Analyze Diet

Field evaluation of a commercial M-protein vaccine against Streptococcus equi infection in foals.

Abstract: A double-blind randomized clinical trial was undertaken to determine the value of parenterally administered Streptococcus equi M-protein vaccine in foals during an epizootic of strangles. Weaned mixed-breed foals (n = 664) housed on 2 adjacent feed-lots (A and B) arrived over a 5-day period, 2 weeks before primary vaccination. Foals in lot B (n = 114) were randomly administered vaccine (n = 59) or saline solution (placebo; n = 55) on 3 occasions at biweekly intervals. Foals in lot A (n = 450) were given 1 dose of vaccine (n = 225) or placebo. The following clinical observations were scored blindly by a single observer for all foals in lot B and for 120 (randomly sampled) foals in lot A on a single day, 2 (Lot B) and 6 (lot A) weeks after final vaccination: cervical lymphadenopathy, type of bilateral nasal discharge, and palpable swelling at injection site(s). Bacteriologic culture of nasal swab specimens or lymph node aspirates from selected foals with clinical disease yielded S equi. Cervical lymphadenopathy was observed in 17 of 59 (29%) vaccinates and 39 of 55 (71%) nonvaccinated controls in lot B and in 32 of 60 (53%) vaccinates and 29 of 60 (48%) controls in lot A. Contingency chi 2 analysis confirmed significantly lower cervical lymphadenopathy rate (chi 2 = 18.5; P less than 0.001) and prevalence of mucopurulent nasal discharge (chi 2 = 11.4; P less than 0.01) for vaccinates in lot B only. Swelling(s) at the vaccine injection site were palpated in 44% of lot B and 29% of lot A vaccinates vs less than 2% of placebo controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Publication Date: 1991-04-01 PubMed ID: 2053730
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study identifies the effectiveness of a commercially available M-protein vaccine in protecting foals against Streptococcus equi infection, known as strangles. The double-blind trial revealed the vaccine significantly reduced certain symptoms of strangles in one group of foals.

Study Design

  • The study involved a double-blind randomized clinical trial with 664 weaned mixed-breed foals situated in two adjacent feed-lots named A and B.
  • Lot B consisted of 114 foals. They were vaccinated by intravenous injection with either the M-protein vaccine or a saline solution as a placebo. This was done in three biweekly intervals.
  • In lot A, which included 450 foals, only one dose of the vaccine or placebo was delivered.

Evaluation Method

  • A single observer, blinded to the treatment groups, carried out the clinical observations. They examined all the foals in lot B and a random sample of 120 foals in lot A.
  • The observer examined for symptoms of strangles, including cervical lymphadenopathy (swelling of the lymph nodes in the neck), bilateral nasal discharge, and swelling at the vaccination injection sites.
  • Bacteriologic culture of nasal swab specimens or lymph node aspirates from selected foals with clinical disease yielded S equi, confirming the presence of the disease in the population.

Results

  • In lot B, only 29% of vaccinated foals developed cervical lymphadenopathy, compared to 71% of non-vaccinated controls. Meanwhile, in lot A, a slightly higher percentage of vaccinated foals (53%) developed the symptom compared to non-vaccinated ones (48%).
  • The vaccinated foals in lot B also displayed a significantly lower prevalence of mucopurulent nasal discharge, another symptom of strangles, as confirmed by the chi-squared contingency analysis.
  • However, in terms of side effects of the vaccination, a higher number of vaccinated foals in both lots experienced palpable swelling at the vaccine injection site compared to placebo controls.

Conclusions

  • The M-protein vaccine demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing the incidence of neck lymph node swelling and nasal discharge associated with strangles in vaccinated foals, compared to non-vaccinated foals.
  • However, the incidence of swelling at the vaccine injection site was considerably higher in vaccinated foals than in those who received the placebo, indicating a potential side effect of the vaccine.

Cite This Article

APA
Hoffman AM, Staempfli HR, Prescott JF, Viel L. (1991). Field evaluation of a commercial M-protein vaccine against Streptococcus equi infection in foals. Am J Vet Res, 52(4), 589-592.

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 52
Issue: 4
Pages: 589-592

Researcher Affiliations

Hoffman, A M
  • Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Canada.
Staempfli, H R
    Prescott, J F
      Viel, L

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Antigens, Bacterial / immunology
        • Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins
        • Bacterial Proteins / immunology
        • Bacterial Vaccines
        • Carrier Proteins
        • Cross-Sectional Studies
        • Disease Outbreaks / prevention & control
        • Double-Blind Method
        • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
        • Horses
        • Lymphadenitis / prevention & control
        • Lymphadenitis / veterinary
        • Neck
        • Streptococcal Infections / prevention & control
        • Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
        • Streptococcus / immunology
        • Vaccination / veterinary

        Citations

        This article has been cited 7 times.
        1. Knox A, Zerna G, Beddoe T. Current and Future Advances in the Detection and Surveillance of Biosecurity-Relevant Equine Bacterial Diseases Using Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP). Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 18;13(16).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13162663pubmed: 37627456google scholar: lookup
        2. Jaramillo-Morales C, James K, Barnum S, Vaala W, Chappell DE, Schneider C, Craig B, Bain F, Barnett DC, Gaughan E, Pusterla N. Voluntary Biosurveillance of Streptococcus equi Subsp. equi in Nasal Secretions of 9409 Equids with Upper Airway Infection in the USA. Vet Sci 2023 Jan 20;10(2).
          doi: 10.3390/vetsci10020078pubmed: 36851382google scholar: lookup
        3. Frosth S, Morris ERA, Wilson H, Frykberg L, Jacobsson K, Parkhill J, Flock JI, Wood T, Guss B, Aanensen DM, Boyle AG, Riihimäki M, Cohen ND, Waller AS. Conservation of vaccine antigen sequences encoded by sequenced strains of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi. Equine Vet J 2023 Jan;55(1):92-101.
          doi: 10.1111/evj.13552pubmed: 35000217google scholar: lookup
        4. Charbonneau ARL, Taylor E, Mitchell CJ, Robinson C, Cain AK, Leigh JA, Maskell DJ, Waller AS. Identification of genes required for the fitness of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi in whole equine blood and hydrogen peroxide. Microb Genom 2020 Apr;6(4).
          doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000362pubmed: 32228801google scholar: lookup
        5. Boyle AG, Timoney JF, Newton JR, Hines MT, Waller AS, Buchanan BR. Streptococcus equi Infections in Horses: Guidelines for Treatment, Control, and Prevention of Strangles-Revised Consensus Statement. J Vet Intern Med 2018 Mar;32(2):633-647.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.15043pubmed: 29424487google scholar: lookup
        6. Velineni S, Timoney JF. Characterization and protective immunogenicity of the SzM protein of Streptococcus zooepidemicus NC78 from a clonal outbreak of equine respiratory disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2013 Aug;20(8):1181-8.
          doi: 10.1128/CVI.00069-13pubmed: 23740925google scholar: lookup
        7. Wan J, Weldon E, Ganser G, Morris ERA, Hughes EV, Bordin AI, Heine PA, Hust M, Cohen ND, Gill JJ, Liu M. Immunogenic Streptococcus equi cell surface proteins identified by ORFeome phage display. mSphere 2025 Dec 23;10(12):e0062625.
          doi: 10.1128/msphere.00626-25pubmed: 41288106google scholar: lookup