FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Can Vet J / Evaluation of changes in microbiota after fecal microbiota t...
The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2021; 62(10); 1123-1130; doi: 10.1111/evj.13389

Evaluation of changes in microbiota after fecal microbiota transplantation in 6 diarrheic horses.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to characterize the fecal microbiota of horses with acute and chronic diarrhea before and after fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Six client-owned horses with acute and chronic diarrhea received FMT from 2 healthy donor horses. Microbiota analysis using next-generation sequencing was performed on fecal samples collected before and 2 and 7 d after FMT. Signs of diarrhea improved in 4 horses, whereas the remaining 2 horses did not survive. There was a significant difference in the number of bacterial species between donors and recipients (P < 0.05). The Order Lactobacillales and the genera Lactobacillus, Intestinimonas, and Streptococcus were increased in the microbiota of diarrheic horses, and Saccharofermentans genus increased in healthy donors. The results suggest that FMT from the healthy donors was not effective over a 7-day period as it did not change the fecal microbiota of the diarrheic horses. Further research to improve the efficacy of FMT in horses is needed. Évaluation des modifications du microbiote après une transplantation de microbiote fécal chez six chevaux avec la diarrhée. Le but de cette étude était de caractériser le microbiote fécal des chevaux souffrant de diarrhée aiguë et chronique avant et après la transplantation de microbiote fécal (FMT). Six chevaux souffrant de diarrhée aiguë et chronique et appartenant à des clients ont reçu des FMT provenant de deux chevaux donneurs en bonne santé. Une analyse du microbiote a été réalisée sur des échantillons fécaux prélevés avant et 2 et 7 jours après la FMT. Les signes de la diarrhée se sont améliorés chez 4 des 6 chevaux, tandis que les deux autres n’ont pas survécu. Il y avait une différence significative dans la richesse bactérienne entre les donneurs et les récipients (P < 0,05). L’ordre Lactobacillales, et les genres Lactobacillus, Intestinimonas et Streptococcus ont été associés au microbiote des chevaux diarrhéiques et le genre Saccharofermentanes à celui des donneurs sains. Les résultats suggèrent que la FMT n’a pas réussi à changer le microbiote fécal des chevaux diarrhéiques sur une période de 7 jours. Des recherches supplémentaires pour améliorer l’efficacité de la FMT chez les chevaux sont nécessaires.(Traduit par les auteurs).
Copyright and/or publishing rights held by the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-10-05 PubMed ID: 34602643PubMed Central: PMC8439339DOI: 10.1111/evj.13389Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper investigated the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on horses with acute and chronic diarrhea, and found that while some short-term improvements were noted in the diarrhea symptoms, significant changes in the horses’ fecal microbiome were not observed over a week-long period.

Methods of the Study

  • The study involved six client-owned horses, all suffering from acute and chronic diarrhea, who were subjected to fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT).
  • FMT is a procedure wherein fecal bacteria from a healthy donor are transplanted into a patient’s gut, with the intention to restore a healthy balance to the patient’s gut microbiome.
  • These samples for FMT were taken from two healthy horses that served as donors.
  • The FMT was then carried out on the six diarrheic horses, and fecal samples were collected prior to the transplantation, and then again at 2, and 7 days post-transplantation.

Results of the Study

  • The researchers found that signs of diarrhea improved in four out of the six horses after the FMT. However, two of the horses did not survive.
  • There was a significant difference in the number of bacterial species between donors and recipients, particularly with the order Lactobacillales, and certain genera which were found in increased numbers in the diarrheic horses, while a specific genus was increased in the healthy donors.
  • The results of bacterial sequencing showed that FMT did not significantly alter the fecal microbiota of the diarrheic horses over a 7-day period.

Implications of the Findings

  • This study suggests that while FMT may offer short-term symptomatic relief for horses suffering from acute or chronic diarrhea, it did not provide noticeable long-term changes to the horses’ gut microbiota over the course of a week.
  • The research also identified specific bacterial orders and genera that may play a role in equine diarrhea, which could be potentially useful in future studies and interventions.
  • However, additional research is necessary to further understand the impact of FMT on horses, to refine the process, and possibly identify better target bacteria that can improve the efficacy of FMT in equine patients.

