Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2026; 16(4); 569; doi: 10.3390/ani16040569

Evaluation of Pulse Pressure as a Hemodynamic Marker of Cardiac Disease in Dogs and Horses Undergoing Pre-Anesthetic Assessment.

Abstract: Pulse pressure (PP) reflects ventricular stroke volume and arterial compliance, but its utility as a marker of cardiac disease in animals is not well established. This study evaluated the association between PP and echocardiographically confirmed cardiac abnormalities in dogs and horses and assessed its potential in pre-anesthetic evaluation. Clinical and echocardiography examination of 20 dogs and 20 horses was sufficient for inter-group comparisons and assignments to a Cardiac group (echocardiographically confirmed cardiac disease) or a Control group (healthy animals). Non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure was measured, and PP was calculated. Animals with cardiac abnormalities showed significantly higher PP but not mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) compared with healthy subjects. In horses, PP was approximately 22 mmHg higher in the Cardiac group ( = 0.042), while in dogs, the increase was 25 mmHg ( < 0.001). Regression analysis confirmed cardiac status as an independent predictor of elevated PP ( = 0.001) with excellent and good discriminatory performance between healthy and diseased dogs (AUC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.77-1.00) and healthy and diseased horses (AUC = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.61-1.00), respectively. These results suggest that PP may serve as a sensitive and practical hemodynamic indicator of underlying cardiac disease.
Publication Date: 2026-02-12 PubMed ID: 41751029PubMed Central: PMC12937357DOI: 10.3390/ani16040569Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Cite This Article

APA
Lutvikadic I, Preldzic D, Floriano D, Hopster K. (2026). Evaluation of Pulse Pressure as a Hemodynamic Marker of Cardiac Disease in Dogs and Horses Undergoing Pre-Anesthetic Assessment. Animals (Basel), 16(4), 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16040569

