FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist / Global equine parasite control guidelines: Consensus or conf...
International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance2025; 28; 100600; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100600

Global equine parasite control guidelines: Consensus or confusion?

Abstract: Equine parasite control has historically been characterized by confusing and conflicting information, posing significant challenges for veterinarians and horse owners to make evidence-based decisions. Since 2012, equine parasite control guidelines have been developed and published for different parts of the world to address this situation and provide trusted sources of current guidance. At the 2024 International Equine Infectious Disease Conference in Deauville, Normandy, France, lead authors of equine parasite control guideline documents published in the USA, UK, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, Australia, and Europe convened and presented their guidelines. This led to a discussion of differences and similarities between the guidelines and an effort to identify current research needs in this area. In general, all guidelines recommend a surveillance-based approach for equine parasite control, emphasizing the importance of anthelmintic resistance testing. Some guidelines have a focus on controlling Strongylus vulgaris, while others primarily focus on cyathostomins, ascarids and tapeworms. Although the same four anthelmintic drug classes are marketed in most countries, there are some differences between product portfolios available, most notably between Australia and other countries. European countries have various degrees of prescription-only restrictions on anthelmintic products, whereas products are available over the counter in Australia and the USA. Commercially available diagnostic portfolios differed somewhat between countries and affected recommendations made as well. In conclusion, the guidelines are in general agreement and are based on the same general principles. One major challenge is communicating the recommendations effectively to end-users, which should be made a priority going forward.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-06-03 PubMed ID: 40472642PubMed Central: PMC12171568DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100600Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This is a study about the worldwide guidelines for equine parasite control. The research focuses on the similarities and differences of these guidelines from various countries and their effectiveness in combating equine parasites.

Introduction

  • The study explores the global guidelines for equine parasite control. This subject has been historically characterised by conflicting information which has created challenges for veterinarians and horse owners in making evidence-based decisions.
  • In order to address this issue, guidelines have been developed since 2012 in different parts of the world to provide a reliable source of current guidance.
  • During the International Equine Infectious Disease Conference in 2024, various authors from USA, UK, Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, Australia, and Europe presented their guidelines leading to a discussion identifying similarities, differences, and current research needs.

Recommendations from Different Countries

  • All guidelines recommend a surveillance-based approach for equine parasite control and highlight the significance of anthelmintic resistance testing.
  • Some countries like Denmark place their focus on controlling Strongylus vulgaris while others primarily focus on cyathostomins, ascarids, and tapeworms.
  • Notably, the four anthelmintic drug classes are marketed in most countries. Some differences exist, especially between Australia and other countries, in the portfolios of those products available.
  • The European countries enforce certain prescription-based restrictions on anthelmintic products. However, such products are readily available over the counter in Australia and the USA.
  • Commercially available diagnostic portfolios also differed among countries, but influenced the recommendations given.

Conclusion

  • The research concludes that generally, the guidelines are in agreement and derive from the same foundational principles.
  • However, there are challenges in effectively communicating these recommendations to the end-users. This has been identified as a priority in the future.

Cite This Article

APA
Nielsen MK, Pyatt A, Perrett J, Tydén E, van Doorn D, Pihl TH, Schmidt JS, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Beasley A, Abbas G, Jabbar A. (2025). Global equine parasite control guidelines: Consensus or confusion? Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist, 28, 100600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100600

Publication

International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance
ISSN: 2211-3207
NlmUniqueID: 101576715
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 28
Pages: 100600

Researcher Affiliations

Nielsen, Martin K
  • Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark. Electronic address: martin.nielsen@anivet.au.dk.
Pyatt, Alison
  • International Office, Veterinary Medicines Directorate, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Perrett, Jodie
  • Authorisations Division, Veterinary Medicines Directorate, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Tydén, Eva
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
van Doorn, Deborah
  • Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Royal GD, Deventer, the Netherlands.
Pihl, Tina H
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.
Schmidt, Jennifer S
  • Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; Veterinary Center for Resistance Research, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
von Samson-Himmelstjerna, Georg
  • Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; Veterinary Center for Resistance Research, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
Beasley, Anne
  • School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia.
Abbas, Ghazanfar
  • Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Jabbar, Abdul
  • Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
  • Consensus
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Drug Resistance
  • Parasitic Diseases, Animal / prevention & control
  • Parasitic Diseases, Animal / drug therapy

