Analyze Diet
Research in veterinary science2007; 84(2); 305-310; doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.04.009

Evaluation of equine cecal motility by ausculation, ultrasonography and electrointestinography after jejunocecostomy.

Abstract: Horses often suffer reduced intestinal motility after jejunocecostomy. Therefore, accurate evaluation of intestinal motility is important for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of this condition. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intestinal motility in horses after jejunocecostomy using three different methods, i.e. auscultation, ultrasonography and electrointestinography. Methods: Six healthy thoroughbreds were used in this study. They were subjected to jejunocecostomy. Methods: Bowel sounds in the right paralumbar fossa were assigned a score of 0-3 for intestinal motility evaluation by auscultation, and the number of cecal contractions during a 3-min period were counted by ultrasonography. Electrointestinography (EIG) was used to measure percutaneous potential of the cecum. Results: We identified three specific postoperative periods: the period of reduced intestinal motility (postoperative day 1 to day 2), in which intestinal motility declined, the unstable period (day 3 to day 7), in which intestinal motility partially recovered, and the full recovery period (day 8 to day 31), in which intestinal motility returned to preoperative state. Careful management was found to be especially important during the period of reduced intestinal motility and the unstable period. We found that, in healthy horses that underwent jejunocecostomy, it takes approximately one month for the cecum to return to normal motility patterns observed before surgery. Conclusions: We have shown in this study that evaluation of intestinal motility after jejunocecostomy in horses by EIG is more objective and provides more details than evaluation by auscultation or ultrasonography.
Publication Date: 2007-06-13 PubMed ID: 17570455DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.04.009Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research conducted examined the intestinal movement in horses that underwent jejunocecostomy, a type of surgical procedure. The methods used to detect this movement were auscultation, ultrasonography and electrointestinography, with the latter appearing to be the superior method.

Study Design and Methodology

  • Researchers used six healthy thoroughbred horses for this study. These were subjected to the surgical procedure called jejunocecostomy, where a new connection is created between the jejunum and the cecum in the horse’s digestive system.
  • The level of intestinal motility observed in the horses was evaluated using three different methods: auscultation, where bowel sounds were listened to and scored; ultrasonography, which involved counting the number of cecum contractions in a 3-minute interval; and electrointestinography (EIG), a method that measured the percutaneous potential of the cecum directly, providing a more accurate insight into intestinal motility.

Results and Observations

  • The researchers noted three specific periods after surgery: a period of reduced intestinal motility (days 1 to 2 post-surgery), where the motility declined significantly; an unstable period (days 3 to 7 post-surgery), where there was a partial recovery of functions; and a full recovery period (day 8 to day 31 post-surgery), where the cecal motility fully returned to its preoperative state.
  • The study emphasized careful monitoring and management of postoperative care during the periods of reduced and unstable intestinal motility to prevent complications.
  • It was found that, on average, it takes a month for intestinal motility to return to normal patterns in horses that have gone through a jejunocecostomy procedure.

Conclusion and Recommendations

  • The study showed that EIG proves to be an effective method of assessing intestinal motility after jejunocecostomy. Compared to the auscultation and ultrasonography methods, EIG provided a more comprehensive, objective, and accurate outline of cecal activity.
  • These findings can be used by veterinary surgeons to better manage the postoperative care of horses, particularly in early detection of complications and ensuring a smooth recovery.

Cite This Article

APA
Sasaki N, Murata A, Lee I, Yamada H. (2007). Evaluation of equine cecal motility by ausculation, ultrasonography and electrointestinography after jejunocecostomy. Res Vet Sci, 84(2), 305-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.04.009

Publication

ISSN: 0034-5288
NlmUniqueID: 0401300
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 84
Issue: 2
Pages: 305-310

Researcher Affiliations

Sasaki, Naoki
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan. naoki@obihiro.ac.jp
Murata, Aya
    Lee, Inhyung
      Yamada, Haruo

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Auscultation / veterinary
        • Cecostomy / adverse effects
        • Cecostomy / veterinary
        • Cecum / diagnostic imaging
        • Cecum / physiology
        • Cecum / surgery
        • Female
        • Gastrointestinal Motility / physiology
        • Health
        • Horses / surgery
        • Jejunostomy / adverse effects
        • Jejunostomy / veterinary
        • Male
        • Time Factors
        • Ultrasonography

        Citations

        This article has been cited 7 times.
        1. Farrell A, Kersh K, Liepman R, Dembek KA. Development of a Colic Scoring System to Predict Outcome in Horses. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:697589.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.697589pubmed: 34692803google scholar: lookup
        2. Siwinska N, Zak A, Baron M, Cylna M, Borowicz H. Right dorsal colon ultrasonography in normal adult ponies and miniature horses. PLoS One 2017;12(10):e0186825.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186825pubmed: 29065146google scholar: lookup
        3. Curtis L, Burford JH, Thomas JS, Curran ML, Bayes TC, England GC, Freeman SL. Prospective study of the primary evaluation of 1016 horses with clinical signs of abdominal pain by veterinary practitioners, and the differentiation of critical and non-critical cases. Acta Vet Scand 2015 Oct 6;57:69.
          doi: 10.1186/s13028-015-0160-9pubmed: 26444675google scholar: lookup
        4. Elfenbein JR, Robertson SA, MacKay RJ, KuKanich B, Sanchez L. Systemic and anti-nociceptive effects of prolonged lidocaine, ketamine, and butorphanol infusions alone and in combination in healthy horses. BMC Vet Res 2014;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6.
          doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S6pubmed: 25238633google scholar: lookup
        5. Okamura K, Sasaki N, Kikuchi T, Murata A, Lee I, Yamada H, Inokuma H. Effects of mosapride on motility of the small intestine and caecum in normal horses after jejunocaecostomy. J Vet Sci 2009 Jun;10(2):157-60.
          doi: 10.4142/jvs.2009.10.2.157pubmed: 19461212google scholar: lookup
        6. Maldonado Moreno N, Alves Moreira J, Araujo De Oliveira L, Sanches Gontijo A, Castilho Baldi ML, Rocha Wenceslau R, Beier SL. Analgesic and Gastrointestinal Effects of Methadone in Horses Undergoing Orchiectomy. Animals (Basel) 2025 Aug 11;15(16).
          doi: 10.3390/ani15162358pubmed: 40867687google scholar: lookup
        7. Munsterman AS, Dias Moreira AS, Kottwitz J. Evaluation of the Effects of Detomidine on Equine Myoelectrical Activity Using Electrointestinography. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2025 Mar-Apr;35(2):120-130.
          doi: 10.1111/vec.13464pubmed: 40254911google scholar: lookup