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 4
PII: 569

Researcher Affiliations

Lutvikadic, Ismar
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 382 W Street Rd., Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA.
  • Department of Clinical Science, Veterinary Faculty, University of Sarajevo, Zmaja od Bosne 90, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Preldzic, Dajna
  • Department of Clinical Science, Veterinary Faculty, University of Sarajevo, Zmaja od Bosne 90, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Floriano, Dario
  • Department of Clinical Studies and Advanced Medicine, Matthew J. Ryan Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 2900 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Hopster, Klaus
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 382 W Street Rd., Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 32 references
  1. Brodbelt D.C., Flaherty D., Pettifer G.R. Anesthetic Risk and Informed Consent. In: Grimm K.A., Lamont L.A., Tranquilli W.J., Greene S.A., Robertson S.A., editors. Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2015. pp. 11–22.
  2. Thomas J.A., Lerche P. Anesthesia and Analgesia for Veterinary Technicians. 5th ed. Elsevier; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2017. Patient preparation; pp. 7–51.
  3. Mitchell K., Barletta M., Quandt J., Shepard M., Kleine S., Hofmeister E. Effect of routine pre-anesthetic laboratory screening on pre-operative anesthesia-related decision-making in healthy dogs. Can. Vet. J. 2018;59:773–778.
    pmc: PMC6005072pubmed: 30026626
  4. Ateca L.B., Reineke E.L., Drobatz K.J. Evaluation of the relationship between peripheral pulse palpation and Doppler systolic blood pressure in dogs presenting to an emergency service. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care. 2018;28:226–231. doi: 10.1111/vec.12718.
    doi: 10.1111/vec.12718pubmed: 29659117google scholar: lookup
  5. Stepien R.L., Gregg S.R. Clinical comparison of three methods to measure blood pressure in nonsedated dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1999;215:1623–1628. doi: 10.2460/javma.1999.215.11.1623.
  6. Muir W.W. Cardiovascular Physiology. In: Lamont L., Grimm K., Robertson S., Love L., Schroeder C., editors. Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. 6th ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Inc.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2024. pp. 615–660.
  7. Odette O. Blood Pressure Monitoring. In: Lamont L., Grimm K., Robertson S., Love L., Schroeder C., editors. Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. 6th ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Inc.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2024. pp. 197–208.
  8. Boegli J., Schwarzwald C.C., Mitchell K.J. Diagnostic value of noninvasive pulse pressure measurements in Warmblood horses with aortic regurgitation. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2019;33:1446–1455. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15494.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15494pmc: PMC6524107pubmed: 30938891google scholar: lookup
  9. Suvarna J. Watson’s water hammer pulse. J. Postgrad. Med. 2008;54:163–165. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.40791.
    doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.40791pubmed: 18480541google scholar: lookup
  10. Maurer G. Aortic regurgitation. Heart. 2006;92:994–1000. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.042614.
    doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.042614pmc: PMC1860728pubmed: 16775114google scholar: lookup
  11. Folts J., Rowe G. Coronary and hemodynamic effects of temporary acute aortic insufficiency in intact anesthetized dogs. Circ. Res. 1974;35:238–246. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.35.2.238.
    doi: 10.1161/01.RES.35.2.238google scholar: lookup
  12. Avolio A.P., Kuznetsova T., Heyndrickx G.R., Kerkhof P.L.M., Li J.K. Arterial Flow, Pulse Pressure and Pulse Wave Velocity in Men and Women at Various Ages. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018;1065:153–168. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77932-4_10.
    doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77932-4_10pubmed: 30051383google scholar: lookup
  13. Bonow R., Rosing D., Mcintosh C., Jones M., Maron B.J., Lan K.K., Lakatos E., Bacharach S.L., Green M.V., Epstein S.E. The natural history of asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function. Circulation. 1983;68:509–517. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.68.3.509.
    doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.68.3.509pubmed: 6872164google scholar: lookup
  14. Franklin S., Khan S., Wong N., Larson M.G., Levy D. Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease? The Framingham heart study. Circulation. 1999;100:354–360. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.100.4.354.
    doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.100.4.354pubmed: 10421594google scholar: lookup
  15. Blacher J., Staessen J.A., Girerd X., Gasowski J., Thijs L., Liu L., Wang J.G., Fagard R.H., Safar M.E. Pulse pressure not mean pressure determines cardiovascular risk in older hypertensive patients. Arch. Intern. Med. 2000;160:1085–1089. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.8.1085.
    doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.8.1085pubmed: 10789600google scholar: lookup
  16. Homan T.D., Bordes S.J., Cichowski E. Physiology, Pulse Pressure. StatPearls; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2023. [(accessed on 28 December 2025)]. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482408/
    pubmed: 29494015
  17. Blacher J., Evans A., Arveiler D., Amouyel P., Ferrières J., Bingham A., Yarnell J., Haas B., Montaye M., Ruidavets J.B., et al. PRIME Study Group. Residual Cardiovascular Risk in Treated Hypertension and Hyperlipidaemia: The PRIME study. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2010;24:19–26. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2009.34.
    doi: 10.1038/jhh.2009.34pubmed: 19474798google scholar: lookup
  18. Moyá-Amengual A., Ruiz-García A., Pallarés-Carratalá V., Serrano-Cumplido A., Prieto-Díaz M.Á., Segura-Fragoso A., Cinza-Sanjurjo S. The Researchers of the IBERICAN Study. Elevated pulse pressure and cardiovascular risk associated in Spanish population attended in primary care: IBERICAN study. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023;10:1090458. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1090458.
    doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1090458pmc: PMC10203900pubmed: 37229234google scholar: lookup
  19. Melgarejo J.D., Thijs L., Wei D.M., Bursztyn M., Yang W.Y., Li Y., Asayama K., Hansen T.W., Kikuya M., Ohkubo T., et al. Relative and Absolute Risk to Guide the Management of Pulse Pressure, an Age-Related Cardiovascular Risk Factor. Am. J. Hypertens. 2021;34:929–938. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab048.
    doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpab048pmc: PMC8457427pubmed: 33687055google scholar: lookup
  20. Fielding C.L., Stolba D.N. Pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation in horses undergoing general anesthesia. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care. 2012;22:372–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00746.x.
  21. Fantoni D.T., Ida K.K., Gimenes A.M., Mantovani M.M., Castro J.R., Patrício G.C.F., Ambrósio A.M., Otsuki D.A. Pulse pressure variation as a guide for volume expansion in dogs undergoing orthopedic surgery. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2017;44:710–718. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.11.011.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.11.011pubmed: 28734854google scholar: lookup
  22. Kim D., Son W.G., Shin D., Kim J., Lee I. Effect of the respiratory rate on the pulse pressure variation induced by hemorrhage in anesthetized dogs. J. Vet. Sci. 2022;23:e68. doi: 10.4142/jvs.22090.
    doi: 10.4142/jvs.22090pmc: PMC9715388pubmed: 36038189google scholar: lookup
  23. Dalmagro T.L., Teixeira-Neto F.J., Celeita-Rodrígez N., Garofalo N.A., López-Castañeda B., do Nascimento-Junior P. Comparison between pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation measured from a peripheral artery for accurately predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated dogs. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2021;48:501–508. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2021.01.009.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2021.01.009pubmed: 34020897google scholar: lookup
  24. Boysen S.R., Gommeren K. Assessment of Volume Status and Fluid Responsiveness in Small Animals. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;28:630643. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.630643.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.630643pmc: PMC8193042pubmed: 34124213google scholar: lookup
  25. Araos J., Kenny J.S., Rousseau-Blass F., Pang D.S. Dynamic prediction of fluid responsiveness during positive pressure ventilation: A review of the physiology underlying heart-lung interactions and a critical interpretation. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2020;47:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.08.004.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.08.004pubmed: 31831334google scholar: lookup
  26. Boon J.A. Veterinary Echocardiography. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; Chichester, UK: 2011. The two-dimensional echocardiographic exam; pp. 54–138.
  27. de Madron E. Normal Views: 2D, TM, Spectral, and Color Doppler. In: de Madron E., Chetboul V., Bussadori C., editors. Clinical Echocardiography of the Dog and Cat. Elsevier Masson; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2015. pp. 3–19.
  28. Cornell C.C., Kittleson M.D., Torre P.D., Häggström J., Lombard C.W., Pedersen H.D., Vollmar A., Wey A. Allometric Scaling of M-mode Cardiac Measurements in Normal Adult Dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2004;18:311–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2004.tb02551.x.
  29. Tang K.S., Medeiros E.D., Shah A.D. Wide pulse pressure: A clinical review. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2020;22:1960–1967. doi: 10.1111/jch.14051.
    doi: 10.1111/jch.14051pmc: PMC8029839pubmed: 32986936google scholar: lookup
  30. Brown S.A. Hypertension, Heart Failure, and Shock. In: Reece W.O., editor. Dukes’ Physiology of Domestic Animals. 13th ed. Wiley Blackwell; Ames, IA, USA: 2015. pp. 429–442.
  31. Bonagura J.D., Stepien R.L. Vascular Diseases. In: Birchard S.J., Sherding R.G., editors. Saunders Manual of Small Animal Practice. 3rd ed. Saunders Elsevier; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2006. pp. 1574–1588.
  32. Thomas J.A., Lerche P. Anesthesia and Analgesia for Veterinary Technicians. 5th ed. Elsevier; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2017. Anesthetic Problems and Emergencies; pp. 362–403.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.