FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / BMC Vet Res / Faecal microbiota and serum metabolome association with equi...
BMC veterinary research2025; 21(1); 411; doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04853-2

Faecal microbiota and serum metabolome association with equine metabolic syndrome in connemara ponies.

Abstract: Faecal microbiome and serum metabolome have been studied in human medicine to provide a better understanding of metabolic derangements including diabetes; however, equivalent studies in equine medicine are limited. This was a case-control study conducted to identify differences in faecal microbiota composition and concurrent serum metabolite patterns between metabolically normal Connemara ponies and those with Equine Metabolic Syndrome (EMS). Thirty privately owned Connemara ponies (15 EMS and 15 controls) were included in the study. EMS was diagnosed by oral sugar test (OST). Blood samples were collected before and after an oral sugar challenge. One concurrent faecal sample was collected from each pony. Sequencing of the V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene was used to identify the microbial communities in faecal samples and assess the differences in microbial profiles between groups. Serum metabolites were analyzed using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Finally, multi-omics analysis was conducted by integration of microbiota-metabolome datasets to determine potential associations between metabolites and microbiota in EMS. Results: The faecal microbiota community composition was significantly different between EMS and control groups (p = 0.04 and r = 4.3%). EMS ponies showed reduced species richness and evenness compared to normal ponies, however it did not reach significant difference. The EMS ponies showed an enrichment of serum metabolites belonging to triglycerides (TGs), along with a reduction of other metabolite classes. Integrative multi-omics analysis revealed two modules in the metabolome and microbiota datasets that were significantly different between the EMS and control groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study suggests that concurrent faecal microbiota and serum metabolome features significantly differ between Connemara ponies with and without EMS. These results provide insights that may assist in the search for diagnostic markers associated with microbiota changes and novel preventative management methods to manipulate microbiota in horses with EMS.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-07-01 PubMed ID: 40598279PubMed Central: PMC12220031DOI: 10.1186/s12917-025-04853-2Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study focuses on examining the differences in faecal microbiota and serum metabolome between normal Connemara ponies and those diagnosed with Equine Metabolic Syndrome (EMS), broadening the understanding of metabolic disorders in the equine medical field.

Objective and Methodology

  • The objective of this study was to identify and analyse existing differences in faecal microbiota and concurrent serum metabolite patterns between EMS diagnosed Connemara ponies and their metabolically normal counterparts.
  • The researchers carried out a case-control study that included thirty privately owned Connemara ponies—15 were diagnosed with EMS, and 15 served as controls.
  • The identification process of EMS was through an oral sugar test (OST).
  • Blood samples were gathered before and after triggering an oral sugar challenge.
  • Each pony provided one concurrent faecal sample.
  • The researchers used sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene to recognize and assess contrasting microbial community profiles among the groups.
  • Liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) was utilised for the analysis of the serum metabolites.
  • Finally, an integrative multi-omics analysis of microbiota-metabolome datasets was performed to identify potential associations between metabolites and microbiota in EMS.

Results

  • The study revealed a significant difference in the composition of the faecal microbiota community between the EMS and control groups.
  • EMS ponies displayed reduced species richness and evenness compared to normal ponies, but this difference wasn’t statistically significant.
  • In the serum metabolites, an enrichment was observed in the EMS ponies related to triglycerides (TGs), along with a reduction of other metabolite classes.
  • The multi-omics analysis identified two modules in the metabolome and microbiota datasets that were significantly distinct between the EMS and control groups.

Conclusion

  • The study concludes that there are significant differences in the faecal microbiota and serum metabolome features between Connemara ponies with and without EMS.
  • This research provides valuable insights that might assist in finding diagnostic markers related to microbiota changes and developing new preventative management methods to control microbiota in horses with EMS.

