Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1983; 15(3); 251-252; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb01782.x

Evaluation of quantitative bacterial counts as an aid in the treatment of wounds in the horse.

Abstract: Bacterial quantification was evaluated in 15 cases as a means of wound assessment. This study suggests that bacterial quantification may be used as an aid in the evaluation of treatment procedures and wound preparation in veterinary surgery.
Publication Date: 1983-07-01 PubMed ID: 6884314DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb01782.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article studies the effectiveness of bacterial quantification, or counting, as a tool in assessing and treating wounds in horses during veterinary surgery.

Summary of Methodology

The researchers conducted their study with 15 test subjects, presumably horses. They used bacterial quantification as a means to assess the extent and severity of their wounds. This basically means they counted the number of bacterial colonies present in the wound as a measure of how severe the wound is.

  • This procedure is significantly different from conventional methods of wound assessment, which usually involve visual examination and symptom checklists.
  • The use of bacterial quantification may provide a more accurate and objective measure of wound severity, as it directly quantifies an important aspect of wound infection.

Main Findings

Based on the results of their experimental trials, the researchers suggest that bacterial quantification can be used as a guide in evaluating the effectiveness of treatment procedures.

  • If the bacterial count in the wound decreases after a particular treatment, that treatment could be considered effective.
  • Conversely, if the bacterial count does not decrease or increases, that might indicate that the treatment is not working and needs adjustment.

Implications for Veterinary Practice

The findings of this study have important implications for veterinary surgery.

  • Bacterial quantification could aid in preparing for surgery, as it can provide a sense of how severe the wound infection is.
  • This could help surgeons decide on the best course of action before they begin the operation, potentially improving surgical outcomes.
  • Furthermore, bacterial quantification could also aid in tracking the progress of wound healing after surgery, giving veterinary practitioners a concrete measure of progress.

In conclusion, the researchers recommend using bacterial counts as a new aid in the treatment of wounds in horses, alongside traditional wound assessment methods.

Cite This Article

APA
Peyton LC, Connelly MB. (1983). Evaluation of quantitative bacterial counts as an aid in the treatment of wounds in the horse. Equine Vet J, 15(3), 251-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb01782.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 3
Pages: 251-252

Researcher Affiliations

Peyton, L C
    Connelly, M B

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Bacteria / isolation & purification
      • Bacterial Infections / microbiology
      • Bacterial Infections / veterinary
      • Biopsy / veterinary
      • Horse Diseases / microbiology
      • Horses
      • Wound Infection / microbiology
      • Wound Infection / veterinary
      • Wounds and Injuries / microbiology
      • Wounds and Injuries / veterinary

      Citations

      This article has been cited 0 times.