Analyze Diet
Veterinary parasitology2011; 184(2-4); 387-391; doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.08.015

Evaluation of conventional PCR for detection of Strongylus vulgaris on horse farms.

Abstract: Strongyle parasites are ubiquitous in grazing horses. Of these, the bloodworm Strongylus vulgaris is regarded as most pathogenic. Increasing levels of anthelmintic resistance in strongyle parasites has led to recommendations of decreased treatment intensities, and there is now a pronounced need for reliable tools for detection of parasite burdens in general and S. vulgaris in particular. The only method currently available for diagnosing S. vulgaris in practice is the larval culture, which is laborious and time-consuming, so veterinary practitioners most often pool samples from several horses together in one culture to save time. Recently, molecular tools have been developed to detect S. vulgaris in faecal samples. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of a conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with the traditional larval culture and furthermore test the performance of pooled versus individual PCR for farm screening purposes. Faecal samples were obtained from 331 horses on 18 different farms. Farm size ranged from 6 to 56 horses, and horses aged between 2 months and 31 years. Larval cultures and PCR were performed individually on all horses. In addition, PCR was performed on 66 faecal pools consisting of 3-5 horses each. Species-specific PCR primers previously developed were used for the PCR. PCR and larval culture detected S. vulgaris in 12.1 and 4.5% of individual horses, respectively. On the farm level, eight farms tested positive with the larval culture, while 13 and 11 farms were positive with the individual and pooled PCRs, respectively. The individual PCR method was statistically superior to the larval culture, while no statistical difference could be detected between pooled and individual PCR for farm screening. In conclusion, pooled PCR appears to be a useful tool for farm screening for S. vulgaris.
Publication Date: 2011-08-16 PubMed ID: 21889849DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.08.015Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the effectiveness of the conventional Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method in detecting the parasitic worm, Strongylus vulgaris, which is harmful to horses. This method was compared with the traditional larval culture method and also tested in both individual and grouped settings. The PCR technique proved to be significantly more efficient than the larval culture, while its effectiveness remained largely the same in both individual and pooled farm screenings.

Strongylus vulgaris Detection Methods

  • The study was conducted to examine the performance of conventional PCR in identifying the presence of Strongylus vulgaris in horses, relative to the traditional method of larval culture.
  • The latter technique, despite being the only currently available method of diagnosing S. vulgaris, is laborious and time-consuming. This often leads veterinarians to pool samples from multiple horses, which might affect the accuracy of the results.
  • Meanwhile, the PCR technique has recently emerged as a new tool for detecting S. vulgaris in faeces samples. The research aimed to determine the efficacy of this method when employed individually or in pooled screenings.

Sample Collection

  • Faeces samples were collected from a total of 331 horses residing on 18 different farms. The sizes of these farms varied, housing between six and 56 horses, with the ages of the horses ranging from two months to 31 years old.
  • Both the larval culture and PCR methods were applied individually to each horse.
  • Apart from individual testing, 66 pooled PCR tests were also conducted, which consists of samples from 3-5 horses each.

Research Findings

  • Results of the tests revealed that the PCR method and the larval culture were able to detect S. vulgaris in 12.1% and 4.5% of the individual horses, respectively.
  • At the farm level, eight were tested positive using the larval culture, while the individual and pooled PCR tests yielded positive results in 13 and 11 farms, respectively.
  • Statistical data indicated the superiority of the individual PCR method over the larval culture in terms of accuracy.
  • However, no significant statistical difference was found between the performances of individual and pooled PCR for farm screenings.

Conclusion

  • The research concludes that the PCR technique, when employed in a pooled manner, can prove to be a valuable tool for farm screenings of S. vulgaris. This method is not only more efficient than the traditional larval culture but also demonstrates comparable effectiveness in both individual and pooled settings.

Cite This Article

APA
Bracken MK, Wøhlk CB, Petersen SL, Nielsen MK. (2011). Evaluation of conventional PCR for detection of Strongylus vulgaris on horse farms. Vet Parasitol, 184(2-4), 387-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.08.015

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2550
NlmUniqueID: 7602745
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 184
Issue: 2-4
Pages: 387-391

Researcher Affiliations

Bracken, M K
  • Department of Large Animal Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Wøhlk, C B M
    Petersen, S L
      Nielsen, M K

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Feces / parasitology
        • Female
        • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
        • Horses
        • Male
        • Polymerase Chain Reaction
        • Reproducibility of Results
        • Strongyle Infections, Equine / diagnosis
        • Strongylus / genetics

        Citations

        This article has been cited 7 times.
        1. Martins AV, Coelho AL, Corrêa LL, Ribeiro MS, Lobão LF, Palmer JPS, Moura LC, Molento MB, Barbosa ADS. First microscopic and molecular parasitological survey of Strongylus vulgaris in Brazilian ponies. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2023;32(3):e006323.
          doi: 10.1590/S1984-29612023036pubmed: 37377279google scholar: lookup
        2. Boelow H, Krücken J, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Epidemiological study on factors influencing the occurrence of helminth eggs in horses in Germany based on sent-in diagnostic samples. Parasitol Res 2023 Mar;122(3):749-767.
          doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07765-4pubmed: 36627515google scholar: lookup
        3. Jürgenschellert L, Krücken J, Bousquet E, Bartz J, Heyer N, Nielsen MK, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Occurrence of Strongylid Nematode Parasites on Horse Farms in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany, With High Seroprevalence of Strongylus vulgaris Infection. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:892920.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.892920pubmed: 35754549google scholar: lookup
        4. Kaspar A, Pfister K, Nielsen MK, Silaghi C, Fink H, Scheuerle MC. Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture - method comparison and occurrence assessment. BMC Vet Res 2017 Jan 11;13(1):19.
          doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0918-ypubmed: 28077153google scholar: lookup
        5. Lu Y, Ru P, Qin S, Zhang Y, Fu E, Cai M, Tuohuti N, Wu H, Zhang Y, Zhang Y. Epidemiological Patterns of Gastrointestinal Parasitic Infections in Equine Populations from Urumqi and Ili, Xinjiang, China. Vet Sci 2025 Jul 6;12(7).
          doi: 10.3390/vetsci12070644pubmed: 40711304google scholar: lookup
        6. Stahel L, Bigler NA, Grimm F, Schnyder M, Oehm AW. Case report: The gastrointestinal nematode Strongylus vulgaris as a cause of hoof abscess in a donkey. BMC Vet Res 2025 Jul 10;21(1):454.
          doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04492-7pubmed: 40640810google scholar: lookup
        7. Diekmann I, Blazejak K, Krücken J, Strube C, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Comparison of morphological and molecular Strongylus spp. identification in equine larval cultures and first report of a patent Strongylus asini infection in a horse. Equine Vet J 2025 Mar;57(2):522-529.
          doi: 10.1111/evj.14134pubmed: 39012065google scholar: lookup