FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Genet Sel Evol / Genetic diversity of a large set of horse breeds raised in F...
Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE2009; 41(1); 5; doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-5

Genetic diversity of a large set of horse breeds raised in France assessed by microsatellite polymorphism.

Abstract: The genetic diversity and structure of horses raised in France were investigated using 11 microsatellite markers and 1679 animals belonging to 34 breeds. Between-breed differences explained about ten per cent of the total genetic diversity (Fst = 0.099). Values of expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.43 to 0.79 depending on the breed. According to genetic relationships, multivariate and structure analyses, breeds could be classified into four genetic differentiated groups: warm-blooded, draught, Nordic and pony breeds. Using complementary maximisation of diversity and aggregate diversity approaches, we conclude that particular efforts should be made to conserve five local breeds, namely the Boulonnais, Landais, Merens, Poitevin and Pottok breeds.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2009-01-05 PubMed ID: 19284689PubMed Central: PMC3225878DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-5Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aimed to explore the genetic diversity of different horse breeds in France, using microsatellite markers to identify distinct genetic groups among 34 breeds, with a focus on five local breeds.

Objective and Methodology

  • The main goal of this study was to examine and understand the genetic diversity and structure of numerous horse breeds raised in France. This research was essential to aid in the conservation of certain breeds.
  • The research team used 11 different microsatellite markers (areas in the DNA where short sequences are repeated) to study 1679 horses from various breeds.

Findings

  • The researchers found that the differences between breeds explain about ten per cent of the total genetic diversity, as revealed by the Fst value of 0.099. Fst is a statistical measure used in genetics to quantify the genetic diversity within and between populations.
  • The expected heterozygosity, which gauges genetic diversity within a breed, varied between different breeds – indicating that some breeds are genetically more diverse than others.
  • Based on genetic relations, multivariate analysis (a statistical method used to examine several variables simultaneously), and structure analyses, the 34 horse breeds could be grouped into four genetically differentiated groups: warm-blooded, draught, Nordic and pony breeds.

Implications

  • The researchers used two conservancy strategies – the maximization of diversity and aggregate diversity approaches – to conclude that greater conservation efforts should focus on five local breeds: the Boulonnais, Landais, Merens, Poitevin and Pottok.
  • This information can be utilized by breeders and conservationists to make informed breeding decisions and conservation efforts to maintain or even increase genetic diversity within these breeds.

Cite This Article

APA
Leroy G, Callède L, Verrier E, Mériaux JC, Ricard A, Danchin-Burge C, Rognon X. (2009). Genetic diversity of a large set of horse breeds raised in France assessed by microsatellite polymorphism. Genet Sel Evol, 41(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-5

Publication

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
NlmUniqueID: 9114088
Country: France
Language: English
Volume: 41
Issue: 1
Pages: 5

Researcher Affiliations

Leroy, Grégoire
  • AgroParisTech, UMR1236 Génétique et Diversité Animales, 16 rue Claude Bernard, Paris, France. gregoire.leroy@agroparistech.fr
Callède, Lucille
    Verrier, Etienne
      Mériaux, Jean-Claude
        Ricard, Anne
          Danchin-Burge, Coralie
            Rognon, Xavier

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Breeding
              • Female
              • France
              • Genetic Variation
              • Horses / classification
              • Horses / genetics
              • Male
              • Microsatellite Repeats
              • Phylogeny
              • Polymorphism, Genetic

