Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record2012; 172(7); 182; doi: 10.1136/vr.101049

Forces applied with a hoof tester to cadaver feet vary widely between users.

Abstract: Hoof testers are commonly used in equine practice. In this study, we determined the intraoperator and interoperator reliability of force application with hoof testers for different groups: experienced veterinarians, novices and farriers. For this purpose, we have developed and validated an instrumented hoof tester. Forces varied significantly between the different regions of the foot for experienced operators applying the highest forces to the heels, then the frog, then the toe, and the lowest forces to the quarters. Novices applied significantly more force to the toe versus the frog. Intraoperator reliability varied significantly between regions and operators. Novices had the narrowest width of limits of agreement for the frog and heel, but the widest for the toe and the quarters, whereas farriers had the narrowest width of agreement for the toe and quarter. Force application differed significantly between groups for the frog and heel regions, but not the toe and quarters. Veterinarians applied higher forces to the frog compared with farriers and novices, and higher forces to the heel compared with novices. This study showed that hoof tester forces vary widely within and between operators, and standardisation of hoof tester use is needed to make this diagnostic test more reliable.
Publication Date: 2012-12-15 PubMed ID: 23243120DOI: 10.1136/vr.101049Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research highlights that the force applied by different users using a hoof tester on horse feet varies widely, and standardization is needed to make this diagnostic test more reliable.

Introduction

  • The study focuses on determining the reliability of the force application using hoof testers, an instrument used in equine practice. The testers are used by different groups including experienced veterinarians, novices and farriers.
  • The researchers have developed an instrumented hoof tester to get accurate readings and validation.

Methodology

  • Forces were applied to different parts of the foot such as the heels, the frog, the toe, and the quarters.
  • These force applications were recorded, with a special focus on noting if the force varied significantly in different regions of the foot and among different operators.

Findings

  • The study found that the forces applied varied significantly between different regions of the foot.
  • Experienced operators applied the highest forces to the heels, followed by the frog, then the toe, and finally applied the least force on the quarters.
  • The novices applied significantly more force to the toe as compared to the frog. Their intraoperator reliability fluctuated significantly among operators and different regions.
  • The force application varied greatly among different groups for the frog and heel regions, but not so much for the toe and quarters.
  • Veterinarians tended to apply higher forces to the frog compared to farriers and novices and higher forces to the heel as compared to novices.

Conclusion

  • It was concluded that the forces applied by the hoof tester varied widely both within a single operator and among different operators.
  • Due to this variation, the study suggests that a standard method for using the hoof tester needs to be developed to make this diagnostic test more reliable.

Cite This Article

APA
Arndt JL, Pfau T, Day P, Pardoe C, Bolt DM, Weller R. (2012). Forces applied with a hoof tester to cadaver feet vary widely between users. Vet Rec, 172(7), 182. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.101049

Publication

ISSN: 2042-7670
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 172
Issue: 7
Pages: 182

Researcher Affiliations

Arndt, J L
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.
Pfau, T
    Day, P
      Pardoe, C
        Bolt, D M
          Weller, R

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Biomechanical Phenomena
            • Cadaver
            • Foot Diseases / diagnosis
            • Foot Diseases / veterinary
            • Hoof and Claw
            • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
            • Horses
            • Reproducibility of Results

            Citations

            This article has been cited 0 times.