Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2002; 34(7); 686-691; doi: 10.2746/042516402776250450

Foraging enrichment for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection.

Abstract: The restricted access to pasture experienced by many competition horses has been linked to the exhibition of stereotypic and redirected behaviour patterns. It has been suggested that racehorses provided with more than one source of forage are less likely to perform these patterns; however, the reasons for this are currently unclear. To investigate this in 4 replicated trials, up to 12 horses were introduced into each of 2 identical stables containing a single forage, or 6 forages for 5 min. To detect novelty effects, in the first and third trials the single forage was hay. In the second and fourth, it was the preferred forage from the preceding trial. Trials were videotaped and 12 mutually exclusive behaviour patterns compared. When hay was presented as the single forage (Trials 1 and 3), all recorded behaviour patterns were significantly different between stables; e.g. during Trial 3 in the 'Single' stable, horses looked over the stable door more frequently (P<0.001), moved for longer (P<0.001), foraged on straw bedding longer (P<0.001), and exhibited behaviour indicative of motivation to search for alternative resources (P<0.001) more frequently. When a previously preferred forage was presented as the single forage (Trials 2 and 4) behaviour was also significantly different between stables, e.g in Trial 4 horses looked out over the stable door more frequently (P<0.005) and foraged for longer in their straw bedding (P<0.005). Further study is required to determine whether these effects persist over longer periods. However, these trials indicate that enrichment of the stable environment through provision of multiple forages may have welfare benefits for horses, in reducing straw consumption and facilitating the expression of highly motivated foraging behaviour.
Publication Date: 2002-11-29 PubMed ID: 12455839DOI: 10.2746/042516402776250450Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates how providing multiple forage sources, instead of a single one, can impact behaviours of competition horses that have limited access to pasture. The findings suggest that a varied forage environment may lower the exhibition of anxious and redirected behaviours, potentially benefiting the welfare of stable-confined horses.

Objective and Study Design

  • The purpose of this research was to understand the effect of foraging enrichment for racehorses that have limited or no access to pasture. The researchers hypothesised that giving these horses access to multiple types of forage might reduce disruptive behaviours linked to stress or boredom.
  • In four independent trials, different groups of up to 12 horses were introduced to two identical stables. One stable had a single type of forage, while the other provided six different types. The animals were allowed to forage for 5 minutes, and the trials were recorded for later analysis.

Evaluation of Behaviour

  • The researchers identified 12 distinct behaviours during the foraging process. These were used as indicators of the horses’ psychological state.
  • When the only available forage was hay, the horses in the single-forage stable exhibited more restless behaviours. They looked over the stable door more often, moved for longer periods, spent more time foraging on straw bedding, and showed more signs of frustration or a desire for more options.
  • Even when the horses’ previously preferred forage was the only choice, these behaviours persisted, further suggesting that variety and choice mattered to the animals.

Implications for Horse Welfare

  • Though these trials were short, they provide initial evidence that forage enrichment could be beneficial for horses, especially those in stables with limited access to diverse food options.
  • The horses showed signs of satisfaction when given a range of choices for foraging, suggesting that they are motivated to exhibit natural foraging behaviour. This could potentially reduce the consumption of non-food items like straw and reduce undesirable behaviours.
  • Further research is needed to understand the long-term effects of foraging enrichment for stabled horses, but these early results imply that providing multiple forage options could be a valuable tool in improving horse welfare.

Cite This Article

APA
Goodwin D, Davidson HP, Harris P. (2002). Foraging enrichment for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection. Equine Vet J, 34(7), 686-691. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516402776250450

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 34
Issue: 7
Pages: 686-691

Researcher Affiliations

Goodwin, D
  • Anthrozoology Institute, University of Southampton, UK.
Davidson, H P B
    Harris, P

      MeSH Terms

      • Animal Feed
      • Animal Husbandry / methods
      • Animal Welfare
      • Animals
      • Behavior, Animal
      • Female
      • Horse Diseases / psychology
      • Horses / physiology
      • Housing, Animal
      • Male
      • Poaceae
      • Stereotyped Behavior
      • Videotape Recording

      Citations

      This article has been cited 11 times.
      1. Hodgson S, Bennett-Skinner P, Lancaster B, Upton S, Harris P, Ellis AD. Posture and Pull Pressure by Horses When Eating Hay or Haylage from a Hay Net Hung at Various Positions. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 31;12(21).
        doi: 10.3390/ani12212999pubmed: 36359123google scholar: lookup
      2. Lesimple C. Indicators of Horse Welfare: State-of-the-Art. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 13;10(2).
        doi: 10.3390/ani10020294pubmed: 32069888google scholar: lookup
      3. Sauer FJ, Hermann M, Ramseyer A, Burger D, Riemer S, Gerber V. Effects of breed, management and personality on cortisol reactivity in sport horses. PLoS One 2019;14(12):e0221794.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221794pubmed: 31790402google scholar: lookup
      4. Jonckheer-Sheehy VS, Houpt KA. Management methods to improve the welfare of horses used in research. Lab Anim (NY) 2015 Sep;44(9):350-8.
        doi: 10.1038/laban.741pubmed: 26300095google scholar: lookup
      5. Onaolapo OJ, Onaolapo AY, Akanmu MA, Olayiwola G. Foraging enrichment modulates open field response to monosodium glutamate in mice. Ann Neurosci 2015 Jul;22(3):162-70.
        doi: 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.220306pubmed: 26130924google scholar: lookup
      6. McBride SD, Mills DS. Psychological factors affecting equine performance. BMC Vet Res 2012 Sep 27;8:180.
        doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-180pubmed: 23016987google scholar: lookup
      7. Lewis M, Kim SJ. The pathophysiology of restricted repetitive behavior. J Neurodev Disord 2009 Jun;1(2):114-32.
        doi: 10.1007/s11689-009-9019-6pubmed: 21547711google scholar: lookup
      8. Hausberger M, Gautier E, Biquand V, Lunel C, Jégo P. Could work be a source of behavioural disorders? A study in horses. PLoS One 2009 Oct 28;4(10):e7625.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007625pubmed: 19862328google scholar: lookup
      9. Lewis MH, Tanimura Y, Lee LW, Bodfish JW. Animal models of restricted repetitive behavior in autism. Behav Brain Res 2007 Jan 10;176(1):66-74.
        doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.08.023pubmed: 16997392google scholar: lookup
      10. Christie JL, Hewson CJ, Riley CB, McNiven MA, Dohoo IR, Bate LA. Management factors affecting stereotypies and body condition score in nonracing horses in Prince Edward Island. Can Vet J 2006 Feb;47(2):136-43.
        pubmed: 16579039
      11. Brauns M, Ali A, Berger J, McLean A. Physiological and Behavioral Responses of Stabled Horses (Equus caballus) to Three Types of Environmental Enrichment. Animals (Basel) 2025 Sep 23;15(19).
        doi: 10.3390/ani15192779pubmed: 41096375google scholar: lookup