              References

              This article includes 36 references
              1. Toro MA, Fernandez J, Caballero A. Scientific basis for policies in conservation of farm animal genetic resources.. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 13–18 August 2006; Belo Horizonte, Brazil. 2006.
              2. Aberle KS, Hamann H, Drögemüller C, Distl O. Genetic diversity in German draught horse breeds compared with a group of primitive, riding and wild horses by means of microsatellite DNA markers.. Anim Genet 2004;35:270–277.
                doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01166.xpubmed: 15265065google scholar: lookup
              3. Bjørnstad G, Gunby E, Røed KH. Genetic structure of Norwegian horse breeds.. J Anim Breed Genet 2000;117:307–317.
                doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0388.2000.00264.xgoogle scholar: lookup
              4. Cañon J, Checa ML, Carleos C, Vega-Pla JL, Vallejo M, Dunner S. The genetic structure of Spanish Celtic horse breeds inferred from microsatellite data.. Anim Genet 2000;31:39–48.
                doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00591.xpubmed: 10690360google scholar: lookup
              5. Druml T, Curik I, Baumung R, Aberle K, Distl O, Sölknet J. Individual-based assessment of population structure and admixture in Austrian, Croatian and German draught horses.. Heredity 2007;98:114–122.
                doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800910pubmed: 17035951google scholar: lookup
              6. Luis C, Juras R, Oom MM, Cothran EG. Genetic diversity and relationships of Portuguese and other horse breeds based on protein and microsatellite loci variation.. Anim Genet 2007;38:20–27.
                doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01545.xpubmed: 17257184google scholar: lookup
              7. Marletta D, Tupac-Yupanqui I, Bordonaro S, Garcia D, Guastella AM, Criscione A, Cañon J, Dunner S. Analysis of genetic diversity and the determination of relationships among western Mediterranean horse breeds using microsatellite markers.. J Anim Breed Genet 2006;123:315–325.
                doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00603.xpubmed: 16965404google scholar: lookup
              8. Moureaux S, Ricard A, Mériaux JC, Verrier E. Caractérisation génétique des races françaises de sport et de course et analyse de leur variabilité génétique.. 21ème journée de la recherche équine 1995; Les Haras Nationaux, Le Pin-au-Haras. 1995. pp. 100–105.
              9. Plante Y, Vega-Pla JL, Lucas Z, Colling D, de March B, Buchanan F. Genetic diversity in a feral horse population from sable island, Canada.. J Hered 2007;98(6):594–602.
                doi: 10.1093/jhered/esm064pubmed: 17855732google scholar: lookup
              10. Solis A, Jugo BM, Mériaux JC, Iriondo M, Mazon LI, Aguirre AI, Vicario A, Estomba A. Genetic diversity within and among four south European native horse breeds based on microsatellite DNA analysis: implications for conservation.. J Hered 2005;96(6):670–678.
                doi: 10.1093/jhered/esi123pubmed: 16267169google scholar: lookup
              11. Caballero A, Toro MA. Analysis of genetic diversity for the management of conserved subdivided populations.. Conserv Genet 2002;3:289–299.
                doi: 10.1023/A:1019956205473google scholar: lookup
              12. Ollivier L, Foulley JL. Aggregate diversity: New approach combining within- and between-breed genetic diversity.. Livest Prod Sci 2005;95:247–254.
                doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.01.005google scholar: lookup
              13. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. GENETIX 4.04, Logiciel sous Windows TM pour la Génétique des Populations.. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier 2001.
              14. Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism.. J Hered 1995;86:248–249.
              15. Goudet J, Raymond M, De Meeüs T, Rousset F. Testing differentiation in diploid populations.. Genetics 1996;144:1933–1940.
                pmc: PMC1207740pubmed: 8978076
              16. Rice WR. Analysing table of statistical tests.. Evolution 1989;43:223–225.
                doi: 10.2307/2409177pubmed: 28568501google scholar: lookup
