FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Garrano Horses Perceive Letters of the Alphabet on a Touchsc...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2022; 12(24); 3514; doi: 10.3390/ani12243514

Garrano Horses Perceive Letters of the Alphabet on a Touchscreen System: A Pilot Study.

Abstract: This study aimed to use a computer-controlled touchscreen system to examine visual discrimination in Garrano horses (), an endangered breed of pony belonging to the Iberian horse family. This pilot study focused on the perceptual similarity among letters of the alphabet. We tested five horses in a one-male unit (OMU) living permanently in a semi-free enclosure near their natural habitat in Serra d'Arga, northern Portugal. Horses were trained to nose-touch black circles that appeared on the screen. Then, they were tested for discrimination of five letters of the Latin alphabet in Arial font, namely O, B, V, Z, and X, using a two-choice discrimination task. The confusion matrix of letter pairs was used to show the MDS and to identify the relative contribution of shape features. The results showed perceptual similarities among letters with curvatures pitted against those of straight lines. Shape perception in horses seems to share features with that of humans and other animals living in different niches. The touchscreen system proved to be an objective and innovative way of studying cognition in the socially organized group of horses. The automated system can promote the welfare of captive horses by maximizing their freedom of movement.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-12-12 PubMed ID: 36552434PubMed Central: PMC9774258DOI: 10.3390/ani12243514Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is about a study that examines how Garrano horses perceive different letters of the alphabet using a touchscreen system.

Research Objective and Methodology

The research team aimed to understand the visual discrimination abilities of Garrano horses, an endangered breed of pony in the Iberian horse family. They devised an innovative approach to studying cognition in horses—an interactive, computer-controlled touchscreen method. This study was carried out with a group of five horses, consisting of a one-male unit living in a semi-free enclosure near their natural habitat in Serra d’Arga, northern Portugal.

Initially, the team trained the horses to nose-touch black circles that appeared on the touchscreen. Once this was established, they began testing the horses’ ability to discriminate between five letters of the Latin alphabet in Arial font: O, B, V, Z, and X. This was done using a two-choice discrimination task.

  • The team utilized a confusion matrix to analyze how often each of the horse misinterpreted one letter for another. This enabled them to identify perceptual similarities and differences between the selected letters.
  • The multidimensional scaling (MDS) applied would help discern the relative influence of shape features on the horse’s perception.

Major Findings

The test results revealed that horses were able to perceive letters differently based on their shape features:

  • The horses confused letters with similar curvatures, and separately, letters composed of straight lines with each other, indicating perceptual parallels based on the shape of the letters.
  • The shape perception in horses was found to share similar features with that of humans and other animals, even those residing in different niches.

Significance and Implications

This pilot study demonstrated that the touchscreen system is an effective, objective tool for studying cognition in horses. Furthermore, the automated system contributed positively to the living conditions of captive horses.

  • The touchscreen system introduced a novel way to increase our understanding of horse cognition, specifically in terms of visual discrimination capabilities.
  • The system allowed horses a degree of freedom of movement, thereby promoting better welfare conditions for captive horses.
  • This research could continue to evolve and possibly aid in the development and improvement of training programs for horses and other captive animals.

Cite This Article

APA
Schubert CL, Ryckewaert B, Pereira C, Matsuzawa T. (2022). Garrano Horses Perceive Letters of the Alphabet on a Touchscreen System: A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel), 12(24), 3514. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243514