Cite This Article

APA
Costa M, Di Pietro R, Bessegatto JA, Pereira PFV, Stievani FC, Gomes RG, Lisbôa JAN, Weese JS. (2021). Evaluation of changes in microbiota after fecal microbiota transplantation in 6 diarrheic horses. Can Vet J, 62(10), 1123-1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13389

Publication

The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne
ISSN: 0008-5286
NlmUniqueID: 0004653
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 62
Issue: 10
Pages: 1123-1130

Researcher Affiliations

Costa, Marcio
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Q (Costa, Di Pietro); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Bessegatto, Pereira, Stievani, Gomes, Lisbôa); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Filadelfia, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Stievani); Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Weese).
Di Pietro, Rebecca
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Q (Costa, Di Pietro); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Bessegatto, Pereira, Stievani, Gomes, Lisbôa); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Filadelfia, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Stievani); Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Weese).
Bessegatto, José Antonio
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Q (Costa, Di Pietro); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Bessegatto, Pereira, Stievani, Gomes, Lisbôa); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Filadelfia, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Stievani); Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Weese).
Pereira, Priscilla Fajardo Valente
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Q (Costa, Di Pietro); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Bessegatto, Pereira, Stievani, Gomes, Lisbôa); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Filadelfia, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Stievani); Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Weese).
Stievani, Fernanda C
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Q (Costa, Di Pietro); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Bessegatto, Pereira, Stievani, Gomes, Lisbôa); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Filadelfia, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Stievani); Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Weese).
Gomes, Roberta Gaberlini
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Q (Costa, Di Pietro); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Bessegatto, Pereira, Stievani, Gomes, Lisbôa); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Filadelfia, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Stievani); Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Weese).
Lisbôa, Júlio A N
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Q (Costa, Di Pietro); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Bessegatto, Pereira, Stievani, Gomes, Lisbôa); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Filadelfia, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Stievani); Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Weese).
Weese, J Scott
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Q (Costa, Di Pietro); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Bessegatto, Pereira, Stievani, Gomes, Lisbôa); Department of Clinical Studies, Universidade Filadelfia, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil (Stievani); Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario (Weese).

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Bacteria
  • Diarrhea / therapy
  • Diarrhea / veterinary
  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation / veterinary
  • Feces
  • Horses
  • Microbiota
  • Treatment Outcome

