Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record2005; 157(1); 9-13; doi: 10.1136/vr.157.1.9

Factors associated with the wastage and achievements in competition of event horses registered in the United Kingdom.

Abstract: The aims of this study were to estimate the wastage of horses registered for eventing in Britain, to investigate the reasons for this wastage and to evaluate factors affecting the horses' achievement of grade I status (at least 61 points) while registered. An analysis of the database of the British Eventing register found that 33.7 per cent of horses registered for the first time in 1999 were not re-registered for eventing in subsequent years. By using multivariable logistic regression analysis, it was shown that horses that were kept at an event yard were more likely to be re-registered than those kept on other premises (odds ratio [or] 2.0, 95 per cent confidence interval [ci] 1.2 to 3.2), and those that took part in showjumping while registered were also more likely to be re-registered (or 1.5, 95 per cent ci 1.1 to 2.2). Horses that took part in unaffiliated eventing while registered were less likely to be re-registered the following year (or 0.7, 95 per cent ci 0.5 to 0.9), as were those that were not insured (or 0.7, 95 per cent ci 0.5 to 1.0) and those from outside the British Isles (or 0.6, 95 per cent ci 0.3 to 1.0). Veterinary problems were the most commonly cited explanation (35.1 per cent) why horses that remained in their original ownership were not re-registered with British Eventing the following year. Horses from Australia were more likely to achieve grade I status than horses from the British Isles (or 9.7, 95 per cent ci 7.1 to 13.2), as were horses from New Zealand (or 6.4, 95 per cent ci 5.0 to 8.2), the usa (or 5.2, 95 per cent ci 3.8 to 7.2) and France (or 2.8, 95 per cent ci 2.1 to 3.7), but horses from the Netherlands (or 0.5, 95 per cent ci 0.3 to 0.9) and Belgium (or 0.3, 95 per cent ci 0.1 to 0.9) were less likely to achieve grade I status. Mares were less likely to achieve grade I status than geldings (or 0.4, 95 per cent ci 0.4 to 0.5).
Publication Date: 2005-07-05 PubMed ID: 15995236DOI: 10.1136/vr.157.1.9Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study focuses on the factors affecting the performance and wastage of event horses in Britain and their likelihood of attaining Grade I status, with findings revealing that location, insurance, and type of training facilities significantly impact the horse’s career.

Estimation of Wastage in Event Horses

  • The research seeks to estimate the prevalence of wastage, defined as horses registered for events but not re-registered in subsequent years. This study noticed that 33.7% of horses, registered for the first time in 1999, were not re-registered for eventing in the following years, indicating a significant instance of wastage.

Factors Influencing Re-registration

  • Horses kept at eventing yards, which are a form of specialist training facility, were twice as likely to be re-registered. This may show the value of skilled training and the quality of the facilities for the horses’ performance.
  • Horses that participated in showjumping events had a 50% higher likelihood of getting re-registered. This might suggest that engagement in a variety of equine activities maintains horses’ fitness and interest in eventing.
  • Contrarily, horses participating in unaffiliated eventing were less likely to be re-registered. This might be due to the lower standards or lack of recognized accreditation in these events affecting the horse’s performance or fitness.
  • Having insurance affected the re-registration of the horses. Uninsured horses were less likely to be re-registered, possibly reflecting higher veterinary costs that owners are unable to handle.

Geographical Impact

  • Horses outside of the British Isles were less likely to be re-registered, perhaps due to logistical or cost issues in international participation.
  • Interestingly, horses hailing from Australia, New Zealand, the United States, and France were more likely to achieve Grade I level, reflecting better breeding or training practices in these countries. In contrast, horses from Netherlands and Belgium were less likely to achieve this status.

Gender and Performance

  • The study discovered that mares were less likely to achieve Grade I status in comparison to geldings, suggesting a potential difference in performance or training reception between the sexes.

Role of Veterinary Problems

  • Veterinary problems were a significant factor leading to wastage, with over a third of horses not re-registered due to health issues. This statistic highlights the imperative need for effective healthcare protocols for maintaining the longevity of event horses’ careers.

Cite This Article

APA
O'Brien E, Stevens KB, Pfeiffer DU, Hall J, Marr CM. (2005). Factors associated with the wastage and achievements in competition of event horses registered in the United Kingdom. Vet Rec, 157(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.157.1.9

Publication

ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 157
Issue: 1
Pages: 9-13

Researcher Affiliations

O'Brien, E
  • Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA.
Stevens, K B
    Pfeiffer, D U
      Hall, J
        Marr, C M

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Databases, Factual
          • Female
          • Horses / classification
          • Logistic Models
          • Male
          • Registries / statistics & numerical data
          • Sports
          • Surveys and Questionnaires
          • United Kingdom

          Citations

          This article has been cited 5 times.
          1. Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 5;12(9).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
          2. Fenner K, Caspar G, Hyde M, Henshall C, Dhand N, Probyn-Rapsey F, Dashper K, McLean A, McGreevy P. It's all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament. PLoS One 2019;14(5):e0216699.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216699pubmed: 31086385google scholar: lookup
          3. Roszkowska K, Witkowska-Pilaszewicz O, Przewozny M, Cywinska A. Whole body and partial body cryotherapies - lessons from human practice and possible application for horses. BMC Vet Res 2018 Dec 12;14(1):394.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1679-6pubmed: 30541547google scholar: lookup
          4. Rogers CW, Bolwell CF, Gee EK. Proactive Management of the Equine Athlete. Animals (Basel) 2012 Dec 19;2(4):640-55.
            doi: 10.3390/ani2040640pubmed: 26487168google scholar: lookup
          5. Munsters CC, van den Broek J, Welling E, van Weeren R, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM. A prospective study on a cohort of horses and ponies selected for participation in the European Eventing Championship: reasons for withdrawal and predictive value of fitness tests. BMC Vet Res 2013 Sep 13;9:182.
            doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-182pubmed: 24034152google scholar: lookup