Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2006; 228(8); 1221-1227; doi: 10.2460/javma.228.8.1221

Evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol or ketamine-medetomidine-propofol combination in horses.

Abstract: Objective-To compare the anesthetic and cardiorespiratory effects of total IV anesthesia with propofol (P-TIVA) or a ketamine-medetomidine-propofol combination (KMP-TIVA) in horses. Design-Randomized experimental trial. Animals-12 horses. Procedure-Horses received medetomidine (0.005 mg/kg [0.002 mg/lb], IV). Anesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.04 mg/kg [0.018 mg/lb], IV) and ketamine (2.5 mg/kg [1.14 mg/lb], IV). All horses received a loading dose of propofol (0.5 mg/kg [0.23 mg/lb], IV), and 6 horses underwent P-TIVA (propofol infusion). Six horses underwent KMP-TIVA (ketamine [1 mg/kg/h {0.45 mg/lb/h}] and medetomidine [0.00125 mg/kg/h {0.0006 mg/lb/h}] infusion; the rate of propofol infusion was adjusted to maintain anesthesia). Arterial blood pressure and heart rate were monitored. Qualities of anesthetic induction, transition to TIVA, and maintenance of and recovery from anesthesia were evaluated. Results-Administration of KMP IV provided satisfactory anesthesia in horses. Compared with the P-TIVA group, the propofol infusion rate was significantly less in horses undergoing KMP-TIVA (0.14 +/- 0.02 mg/kg/min [0.064 +/- 0.009 mg/lb/min] vs 0.22 +/- 0.03 mg/kg/min [0.1 +/- 0.014 mg/lb/min]). In the KMP-TIVA and P-TIVA groups, anesthesia time was 115 +/- 17 minutes and 112 +/- 11 minutes, respectively, and heart rate and arterial blood pressure were maintained within acceptable limits. There was no significant difference in time to standing after cessation of anesthesia between groups. Recovery from KMP-TIVA and P-TIVA was considered good and satisfactory, respectively. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-In horses, KMP-TIVA and P-TIVA provided clinically useful anesthesia; the ketamine-medetomidine infusion provided a sparing effect on propofol requirement for maintaining anesthesia.
Publication Date: 2006-04-19 PubMed ID: 16618226DOI: 10.2460/javma.228.8.1221Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses a comparison study between two methods of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in horses: a propofol-only method (P-TIVA) and a method combining ketamine, medetomidine, and propofol (KMP-TIVA). The study establishes that both methods were clinically effective, with the ketamine-medetomidine combination presenting a sparing effect on the propofol requirement.

Research Design & Procedure

  • The study designed a randomized experimental trial involving 12 horses. Each horse was assigned into two groups: P-TIVA group and KMP-TIVA group.
  • All horses were first given medetomidine, and then anesthesia was induced with midazolam and ketamine. Afterward, a loading dose of propofol was administered to all horses.
  • In the P-TIVA group, horses were provided an infusion of propofol, while in the KMP-TIVA group, horses were given an infusion of ketamine and medetomidine, and the rate of propofol infusion was adjusted to maintain anesthesia.

Monitoring & Evaluation

  • Throughout the experiment, the horses’ arterial blood pressure and heart rate were monitored. The quality of anesthetic induction, transition to TIVA, and maintenance of and recovery from anesthesia were evaluated.
  • The study compared the propofol infusion rates, anesthesia times, heart rates, blood pressures, and recovery times between the two methods.

Results

  • Both the P-TIVA and KMP-TIVA methods were shown to provide satisfactory anesthesia in horses.
  • The propofol infusion rate was significantly lower in the KMP-TIVA group, indicating a sparing effect on propofol requirement compared to the P-TIVA group.
  • The overall anesthesia time, heart rate, and arterial blood pressure were maintained within acceptable limits for both groups. There was no noticeable difference in the time required for the horses to stand after anesthesia.
  • The recovery from both methods was considered good and satisfactory, respectively.

Conclusion

  • The research concludes that both the propofol-only method and the ketamine-medetomidine-propofol combination method can provide clinically useful anesthesia for horses.
  • The study highlights that the KMP-TIVA can spare the amount of propofol needed for maintaining anesthesia, which could be a more cost-effective option in veterinary practice.

Cite This Article

APA
Umar MA, Yamashita K, Kushiro T, Muir WW. (2006). Evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol or ketamine-medetomidine-propofol combination in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 228(8), 1221-1227. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.228.8.1221

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 228
Issue: 8
Pages: 1221-1227

Researcher Affiliations

Umar, Mohammed A
  • Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido 0698501, Japan.
Yamashita, Kazuto
    Kushiro, Tokiko
      Muir, William W

        MeSH Terms

        • Anesthesia, Intravenous / methods
        • Anesthesia, Intravenous / veterinary
        • Anesthetics, Intravenous / pharmacology
        • Animals
        • Blood Pressure / drug effects
        • Blood Pressure / physiology
        • Drug Combinations
        • Female
        • Heart Rate / drug effects
        • Heart Rate / physiology
        • Horses / physiology
        • Ketamine / pharmacology
        • Male
        • Medetomidine / pharmacology
        • Propofol / pharmacology
        • Treatment Outcome

        Citations

        This article has been cited 2 times.
        1. Gozalo-Marcilla M, Ringer SK. Recovery after General Anaesthesia in Adult Horses: A Structured Summary of the Literature.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 14;11(6).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11061777pubmed: 34198637google scholar: lookup
        2. Umar MA, Fukui S, Kawase K, Itami T, Yamashita K. Cardiovascular effects of total intravenous anesthesia using ketamine-medetomidine-propofol (KMP-TIVA) in horses undergoing surgery.. J Vet Med Sci 2015 Mar;77(3):281-8.
          doi: 10.1292/jvms.14-0370pubmed: 25409552google scholar: lookup