Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record2025; 198(1); e21-e29; doi: 10.1002/vetr.5429

Factors influencing UK veterinarians’ decisions to leave equine clinical practice.

Abstract: Recruitment and retention of equine veterinarians presents an ongoing challenge for employers. Recent research has highlighted factors that contribute to attrition across the profession, but further understanding of the specific challenges faced in the equine sector is needed. This study builds on existing research by exploring the relative impact of different factors on veterinarians' decisions to leave equine clinical practice. Methods: Veterinarians who had left equine clinical practice in the UK within the previous 10 years were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey. The participants were asked about the extent to which various factors influenced their decision to leave, and about the kind of job roles they were pursuing instead. Results: Both work-related and non-work-related (personal) factors had an important impact on the decision to leave equine clinical practice, and there was often interplay between the two. The three factors with the most significant impact were work related. These were 'excessive workload/unsustainable work schedules', 'the requirement for out-of-hours work' and 'lack of opportunity for professional growth'. The most important non-work-related factors were 'lack of personal time' and 'alternative professional interests'. In comparison to existing research from the entire veterinary profession, the requirement for out-of-hours work and a lack of opportunity for professional growth appeared to be particularly relevant for the equine sector. Conclusions: The number of participants was relatively small (n = 33), and limited demographic data were collected; therefore, the results cannot be extrapolated to different demographic groups. Conclusions: This information may help guide decision making to improve retention of a resilient equine veterinary workforce.
Publication Date: 2025-06-02 PubMed ID: 40455517PubMed Central: PMC12758261DOI: 10.1002/vetr.5429Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Cite This Article

APA
Rigby C, Prutton A. (2025). Factors influencing UK veterinarians’ decisions to leave equine clinical practice. Vet Rec, 198(1), e21-e29. https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.5429

Publication

ISSN: 2042-7670
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 198
Issue: 1
Pages: e21-e29

Researcher Affiliations

Rigby, Charlotte
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Prutton, Alison
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Veterinarians / psychology
  • Veterinarians / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • United Kingdom
  • Male
  • Female
  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Decision Making
  • Adult
  • Veterinary Medicine
  • Middle Aged
  • Workload / psychology
  • Career Choice
  • Job Satisfaction
  • Personnel Turnover / statistics & numerical data