Cite This Article

APA
Al-Ansari AS, Duggan V, Mulcahy G, Yin X, Brennan L, Cotter PD, Patel SH, O'Donovan CM, Crispie F, Walshe N. (2025). Faecal microbiota and serum metabolome association with equine metabolic syndrome in connemara ponies. BMC Vet Res, 21(1), 411. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04853-2

Publication

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 1
Pages: 411
PII: 411

Researcher Affiliations

Al-Ansari, Ahmed Saleh
  • College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khodh, Muscat, Oman. asansari@squ.edu.om.
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. asansari@squ.edu.om.
Duggan, Vivienne
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Mulcahy, Grace
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
  • Conway Institute of Biomedical and Biomolecular Research, Dublin, Ireland.
Yin, Xiaofei
  • Conway Institute of Biomedical and Biomolecular Research, Dublin, Ireland.
Brennan, Lorraine
  • Conway Institute of Biomedical and Biomolecular Research, Dublin, Ireland.
Cotter, Paul D
  • SeqBiome Ltd, Cork, Ireland.
  • Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Cork, Ireland.
Patel, Shriram H
  • SeqBiome Ltd, Cork, Ireland.
O'Donovan, Ciara M
  • SeqBiome Ltd, Cork, Ireland.
Crispie, Fiona
  • Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Cork, Ireland.
Walshe, Nicola
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
  • Department of Biological Sciences, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Co. Limerick, Ireland.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horse Diseases / blood
  • Horse Diseases / metabolism
  • Metabolome
  • Metabolic Syndrome / veterinary
  • Metabolic Syndrome / microbiology
  • Metabolic Syndrome / blood
  • Metabolic Syndrome / metabolism
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Male
  • Female
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
  • Microbiota
  • Gastrointestinal Microbiome

