Veterinary record open2020; 7(1); e000441; doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2020-000441

Evaluation of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device accuracy in field and in hospital conditions in horses.

Abstract: Due to compactness and cheapness, smartphone ECG (sECG) could be very useful to equine practitioners. However, previous studies have evaluated the accuracy of sECG in hospitalised horses only. Different conditions in the field could influence the accuracy of the device. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of sECG in field and in hospital conditions. Methods: This is a prospective study. Paired standard base-apex ECG (stECG) and sECG were recorded in hospitalised horses and in subjects examined in field conditions. ECGs were analysed for heart rate and rhythm, presence/type of arrhythmias, presence/duration of artefacts, electrocardiographic waves and interval parameters by a blinded clinician. Statistical analysis evaluated the agreement between stECG and sECG and the differences in the prevalence of artefact in field and hospital conditions. Results: Nineteen (hospital) and 40 (field) paired ECGs were analysed. Agreement between stECG and sECG was found for heart rate and rhythm, evaluation of atrioventricular block and premature complexes, P wave and PQ interval duration, and QRS complex duration and polarity. No differences were found between artefacts recorded in hospital and in field conditions. Conclusions: sECG is a feasible tool for evaluation of rhythm in horses and is as accurate in field as in ambulatory conditions.
© British Veterinary Association 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-12-21 PubMed ID: 33381302PubMed Central: PMC7754639DOI: 10.1136/vetreco-2020-000441Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research evaluates the accuracy of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram (ECG) device for monitoring horse heart conditions both in the hospital and in the field. This research is significant as it tests the viability of the solution in varied situations which could be helpful due to the affordability and portability of the smartphone ECG.

Purpose

  • The study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of a smartphone-based ECG device in differing conditions – hospital and field scenarios. The authors considered it essential given the convenience, cost-effectiveness and portability of the device. Traditional studies have only evaluated the effectiveness in hospitalised conditions which may not match real-world situations.

Methods

  • This study was done in a prospective manner. The authors recorded both the standard base-apex ECG and the smartphone ECG for both hospitalised horses and those in the field.
  • The ECGs were analysed for heart rate, rhythm, arrhythmia presence and type, artefacts presence/duration, and electrocardiographic waves with interval parameters by a clinician blinded to the devices used.
  • The researchers then performed a statistical analysis to evaluate the agreement between both types of ECGs and to find out any differences in the prevalence of artefacts in hospital and field conditions.

Results

  • Nineteen ECG pairs from the hospital and forty from field conditions were analysed.
  • Results indicated good agreement between the standard ECG and the smartphone-based ECG in terms of heart rate, rhythm, evaluation of atrioventricular block and premature complexes, and the duration and polarity of the P wave, PQ interval and QRS complex.
  • The prevalence of artefacts, or poor-quality data, was found to be consistent between hospital and field conditions, indicating that the device performs well in different settings.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that the smartphone-based ECG is an effective tool for evaluating heart rhythm in horses and found its accuracy level to be comparable in both hospitalised and field conditions.

Significance

  • The research showcases that the smartphone-based ECG device can potentially be used widely by equine practitioners considering its cost-effectiveness and ease of use. It performs well in diverse conditions, which means it can aid clinicians in various scenarios without compromising on the accuracy.

Cite This Article

APA
Alberti E, Stucchi L, Pesce V, Stancari G, Ferro E, Ferrucci F, Zucca E. (2020). Evaluation of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device accuracy in field and in hospital conditions in horses. Vet Rec Open, 7(1), e000441. https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2020-000441

Publication

Veterinary record open
ISSN: 2052-6113
NlmUniqueID: 101653671
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 7
Issue: 1
Pages: e000441
PII: e000441

Researcher Affiliations

Alberti, Elena
  • Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.
Stucchi, Luca
  • Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.
Pesce, Valeria
  • Veterinary practitioner, Genova, Italy.
Stancari, Giovanni
  • Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.
Ferro, Elisabetta
  • Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.
Ferrucci, Francesco
  • Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.
Zucca, Enrica
  • Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