Conflict of Interest Statement

Neither of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

References

This article includes 41 references
  1. nRoyal College of Veterinary Surgeonsn. Recruitment, retention and return in the veterinary profession. RCVS Workforce Summit 2021. Preliminary Report. Vol. 2; 2022. Accessed Nov 2024. Available from: https://www.rcvs.org.uk/news‐and‐views/publications/recruitment‐retention‐and‐return‐in‐the‐veterinary‐profession/n
  2. nBegeny C, Ryan M, Bongiorno R. Motivation, satisfaction, and retention. Understanding the importance of vets’ day‐to‐day work experiences. British Veterinary Association; 2018. Accessed Oct 2024. Available from: https://www.bva.co.uk/media/2990/motivation‐satisfaction‐and‐retention‐bva‐workforce‐report‐nov‐2018‐1.pdfn
  3. Hagen JR, Weller R, Mair TS, Kinnison T. Investigation of factors affecting recruitment and retention in the UK veterinary profession. Vet Rec. 2020;187(9):354.
    pubmed: 32817568
  4. nWebb A. Quit warning: one in three vets say future not bright—BVA survey. Vet Times. 2024. Accessed Nov 2024. Available from: https://www.vettimes.co.uk/news/quit‐warning‐one‐in‐three‐vets‐say‐future‐not‐bright‐bva‐survey/n
  5. nVet Futures. Seven‐year itch: vets who make the move to non‐clinical work do so after seven years. 2018. Accessed Nov 2024. Available from: https://vetfutures.org.uk/seven‐year‐itch‐vets‐who‐make‐the‐move‐to‐non‐clinical‐work‐do‐so‐after‐seven‐years/n
  6. Griffiths H. BEVA recruitment and retention. Proceedings of the British Equine Veterinary Association Annual Congress, Liverpool, UK. 7‐10 September. 2022.
  7. nGrieve L. Improve veterinary practice. Focus: supporting the next generation of equine vets. 2023. Accessed Oct 2024. Available from: https://www.veterinary‐practice.com/article/supporting‐the‐next‐generation‐of‐equine‐vetsn
  8. nGrieve L. Improve veterinary practice. Focus: where have all the equine vets gone?n2022. Accessed Oct 2024 Available from: https://www.veterinary‐practice.com/article/where‐have‐all‐the‐equine‐vets‐gonen
  9. nSmith R. Improve veterinary practice. Focus: how can we address the veterinary workforce shortfall?n2024. Accessed Oct 2024. Available from: https://www.veterinary‐practice.com/article/how‐can‐we‐address‐the‐veterinary‐workforce‐shortfalln
  10. Grice AL. Time for change in the equine veterinary industry. Equine Vet Educ. 2023;35(2):60‒61.
  11. Whitaker K, Burnette A, Tan JY, Graves M, Hunt J, Devine E, et al. Factors influencing equine veterinarians' job satisfaction and retention: a focus group study. Equine Vet J. 2025:14467.
    pmc: PMC12508282pubmed: 39790082
  12. Elcock E, Scholfield I, Hill BJ, Braid HR, Mair TS. Survey of UK veterinary students’ perceptions about a career in equine practice. Equine Vet Educ. 2025;37:21‒28.
  13. nAmerican Veterinary Medical Associationn, American Association of Equine Practitioners. AAEP/AVMA Economic Report. 2017. Accessed Nov 2024. Available from: https://aaep.org/resource/aaep‐avma‐economic‐report/n
  14. Arbe Montoya AI, Hazel SJ, Matthew SM, McArthur ML. Why do veterinarians leave clinical practice? A qualitative study using thematic analysis. Vet Rec. 2021;188(1):e2.
    pubmed: 34651756
  15. Parkin TDH, Brown J, Macdonald EB. Occupational risks of working with horses: a questionnaire survey of equine veterinary surgeons. Equine Vet Educ. 2018;30:200‒205.
  16. nBritish Equine Veterinary Associationn, British Small Animal Veterinary Association and Royal Veterinary College. Recruitment and retention in the veterinary profession Survey. 2018. Accessed Mar 2024. Available from: https://www.beva.org.uk/retention‐surveyn
  17. Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2013.
  18. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77‒101.
  19. O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ. “Any other comments?” Open questions on questionnaires—a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:1‒7.
    pmc: PMC533875pubmed: 15533249
  20. Hatch PH, Winefield HR, Christie BA, Lievaart JJ. Workplace stress, mental health, and burnout of veterinarians in Australia. Aust Vet J. 2011;89(11):460‒468.
    pubmed: 22008127
  21. de Vries N, Boone A, Godderis L, Bouman J, Szemik S, Matranga D, et al. The race to retain healthcare workers: a systematic review on factors that impact retention of nurses and physicians in hospitals. Inquiry. 2023;60:1‒21.
    pmc: PMC10014988pubmed: 36912131
  22. Marufu TC, Collins A, Vargas L, Gillespie L, Almghairbi D. Factors influencing retention among hospital nurses: systematic review. Br J Nurs. 2021;30(5):302‒308.
    pubmed: 33733849
  23. Arbe Montoya AI, Hazel SJ, Hebart ML, McArthur ML. Risk factors associated with veterinary attrition from clinical practice: a descriptive study. Aust Vet J. 2021;99(11):495‒501.
    pubmed: 34389973
  24. nImprove Veterinary Practice. Focus: farm animal and equine out‐of‐hours calls: the challenge or the nightmare. 2011. Accessed Oct 2024. Available from: https://www.veterinary‐practice.com/article/farm‐animal‐and‐equine‐out‐of‐hours‐calls‐the‐challenge‐or‐the‐nightmaren
  25. Kogan LR, Rishniw M. Differences in perceptions and satisfaction exist among veterinarians employed at corporate versus privately owned veterinary clinics. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2023;261(12):1838‒1846.
    pubmed: 37607680
  26. nBritish Veterinary Associationn. Voice of the veterinary profession survey. 2018. Accessed Oct 2024. Available from: https://www.bva.co.uk/take‐action/voice‐survey/n
  27. nRobinson D, Edwards M, Mason B, Cockett J, Graham KA, Martin A. The 2019 survey of the veterinary profession. A report for the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. RCVS. 2020. Accessed Nov 2024. Available from: https://www.rcvs.org.uk/news-and‐views/publications/the‐2019‐survey‐of‐the‐veterinary‐profession/n
  28. Kogan LR, Rishniw M. Veterinarians and moral distress. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2023;261(5):1‒7.
    pubmed: 36753393
  29. nBritish Equine Veterinary Association. Don't break your vet. 2018. Accessed Jan 2025. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZLor1KlzkI9X1UpvbOxwllS1BNoLvcmRn
  30. nBritish Equine Veterinary Association. Workplace safety. Accessed Jan 2025. Available from: https://www.beva.org.uk/Guidance‐and‐Resources/Practice‐Managers/workplace‐safetyn
  31. Furtado T, Whiting M, Schofield I, Jackson R, Tulloch JSP. Pain, inconvenience and blame: defining work‐related injuries in the veterinary workplace. Occup Med‐C. 2024;74(7):501‒507.
    pmc: PMC11444373pubmed: 39129359
  32. Arbe Montoya AI, Matthew SM, Jarden A, Hazel SJ, McArthur ML. Moral distress in veterinarians. Vet Rec. 2019;185(20):6.
    pubmed: 31427407
  33. Baysal Y, Goy N, Hartnack S, Guseva Canu I. Moral distress measurement in animal care workers: a systematic review. Br Med J Open. 2024;14(4):e082235.
    pmc: PMC11033641pubmed: 38643012
  34. Corley MC, Elswick RK, Gorman M, Clor T. Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33(2):250‒256.
    pubmed: 11168709
  35. Morley G, Ives J, Bradbury‐Jones C, Irvine F. What is ‘moral distress’? A narrative synthesis of the literature. Nurs Ethics. 2019;26(3):646‒662.
    pmc: PMC6506903pubmed: 28990446
  36. Rollin BE. Euthanasia, moral stress, and chronic illness in veterinary medicine. Vet Clin Small Anim Pract. 2011;41(3):651‒659.
    pubmed: 21601753
  37. O'Connell CB. Gender and the experience of moral distress in critical care nurses. Nurs Ethics. 2015;22(1):32‒42.
    pubmed: 24482261
  38. Hossain M, Himi S, Ameen J. Strategic use of exit interviews: the art of retention. Asian J Bus Acc. 2017;2(4):1‒2.
  39. Flint A, Webster J. The use of the exit interview to reduce turnover amongst healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3):1‒6.
    pubmed: 21249677
  40. Elston DM. Participation bias, self‐selection bias, and response bias. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;18:1‒2.
    pubmed: 34153389
  41. Kreitchmann RS, Abad FJ, Ponsoda V, Nieto MD, Morillo D. Controlling for response biases in self‐report scales: forced‐choice vs. psychometric modelling of Likert items. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2309.
    pmc: PMC6803422pubmed: 31681103

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.