FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / BMC Vet Res / Evaluation of contact heat thermal threshold testing for sta...
BMC veterinary research2013; 9; 4; doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-4

Evaluation of contact heat thermal threshold testing for standardized assessment of cutaneous nociception in horses – comparison of different locations and environmental conditions.

Abstract: The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of contact heat thermal stimulation in horses at different body sites and under different environmental conditions and different test situations. Five warm-blood horses were equipped with the thermal probe located on the skin of nostril (N), withers (W) or coronary band (C). Skin temperature and reaction temperature (thermal threshold) at each location were measured and percent thermal excursion (% TE = 100 * (threshold temperature - skin temperature)/(cut-out temperature - skin temperature) was calculated. Environmental conditions were changed in partial random order for all locations, so each horse was tested in its familiar box stall and stocks, in the morning and evening and at warm and cold ambient temperatures. Type of reaction to the stimulus and horse's general behaviour during stimulation were recorded. The stimulation sites were examined for the occurrence of possible skin lesions. Results: Skin temperatures were significantly different during warm and cold ambient temperatures at all three locations, but remained constant over repeated stimulation. An obvious response to stimulation before reaching cut-out temperature could be detected most frequently at N and W in boxes during warm ambient temperatures. The most frequent type of reaction to thermal stimulation at the nostril was headshaking (64.6%), skin twitching at the withers (82.9%) and hoof withdrawal at the coronary band (79.2%). Conclusions: The outcome of thermal threshold testing depended on ambient temperature, stimulation site and environment. Best results with the WTT2 in horses were obtained at the nostrils or withers in a familiar environment at warm ambient temperatures.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2013-01-08 PubMed ID: 23298405PubMed Central: PMC3551666DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-4Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study explores the effectiveness of contact heat thermal stimulation as a method for assessing skin-based pain in horses, observing changes in different environmental conditions and body sites.

Methodology

  • The study involved five warm-blood horses which were subjected to thermal stimulus via a probe placed on their skin at three different locations (nostril, withers or coronary band).
  • Both the skin temperature and the reaction temperature were measured at each location and the percent thermal excursion was calculated.
  • The environmental conditions were deliberately varied, altering the horses’ surroundings (having them in familiar boxes and stock, during morning and evening, and in both warm and cold temperatures).
  • The type of reaction the horses had towards the stimulus, as well as their general behavior during the stimulation, was recorded.
  • The sites of stimulation were also monitored for any skin lesions.

Results

  • Significant differences were found in skin temperatures at all three locations during warm and cold ambient temperatures. However, the temperatures were constant during repeated stimulations.
  • Obvious responses to stimulation before reaching the cut-out temperature were most frequently detected at the nostrils and withers when the horses were in boxes during warm ambient temperatures.
  • Reactions to thermal stimulation varied: nostril stimulation produced a headshakin responseg 64.6% of the time, skin twitching occurred at the withers 82.9% of the time and hoof withdrawal at the coronary band happened 79.2% of the time.

Conclusions

  • The results of thermal threshold testing varied based on the ambient temperature, site of stimulation, and the horse’s environment.
  • The best results were achieved when testing was performed on the nostrils or withers in a familiar environment and at warm ambient temperatures.

Cite This Article

APA
Poller C, Hopster K, Rohn K, Kästner SB. (2013). Evaluation of contact heat thermal threshold testing for standardized assessment of cutaneous nociception in horses – comparison of different locations and environmental conditions. BMC Vet Res, 9, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-4

Publication

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 9
Pages: 4

Researcher Affiliations

Poller, Christin
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation Hannover, Germany. c.poller@gmx.net
Hopster, Klaus
    Rohn, Karl
      Kästner, Sabine Br

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Environment
        • Horses / physiology
        • Hot Temperature
        • Nociception / physiology
        • Sensory Thresholds / physiology
        • Skin Physiological Phenomena
        • Skin Temperature / physiology
        • Thermosensing / physiology