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 24
PII: 3514

Researcher Affiliations

Schubert, Clara-Lynn
  • Department of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurosciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering of Sorbonne University, CEDEX 05, 75005 Paris, France.
Ryckewaert, Barbara
  • Laboratory «Scenes of the World, Creation, Critical Knowledge», Doctoral School of Aesthetics, Sciences and Technology of the Arts, University of Paris 8 Vincennes, CEDEX 02, 93526 Saint-Denis, France.
Pereira, Carlos
  • Department of LEA (Applied Foreign Languages), University of Paris 3 Sorbonne Nouvelle, CEDEX 05, 75230 Paris, France.
Matsuzawa, Tetsuro
  • Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
  • Department of Pedagogy, Chubu Gakuin University, Gifu 504-8037, Japan.
  • College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 59 references
  1. Outram AK, Stear NA, Bendrey R, Olsen S, Kasparov A, Zaibert V, Thorpe N, Evershed RP. The earliest horse harnessing and milking.. Science 2009 Mar 6;323(5919):1332-5.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1168594pubmed: 19265018google scholar: lookup
  2. Matsuzawa T. Horse cognition and behavior from the perspective of primatology.. Primates 2017 Oct;58(4):473-477.
    doi: 10.1007/s10329-017-0632-9pubmed: 28929250google scholar: lookup
  3. Pereira C. Le poney Garrano, une race autochtone valorisée dans les courses de pays et les pratiques equestres (Attelage, equitation de tradition, dressage…). Ethnozootechnie Société d’ethnozootechnie 2017;82:123–128.
  4. Pereira C. Percurso do Garrano, Leituras Interdisciplinares do Projecto. Viana do Castelo. Éditions de la Municipalité de Viana do Castelo; Viana do Castelo, Portugal: 2020; pp. 149–169.
  5. Ringhofer M, Inoue S, Mendonça RS, Pereira C, Matsuzawa T, Hirata S, Yamamoto S. Comparison of the social systems of primates and feral horses: data from a newly established horse research site on Serra D'Arga, northern Portugal.. Primates 2017 Oct;58(4):479-484.
    doi: 10.1007/s10329-017-0614-ypubmed: 28585062google scholar: lookup
  6. Maeda T, Ochi S, Ringhofer M, Sosa S, Sueur C, Hirata S, Yamamoto S. Aerial drone observations identified a multilevel society in feral horses.. Sci Rep 2021 Jan 8;11(1):71.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79790-1pmc: PMC7794487pubmed: 33420148google scholar: lookup
  7. Mendonça R.S., Pinto P., Inoue S., Ringhofer M., Godinho R., Hirata S. Social determinants of affiliation and cohesion in a population of feral horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;245:105496.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105496google scholar: lookup
  8. Mendonça RS, Ringhofer M, Pinto P, Inoue S, Hirata S. Feral horses' (Equus ferus caballus) behavior toward dying and dead conspecifics.. Primates 2020 Jan;61(1):49-54.
    doi: 10.1007/s10329-019-00728-xpubmed: 31134472google scholar: lookup
  9. Pinto P., Mendonça R.S., Hirata S. Examining the costs and benefits of male-male associations in a group-living equid. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2022;253:105660.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105660google scholar: lookup
  10. Inoue S., Yamamoto S., Ringhofer M., Mendonça R.S., Pereira C., Hirata S. Spatial positioning of individuals in a group of feral horses: A case study using drone technology. Mammal Res. 2019;64:249–259.
    doi: 10.1007/s13364-018-0400-2google scholar: lookup
  11. Hirata S. Studying feral horse behavior from the sky. Artif. Life Robot. 2022;27:196–203.
    doi: 10.1007/s10015-022-00746-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  12. Ringhofer M., Go C.K., Inoue S.S., Mendonça R., Hirata S., Kubo T., Yamamoto S. Herding mechanisms to maintain the cohesion of a harem group: Two interaction phases during herding. J. Ethol. 2020;38:71–77.
    doi: 10.1007/s10164-019-00622-5google scholar: lookup
  13. Grueter CC, Chapais B, Zinner D. Evolution of Multilevel Social Systems in Nonhuman Primates and Humans.. Int J Primatol 2012 Oct;33(5):1002-1037.
    doi: 10.1007/s10764-012-9618-zpmc: PMC3456960pubmed: 23024444google scholar: lookup
  14. Grueter CC, Qi X, Li B, Li M. Multilevel societies.. Curr Biol 2017 Sep 25;27(18):R984-R986.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.063pubmed: 28950088google scholar: lookup
  15. Freitas J., Álvares F. Economic impact of wolf predation on free-ranging horses in Portugal. Carniv. Damage Prev. News. 2021;23:37–47.
  16. Pereira A.A. Garrano: O Bravo Cavalo das Montanhas. Câmara Municipal de Viana do Castelo, Portugal; Viana do Castelo, Portugal: 2018. p. 71.
  17. Lagos L., Bárcena F. Spatial variability in wolf diet and prey selection in Galicia (NW Spain). Mammal Res. 2018;63:125–139.
    doi: 10.1007/s13364-018-0352-6google scholar: lookup
  18. Hausberger M., Roche H., Henry S., Visser E.K. A review of the human–horse relationship. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;109:1–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.015google scholar: lookup
  19. Christensen J.W. Behavioral Biology of Horses. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2021. Behavioral Biology of Laboratory Animals; pp. 285–297.
  20. Hanggi E.B. Equine Cognition and Perception: Understanding the Horse. In: Fujita K., Itakura S., editors. Diversity of Cognition: Evolution, Development, Domestication and Pathology. Kyoto University Press; Kyoto, Japan: 2006. pp. 98–118.
