Experiences of Interdisciplinary Working from the Perspective of the Society of Master Saddlers Qualified Saddle Fitters.
Abstract: Horse owners seek the advice and support of a number of equestrian professionals in carrying out their duty of care for their animal. In some instances, these professionals form a multi-disciplinary team (MDT). The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of the Society of Master Saddlers' qualified saddle fitters (SMSQSFs) working with other professionals and to understand the nature of inter-disciplinary working from an SMSQSF perspective. Semi-structured, one-to-one online interviews with fourteen SMSQSFs were completed. Areas explored included the nature of the participant's client base; the frequency and nature of their interactions with other professionals; their perceptions of horse owner expectations of an MDT approach; and any benefits, challenges, and barriers to an MDT approach within an equestrian setting. Interviews were video and audio recorded (MS Teams), transcribed verbatim (Otter ai), and imported into qualitative data analysis software (NVivo, version 12). Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Six themes were identified: (1) effective communication; (2) multidisciplinary expectations; (3) horse welfare; (4) professionalism; (5) relationships; (6) working together. Communication was recognised as a crucial component of an effective MDT. Most participants valued and desired an MDT approach. They felt they had a key role to play within the equestrian MDT, not only in the prevention of deterioration in horse welfare but also in improving the functionality and performance of the horse-rider partnership. Effective MDT working was also seen as having benefits to SMSQSFs and other professional stakeholders alike, although time and financial constraints were identified as barriers to MTD working. The role of the horse owner within the MDT was unclear and potentially complex, and this and other factors such as the professional identity of the SMSQSF, personal relationships, and input from others outside of the MDT team were identified as challenges to effective MDT working. This present study found that SMSQSFs experience similar benefits and challenges to an MDT approach as seen in human healthcare settings. The role of the horse owner, communication, and professional recognition are indicated as pivotal to MDT effectiveness in achieving optimal saddle fit.
Publication Date: 2024-02-07 PubMed ID: 38396527PubMed Central: PMC10886140DOI: 10.3390/ani14040559Google Scholar: Lookup The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research studies the experiences of qualified saddle fitters as part of a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) of equestrian professionals. It pinpoints communication, expectations, horse welfare, professionalism, relationships, and collaborative work as major themes that affect the effectiveness of these teams.
The Research Methodology
- This study employs semi-structured, face-to-face online interviews conducted with fourteen Society of Master Saddlers’ qualified saddle fitters (SMSQSFs).
- The interviews focused on various elements including the nature and size of the participant’s clientele base, their interactions with other professionals, their perception of horse owner’s expectations from the MDT, and the benefits and challenges of working within an MDT in an equestrian setting.
- These interviews were video and audio captured, transcribed verbatim and broken down into searchable pieces for analysis using thematic analysis.
Findings of the Study
- Six major themes were identified in this study. They include effective communication, multidisciplinary expectations, horse welfare, professionalism, relationships, and working together.
- Effective communication was stressed as a necessary factor for any MDT to function efficiently.
- Most participants recognized the advantages of an MDT working approach and their unique contribution to it, especially in preventing the decline in horse welfare and in improving the functionality and performance of the horse-rider duo.
- Obstacles to effective MDT working were identified to be time and financial constraints.
- The role of the horse owner within the MDT was found to be complex and unclear.
- Professional identity, personal relationships, and external input from others outside of the MDT team posed as challenges to effective team work.
Implications of the Study
- The experiences of SMSQSFs in an MDT show similarities with those recorded in human healthcare settings, giving an interesting perspective on interdisciplinary collaborations.
- The role of the horse owner, effective communication, and recognition of professional roles are deemed crucial for the effectiveness of an MDT in achieving an optimal saddle fit for the horses.
Cite This Article
APA
Nankervis K, MacKechnie-Guire R, Maddock C, Pyatt A.
(2024).
Experiences of Interdisciplinary Working from the Perspective of the Society of Master Saddlers Qualified Saddle Fitters.
Animals (Basel), 14(4), 559.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14040559 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Equine Department, Hartpury University, Gloucestershire GL19 3BE, UK.
- Equine Department, Hartpury University, Gloucestershire GL19 3BE, UK.