References

This article includes 39 references
  1. Baumler AJ, Sperandio V. Interactions between the microbiota and pathogenic bacteria in the gut.. Nature 2016;535:85–93.
    pmc: PMC5114849pubmed: 27383983
  2. Gensollen T, Iyer SS, Kasper DL, Blumberg RS. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system.. Science 2016;352:539–544.
    pmc: PMC5050524pubmed: 27126036
  3. Costa MC, Weese JS. Understanding the intestinal microbiome in health and disease.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2018;34:1–12.
    pubmed: 29402480
  4. Glinsky MJ, Smith RM, Spires HR, Davis CL. Measurement of volatile fatty acid production rates in the cecum of the pony.. J Anim Sci 1976;42:1465–1470.
    pubmed: 931822
  5. Costa MC, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses and horses with colitis by high throughput sequencing of the V3–V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene.. PLoS One 2012;7:e41484–e.
    pmc: PMC3409227pubmed: 22859989
  6. Weese JS, Holcombe SJ, Embertson RM. Changes in the faecal microbiota of mares precede the development of post partum colic.. Equine Vet J 2015;47:641–649.
    pubmed: 25257320
  7. Bulmer LS, Murray J-A, Burns NM. High-starch diets alter equine faecal microbiota and increase behavioural reactivity.. Sci Rep 2019;9:18621.
    pmc: PMC6901590pubmed: 31819069
  8. Costa MC, Stämpfli HR, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E, Gomes RG, Weese JS. Changes in the equine fecal microbiota associated with the use of systemic antimicrobial drugs.. BMC Vet Res 2015;11:19.
    pmc: PMC4323147pubmed: 25644524
  9. Al Jassim RAM, Andrews FM. The bacterial community of the horse gastrointestinal tract and its relation to fermentative acidosis, laminitis, colic, and stomach ulcers.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2009;25:199–215.
    pubmed: 19580934
  10. Group IECR. Science-in-brief: Report on the Havemeyer Foundation workshop on acute colitis of the adult horse.. Equine Vet J 2020;52:163–164.
    pmc: PMC7163712pubmed: 32034964
  11. . Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food London.. Ontario (Canada): FAO/WHO; 2002. [Last accessed May 3, 2021]. [cited 2020]. Available from: https://www.who.int/foodsafety/fs_management/en/probiotic_guidelines.pdf.
  12. Gupta S, Allen-Vercoe E, Petrof EO. Fecal microbiota transplantation: In perspective.. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2016;9:229–239.
    pmc: PMC4749851pubmed: 26929784
  13. Quraishi MN, Widlak M, Bhala N. Systematic review with meta-analysis: The efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection.. Aliment Pharmacol Therap 2017;46:479–493.
    pubmed: 28707337
  14. Gough E, Shaikh H, Manges AR. Systematic review of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecal bacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:994–1002.
    pubmed: 22002980
  15. Mullen KR, Yasuda K, Divers TJ, Weese JS. Equine faecal microbiota transplant: Current knowledge, proposed guidelines and future directions.. Equine Vet Educ 2018;30:151–160.
    pmc: PMC7159401pubmed: 32313396
  16. McKinney CA, Oliveira BCM, Bedenice D. The fecal microbiota of healthy donor horses and geriatric recipients undergoing fecal microbial transplantation for the treatment of diarrhea.. PloS One 2020;15:e0230148.
    pmc: PMC7064224pubmed: 32155205
  17. Dias D, Sousa S, Molezini F, Ferreira H, Campos R. Efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for treating acute colitis in horses undergoing colic surgery.. Pesquisa Veterináia Brasileira 2018;38:1564–1569.
  18. McKinney CA, Bedenice D, Pacheco AP. Assessment of clinical and microbiota responses to fecal microbial transplantation in adult horses with diarrhea.. PloS One 2021;16:e0244381.
    pmc: PMC7808643pubmed: 33444319
  19. Liu P-Y, Wu W-K, Chen C-C, Panyod S, Sheen L-Y, Wu MS. Evaluation of compatibility of 16S rRNA V3V4 and V4 amplicon libraries for clinical microbiome profiling.. bioRxiv 2020:2020.08.18.256818.
  20. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013;79:5112–5120.
    pmc: PMC3753973pubmed: 23793624
  21. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation.. Genome Biol 2011;12:R60.
    pmc: PMC3218848pubmed: 21702898
  22. Elzinga SE, Weese JS, Adams AA. Comparison of the fecal microbiota in horses with equine metabolic syndrome and metabolically normal controls fed a similar all-forage diet.. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;44:9–16.
  23. Stewart HL, Pitta D, Indugu N. Changes in the faecal bacterial microbiota during hospitalisation of horses with colic and the effect of different causes of colic.. Equine Vet J 2020 Nov 22.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13389pubmed: 33222287google scholar: lookup
  24. Jeffery IB, O’Toole PW, Öhman L. An irritable bowel syndrome subtype defined by species-specific alterations in faecal microbiota.. Gut 2012;61:997–1006.
    pubmed: 22180058
  25. Garber A, Hastie P, Murray J-A. Factors influencing equine gut microbiota: Current knowledge.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;88:102943.
    pubmed: 32303307
  26. Arnold CE, Isaiah A, Pilla R. The cecal and fecal microbiomes and metabolomes of horses before and after metronidazole administration.. PLoS One 2020;15:e0232905.
    pmc: PMC7244109pubmed: 32442163
  27. Salem SE, Maddox TW, Berg A. Variation in faecal microbiota in a group of horses managed at pasture over a 12-month period.. Sci Rep 2018;8:8510.
    pmc: PMC5981443pubmed: 29855517
  28. McKinney CA, Oliveira BCM, Bedenice D. The fecal microbiota of healthy donor horses and geriatric recipients undergoing fecal microbial transplantation for the treatment of diarrhea.. PLoS One 2020;15:e0230148.
    pmc: PMC7064224pubmed: 32155205
  29. Kump P, Wurm P, Gröchenig HP. The taxonomic composition of the donor intestinal microbiota is a major factor influencing the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation in therapy refractory ulcerative colitis.. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018;47:67–77.
    pmc: PMC5765501pubmed: 29052237
  30. Wilson BC, Vatanen T, Cutfield WS, O’Sullivan JM. The super-donor phenomenon in fecal microbiota transplantation.. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2019;9:2.
    pmc: PMC6348388pubmed: 30719428
  31. Paramsothy S, Kamm MA, Kaakoush NO. Multidonor intensive faecal microbiota transplantation for active ulcerative colitis: A randomised placebo-controlled trial.. Lancet 2017;389:1218–1228.
    pubmed: 28214091
  32. Guo P, Zhang K, Ma X, He P. Clostridium species as probiotics: potentials and challenges.. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2020;11:24.
    pmc: PMC7031906pubmed: 32099648
  33. Mach N, Foury A, Kittelmann S. The effects of weaning methods on gut microbiota composition and horse physiology.. Front Physiol 2017;8:535.
    pmc: PMC5524898pubmed: 28790932
  34. Papanicolas LE, Choo JM, Wang Y. Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?. EBioMed 2019;41:509–516.
    pmc: PMC6444077pubmed: 30796005
  35. Manor O, Dai CL, Kornilov SA. Health and disease markers correlate with gut microbiome composition across thousands of people.. Nature Commun 2020;11:5206.
    pmc: PMC7562722pubmed: 33060586
  36. Celi P, Verlhac V, Pérez Calvo E, Schmeisser J, Kluenter A-M. Biomarkers of gastrointestinal functionality in animal nutrition and health.. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2019;250:9–31.
  37. Rodriguez C, Taminiau B, Brévers B. Faecal microbiota characterisation of horses using 16 rdna barcoded pyrosequencing, and carriage rate of clostridium difficile at hospital admission.. BMC Microbiol 2015;15:181.
    pmc: PMC4573688pubmed: 26377067
  38. Arroyo LG, Rossi L, Santos BP, Gomez DE, Surette MG, Costa MC. Luminal and mucosal microbiota of the cecum and large colon of healthy and diarrheic horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:1403.
    pmc: PMC7460328pubmed: 32806591
  39. Weese JS, Rousseau J. Evaluation of Lactobacillus pentosus WE7 for prevention of diarrhea in neonatal foals.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226:2031–2034.
    pubmed: 15989186

