FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Genet Sel Evol / Genetic diversity of a large set of horse breeds raised in F...
Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE2009; 41(1); 5; doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-5

Genetic diversity of a large set of horse breeds raised in France assessed by microsatellite polymorphism.

Abstract: The genetic diversity and structure of horses raised in France were investigated using 11 microsatellite markers and 1679 animals belonging to 34 breeds. Between-breed differences explained about ten per cent of the total genetic diversity (Fst = 0.099). Values of expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.43 to 0.79 depending on the breed. According to genetic relationships, multivariate and structure analyses, breeds could be classified into four genetic differentiated groups: warm-blooded, draught, Nordic and pony breeds. Using complementary maximisation of diversity and aggregate diversity approaches, we conclude that particular efforts should be made to conserve five local breeds, namely the Boulonnais, Landais, Merens, Poitevin and Pottok breeds.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2009-01-05 PubMed ID: 19284689PubMed Central: PMC3225878DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-5Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aimed to explore the genetic diversity of different horse breeds in France, using microsatellite markers to identify distinct genetic groups among 34 breeds, with a focus on five local breeds.

Objective and Methodology

  • The main goal of this study was to examine and understand the genetic diversity and structure of numerous horse breeds raised in France. This research was essential to aid in the conservation of certain breeds.
  • The research team used 11 different microsatellite markers (areas in the DNA where short sequences are repeated) to study 1679 horses from various breeds.

Findings

  • The researchers found that the differences between breeds explain about ten per cent of the total genetic diversity, as revealed by the Fst value of 0.099. Fst is a statistical measure used in genetics to quantify the genetic diversity within and between populations.
  • The expected heterozygosity, which gauges genetic diversity within a breed, varied between different breeds – indicating that some breeds are genetically more diverse than others.
  • Based on genetic relations, multivariate analysis (a statistical method used to examine several variables simultaneously), and structure analyses, the 34 horse breeds could be grouped into four genetically differentiated groups: warm-blooded, draught, Nordic and pony breeds.

Implications

  • The researchers used two conservancy strategies – the maximization of diversity and aggregate diversity approaches – to conclude that greater conservation efforts should focus on five local breeds: the Boulonnais, Landais, Merens, Poitevin and Pottok.
  • This information can be utilized by breeders and conservationists to make informed breeding decisions and conservation efforts to maintain or even increase genetic diversity within these breeds.

Cite This Article

APA
Leroy G, Callède L, Verrier E, Mériaux JC, Ricard A, Danchin-Burge C, Rognon X. (2009). Genetic diversity of a large set of horse breeds raised in France assessed by microsatellite polymorphism. Genet Sel Evol, 41(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-5

Publication

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
NlmUniqueID: 9114088
Country: France
Language: English
Volume: 41
Issue: 1
Pages: 5

Researcher Affiliations

Leroy, Grégoire
  • AgroParisTech, UMR1236 Génétique et Diversité Animales, 16 rue Claude Bernard, Paris, France. gregoire.leroy@agroparistech.fr
Callède, Lucille
    Verrier, Etienne
      Mériaux, Jean-Claude
        Ricard, Anne
          Danchin-Burge, Coralie
            Rognon, Xavier

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Breeding
              • Female
              • France
              • Genetic Variation
              • Horses / classification
              • Horses / genetics
              • Male
              • Microsatellite Repeats
              • Phylogeny
              • Polymorphism, Genetic