        References

        This article includes 28 references
        1. Le Bars D, Gozariu M, Cadden SW. Animal models of nociception. Pharmacol Rev 2001;53(4):597–652.
          pubmed: 11734620
        2. D’Amour FE, Smith DL. A method for determining loss of pain sensation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1941;72:74–79.
        3. Luttinger D. Determination of antinociceptive efficacy of drugs in mice using different water temperatures in a tail-immersion test. J Pharmacol Methods 1985;13:351–357.
          doi: 10.1016/0160-5402(85)90017-8pubmed: 3927065google scholar: lookup
        4. Woolfe G, Macdonald AD. The evaluation of the analgesic action of pethidine hydrochloride (Demerol). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1944;80:300–307.
        5. Robertson SA, Sanchez LC, Merritt AM, Doherty TJ. Effect of systemic lidocaine on visceral and somatic nociception in conscious horses. Equine Vet J 2005;37(2):122–127.
          pubmed: 15779623
        6. Sanchez LC, Elfenbein JR, Robertson SA. Effect of acepromazine, butorphanol, or N-butylscopolammonium bromide on visceral and somatic nociception and duodenal motility in conscious horses. Am J Vet Res 2008;69:579–585.
          doi: 10.2460/ajvr.69.5.579pubmed: 18447787google scholar: lookup
        7. Love EJ, Taylor PM, Murrell J, Dixon MJ, Whay HR, Waterman-Pearson AE. Modification of a feline thermal threshold testing system for use in horses [abstract]. Vet Anaesth Analg 2008;35(3):s10.
        8. Elfenbein JR, Sanchez LC, Robertson SA, Cole CA, Sams R. Effect of detomidine on visceral and somatic nociception and duodenal motility in conscious adult horses. Vet Anaesth Analg 2009;36:162–172.
          doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2008.00441.xpubmed: 19239655google scholar: lookup
        9. Pippi NL, Lumb WV, Fialho SAG, Scott RJ. A model for evaluating pain in ponies. J Equine Med Surg 1979;3:430–435.
        10. Kamerling SG, Weckman TJ, DeQuick DJ, Tobin T. A method for studying cutaneous pain perception and analgesia in horses. J Pharmacol Methods 1985;13:267–274.
          doi: 10.1016/0160-5402(85)90027-0pubmed: 3999760google scholar: lookup
        11. Carregaro AB, Luna SPL, Mataqueiro MI, de Queiro-Neto A. Effects of buprenorphine on nociception and spontaneous locomotor activity in horses. Am J Vet Res 2007;68:246–250.
          doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.3.246pubmed: 17331012google scholar: lookup
        12. Dhanjal JK, Wilson DV, Robinson E, Tobin TT, Dirokulu L. Intravenous tramadol: effects, nociceptive properties, and pharmacokinetics in horses. Vet Anaesth Analg 2009;36:581–590.
          doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2009.00492.xpubmed: 19845931google scholar: lookup
        13. Dixon MJ, Robertson SA, Taylor PM. A thermal threshold testing device for evaluation of analgesics in cats. Res Vet Sci 2002;72:205–210.
          doi: 10.1053/rvsc.2001.0543pubmed: 12076115google scholar: lookup
        14. Love EJ, Murrell J, Whay HR. Thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in horses: a review. Vet Anaesth Analg 2011;38:3–14.
          doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00580.xpubmed: 21214705google scholar: lookup
        15. Lascelles BDX, Waterman AE, Cripps PJ, Livingston A, Henderson G. Central sensitization as a result of surgical pain: investigation of the pre-emptive value of pethidine for ovariohysterectomy in the rat. Pain 1995;62:201–212.
          doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00266-Hpubmed: 8545146google scholar: lookup
        16. Whay HR, Waterman AE, Webster AJF, O’Brien JK. The influence of lesion type on the duration of hyperalgesia associated with hindlimb lameness in dairy cattle. Vet J 1998;156:23–29.
          doi: 10.1016/S1090-0233(98)80058-0pubmed: 9691848google scholar: lookup
        17. Chambers JP, Waterman AE, Livingston A. Further development of equipment to measure nociceptive thresholds in large animals. Vet Anaesth Analg 1994;21:66–72.
          doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.1994.tb00489.xgoogle scholar: lookup
        18. Van Dierendonck MC, De Vries H, Schilder MBH, Colenbrander B, þorhallsdóttir AG, Sigurjónsdottir H. Interventions in social behaviour in a herd of mares and geldings. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009;116:67–73.
          doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.07.003google scholar: lookup
        19. Love EJ, Taylor PM, Murrell J, Whay HR. Effects of acepromazine, butorphanol and buprenorphine on thermal and mechanical nociceptive thresholds in horses. Equine Vet J 2012;44(2):221–225.
          doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00412.xpubmed: 21696438google scholar: lookup
        20. Lichtman AH, Smith FL, Martin BR. Evidence that the antinociceptive tail-flick response is produced independently from changes in either tail-skin temperature or core temperature. Pain 1993;55:283–295.
          doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90003-8pubmed: 8121689google scholar: lookup
        21. Pringle J, Roberts C, Kohl M, Lekeux P. Near infrared spectroscopy in large animals: optical pathlength and influence of hair covering and epidermal pigmentation. Vet J 1999;158:48–52.
          doi: 10.1053/tvjl.1998.0306pubmed: 10409416google scholar: lookup
        22. Wegner K, Soma KLR, Ippolito M, Uboh CE. Validation of a wireless thermal and mechanical nociceptive testing device in horses. New Zealand: Proceedings of the 18th international conference of racing analysts and veterinarians; 2010.
        23. Mayhew IGJ. Evaluation of large animal neurologic patients: Neurologic evaluation. In: Large animal neurology. 2. Mayhew IGJ, editor. Chichester, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell Pub; 2009; pp. 11–46.
        24. Monteiro-Riviere NA, Bristol DG, Manning TO, Rogers RA, Riviere JE. Interspecies and interregional analysis of the comparative histologic thickness and laser Doppler blood flow measurements at five cutaneous sites in nine species. J Invest Dermatol 1990;95(5):582–586.
          doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12505567pubmed: 2230221google scholar: lookup
        25. TjØlsen A, Rosland JH, Berge O, Hole K. The increasing- temperature Hot- plate test: an improved test of nociception in mice and rats. J Pharmacol Methods 1991;25:241–250.
          doi: 10.1016/0160-5402(91)90014-Vpubmed: 2056753google scholar: lookup
        26. Klatzkin RR, Mechlin B, Girdler SS. Menstrual cycle phase does not influence gender differences in experimental pain sensitivity. Eur J Pain 2010;14(1):77–82.
          doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.01.002pmc: PMC2819535pubmed: 19217329google scholar: lookup
        27. Terner JM, Lomas LM, Picker MJ. Influence of estrous cycle and gonadal hormone depletion on nociception and opioid antinociception in female rats of four strains. J Pain 2005;6(6):372–383.
          doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.354pubmed: 15943959google scholar: lookup
        28. Brosnan RJ, Pypendop BH, Siao KT, Stanley CD. Effects of remifentanil on measures of anesthetic immobility and analgesia in cats. Am J Vet Res 2009;70(9):1065–1071.
          doi: 10.2460/ajvr.70.9.1065pubmed: 19719420google scholar: lookup
        Subscribe to our newsletter
        Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.