  21. McGreevy P., Christensen J.W., Von Borstel U.K., McLean A. Equitation Science. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2018.
  22. Brubaker L, Udell MA. Cognition and learning in horses (Equus caballus): What we know and why we should ask more.. Behav Processes 2016 May;126:121-31.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.017pubmed: 27018202google scholar: lookup
  23. Fureix C, Jego P, Henry S, Lansade L, Hausberger M. Towards an ethological animal model of depression? A study on horses.. PLoS One 2012;7(6):e39280.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039280pmc: PMC3386251pubmed: 22761752google scholar: lookup
  24. Smith AV, Proops L, Grounds K, Wathan J, McComb K. Functionally relevant responses to human facial expressions of emotion in the domestic horse (Equus caballus).. Biol Lett 2016 Feb;12(2):20150907.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0907pmc: PMC4780548pubmed: 26864784google scholar: lookup
  25. Lansade L., Pichard G., Leconte M. Sensory sensitivities: Components of a horse’s temperament dimension. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;114:534–553.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.02.012google scholar: lookup
  26. Nakamura K, Takimoto-Inose A, Hasegawa T. Cross-modal perception of human emotion in domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Sci Rep 2018 Jun 21;8(1):8660.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26892-6pmc: PMC6013457pubmed: 29930289google scholar: lookup
  27. Jardat P, Ringhofer M, Yamamoto S, Gouyet C, Degrande R, Parias C, Reigner F, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Horses form cross-modal representations of adults and children.. Anim Cogn 2023 Mar;26(2):369-377.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01667-9pubmed: 35962844google scholar: lookup
  28. Rørvang MV, Nielsen BL, McLean AN. Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:633.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633pmc: PMC7509108pubmed: 33033724google scholar: lookup
  29. Christensen JW, Ahrendt LP, Malmkvist J, Nicol C. Exploratory behaviour towards novel objects is associated with enhanced learning in young horses.. Sci Rep 2021 Jan 14;11(1):1428.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80833-wpmc: PMC7809405pubmed: 33446827google scholar: lookup
  30. Ringhofer M, Yamamoto S. Domestic horses send signals to humans when they face with an unsolvable task.. Anim Cogn 2017 May;20(3):397-405.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1056-4pubmed: 27885519google scholar: lookup
  31. Takimoto A., Hori Y., Fujita K. Horses (Equus caballus) adaptively change the modality of their begging behavior as a function of human attentional states. Psychologia 2016;59:100–111.
    doi: 10.2117/psysoc.2016.100google scholar: lookup
  32. Ringhofer M, Trösch M, Lansade L, Yamamoto S. Horses with sustained attention follow the pointing of a human who knows where food is hidden.. Sci Rep 2021 Aug 10;11(1):16184.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95727-8pmc: PMC8355342pubmed: 34376761google scholar: lookup
  33. Rørvang MV, Nielsen TB, Christensen JW. Horses Failed to Learn from Humans by Observation.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jan 29;10(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10020221pmc: PMC7070367pubmed: 32013218google scholar: lookup
  34. Ragonese G, Baragli P, Mariti C, Gazzano A, Lanatà A, Ferlazzo A, Fazio E, Cravana C. Interspecific two-dimensional visual discrimination of faces in horses (Equus caballus).. PLoS One 2021;16(2):e0247310.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247310pmc: PMC7894942pubmed: 33606816google scholar: lookup
  35. Hanggi EB, Ingersoll JF. Long-term memory for categories and concepts in horses (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2009 May;12(3):451-62.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0205-9pubmed: 19148689google scholar: lookup
  36. Farmer K, Krueger K, Byrne RW. Visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) interacting with humans.. Anim Cogn 2010 Mar;13(2):229-38.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0260-xpubmed: 19618222google scholar: lookup
  37. Farmer K, Krüger K, Byrne RW, Marr I. Sensory laterality in affiliative interactions in domestic horses and ponies (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2018 Sep;21(5):631-637.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1196-9pmc: PMC6097077pubmed: 29948296google scholar: lookup
  38. Hanggi E.B. Interocular transfer of learning in horses (Equus caballus). J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1999;19:518–524.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(99)80232-9google scholar: lookup
  39. Saslow C.A. Understanding the perceptual world of horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:209–224.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00092-8google scholar: lookup
  40. Hanggi EB, Ingersoll JF, Waggoner TL. Color vision in horses (Equus caballus): deficiencies identified using a pseudoisochromatic plate test.. J Comp Psychol 2007 Feb;121(1):65-72.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.1.65pubmed: 17324076google scholar: lookup
  41. Timney B, Keil K. Visual acuity in the horse.. Vision Res 1992 Dec;32(12):2289-93.
    doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90092-Wpubmed: 1288005google scholar: lookup
