Analyze Diet

Gastrointestinal ultrasonography in normal adult ponies.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics based on ultrasonographic examination of the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, cecum, and peritoneal fluid in normal adult ponies. Abdominal ultrasonographic examination was performed in nine unsedated standing ponies. The duodenum was examined at three sites and the jejunum in 12 regions. Wall thickness, contractility, distention, and luminal contents were recorded. Stomach wall thickness and location, cecal wall thickness, and peritoneal fluid location and character were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed. Wall thicknesses (in cm) were 0.431 +/- 0.069 for the stomach, 0.188 +/- 0.033 for the duodenum (at all sites), 0.195 +/- 0.031 for the jejunum (at all regions), and 0.179 +/- 0.031 for the cecum. Duodenal contractions per minute were 3.78 +/- 1.10. The stomach spanned 5.14 +/- 0.9 intercostal spaces, with the 8th intercostal space being the most cranial and the 15th intercostal space being the most caudal space through which the stomach was identified. It was possible to identify the jejunum in all ponies dorsal to the left dorsal colon and from the ventral abdominal wall. Peritoneal fluid was identified in six ponies. Peritoneal fluid was usually seen transiently and most commonly in the ventral aspect of the abdominal cavity or around the duodenum. Overall, the ponie's abdominal ultrasonographic examinations revealed wall thicknesses that were less than the published normal ranges for horses. It appears that ponies may have increased duodenal contractility than horses and that the conformation of ponies may change the locations for imaging the stomach.
Publication Date: 2008-06-13 PubMed ID: 18546787DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2008.00367.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study aims to understand the ultrasonic characteristics of the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, cecum, and peritoneal fluid in normal adult ponies. It found that wall thickness, contractility, distention, and luminal contents can all be examined and recorded. The results suggest that ponies might have increased duodenal contractility than horses and their body shape may influence the imaging locations for the stomach.

Study Objective and Methodology

  • The aim of this research was to establish the normal ultrasonographic features of the gastrointestinal track including the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, cecum, and peritoneal fluid in adult ponies.
  • To achieve this, abdominal ultrasonographic examinations were conducted on nine ponies in a standing position without sedation.
  • Three sites on the duodenum and twelve regions of the jejunum were scrutinized during this process.
  • Various aspects such as wall thickness, contractility, distention, and luminal contents were accurately recorded for each segment of the gastrointestinal tract.

Key Findings of the Study

  • The study found that wall thicknesses were 0.431 cm for the stomach, 0.188 cm for the duodenum, 0.195 cm for the jejunum, and 0.179 cm for the cecum.
  • The study also revealed that the duodenal contractions per minute were 3.78.
  • The stomach spanned across 5.14 intercostal spaces, with the 8th intercostal spot being the most cranial and the 15th intercostal space being the most caudal in which the stomach was identified.
  • It was discovered that the jejunum in all ponies could be identified dorsal to the left dorsal colon and from the ventral abdominal wall.
  • Peritoneal fluid was found in six ponies, usually seen transiently and most commonly in the ventral aspect of the abdominal cavity or around the duodenum.

Conclusion and Implications

  • The ultrasonographic examinations revealed that wall thicknesses for ponies were less than the normal ranges published for horses.
  • This suggests that ponies may have a higher level of duodenal contractility compared to horses and that a pony’s body shape could affect the optimal locations for imaging the stomach.
  • Therefore, this study has potential implications for veterinary practice, as it provides novel insights into the ultrasonographic examination of ponies, which may help in early diagnosis and more effective treatment of any issues in the future.

Cite This Article

APA
Epstein K, Short D, Parente E, Reef V, Southwood L. (2008). Gastrointestinal ultrasonography in normal adult ponies. Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 49(3), 282-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2008.00367.x

Publication

ISSN: 1058-8183
NlmUniqueID: 9209635
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 49
Issue: 3
Pages: 282-286

Researcher Affiliations

Epstein, Kira
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, New Bolton Center, Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA. kirae@uga.edu
Short, Diana
    Parente, Eric
      Reef, Virginia
        Southwood, Louise

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Ascitic Fluid / diagnostic imaging
          • Cecum / anatomy & histology
          • Cecum / diagnostic imaging
          • Duodenum / anatomy & histology
          • Duodenum / diagnostic imaging
          • Female
          • Gastrointestinal Motility / physiology
          • Gastrointestinal Tract / anatomy & histology
          • Gastrointestinal Tract / diagnostic imaging
          • Horses / anatomy & histology
          • Horses / physiology
          • Jejunum / anatomy & histology
          • Jejunum / diagnostic imaging
          • Male
          • Reference Values
          • Stomach / anatomy & histology
          • Stomach / diagnostic imaging
          • Ultrasonography / methods
          • Ultrasonography / veterinary

          Citations

          This article has been cited 7 times.
          1. Talbot SE, Tallon R, Dunkel B. Clinical presentation and outcome of gastric impactions with or without concurrent intestinal lesions in horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2023 Jul-Aug;37(4):1544-1551.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.16735pubmed: 37403262google scholar: lookup
          2. Epstein KL, Hall MD. Effect of Nasogastric Tube Placement, Manipulation, and Fluid Administration on Transcutaneous Ultrasound Visualization and Assessment of Stomach Position in Healthy Unfed and Fed Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 6;12(23).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12233433pubmed: 36496953google scholar: lookup
          3. Diana A, Freccero F, Giancola F, Linta N, Pietra M, Luca V, Salamanca G, Cipone M, Chiocchetti R. Ex vivo ultrasonographic and histological morphometry of small intestinal wall layers in horses.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2022 May;63(3):353-363.
            doi: 10.1111/vru.13059pubmed: 35171532google scholar: lookup
          4. Siwinska N, Zak A, Baron M, Cylna M, Borowicz H. Right dorsal colon ultrasonography in normal adult ponies and miniature horses.. PLoS One 2017;12(10):e0186825.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186825pubmed: 29065146google scholar: lookup
          5. Mirle E, Wogatzki A, Kunzmann R, Schoenfelder AM, Litzke LF. Correlation between capillary oxygen saturation and small intestinal wall thickness in the equine colic patient.. Vet Rec Open 2017;4(1):e000197.
            doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2016-000197pubmed: 28761667google scholar: lookup
          6. Williams S, Cooper J, Freeman S. Evaluation of normal findings using a detailed and focused technique for transcutaneous abdominal ultrasonography in the horse.. BMC Vet Res 2014;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5.
            doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S5pubmed: 25238559google scholar: lookup
          7. Abraham M, Reef VB, Sweeney RW, Navas de Solís C. Gastrointestinal ultrasonography of normal Standardbred neonates and frequency of asymptomatic intussusceptions.. J Vet Intern Med 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):1580-6.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.12413pubmed: 25103616google scholar: lookup