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the UCD Animal Research Ethics Committee (reference AREC-21–02- Duggan) and performed under license from the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) (reference AE18982/P198). Every pony’s owner’s consent was obtained, and a consent form was signed. Consent for Publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 55 references
  1. Durham AE, Frank N, McGowan CM, Menzies-Gow NJ, Roelfsema E, Vervuert I. ECEIM consensus statement on equine metabolic syndrome.. J Vet Intern Med 2019;33(2):335–49.
    pmc: PMC6430910pubmed: 30724412
  2. Frank N, Tadros EM. Insulin dysregulation.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2014;46:103–12.
    pubmed: 24033478
  3. De Laat MA, Fitzgerald DM. Equine metabolic syndrome: Role of the enteroinsular axis in the insulin response to oral carbohydrate.. Vet J 2023;294(February):105967.
    pubmed: 36858344doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.105967google scholar: lookup
  4. Grenager NS. Endocrinopathic Laminitis.. Vet Clin North Am - Equine Pract 2021;37(3):619–38.
    pubmed: 34674908doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2021.08.001google scholar: lookup
  5. Banse HE, McFarlane D. Comparison of three methods for evaluation of equine insulin regulation in horses of varied body condition score.. J Equine Vet Sci 2014;34(6):742–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2014.01.001google scholar: lookup
  6. Van Den Wollenberg L, Vandendriessche V, van Maanen K, Counotte GHM. Comparison of Two Diagnostic Methods to Detect Insulin Dysregulation in Horses Under Field Conditions.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;88:102954.
    pubmed: 32303301doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102954google scholar: lookup
  7. Pedersen HK, Gudmundsdottir V, Nielsen HB, Hyotylainen T, Nielsen T, Jensen BAH. Human gut microbes impact host serum metabolome and insulin sensitivity.. Nature 2016;535(7612):376–81.
    pubmed: 27409811doi: 10.1038/nature18646google scholar: lookup
  8. Liu R, Hong J, Xu X, Feng Q, Zhang D, Gu Y. Gut microbiome and serum metabolome alterations in obesity and after weight-loss intervention.. Nat Med 2017;23(7):859–68.
    pubmed: 28628112
  9. Tilg H, Moschen AR. Microbiota and diabetes: An evolving relationship.. Gut 2014;63(9):1513–21.
    pubmed: 24833634
  10. Elzinga SE, Weese JS, Adams AA. Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Horses With Equine Metabolic Syndrome and Metabolically Normal Controls Fed a Similar All-Forage Diet.. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;44:9–16.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.05.010google scholar: lookup
  11. Fitzgerald DM, Spence RJ, Stewart ZK, Prentis PJ, Sillence MN, De Laat MA. The effect of diet change and insulin dysregulation on the faecal microbiome of ponies.. J Exp Biol 2020;223(7):jeb219154.
    pubmed: 32098884doi: 10.1242/jeb.219154google scholar: lookup
  12. Floegel A, Stefan N, Yu Z, Mühlenbruch K, Drogan D, Joost HG. Identification of serum metabolites associated with risk of type 2 diabetes using a targeted metabolomic approach.. Diabetes 2013;62(2):639–48.
    pmc: PMC3554384pubmed: 23043162
  13. Jacob SI, Murray KJ, Rendahl AK, Geor RJ, Schultz NE, McCue ME. Metabolic perturbations in Welsh Ponies with insulin dysregulation, obesity, and laminitis.. J Vet Intern Med 2018;32(3):1215–33.
    pmc: PMC5980341pubmed: 29572947
  14. Patterson Rosa L, Mallicote MF, Long MT, Brooks SA. Metabogenomics reveals four candidate regions involved in the pathophysiology of Equine Metabolic Syndrome.. Mol Cell Probes 2020;53:101620.
    pmc: PMC7494547pubmed: 32659253
  15. Al-Ansari AS, Golding E, Walshe N, Mooney CT, Duggan V. Obesity and obesity-associated metabolic disease conditions in Connemara ponies in Ireland.. Equine Vet J 2023;(October):1–8.
    pubmed: 37985219
  16. Tyma JF, Epstein KL, Whitfield-Cargile CM, Cohen ND, Giguère S. Investigation of effects of omeprazole on the fecal and gastric microbiota of healthy adult horses.. Am J Vet Res 2019;80(1):79–86.
    pubmed: 30605038
  17. Walshe N, Duggan V, Cabrera-Rubio R, Crispie F, Cotter P, Feehan O. Removal of adult cyathostomins alters faecal microbiota and promotes an inflammatory phenotype in horses.. Int J Parasitol 2019;49(6):489–500.