  42. Podgorny P., Garner W.R. Reaction time as a measure of inter-and intra-object visual similarity: Letters of the alphabet. Percept. Psychophys. 1979;26:37–52.
    doi: 10.3758/BF03199860google scholar: lookup
  43. Matsuzawa T. Form perception and visual acuity in a chimpanzee.. Folia Primatol (Basel) 1990;55(1):24-32.
    doi: 10.1159/000156494pubmed: 2394413google scholar: lookup
  44. Blough DS. Pigeon perception of letters of the alphabet.. Science 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):397-8.
    doi: 10.1126/science.7123242pubmed: 7123242google scholar: lookup
  45. Blough DS, Franklin JJ. Pigeon discrimination of letters and other forms in texture displays.. Percept Psychophys 1985 Dec;38(6):523-32.
    doi: 10.3758/BF03207061pubmed: 3834397google scholar: lookup
  46. Tomonaga M, Uwano Y, Saito T. How dolphins see the world: a comparison with chimpanzees and humans.. Sci Rep 2014 Jan 16;4:3717.
    doi: 10.1038/srep03717pmc: PMC3893789pubmed: 24435017google scholar: lookup
  47. Tomonaga M, Kumazaki K, Camus F, Nicod S, Pereira C, Matsuzawa T. A horse's eye view: size and shape discrimination compared with other mammals.. Biol Lett 2015 Nov;11(11).
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0701pmc: PMC4685539pubmed: 26601679google scholar: lookup
  48. Mejdell C.M., Buvik T., Jørgensen G.H., Bøe K.E. Horses can learn to use symbols to communicate their preferences. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;184:66–73.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.07.014google scholar: lookup
  49. Pereira C. Sémiotique et Zoologie. Éditions Kime; Paris, France: 2018. La Sémiotique en Interface; pp. 647–669.
  50. Samhita L, Gross HJ. The "Clever Hans Phenomenon" revisited.. Commun Integr Biol 2013 Nov 1;6(6):e27122.
    doi: 10.4161/cib.27122doi: 10.4161/cib.27122pmc: PMC3921203pubmed: 24563716google scholar: lookup
  51. Matsuzawa T. The Ai project: historical and ecological contexts.. Anim Cogn 2003 Dec;6(4):199-211.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-003-0199-2pubmed: 14566577google scholar: lookup
  52. Martin CF, Muramatsu A, Matsuzawa T. Apex and ApeTouch: Development of a Portable Touchscreen System and Software for Primates at Zoos.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jun 28;12(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12131660pmc: PMC9265006pubmed: 35804559google scholar: lookup
  53. Heffner R.S., Heffner H.E. Hearing in large mammals: Horses (Equus caballus) and cattle (Bos taurus). Behav. Neurosci. 1983;97:299–309.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.97.2.299google scholar: lookup
  54. Ferster C.B., Skinner B.F. Schedules of Reinforcement. Appleton-Century-Crofts; New York, NY, USA: 1957.
    doi: 10.1037/10627-000google scholar: lookup
  55. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2020.
  56. Treisman A, Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.. Psychol Rev 1988 Jan;95(1):15-48.
    doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.15pubmed: 3353475google scholar: lookup
  57. Leehey SC, Moskowitz-Cook A, Brill S, Held R. Orientational anisotropy in infant vision.. Science 1975 Nov 28;190(4217):900-2.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1188370pubmed: 1188370google scholar: lookup
  58. Lansade L, Colson V, Parias C, Trösch M, Reigner F, Calandreau L. Female horses spontaneously identify a photograph of their keeper, last seen six months previously.. Sci Rep 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6302.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62940-wpmc: PMC7156667pubmed: 32286345google scholar: lookup
  59. De Andino E.V.M., McDonnell S.M. Evaluation of operant learning in young foals using target training. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;193:67–72.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.021google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Muramatsu A, Matsuzawa T. Sequence Order in the Range 1 to 19 by Chimpanzees on a Touchscreen Task: Processing Two-Digit Arabic Numerals. Animals (Basel) 2023 Feb 21;13(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13050774pubmed: 36899632google scholar: lookup
  2. Ricci-Bonot C, Brosche K, Baragli P, Nicol C. A systematic review on the effect of individual characteristics and management practices on equine cognition. Anim Cogn 2025 Nov 26;28(1):96.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-02016-2pubmed: 41296132google scholar: lookup
  3. Gao J, Yamanashi Y, Tanaka M. Touchscreen Tasks for Cognitive Testing in Domestic Goats (Capra hircus): A Pilot Study Using Odd-Item Search Training. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 17;15(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15142115pubmed: 40723578google scholar: lookup
  4. Hassinger L, Nippert-Eng C. Beyond the Camera Trap: A Systematic Review of Computing Technology Used to Monitor and Interact with (More) Varied Taxa in Zoos and Aquariums. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jun 11;15(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15121721pubmed: 40564273google scholar: lookup
  5. Sueur C, Pelé M. Editorial: Recent Advances in Animal Cognition and Ethology. Animals (Basel) 2023 Sep 12;13(18).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13182890pubmed: 37760290google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,383 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.