Abstract: Baroque horses represent a distinctive group of breeds that emerged mainly between the 16th and 18th centuries, shaped by the demands of European royalty and their courts. Although recognised as separate breeds, they share common ancestry, breeding goals, and historical gene flow. This study aimed to evaluate their genomic diversity, population structure, and admixture patterns. We analysed 1 160 individuals from eight breeds - Lipizzan, Old Kladruby Horse, Pura Raza Española, Lusitano, Friesian, Criollo, Peruvian Paso, and Puerto Rican Paso Fino - using 34 026 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, with the Croatian Arab horse included as an outgroup. The Lipizzan was further divided into national subpopulations, the two Old Kladruby subpopulations defined by colour (black and grey), and within the Pura Raza Española, the Carthusian strain was treated as a distinct subpopulation. Observed genetic diversity, measured by heterozygosity and haplotype richness, was broadly comparable across breeds, although clear differences were observed between breeds with the lowest values (Friesian) and those with the highest values (Lusitano and Criollo). Genomic inbreeding coefficients, estimated using runs of homozygosity (F) and homozygosity-by-descent segments (F), ranged from ∼0.06 to ∼0.29 and ∼0.14 to ∼0.27, respectively. These values indicate relatively high levels of inbreeding, which may reflect the closed breeding structure of the populations and their relatively limited effective population sizes. In contrast, most individual inbreeding coefficient (F) values were negative, reflecting deliberate avoidance of close-relative matings. Estimates of contemporary effective population size (N) ranged from ∼50 to ∼240 across breeds, depending on the method. Historical N trajectories revealed two distinct demographic decline patterns: one occurring around 12 generations ago and the other around 22 generations ago. Evidence of recent between-breed gene flow was detected among Iberian breeds and between Croatian Arab and Lusitano, whereas shared historical ancestry among Baroque breeds was evident across populations. These results provide new insights into the genomic architecture of Baroque horses and offer valuable guidance for managing their genetic diversity.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study investigates the genetic diversity and population history of Baroque horse breeds that originated between the 16th and 18th centuries, using genomic data from multiple breeds to understand their relationships, inbreeding levels, and historical gene flow.
Background and Objective
Baroque horses are a group of distinctive horse breeds developed primarily for European royalty and their courts.
Although recognized as separate breeds, they share common ancestry and similar breeding goals influenced by their historical context.
The study aimed to:
Evaluate the genomic diversity within and between these breeds.
Understand their population structure and patterns of genetic admixture.
Assess historical and contemporary population dynamics.
Breeds and Samples Analyzed
Genomic data were collected from 1,160 individuals representing eight Baroque horse breeds:
Lipizzan (with national subpopulations)
Old Kladruby Horse (divided by coat color: black and grey)
Pura Raza Española (including the Carthusian strain as a unique subpopulation)
Lusitano
Friesian
Criollo
Peruvian Paso
Puerto Rican Paso Fino
The Croatian Arab horse was used as an outgroup to provide comparative genomic context.
Genotyping involved analysis of 34,026 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), a type of genetic marker.
Genetic Diversity Findings
Diversity was assessed by heterozygosity (a common measure of genetic variation) and haplotype richness (variety of genetic combinations).
Most breeds had broadly similar levels of genetic diversity, but extremes were noted:
Friesian showed the lowest genetic diversity.
Lusitano and Criollo exhibited the highest diversity.
Inbreeding Levels
Inbreeding was estimated through:
Runs of Homozygosity (ROH) to measure F (inbreeding coefficient based on homozygous genomic regions).
Homozygosity-by-descent (segments shared identically due to common ancestry).
Inbreeding coefficients ranged:
ROH-based F values: approximately 0.06 to 0.29, indicating low to moderate inbreeding across breeds.
Homozygosity-by-descent F values: approximately 0.14 to 0.27, reinforcing similar conclusions.
These relatively high values suggest:
Closed breeding practices with limited new genetic inputs.
Small effective population sizes.
Interestingly, individual inbreeding coefficients (F) were often negative, implying active management to avoid mating close relatives.
Effective Population Size and Demographic History
Contemporary effective population size (Nₑ), a measure of genetic health and breeding potential, ranged approximately from 50 to 240 depending on the breed and estimation method.
Historical population size trajectories revealed two key periods of demographic decline:
One approximately 12 generations ago.
Another roughly 22 generations ago.
These declines may reflect historical events affecting breeding populations, such as wars, changes in breeding practices, or other bottlenecks.
Population Structure and Gene Flow
Gene flow analysis demonstrated:
Recent genetic exchanges among the Iberian breeds (such as Lusitano and Pura Raza Española).
Gene flow between the Croatian Arab breed and the Lusitano, indicating cross-breeding or historical admixture.
Shared genetic ancestry patterns were found across the Baroque breeds, supporting their common historical roots despite breed distinctions.
Implications and Conclusions
The study provides valuable insight into the genomic diversity and historical genetic relationships among Baroque horses.
Information about inbreeding and effective population sizes is essential for developing breeding strategies to maintain genetic health.
Understanding gene flow and population structure aids in conserving the genetic heritage of these culturally important horses.
The results can guide breeding programs aiming to preserve Baroque horses as a living cultural heritage while maintaining their genetic viability.
Cite This Article
APA
Vostra-Vydrova H, Moravcikova N, Kasarda R, Shihabi M, Druet T, Halvonik A, Hofmanova B, Dovc P, Zorc M, Molina A, Demyda-Peyrás S, Valera M, Kovács M, Posta J, Rogić B, Cubric-Curik V, Vostry L, Curik I.
(2026).
Genomic diversity and historical legacy of Baroque horses: a living cultural heritage.
Animal, 20(8), 101897.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2026.101897
Czech University of Life Science Prague, Kamycka 129, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.
Moravcikova, N
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovak Republic.
Kasarda, R
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovak Republic.
Shihabi, M
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Druet, T
Unit of Animal Genomics, GIGA-R & Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lège, Belgium.
Halvonik, A
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovak Republic.
Hofmanova, B
Czech University of Life Science Prague, Kamycka 129, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.
Dovc, P
Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Zorc, M
Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Molina, A
Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Demyda-Peyrás, S
Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Valera, M
Departamento de Agronomía, ETSIA, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Kovács, M
Doctoral School of Animal Science, University of Debrecen, Böszörményi str 138, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary; Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Böszörményi str 138, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Posta, J
Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Böszörményi str 138, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Rogić, B
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Banja Luka, Bulevar vojvode Petra Bojovica 1A, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Cubric-Curik, V
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Vostry, L
Czech University of Life Science Prague, Kamycka 129, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: vostry@af.czu.cz.
Curik, I
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; Institute of Animal Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Guba S. str. 40, H-7400 Kaposvár, Hungary.