- Equine Department, Hartpury University, Gloucestershire GL19 3BE, UK.
- International Office, Veterinary Medicines Directorate, Addlestone KT15 3LS, UK.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
This article includes 42 references
- The British Equestrian Trade Association National Equestrian Survey. 2023. [(accessed on 18 October 2023)]. Available online: https://www.nationalequineforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/NEF23-BETA-The-National-Equestrian-Survey-2023.pdf.
- Taberna M., Gil Moncayo F., Janu00e9-Salas E., Antonio M., Arribas L., Vilajosana E., Peralvez Torres E., Mesu00eda R. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach and quality of care. Front. Oncol. 2020;10:85. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00085.
- Borrill C., West M., Shapiro D., Rees A. Team working and effectiveness in health care. Br. J. Healthc. Manag. 2000;6:364u2013371. doi: 10.12968/bjhc.2000.6.8.19300.
- Moyer W.A., Werner H.W., Ou2019Grady S.E., Ridley J.T. The veterinaryu2013farrier relationship: Establishing and sustaining a mutually beneficial liaison. Equine Vet. Educ. 2018;30:573u2013575. doi: 10.1111/eve.12936.
- McGowan C.M., Stubbs N.C., Jull G.A. Equine physiotherapy: A comparative view of the science underlying the profession. Equine Vet. J. 2007;39:90u201394. doi: 10.2746/042516407X163245.
- Veterinary Surgeons Act. [(accessed on 18 October 2023)];1966 Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1966/36.
- Farriers (Registration) Act. [(accessed on 18 October 2023)];2017 Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2017/28/contents.
- The Veterinary Surgery (Exemptions) Order. [(accessed on 18 October 2023)];2015 Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/772.
- The Equine Fitters Council. [(accessed on 18 October 2023)]. Available online: https://www.equinefittersdirectory.org/what-we-do/
- Dyson S., Carson S., Fisher M. Saddle fitting, recognising an ill-fitting saddle and the consequences of an ill-fitting saddle to horse and rider. Equine Vet. Educ. 2015;27:533u2013543. doi: 10.1111/eve.12436.
- Horseman S.V., Buller H., Mullan S., Whay H.R. Current welfare problems facing horses in Great Britain as identified by equine stakeholders. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0160269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160269.
- Clayton H.M., MacKechnie-Guire R. Tack Fit and Use. Vet. Clin. Equine Pract. 2022;38:585u2013601. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2022.07.003.
- Atwal A., Caldwell K. Do all health and social care professionals interact equally: A study of interactions in multidisciplinary teams in the United Kingdom. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2005;19:268u2013273. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00338.x.
- Carter S., Garside P., Black A. Multidisciplinary team working, clinical networks, and chambers; opportunities to work differently in the NHS. BMJ Qual. Saf. 2003;12((Suppl. S1)):i25u2013i28. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_1.i25.
- Lynden J., Ogden J., Hollands T. Contracting for careu2013the construction of the farrier role in supporting horse owners to prevent laminitis. Equine Vet. J. 2018;50:658u2013666. doi: 10.1111/evj.12950.
- Hesse K.L., Verheyen K.L.P. Associations between physiotherapy findings and subsequent diagnosis of pelvic or hindlimb fracture in racing Thoroughbreds. Equine Vet. J. 2010;42:234u2013239. doi: 10.2746/042516409X478479.
- Greve L., Dyson S.J. An investigation of the relationship between hindlimb lameness and saddle slip. Equine Vet. J. 2013;45:570u2013577. doi: 10.1111/evj.12029.
- Greve L., Dyson S.J. The interrelationship of lameness, saddle slip and back shape in the general sports horse population. Equine Vet. J. 2014;46:687u2013694. doi: 10.1111/evj.12222.
- Furtado T., Christley R. Study design synopsis: From the horseu2019s mouth: Qualitative methods for equine veterinary research. Equine Vet. J. 2021;53:867u2013871. doi: 10.1111/evj.13436.
- May C.F. Discovering new areas of veterinary science through qualitative research interviews: Introductory concepts for veterinarians. Aust. Vet. J. 2018;96:278u2013284. doi: 10.1111/avj.12718.