    pubmed: 30986403doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.02.003google scholar: lookup
  18. Solieri L, Dakal TC, Giudici P. Next-generation sequencing and its potential impact on food microbial genomics.. Ann Microbiol 2013;63(1):21–37.
  19. Walshe N, Cabrera-Rubio R, Collins R, Puggioni A, Gath V, Crispie F. A Multiomic Approach to Investigate the Effects of a Weight Loss Program on the Intestinal Health of Overweight Horses.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8(June):1–16.
    pmc: PMC8249564pubmed: 34222398
  20. Yin X, Prendiville O, McNamara AE, Brennan L. Targeted Metabolomic Approach to Assess the Reproducibility of Plasma Metabolites over a Four Month Period in a Free-Living Population.. J Proteome Res 2022;21(3):683–90.
    pmc: PMC8902803pubmed: 34978446
  21. Anh NK, Thu NQ, Tran N, Tien N, Long NP. Advancements in Mass Spectrometry-Based Targeted Metabolomics and Lipidomics : Implications for Clinical Research.. Molecules 2024;29(24):1–23.
    pmc: PMC11677340pubmed: 39770023
  22. Zhou B, Xiao JF, Tuli L, Ressom HW. LC-MS-based metabolomics.. Mol Biosyst 2012;8(2):470–81.
    pmc: PMC3699692pubmed: 22041788
  23. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.. Bioinformatics 2014;30(15):2114–20.
    pmc: PMC4103590pubmed: 24695404
  24. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.. Nat Methods 2016;13(7):581–3.
    pmc: PMC4927377pubmed: 27214047
  25. Davis NM, Proctor DiM, Holmes SP, Relman DA, Callahan BJ. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data.. Microbiome 2018;6(1):1–14.
    pmc: PMC6298009pubmed: 30558668
  26. Mallick H, Rahnavard A, McIver LJ, Ma S, Zhang Y, Nguyen LH. Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies.. PLoS Comput Biol 2021;17(11):1–27.
    pmc: PMC8714082pubmed: 34784344doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009442google scholar: lookup
  27. Liu Y. CWGCNA : an R package to perform causal inference from the WGCNA framework.. NAR genomics bioinformatics 2024;6(2):lqae042.
    pmc: PMC11044439pubmed: 38666214
  28. Arias-González JE, Acosta-González G, Membrillo N, Garza-Pérez JR, Castro-Pérez JM. Predicting spatially explicit coral reef fish abundance, richness and Shannon-Weaver index from habitat characteristics.. Biodivers Conserv 2012;21(1):115–30.
  29. Voland L, Le Roy T, Debédat J, Clément K. Gut microbiota and vitamin status in persons with obesity: A key interplay.. Obes Rev 2022;23(2):e13377-n/a.
    pubmed: 34767276
  30. Gao Y, Li W, Huang X, Lyu Y, Yue C. Advances in Gut Microbiota-Targeted Therapeutics for Metabolic Syndrome.. Microorganisms 2024;12(5):1–14.
    pmc: PMC11123306pubmed: 38792681
  31. Olalekan SO, Bakare OO, Osonuga IO, Faponle AS, Adegbesan BO, Ezima EN. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites: implications for metabolic syndrome and therapeutic interventions.. Egypt J Intern Med 2024;36(1).
    doi: 10.1186/s43162-024-00342-4google scholar: lookup
  32. Coleman MC, Whitfield-Cargile CM, Madrigal RG, Cohen ND. Comparison of the microbiome, metabolome, and lipidome of obese and non-obese horses.. PLoS One 2019;14(4):1–17.
    pmc: PMC6478336pubmed: 31013335
  33. Zheng Y, Qin C, Wen M, Zhang L, Wang W. The Effects of Food Nutrients and Bioactive Compounds on the Gut Microbiota: A Comprehensive Review.. Foods 2024;13(9):1–21.
    pmc: PMC11083588pubmed: 38731716
  34. Buckel W. Energy Conservation in Fermentations of Anaerobic Bacteria.. Front Microbiol 2021;12(September):1–16.
    pmc: PMC8473912pubmed: 34589068
  35. Fitzgerald DM, Anderson ST, Sillence MN, De Laat MA. The cresty neck score is an independent predictor of insulin dysregulation in ponies.. PLoS ONE 2019;14(7):1–15.
    pmc: PMC6655749pubmed: 31339945
  36. Gong R, Luo G, Wang M, Ma L, Sun S, Wei X. Associations between TG/HDL ratio and insulin resistance in the US population: a cross-sectional study.. Endocr Connect 2021;10(11):1502–12.
    pmc: PMC8630769pubmed: 34678755
  37. Suagee JK, Corl BA, Wearn JG, Crisman MV, Hulver MW, Geor RJ. Effects of the Insulin-Sensitizing Drug Pioglitazone and Lipopolysaccharide Administration on Insulin Sensitivity in Horses.. 2011;25(2):356–64.
    pubmed: 21314724
  38. Elzinga S, Wood P, Adams AA. Plasma Lipidomic and Inflammatory Cytokine Profiles of Horses With Equine Metabolic Syndrome.. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;40:49–55.