              17. Goudet J. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Suisse 2001.
              18. Reynolds J, Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimation of the Coancestry Coefficient: Basis for a Short-Term Genetic Distance.. Genetics 1983;105:767–779.
                pmc: PMC1202185pubmed: 17246175
              19. Hudson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.. Mol Biol Evol 2006;23:254–267.
                doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj030pubmed: 16221896google scholar: lookup
              20. Pritchard JK, Wen W. Documentation for STRUCTURE software (Version 2). University of Chicago 2003.
              21. Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure.. Bioinformatics 2007;23:1801–1806.
                doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233pubmed: 17485429google scholar: lookup
              22. Weitzman ML. On diversity.. Quart J Econom 1992;107:363–405.
                doi: 10.2307/2118476google scholar: lookup
              23. Simianer H, Marti SB, Gibson J, Hannotte O, Rege JEO. An approach to the optimal allocation of conservation funds to minimize loss of genetic diversity between livestock breeds.. Ecol Econ 2003;45:377–392.
                doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00092-2google scholar: lookup
              24. FAO. Secondary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans: Management of small populations at risk.. Rome, Italy 1998.
              25. Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973;70:3321–3323.
                doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321pmc: PMC427228pubmed: 4519626google scholar: lookup
              26. Moureaux S, Verrier E, Ricard A, Mériaux JC. Genetic variability within French race and riding horse breeds from genealogical data and blood marker polymorphisms.. Genet Sel Evol 1996;28:83–102.
                doi: 10.1051/gse:19960105google scholar: lookup
              27. Quittet E, Blanc H. Races chevalines en France. 2.. Paris: La Maison Rustique 1974.
              28. Takezaki N, Nei M. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic tree from microsatellite DNA.. Genetics 1996;144:389–399.
                pmc: PMC1207511pubmed: 8878702
              29. Ducro BJ, Bovenhuis H, Neuteboom M, Hellinga I. Genetic diversity in the Dutch Friesian horse.. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 13–18 August 2006. Belo Horizonte, Brazil; 2006.
              30. Dubois C, Ricard A. Etat des lieux de la sélection Selle-Français. Quelle marge de manœuvre possible pour d'autres plans de sélection?. 31ème journée de la recherche équine 2 March 2005. Les Haras Nationaux, Le Pin-au-Haras; 2005. pp. 173–185.
              31. Cañon J, Garcia D, Garcia-Atance MA, Obexer-Ruff G, Lenstra JA, Ajmone-Marsan P, Dunner S. Geographical partitioning of goat diversity in Europe and the Middle East.. Anim Genet 2006;37:327–334.
                doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01461.xpubmed: 16879341google scholar: lookup
              32. Petit RJ, El Mousadik A, Pons O. Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers.. Conserv Biol 1998;12:844–855.
                doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96489.xgoogle scholar: lookup
              33. Foulley JL, Ollivier L. Estimating allelic richness and its diversity.. Livest Sci 2006;101:150–158.
                doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.10.021google scholar: lookup
              34. Reist-Marti SB, Simianer H, Hanotte O, Rege JEO. Weitzman's approach and Conservation of Breed Diversity: an Application to African Cattle Breeds.. Conserv Biol 2003;17:1299–1311.
                doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01587.xgoogle scholar: lookup
              35. Danvy S, Heydeman P. Le point sur les ressources génétiques équines en France. 31ème journée de la recherche équine 2 March 2005. Les Haras Nationaux, Le Pin-au-Haras; 2005. pp. 135–146.
              36. Verrier E, Loywick V, Donvez J, Blouin C, Joffrin C, Heyman G, Cottrant JF. La gestion génétique des races d'effectifs limités: principes et application aux cas du cheval de trait Boulonnais et de l'âne grand noir du Berry. 31ème journée de la recherche équine 2 March 2005. Les Haras Nationaux, Le Pin-au-Haras; 2005. pp. 161–171.

