Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2016; 48(6); 765-769; doi: 10.1111/evj.12546

Ex vivo comparison of the giant and transfixing knot in equine open and closed castration.

Abstract: In equine castration, application of a ligature on the spermatic cord to prevent complications such as haemorrhage and evisceration has been reported with controversial results. Characteristics of commonly used knots have not been studied. Objective: To compare the modified transfixing and giant knots and the emasculator in open and closed equine castration techniques. Methods: Ex vivo experiment. Methods: A total of 144 testicles were randomly assigned to 2 groups for open or closed castration. Both groups were divided into 3 subgroups of 18 specimens each: emasculator only, emasculator plus giant knot and emasculator plus transfixing knot and the open castration group also contained 2 further subgroups of 18 testicles each: giant knot only and transfixing knot only. The length of suture material used was measured for each knot and the leaking pressure of the testicular artery measured using dye injection. In the closed castration group, parietal tunic tensile strength was measured with a tensiometer. Results: Leaking pressure was higher in open compared with closed castration, with no significant difference among subgroups. In the closed castration group, minimum leaking pressure for the emasculator plus transfixing knot and emasculator only subgroups were close to standard physiological arterial pressures. The giant knot required less suture material than the transfixing knot. Parietal tunic tensile strength was higher when ligatures were applied. Conclusions: The giant and transfixing knot techniques have comparable haemostatic capability and parietal tunic tensile strength, but the giant knot requires less suture material. In open castration, using the emasculator alone may produce adequate haemostasis. In closed castration, using the giant knot in combination with the emasculator increases the bursting pressure and possibly reduces the incidence of haemorrhage. In closed castration, application of a ligature may reduce the risk of evisceration.
Publication Date: 2016-01-11 PubMed ID: 26639302DOI: 10.1111/evj.12546Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates the effectiveness of using different knot techniques on a horse’s testicles during castration. It found that the hole left by the giant and transfixing knots is similar in size, but the giant knot requires less suture material.

Research Objective

  • The purpose of this study was to compare the modified giant and transfixing knots and the emasculator in open and closed equine castration techniques.

Methods

  • 144 testicles were split into two groups: those used for open castration and those for closed castration.
  • The groups were further divided to compare multiple techniques: an emasculator only, an emasculator plus a giant knot, and an emasculator plus a transfixing knot.
  • The open castration group also analyzed the effects of the giant knot and transfixing knot by themselves.
  • The researchers measured the length of suture material needed for each knot and the leaking pressure of the testicular artery using dye injection. For the closed castration group, they evaluated the strength of the parietal tunic with a tensiometer.

Key Findings

  • The study found that open castration resulted in higher leaking pressure than closed castration. However, there wasn’t a significant difference between subgroups.
  • Minimum leaking pressure for the emasculator plus transfixing knot and emasculator-only subgroups was near standard physiological arterial pressures.
  • The giant knot used less suture material than the transfixing knot.
  • The tensile strength of the tunic was greater when ligatures were used.

Conclusions

  • The giant and transfixing knot techniques have comparable haemostatic capability and parietal tunic tensile strength, but the giant knot uses less suture material.
  • In open castration, using just the emasculator could provide suitable haemostasis.
  • For closed castration, using the giant knot with the emasculator increased the bursting pressure, potentially reducing the likelihood of haemorrhage.
  • Applying a ligature ring in closed castration could reduce the risk of evisceration.

Cite This Article

APA
Comino F, Giusto G, Caramello V, Pagliara E, Bellino C, Gandini M. (2016). Ex vivo comparison of the giant and transfixing knot in equine open and closed castration. Equine Vet J, 48(6), 765-769. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12546

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 48
Issue: 6
Pages: 765-769

Researcher Affiliations

Comino, F
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy. francesco.comino@gmail.com.
Giusto, G
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Caramello, V
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Pagliara, E
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Bellino, C
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Gandini, M
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cadaver
  • Horses / surgery
  • Ligation
  • Male
  • Orchiectomy / methods
  • Orchiectomy / veterinary
  • Spermatic Cord
  • Surgery, Veterinary / instrumentation
  • Suture Techniques / veterinary
  • Sutures
  • Tensile Strength
  • Testis

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.