  39. Pleasant RS, Suagee JK, Thatcher CD, Elvinger F, Geor RJ. Adiposity, plasma insulin, leptin, lipids, and oxidative stress in mature light breed horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2013;27(3):576–82.
    pubmed: 23517373
  40. Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Arora T. Nutrition, the gut microbiome and the metabolic syndrome.. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2013;27(1):59–72.
    pubmed: 23768553doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.03.017google scholar: lookup
  41. Schoster A, Weese JS, Guardabassi L. Probiotic Use in Horses - What is the Evidence for Their Clinical Efficacy?. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2014;28:1640–52.
    pmc: PMC4895607pubmed: 25231539
  42. Mullen KR, Yasuda K, Divers TJ, Weese JS. Equine faecal microbiota transplant: Current knowledge, proposed guidelines and future directions.. Equine Vet Educ 2016;30(3):151–60.
    pmc: PMC7159401pubmed: 32313396
  43. Costa MC, Silva G, Ramos RV, Staempfli HR, Arroyo LG, Kim P. Characterization and comparison of the bacterial microbiota in different gastrointestinal tract compartments in horses.. Vet J 2015;205(1):74–80.
    pubmed: 25975855doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.03.018google scholar: lookup
  44. Lauber CL, Zhou N, Gordon JI, Knight R, Fierer N. Effect of storage conditions on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and human-associated samples.. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2010;307(1):80–6.
    pmc: PMC3148093pubmed: 20412303
  45. Gavriliuc S, Stothart MR, Henry A, Poissant J. Long-term storage of feces at -80 °C versus -20 °C is negligible for 16S rRNA amplicon profiling of the equine bacterial microbiome.. PeerJ 2021;9:e10837.
    pmc: PMC7953882pubmed: 33854827
  46. Theelen MJP, Luiken REC, Wagenaar JA, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Rossen JWA, Zomer AL. The equine faecal microbiota of healthy horses and ponies in the netherlands: Impact of host and environmental factors.. Animals 2021;11(6):1–17.
    pmc: PMC8231505pubmed: 34204691
  47. Earing JE, Durig AC, Gellin GL, Lawrence LM, Flythe MD. Bacterial colonization of the equine gut; comparison of mare and foal pairs by PCR-DGGE.. Adv Microbiol 2012;2(June):79–86.
  48. Costa MC, Stämpfli HR, Allen-Vercoe E, Weese JS. Development of the faecal microbiota in foals.. Equine Vet J 2016;48(6):681–8.
    pubmed: 26518456
  49. Faubladier C, Sadet-Bourgeteau S, Philippeau C, Jacotot E, Julliand V. Molecular monitoring of the bacterial community structure in foal feces pre- and post-weaning.. Anaerobe 2014;25:61–6.
    pubmed: 24315809doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.11.010google scholar: lookup
  50. Lindenberg F, Krych L, Kot W, Fielden J, Frøkiær H, van Galen G. Development of the equine gut microbiota.. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):1–9.
    pmc: PMC6783416pubmed: 31594971
  51. Dougal K, De La Fuente G, Harris PA, Girdwood SE, Pinloche E, Geor RJ. Characterisation of the faecal bacterial community in adult and elderly horses fed a high fibre, high oil or high starch diet using 454 pyrosequencing.. PLoS One 2014;9(2):e87424.
    pmc: PMC3913607pubmed: 24504261
  52. Julliand V, Grimm P. The Impact of Diet on the Hindgut Microbiome.. J Equine Vet Sci 2017;52:23–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.03.002google scholar: lookup
  53. Macon EL, Harris P, Barker VD, Adams AA. Seasonal Insulin Responses to the Oral Sugar Test in Healthy and Insulin Dysregulated Horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 2022;113:103945.
    pubmed: 35405290doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.103945google scholar: lookup
  54. Karikoski NP, Box JR, Mykkänen AK, Kotiranta VV, Raekallio MR. Variation in insulin response to oral sugar test in a cohort of horses throughout the year and evaluation of risk factors for insulin dysregulation.. Equine Vet J 2022;54(5):905–13.
    pmc: PMC9545906pubmed: 34713928
  55. Knowles EJ, Harris PA, Elliott J, Menzies-Gow NJ. Use of the oral sugar test in ponies when performed with or without prior fasting.. Equine Vet J 2017;49(4):519–24.
    pubmed: 27381044

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.