Citations

This article has been cited 9 times.
  1. Loublier C, Costa M, Taminiau B, Lecoq L, Daube G, Amory H, Cesarini C. Longitudinal Changes in Fecal Microbiota During Hospitalization in Horses With Different Types of Colic. J Vet Intern Med 2025 Mar-Apr;39(2):e70039.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.70039pubmed: 40048584google scholar: lookup
  2. Bell J, Radial SL, Cuming RS, Trope G, Hughes KJ. Effects of fecal microbiota transplantation on clinical outcomes and fecal microbiota of foals with diarrhea. J Vet Intern Med 2024 Sep-Oct;38(5):2718-2728.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.17185pubmed: 39266472google scholar: lookup
  3. Long AE, Pitta D, Hennessy M, Indugu N, Vecchiarelli B, Luethy D, Aceto H, Hurcombe S. Assessment of fecal bacterial viability and diversity in fresh and frozen fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) product in horses. BMC Vet Res 2024 Jul 10;20(1):306.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04166-wpubmed: 38987780google scholar: lookup
  4. Tuniyazi M, Tang R, Hu X, Fu Y, Zhang N. Carbonate buffer mixture and fecal microbiota transplantation hold promising therapeutic effects on oligofructose-induced diarrhea in horses. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1388227.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1388227pubmed: 38711536google scholar: lookup
  5. Boucher L, Leduc L, Leclère M, Costa MC. Current Understanding of Equine Gut Dysbiosis and Microbiota Manipulation Techniques: Comparison with Current Knowledge in Other Species. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 28;14(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14050758pubmed: 38473143google scholar: lookup
  6. Linnehan BK, Kodera SM, Allard SM, Brodie EC, Allaband C, Knight R, Lutz HL, Carroll MC, Meegan JM, Jensen ED, Gilbert JA. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantations in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) using metagenomic sequencing. J Appl Microbiol 2024 Feb 1;135(2).
    doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxae026pubmed: 38305096google scholar: lookup
  7. Quattrini C, Bozorgmanesh R, Egli P, Magdesian KG. Fecal microbiota transplant for treatment of diarrhea in adult hospitalized horses-111 cases (2013-2018). Open Vet J 2023 Sep;13(9):1135-1140.
    doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2023.v13.i9.9pubmed: 37842104google scholar: lookup
  8. Tuniyazi M, Wang W, Zhang N. A Systematic Review of Current Applications of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Horses. Vet Sci 2023 Apr 13;10(4).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci10040290pubmed: 37104445google scholar: lookup
  9. Di Pietro R, Arroyo LG, Leclere M, Costa M. Effects of concentrated fecal microbiota transplant on the equine fecal microbiota after antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Can J Vet Res 2023 Apr;87(2):85-96.
    pubmed: 37020579
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.