- Christley R.M., Perkins E. Researching hard to reach areas of knowledge: Qualitative research in veterinary science. Equine Vet. J. 2010;42:285u2013286. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00074.x.
- Booth A., Hannes K., Harden A., Noyes J., Harris J., Tong A. COREQ (consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies) Guidel. Report. Health Res. A Useru2019s Man. 2014:214u2013226. doi: 10.1002/9781118715598.ch21.
- Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2007;19:349u2013357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
- Bazeley P. Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications Ltd.; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2020. Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies; pp. 1u2013584.
- Braun V., Clarke V. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2022.
- Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006;3:77u2013101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Braun V., Clarke V. What can u201cthematic analysisu201d offer health and wellbeing researchers? Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-Being. 2014;9:26152. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.26152.
- Kinnison T., May S.A., Guile D. Inter-professional practice: From veterinarian to the veterinary team. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 2014;41:172u2013178. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0713-095R2.
- Gomez D.E., Arroyo L.G., Renaud D.L., Viel L., Weese J.S. A multidisciplinary approach to reduce and refine antimicrobial drugs use for diarrhoea in dairy calves. Vet. J. 2021;274:105713. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105713.
- Hall D., James D., Marsden N. Marginal gains: Olympic lessons in high performance for organisations. HR Bull. Res. Pract. 2012;7:9u201313.
- Hillegass B.E., Smith D.M., Phillips S.L. Changing managed care to care management: Innovations in nursing practice. Nurs. Adm. Q. 2002;26:33u201346. doi: 10.1097/00006216-200210000-00007.
- Kodner D.L., Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: Meaning, logic, applications, and implicationsu2014A discussion paper. Int. J. Integr. Care. 2002;2:e12. doi: 10.5334/ijic.67.
- Auschra C. Barriers to the integration of care in inter-organisational settings: A literature review. Int. J. Integr. Care. 2018;18:5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3068.
- Pyatt A.Z. Ph.D. Dissertation. Harper Adams University; Newport, UK: 2017. [(accessed on 30 October 2020)]. Service Provision in the Animal Health Sector. Available online: https://hau.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/17296.
- Loomans J.B.A., Waaijer P.G., Maree J.T.M., van Weeren P.R., Barneveld A. Quality of equine veterinary care. Part 2: Client satisfaction in equine top sports medicine in The Netherlands. Equine Vet. Educ. 2009;21:421u2013428. doi: 10.2746/095777309X448944.
- Pyatt A.Z., Walley K., Wright G.H., Bleach E.C.L. Co-Produced Care in Veterinary Services: A Qualitative Study of UK Stakeholdersu2019 Perspectives. Vet. Sci. 2020;7:149. doi: 10.3390/vetsci7040149.
- Mulligan F.J., Doherty M.L. Production diseases of the transition cow. Vet. J. 2008;176:3u20139. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.018.
- Mulligan F.J., Ou2019Grady L., Rice D.A., Doherty M.L. A herd health approach to dairy cow nutrition and production disease of the transition cow. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2006;96:331u2013353. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.011.
- Campbell M.L. The role of veterinarians in equestrian sport: A comparative review of ethical issues surrounding human and equine sports medicine. Vet. J. 2013;197:535u2013540. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.021.
- Rogers L., De Bru00fan A., Birken S.A., Davies C., McAuliffe E. The micropolitics of implementation; a qualitative study exploring the impact of power, authority, and influence when implementing change in healthcare teams. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2020;20:1059. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05905-z.
- Muca E., Cavallini D., Raspa F., Bordin C., Bergero D., Valle E. Integrating new learning methods into equine nutrition classrooms: The importance of studentsu2019 perceptions. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2023;126:104537. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104537.
- Muca E., Buonaiuto G., Lamanna M., Silvestrelli S., Ghiaccio F., Federiconi A., De Matos Vettori J., Colleluori R., Fusaro I., Raspa F., et al. Reaching a Wider Audience: Instagramu2019s Role in Dairy Cow Nutrition Education and Engagement. Animals. 2023;13:3503. doi: 10.3390/ani13223503.