              Citations

              This article has been cited 18 times.
              1. Hou L, Sulayman A, Zeng Y, Zhou L, Aimaier A, Kader A, Shi L. Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Race Genetic Structure of Major Horse Breeds in Xinjiang, China. Animals (Basel) 2025 Sep 14;15(18).
                doi: 10.3390/ani15182690pubmed: 41007935google scholar: lookup
              2. Hall SJG. Genetic Differentiation among Livestock Breeds-Values for F(st). Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 26;12(9).
                doi: 10.3390/ani12091115pubmed: 35565543google scholar: lookup
              3. Cozzi MC, Valiati P, Longeri M, Ferreira C, Abreu Ferreira S. Genetic Variability Trend of Lusitano Horse Breed Reared in Italy. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jan 1;12(1).
                doi: 10.3390/ani12010098pubmed: 35011204google scholar: lookup
              4. Hanot P, Bayarsaikhan J, Guintard C, Haruda A, Mijiddorj E, Schafberg R, Taylor W. Cranial shape diversification in horses: variation and covariation patterns under the impact of artificial selection. BMC Ecol Evol 2021 Sep 21;21(1):178.
                doi: 10.1186/s12862-021-01907-5pubmed: 34548035google scholar: lookup
              5. Ivanković A, Bittante G, Konjačić M, Kelava Ugarković N, Pećina M, Ramljak J. Evaluation of the Conservation Status of the Croatian Posavina Horse Breed Based on Pedigree and Microsatellite Data. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 18;11(7).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11072130pubmed: 34359258google scholar: lookup
              6. Lancioni H, Cardinali I, Giontella A, Antognoni MT, Miglio A. Mitochondrial DNA variation in the Italian Heavy Draught Horse. PeerJ 2020;8:e8996.
                doi: 10.7717/peerj.8996pubmed: 32461825google scholar: lookup
              7. Winton CL, McMahon R, Hegarty MJ, McEwan NR, Davies-Morel MCG, Morgan C, Nash DM. Genetic diversity within and between British and Irish breeds: The maternal and paternal history of native ponies. Ecol Evol 2020 Feb;10(3):1352-1367.
                doi: 10.1002/ece3.5989pubmed: 32076519google scholar: lookup
              8. Jaworska J, Ropka-Molik K, Wocławek-Potocka I, Siemieniuch M. Inter- and intrabreed diversity of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in primitive and draft horse breeds. PLoS One 2020;15(2):e0228658.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228658pubmed: 32012208google scholar: lookup
              9. Solé M, Ablondi M, Binzer-Panchal A, Velie BD, Hollfelder N, Buys N, Ducro BJ, François L, Janssens S, Schurink A, Viklund Å, Eriksson S, Isaksson A, Kultima H, Mikko S, Lindgren G. Inter- and intra-breed genome-wide copy number diversity in a large cohort of European equine breeds. BMC Genomics 2019 Oct 22;20(1):759.
                doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6141-zpubmed: 31640551google scholar: lookup
              10. Winton CL, Plante Y, Hind P, McMahon R, Hegarty MJ, McEwan NR, Davies-Morel MC, Morgan CM, Powell W, Nash DM. Comparative genetic diversity in a sample of pony breeds from the U.K. and North America: a case study in the conservation of global genetic resources. Ecol Evol 2015 Aug;5(16):3507-22.
                doi: 10.1002/ece3.1562pubmed: 26380682google scholar: lookup
              11. Leroy G, Danchin-Burge C, Palhière I, SanCristobal M, Nédélec Y, Verrier E, Rognon X. How do introgression events shape the partitioning of diversity among breeds: a case study in sheep. Genet Sel Evol 2015 Jun 17;47(1):48.
                doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0131-7pubmed: 26080856google scholar: lookup
              12. Sabbagh M, Danvy S, Ricard A. Genetic and environmental analysis of dystocia and stillbirths in draft horses. Animal 2014 Feb;8(2):184-91.
                doi: 10.1017/S1751731113002061pubmed: 24433956google scholar: lookup
              13. Petersen JL, Mickelson JR, Cleary KD, McCue ME. The American Quarter Horse: population structure and relationship to the thoroughbred. J Hered 2014 Mar-Apr;105(2):148-62.
                doi: 10.1093/jhered/est079pubmed: 24293614google scholar: lookup
              14. Janova E, Futas J, Klumplerova M, Putnova L, Vrtkova I, Vyskocil M, Frolkova P, Horin P. Genetic diversity and conservation in a small endangered horse population. J Appl Genet 2013 Aug;54(3):285-92.
                doi: 10.1007/s13353-013-0151-3pubmed: 23649723google scholar: lookup
              15. Pirault P, Danvy S, Verrier E, Leroy G. Genetic structure and gene flows within horses: a genealogical study at the french population scale. PLoS One 2013;8(4):e61544.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061544pubmed: 23630596google scholar: lookup
              16. Winton CL, Hegarty MJ, McMahon R, Slavov GT, McEwan NR, Davies-Morel MC, Morgan CM, Powell W, Nash DM. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis of native mountain ponies of Britain and Ireland reveals a novel rare population. Ecol Evol 2013 Apr;3(4):934-47.
                doi: 10.1002/ece3.507pubmed: 23610635google scholar: lookup
              17. Petersen JL, Mickelson JR, Cothran EG, Andersson LS, Axelsson J, Bailey E, Bannasch D, Binns MM, Borges AS, Brama P, da Câmara Machado A, Distl O, Felicetti M, Fox-Clipsham L, Graves KT, Guérin G, Haase B, Hasegawa T, Hemmann K, Hill EW, Leeb T, Lindgren G, Lohi H, Lopes MS, McGivney BA, Mikko S, Orr N, Penedo MC, Piercy RJ, Raekallio M, Rieder S, Røed KH, Silvestrelli M, Swinburne J, Tozaki T, Vaudin M, M Wade C, McCue ME. Genetic diversity in the modern horse illustrated from genome-wide SNP data. PLoS One 2013;8(1):e54997.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054997pubmed: 23383025google scholar: lookup
              18. Doan R, Cohen N, Harrington J, Veazey K, Juras R, Cothran G, McCue ME, Skow L, Dindot SV. Identification of copy number variants in horses. Genome Res 2012 May;22(5):899-907.
                doi: 10.1101/gr.128991.111pubmed: 22383489google scholar: lookup
              Subscribe to our newsletter
              Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.