FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(18); 2648; doi: 10.3390/ani15182648

Factors Influencing the Intra-Oral Movement of the Bit: A Cadaveric Study.

Abstract: Bit-related trauma is a welfare issue in equestrian sports; therefore, a proper understanding of how the bit behaves inside the mouth is of importance. The objective of this study is to investigate the influence of bit design (snaffle bits/single/double-jointed; ring/eggbutt and curb bits), size, rein tension, and rein angle on the intra-oral movement of the bit in ex vivo specimens. The lateral and posterior movement of different bits was measured on cadaver heads under different circumstances. This ex vivo model, while not fully replicating natural conditions, provided insight into potential bit-related movements. Lateral displacement of the snaffle bit was significantly greater with higher unilateral rein tension. Bits that were too wide exhibited significantly more lateral and posterior displacement under unilateral rein tension. Posterior displacement increased with both unilateral and bilateral rein tensions. Using a bit that is too wide, using reins at a 20° angle, and applying 4 kg of rein tension were identified as risk factors for contact with the mesial gingival tissues of the mandibular 06s. Similar patterns were observed with curb bits, although bit movement was more restricted, and no contact with the mesial gingival tissues of the mandibular 06s was noted. This study demonstrated that bit design, bit size, rein angle, and rein tension all influence bit movement in the horse's mouth.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-09-10 PubMed ID: 41007896PubMed Central: PMC12466605DOI: 10.3390/ani15182648Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated how different factors such as bit design, size, rein tension, and rein angle influence the movement of a horse’s bit within the mouth using horse cadaver heads.
  • The research aimed to better understand bit behavior to help reduce bit-related trauma in equestrian sports.

Background and Importance

  • Bits are devices placed in a horse’s mouth to help communicate with and control the horse during riding.
  • Bit-related trauma is a recognized welfare issue in equestrian sports, where improper bit use or fitting can cause physical injury and discomfort.
  • Understanding how different factors affect the intra-oral movement of the bit can inform better equipment choices and handling techniques to minimize injury risk.

Research Objectives

  • To examine how bit design (types of bits such as snaffle, ring, eggbutt, and curb bits), bit size, rein tension, and rein angle affect the movement of the bit inside the horse’s mouth.
  • To measure lateral (side-to-side) and posterior (backward) movements of various bits under different controlled conditions.
  • To identify potential risk factors that might cause harmful contact between the bit and sensitive oral tissues.

Methods

  • Used ex vivo models, meaning horse cadaver heads were used to replicate conditions of bit placement and rein tension application.
  • Tested multiple bit designs including snaffle bits with single/double joints, ring and eggbutt types, as well as curb bits.
  • Applied varied rein tensions unilaterally (one rein) and bilaterally (both reins), and adjusted rein angles up to 20°.
  • Measured lateral and posterior movements of the bits utilizing precise mechanical setups in these cadaver specimens.

Key Findings

  • Lateral Displacement:
    • Snaffle bits shifted more side-to-side when higher rein tension was applied on one side (unilateral tension).
    • Excessively wide bits moved more laterally and posteriorly under unilateral rein tension, increasing risk for harmful contact.
  • Posterior Displacement:
    • Bit displacement toward the back of the mouth increased with both unilateral and bilateral rein tension.
    • Using a rein angle of roughly 20° and applying about 4 kg of rein tension were specifically linked to increased contact risk with the mesial gingival tissue (gum area next to a specific lower tooth, mandibular 06).
  • Bit Design Impact:
    • Curb bits showed more restricted movement compared to snaffles, with no damaging contact to the gingival tissue observed.
    • Different joint and ring designs influenced how the bits moved in response to applied forces.

Implications and Conclusions

  • Bit design, size, angle of rein application, and rein tension all play significant roles in how the bit moves inside a horse’s mouth.
  • Bits that are too wide or rein handling methods that produce sharp angles and high unilateral tensions increase risk of harming oral tissues.
  • This study provides evidence-based insights that can guide better fitting and handling practices to reduce bit-related injuries in horses.
  • Ex vivo cadaver studies offer valuable controlled conditions for studying bit dynamics but cannot fully replicate live horse oral environments, suggesting the need for complementary in vivo research.

Cite This Article

APA
Pollaris E, Hannes C, Haspeslagh M, Demey W, Teysen S, Boussauw B, Vlaminck L. (2025). Factors Influencing the Intra-Oral Movement of the Bit: A Cadaveric Study. Animals (Basel), 15(18), 2648. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15182648