This article includes 22 references
  1. Bowen MI. Ambulatory electrocardiography and hear rate variability : Marr CM, Bowen MI, Cardiology of the horse. 2nd edn London: Saunders Elsevier, 2010: 127–37.
  2. Patteson M. Diagnostic aids in equine cardiology : Patteson M, Equine cardiology. Oxford: Blackweel Science, 1996: 70–115.
  3. Saxon LA. Ubiquitous wireless ECG recording: a powerful tool physicians should embrace.. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2013 Apr;24(4):480-3.
    doi: 10.1111/jce.12097pubmed: 23421574google scholar: lookup
  4. Vezzosi T, Sgorbini M, Bonelli F. Evaluation of a smartphone electrocardiograph in healthy horses: comparison with standard base-apex electrocardiography. J Equine Vet Sci 2018;67:61–5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.03.006google scholar: lookup
  5. Smith J, Ward J, Urbano T. Use of AliveCor heart monitor for heart rate and rhythm evaluation in dairy water buffalo calves (bubalis bubalis). JDVAR 2016;4:2–5.
    doi: 10.15406/jdvar.2016.04.00113google scholar: lookup
  6. Bonelli F, Vezzosi T, Meylan M, Nocera I, Ferrulli V, Buralli C, Meucci V, Tognetti R. Comparison of smartphone-based and standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy dairy cows.. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Mar;33(2):981-986.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15396pmc: PMC6430901pubmed: 30592089google scholar: lookup
  7. Vezzosi T, Buralli C, Marchesotti F, Porporato F, Tognetti R, Zini E, Domenech O. Diagnostic accuracy of a smartphone electrocardiograph in dogs: Comparison with standard 6-lead electrocardiography.. Vet J 2016 Oct;216:33-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.06.013pubmed: 27687923google scholar: lookup
  8. Kraus MS, Gelzer AR, Rishniw M. Detection of heart rate and rhythm with a smartphone-based electrocardiograph versus a reference standard electrocardiograph in dogs and cats.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2016 Jul 15;249(2):189-94.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.249.2.189pubmed: 27379594google scholar: lookup
  9. Vezzosi T, Tognetti R, Buralli C, Marchesotti F, Patata V, Zini E, Domenech O. Home monitoring of heart rate and heart rhythm with a smartphone-based ECG in dogs.. Vet Rec 2019 Jan 19;184(3):96.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.104917pubmed: 30559174google scholar: lookup
  10. Gunther-Harrington CT, Arthur R, Estell K, Martinez Lopez B, Sinnott A, Ontiveros E, Varga A, Stern JA. Prospective pre- and post-race evaluation of biochemical, electrophysiologic, and echocardiographic indices in 30 racing thoroughbred horses that received furosemide.. BMC Vet Res 2018 Jan 18;14(1):18.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1336-0pmc: PMC5774161pubmed: 29347921google scholar: lookup
  11. Gallant LR, Jacob SI, Tadros EM. Rapid screening for cardiac arrhythmias in competition draft horses. Comparative Exercise Physiology 2019;15:291–8.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP190029google scholar: lookup
  12. Brložnik M, Petric AD, Kos VK. Wireless body sensor for electrocardiographic monitoring in equine medicine. Proceedings of the 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) 20-24 May 2019. Opatija, Croatia, 2019: 279–83.
  13. Kraus MS, Rishniw M, Divers TJ, Reef VB, Gelzer AR. Utility and accuracy of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device as compared to a standard base-apex electrocardiogram in the horse.. Res Vet Sci 2019 Aug;125:141-147.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.05.018pubmed: 31228737google scholar: lookup
  14. Kronfeld DS. Clinical assessment of nutritional status of the horse : Watson TD, Metabolic and endocrine problems of the horse. London: Saunders, 1998: 84–217.
  15. Reef VB, Marr CM. Dysrhythmias: assessment and medical management : Marr CM, Bowen MI, Cardiology of the horse. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Saunders Elsevier, 2010: 159–78.