              References

              This article includes 36 references
              1. Toro MA, Fernandez J, Caballero A. Scientific basis for policies in conservation of farm animal genetic resources.. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 13–18 August 2006; Belo Horizonte, Brazil. 2006.
              2. Aberle KS, Hamann H, Drögemüller C, Distl O. Genetic diversity in German draught horse breeds compared with a group of primitive, riding and wild horses by means of microsatellite DNA markers.. Anim Genet 2004;35:270–277.
                doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01166.xpubmed: 15265065google scholar: lookup
              3. Bjørnstad G, Gunby E, Røed KH. Genetic structure of Norwegian horse breeds.. J Anim Breed Genet 2000;117:307–317.
                doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0388.2000.00264.xgoogle scholar: lookup
              4. Cañon J, Checa ML, Carleos C, Vega-Pla JL, Vallejo M, Dunner S. The genetic structure of Spanish Celtic horse breeds inferred from microsatellite data.. Anim Genet 2000;31:39–48.
                doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00591.xpubmed: 10690360google scholar: lookup
              5. Druml T, Curik I, Baumung R, Aberle K, Distl O, Sölknet J. Individual-based assessment of population structure and admixture in Austrian, Croatian and German draught horses.. Heredity 2007;98:114–122.
                doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800910pubmed: 17035951google scholar: lookup
              6. Luis C, Juras R, Oom MM, Cothran EG. Genetic diversity and relationships of Portuguese and other horse breeds based on protein and microsatellite loci variation.. Anim Genet 2007;38:20–27.
                doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01545.xpubmed: 17257184google scholar: lookup
              7. Marletta D, Tupac-Yupanqui I, Bordonaro S, Garcia D, Guastella AM, Criscione A, Cañon J, Dunner S. Analysis of genetic diversity and the determination of relationships among western Mediterranean horse breeds using microsatellite markers.. J Anim Breed Genet 2006;123:315–325.
                doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00603.xpubmed: 16965404google scholar: lookup
              8. Moureaux S, Ricard A, Mériaux JC, Verrier E. Caractérisation génétique des races françaises de sport et de course et analyse de leur variabilité génétique.. 21ème journée de la recherche équine 1995; Les Haras Nationaux, Le Pin-au-Haras. 1995. pp. 100–105.
              9. Plante Y, Vega-Pla JL, Lucas Z, Colling D, de March B, Buchanan F. Genetic diversity in a feral horse population from sable island, Canada.. J Hered 2007;98(6):594–602.
                doi: 10.1093/jhered/esm064pubmed: 17855732google scholar: lookup
              10. Solis A, Jugo BM, Mériaux JC, Iriondo M, Mazon LI, Aguirre AI, Vicario A, Estomba A. Genetic diversity within and among four south European native horse breeds based on microsatellite DNA analysis: implications for conservation.. J Hered 2005;96(6):670–678.
                doi: 10.1093/jhered/esi123pubmed: 16267169google scholar: lookup
              11. Caballero A, Toro MA. Analysis of genetic diversity for the management of conserved subdivided populations.. Conserv Genet 2002;3:289–299.
                doi: 10.1023/A:1019956205473google scholar: lookup
              12. Ollivier L, Foulley JL. Aggregate diversity: New approach combining within- and between-breed genetic diversity.. Livest Prod Sci 2005;95:247–254.
                doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.01.005google scholar: lookup
              13. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. GENETIX 4.04, Logiciel sous Windows TM pour la Génétique des Populations.. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier 2001.
              14. Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism.. J Hered 1995;86:248–249.
              15. Goudet J, Raymond M, De Meeüs T, Rousset F. Testing differentiation in diploid populations.. Genetics 1996;144:1933–1940.
                pmc: PMC1207740pubmed: 8978076
              16. Rice WR. Analysing table of statistical tests.. Evolution 1989;43:223–225.
                doi: 10.2307/2409177pubmed: 28568501google scholar: lookup
              17. Goudet J. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Suisse 2001.
              18. Reynolds J, Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimation of the Coancestry Coefficient: Basis for a Short-Term Genetic Distance.. Genetics 1983;105:767–779.
                pmc: PMC1202185pubmed: 17246175
              19. Hudson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.. Mol Biol Evol 2006;23:254–267.
                doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj030pubmed: 16221896google scholar: lookup
              20. Pritchard JK, Wen W. Documentation for STRUCTURE software (Version 2). University of Chicago 2003.
              21. Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure.. Bioinformatics 2007;23:1801–1806.
                doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233pubmed: 17485429google scholar: lookup
              22. Weitzman ML. On diversity.. Quart J Econom 1992;107:363–405.
                doi: 10.2307/2118476google scholar: lookup
              23. Simianer H, Marti SB, Gibson J, Hannotte O, Rege JEO. An approach to the optimal allocation of conservation funds to minimize loss of genetic diversity between livestock breeds.. Ecol Econ 2003;45:377–392.
                doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00092-2google scholar: lookup
              24. FAO. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans: Management of small populations at risk.. Rome, Italy 1998.
              25. Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973;70:3321–3323.
                doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321pmc: PMC427228pubmed: 4519626google scholar: lookup
              26. Moureaux S, Verrier E, Ricard A, Mériaux JC. Genetic variability within French race and riding horse breeds from genealogical data and blood marker polymorphisms.. Genet Sel Evol 1996;28:83–102.
                doi: 10.1051/gse:19960105google scholar: lookup
              27. Quittet E, Blanc H. Races chevalines en France. 2.. Paris: La Maison Rustique 1974.
              28. Takezaki N, Nei M. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic tree from microsatellite DNA.. Genetics 1996;144:389–399.
                pmc: PMC1207511pubmed: 8878702
              29. Ducro BJ, Bovenhuis H, Neuteboom M, Hellinga I. Genetic diversity in the Dutch Friesian horse.. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 13–18 August 2006. Belo Horizonte, Brazil; 2006.
              30. Dubois C, Ricard A. Etat des lieux de la sélection Selle-Français. Quelle marge de manœuvre possible pour d'autres plans de sélection?. 31ème journée de la recherche équine 2 March 2005. Les Haras Nationaux, Le Pin-au-Haras; 2005. pp. 173–185.
              31. Cañon J, Garcia D, Garcia-Atance MA, Obexer-Ruff G, Lenstra JA, Ajmone-Marsan P, Dunner S. Geographical partitioning of goat diversity in Europe and the Middle East.. Anim Genet 2006;37:327–334.
                doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01461.xpubmed: 16879341google scholar: lookup
              32. Petit RJ, El Mousadik A, Pons O. Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers.. Conserv Biol 1998;12:844–855.
                doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96489.xgoogle scholar: lookup
              33. Foulley JL, Ollivier L. Estimating allelic richness and its diversity.. Livest Sci 2006;101:150–158.
                doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.10.021google scholar: lookup
              34. Reist-Marti SB, Simianer H, Hanotte O, Rege JEO. Weitzman's approach and Conservation of Breed Diversity: an Application to African Cattle Breeds.. Conserv Biol 2003;17:1299–1311.
                doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01587.xgoogle scholar: lookup
              35. Danvy S, Heydeman P. Le point sur les ressources génétiques équines en France. 31ème journée de la recherche équine 2 March 2005. Les Haras Nationaux, Le Pin-au-Haras; 2005. pp. 135–146.
              36. Verrier E, Loywick V, Donvez J, Blouin C, Joffrin C, Heyman G, Cottrant JF. La gestion génétique des races d'effectifs limités: principes et application aux cas du cheval de trait Boulonnais et de l'âne grand noir du Berry. 31ème journée de la recherche équine 2 March 2005. Les Haras Nationaux, Le Pin-au-Haras; 2005. pp. 161–171.
              Subscribe to our newsletter
              Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.