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 18
PII: 2648

Researcher Affiliations

Pollaris, Elke
  • Equine Clinic De Morette by Equine Care Group, 1730 Asse, Belgium.
Hannes, Chris
  • Independent Researcher, 2290 Vorselaar, Belgium.
Haspeslagh, Maarten
  • Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Demey, Wouter
  • Independent Researcher, 3290 Schaffen, Belgium.
Teysen, Stijn
  • Independent Researcher, 1730 Asse, Belgium.
Boussauw, Bernard
  • Equine Clinic De Bosdreef by Equine Care Group, 9880 Lokeren, Belgium.
Vlaminck, Lieven
  • Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 26 references
  1. Bennet D.G.. Bits, Bridles and Accessories. In: Easley J., Schumacher J., Dixon P.M., editors. Equine Dentistry. 3rd ed. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2011. pp. 27–42.
  2. Ashley F.H., Waterman-Pearson A.E., Whay H.R.. Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: Application to clinical practice and future studies. Equine Vet. J. 2005;37:565–575.
    doi: 10.2746/042516405775314826pubmed: 16295937google scholar: lookup
  3. Cook W.R., Kibler M.. Behavioural assessment of pain in 66 horses, with and without a bit. Equine Vet. Educ. 2019;31:551–560.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12916google scholar: lookup
  4. Jansson N., Hesselholt M., Falmer-Hansen J.. Extirpation of a mandibular canine tooth in a horse as a treatment for severe bit-induced trauma to the bar. Equine Vet. Educ. 1998;10:143–145.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.1998.tb00868.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  5. Scoggins R.D.. Bits and Mouth Injuries. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1989;9:101–102.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(89)80037-1google scholar: lookup
  6. Smith J.C.. Osteitis and Sequestrum Formation of the Interdental Region of the Mandible in 11 Polo Ponies. Vet. Rec. 1993;133:188–189.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.133.8.188pubmed: 8236716google scholar: lookup
  7. Cook W.R.. Damage by the bit to the equine interdental space and second lower premolar. Equine Vet. Educ. 2011;23:355–360.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2010.00167.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  8. Mata F., Johnson C., Bishop C.. A Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study of Prevalence and Severity of Bit-Induced Oral Trauma in Polo Ponies and Race Horses. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2015;18:259–268.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1004407pubmed: 25679445google scholar: lookup
  9. Bjornsdottir S., Frey R., Kristjansson T., Lundstrom T.. Bit-related lesions in Icelandic competition horses. Acta Vet. Scand. 2014;56:40.
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-014-0040-8pmc: PMC4236600pubmed: 25116656google scholar: lookup
  10. Tell A., Egenvall A., Lundstrom T., Wattle O.. The prevalence of oral ulceration in Swedish horses when ridden with bit and bridle and when unridden. Vet. J. 2018;178:405–410.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.09.020pubmed: 19027332google scholar: lookup
  11. Uldahl M., Clayton H.M.. Lesions associated with the use of bits, nosebands, spurs and whips in Danish competition horses. Equine Vet. J. 2019;51:154–162.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12827pubmed: 29502345google scholar: lookup
  12. Tuomola K., Maki-Kihnia N., Kujala-Wirth M., Mykkanen A., Valros A.. Oral Lesions in the Bit Area in Finnish Trotters After a Race: Lesion Evaluation, Scoring, and Occurrence. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019;6:206.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00206pmc: PMC6640207pubmed: 31355213google scholar: lookup
  13. Clayton H.M., Lee R.. A fluoroscopic study of the position and action of the jointed snaffle bit in the horse’s mouth. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1984;4:193–196.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(84)80141-0google scholar: lookup
  14. Clayton H.M.. A fluoroscopic study of the position and action of different bits in the horse’s mouth. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1985;5:68–77.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(85)80050-2google scholar: lookup
  15. Manfredi J., Clayton H.M., Rosenstein D.. Radiographic study of bit position within the horse’s oral cavity. Equine Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2005;2:195–201.
    doi: 10.1079/ECP200564google scholar: lookup
  16. Manfredi J, Rosenstein D, Lanovaz JL, Nauwelaerts S, Clayton HM. Fluoroscopic study of oral behaviours in response to the presence of a bit and the effects of rein tension. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2010;6:143–148.
    doi: 10.1017/S1755254010000036google scholar: lookup
  17. Clayton HM, Singleton WH, Lanovaz JL, Cloud GL. Strain gauge measurement of rein tension during riding: A pilot study. Equine Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2005;2:203–205.
    doi: 10.1079/ECP200553google scholar: lookup
  18. Pollaris E, Hannes C, Demey W, Teysen S, Boussauw B, Haspeslagh M, Vlaminck L. Bit-induced lesions in the equine mouth: Prevalence and association with the bit. Proceedings of the 28th European Veterinary Dental Forum, Book of Proceedings Utrecht, The Netherlands. 16–18 May 2019; pp. 126–127.
  19. Scoggins RD. Bits, Bitting and Dentistry. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the AAEP San Diego, CA, USA. 28 November 2001; pp. 138–141.
  20. Waran N, McGreevy PD, Casey R. Training Methods and Horse Welfare. The Welfare of Horses Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2002. pp. 151–180.
  21. Quick JS, Warren-Smith AK. Preliminary investigations of horses’ (Equus caballus) responses to different bridles during foundation training. J. Vet. Behav. 2009;4:169–176.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2008.12.001google scholar: lookup
  22. Johnson TJ. Surgical Removal of Mandibular Periostitis (Bone Spurs) Caused by Bit Damage. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the AAEP Denver, CO, USA. 6–10 December 2002; pp. 458–462.
  23. Dumbell L, Lemon C, Williams J. A systematic literature review to evaluate the tools and methods used to measure rein tension. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:77–87.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.04.003google scholar: lookup
  24. Warren-Smith AK, Curtis RA, Greetham L, McGreevy PD. Rein contact between horse and handler during specific equitation movements. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007;108:157–169.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.11.017google scholar: lookup
  25. de Cartier d’Yves A, Ödberg OF. A Preliminary Study on the Relation Between Subjectively Assessing Dressage Performances and Objective Welfare Parameters. Proceedings of the First International Equitation Science Symposium Melbourne, Australia. 26–27 August 2005; Ghent, Belgium: UGent; 2005. pp. 89–110.
  26. Clayton HM, Singleton WH, Lanovaz JL, Cloud GL. Measurement of rein tension during horseback riding using strain gage transducers. Exp. Tech. 2003;27:34–36.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2003.tb00112.xgoogle scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 100,280 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.