  16. Patteson M. Cardiac arrhythmias : Patteson M, Equine cardiology. 2nd edn Iowa State: Blackweel Science, 1996: 172–205.
  17. van Loon G. Cardiac Arrhythmias in Horses.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2019 Apr;35(1):85-102.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2018.12.004pubmed: 30871832google scholar: lookup
  18. Verheyen T, Decloedt A, De Clercq D. Electrocardiography in horses – Part 2: how to read the equine ECG. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift 2010;79:337–44.
  19. Buhl R, Petersen EE, Lindholm M. Cardiac arrhythmias in Standardbreds during and after racing—possible association between heart size, valvular regurgitations, and arrhythmias. J Equine Vet Sci 2013;33:590–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.09.009google scholar: lookup
  20. Nguyen HH, Van Hare GF, Rudokas M, Bowman T, Silva JN. SPEAR Trial: Smartphone Pediatric ElectrocARdiogram Trial.. PLoS One 2015;10(8):e0136256.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136256pmc: PMC4546652pubmed: 26295569google scholar: lookup
  21. Tarakji KG, Wazni OM, Callahan T, Kanj M, Hakim AH, Wolski K, Wilkoff BL, Saliba W, Lindsay BD. Using a novel wireless system for monitoring patients after the atrial fibrillation ablation procedure: the iTransmit study.. Heart Rhythm 2015 Mar;12(3):554-559.
    doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.11.015pubmed: 25460854google scholar: lookup
  22. Chan NY, Choy CC. Screening for atrial fibrillation in 13 122 Hong Kong citizens with smartphone electrocardiogram.. Heart 2017 Jan 1;103(1):24-31.
    doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309993pubmed: 27733533google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Kenchaiwong W, Sangpo P, Kusol A, Pontaema T, Lerdweeraphon W. The position of ground electrode affects electrocardiographic parameters in horses. Vet World 2022 Apr;15(4):1107-1112.
    doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.1107-1112pubmed: 35698497google scholar: lookup
  2. Alberti E, Stucchi L, Lo Feudo CM, Stancari G, Conturba B, Ferrucci F, Zucca E. Evaluation of Cardiac Arrhythmias before, during, and after Treadmill Exercise Testing in Poorly Performing Standardbred Racehorses. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 16;11(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082413pubmed: 34438870google scholar: lookup
  3. Vitale V, Vezzosi T, Tognetti R, Fraschetti C, Sgorbini M. Evaluation of a new portable 1-lead digital cardiac monitor (eKuore) compared with standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy horses. PLoS One 2021;16(8):e0255247.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255247pubmed: 34343184google scholar: lookup
  4. Lee H, Kim G, Bae JS. Digital auscultation in clear and present threat of novel respiratory infectious disease: a narrative review. J Yeungnam Med Sci 2025;42:19.
    doi: 10.12701/jyms.2025.42.19pubmed: 39734324google scholar: lookup
  5. Bindi F, Bozzola C, Vezzosi T, Zucca E, Caivano D, Freccero F, Sala G, Sgorbini M. A new smartphone-based digital stethoscope featuring phonocardiography and electrocardiography in adult horses. Vet Res Commun 2024 Nov 27;49(1):43.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-024-10584-wpubmed: 39601957google scholar: lookup
  6. Khamis TA, Shawaf T, El-Deeb W, Almubarak A, Al-Ali MA, Almuaqqil M, AlAiyan A, Homeida AM. Preliminary study on heart response and locomotor parameters in Donkeys (Equus asinus) during exercise using fitness tracker (Equimetre). Sci Rep 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22211.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72605-7pubmed: 39333304google scholar: lookup
  7. Bindi F, Vezzosi T, Sala G, Freccero F, Marmorini P, Bonelli F, Sgorbini M. Evaluation of a smartphone electrocardiograph in healthy foals and comparison to standard base-apex electrocardiography. Vet Res Commun 2024 Apr;48(2):1227-1232.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-023-10206-xpubmed: 37947988google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.