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interests The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 67 references
  1. Abbas G., Ghafar A., Bauquier J., Beasley A., Ling E., Gauci C.G., El-Hage C., Wilkes E.J.A., McConnell E., Carrigan P., Cudmore L., Hurley J., Beveridge I., Nielsen M.K., Jacobson C., Stevenson M.A., Hughes K.J., Jabbar A.. Prevalence and diversity of ascarid and strongylid nematodes in Australian Thoroughbred horses using next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics tools.. Vet. Parasitol. 2023;323.
    pubmed: 37844388
  2. Abbas G., Ghafar A., McConnell E., Beasley A., Bauquier J., Wilkes E.J.A., El-Hage C., Carrigan P., Cudmore L., Hurley J., Gauci C.G., Beveridge I., Ling E., Jacobson C., Stevenson M., Nielsen M.K., Hughes K., Jabbar A.. A national survey of anthelmintic resistance in ascarid and strongylid nematodes in Australian Thoroughbred horses.. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2024;24.
    pmc: PMC10757041pubmed: 38064906
  3. Abbas G., Ghafar A., Beasley A., Stevenson M., Bauquier J., Koehler A.V., Wilkes E.J.A., McConnell E., El-Hage C., Carrigan P., Cudmore L., Hurley J., Gauci C.G., Beveridge I., Jacobson C., Nielsen M.K., Hughes K., Jabbar A.. Understanding temporal and spatial distribution of intestinal nematodes of horses using faecal egg counts and DNA metabarcoding.. Vet. Parasitol. 2024;325.
    pubmed: 38091893
  4. Anderson H.C., Warner S.F., Ripley N.E., Nielsen M.K.. Performance of three techniques for diagnosing equine tapeworm infection.. Vet. Parasitol. 2024;327.
    pubmed: 38430622
  5. Beasley A., Abbas G., Hughes K., El-Hage C., Jacobson C., Bauquier J., Wilkes E., Carrigan P., Cudmore L., Hurley J., Beveridge I., Nielsen M.K., Jabbar A.. Australian guidelines for equine internal parasite management.. Aust. Vet. J. 2025;103:151–158.
    pmc: PMC11962583pubmed: 39837536
  6. Bellaw J.L., Nielsen M.K.. Meta-analysis of cyathostomin species-specific prevalence and relative abundance in domestic horses from 1975-2020: Emphasis on geographic region and specimen collection method.. Parasit. Vectors. 2020;13:509.
    pmc: PMC7552500pubmed: 33046130
  7. Bosco A., Maurelli M.P., Ianniello D., Morgoglione M.E., Amadesi A., Coles G.C., Cringoli G., Rinaldi L.. The recovery of added nematode eggs from horse and sheep faeces by three methods.. BMC Vet. Res. 2018;14:7.
    pmc: PMC5756441pubmed: 29304858
  8. Bredtmann C.M., Krücken J., Kuzmina T., Louro M., de Carvalho L.M.M., von Samson-Himmelstjerna G.. Nuclear and mitochondrial marker sequences reveal close relationship between Coronocyclus coronatus and a potential Cylicostephanus calicatus cryptic species complex.. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019;75.
    pubmed: 31299325
  9. Bredtmann C.M., Krücken J., Murugaiyan J., Balard A., Hofer H., Kuzmina T.A., von Samson-Himmelstjerna G.. Concurrent proteomic fingerprinting and molecular analysis of cyathostomins.. Proteomics. 2019;19.
    pubmed: 30786147
  10. Bull K.E., Hodgkinson J., Allen K., Poissant J., Peachey L.E.. Quantitative DNA metabarcoding reveals species composition of a macrocyclic lactone and pyrantel resistant cyathostomin population in the UK.. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2025;27.
    pmc: PMC11762968pubmed: 39778419
  11. Carmo T.A.d., Fonseca J.d.S., Braga F.R., Paz-Silva A., Soutello R.V.G.d., Araujo J.V.d.. Exploring the use of helminthophagous fungi in the control of helminthoses in horses: a review.. Animals. 2025;15:864.
    pmc: PMC11939784pubmed: 40150393
  12. Diekmann I., Krücken J., Kuzmina T.A., Bredtmann C.M., Louro M., de Carvalho L.M.M., von Samson-Himmelstjerna G., Matthews J.B., Tzelos T., Kharchenko V.A.. Comparative phylogenetic and sequence identity analysis of internal transcribed spacer 2 and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I as DNA barcode markers for the most common equine Strongylidae species.. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2025;29.
    pubmed: 39955017
  13. Diekmann I., Blazejak K., Krücken J., Strube C., Samson-Himmelstjerna G.v.. Comparison of morphological and molecular Strongylus spp. identification in equine larval cultures and first report of a patent Strongylus asini infection in a horse.. Equine Vet. J. 2025;57:522–529.
    pmc: PMC11807925pubmed: 39012065
  14. Engell-Sørensen K., Pall A., Damgaard C., Holmstrup M.. Seasonal variation in the prevalence of equine tapeworms using coprological diagnosis during a seven-year period in Denmark.. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2018;12:22–25.
    pubmed: 31014802
  15. Eysker M., Jansen J., Mirck M.H.. Control of strongylosis in horses by alternate grazing of horses and sheep and some other aspects of the epidemiology of strongylidae infections.. Vet. Parasitol. 1986;19:103–115.
    pubmed: 3962151
  16. Finnerty C.A., Bonometti S., Ripley N.E., Smith M.A., Nielsen M.K.. Evidence of tapeworm treatment failure in a Central Kentucky Thoroughbred farm.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2024;36:579–585.
  17. Gao Y.Y.Y., Qiu Y.Y., Meng X.Q., Yang X., Zhang Z.H., Diao Z.Y., Z Y, Wang S., Wang C.R., Song M.X.. Comparative analysis of mitochondrial DNA datasets indicates that Cylicostephanus minutus represents a species complex.. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020;84.
    pubmed: 32745810
  18. Halvarsson P., Grandi G., Hägglund S., Höglund J.. Gastrointestinal parasite community structure in horses after the introduction of selective anthelmintic treatment strategies.. Vet. Parasitol. 2024;326.
    pubmed: 38218052
  19. Healey K., Lawlor C., Knox M.R., Chambers M., Lamb J.. Field evaluation of Duddingtonia flagrans IAH 1297 for the reduction of worm burden in grazing animals: tracer studies in sheep.. Vet. Parasitol. 2018;253:48–54.
    pubmed: 29605003
  20. Healey K., Lawlor C., Knox M.R., Chambers M., Lamb J., Groves P.. Field evaluation of Duddingtonia flagrans IAH 1297 for the reduction of worm burden in grazing animals: pasture larval studies in horses, cattle and goats.. Vet. Parasitol. 2018;258:124–132.
    pubmed: 30105972
  21. Hedberg-Alm Y., Tydén E., Riihimäki M., Anlén K., Nyman S., Hedenby J., Lind E.O., Wartel M., Svedberg P.. Hästens mag-tarmparasiter.https://hastsverige.se/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/parasiter-final-2023.pdf [Gastrointestinal parasites of the horse. Prevention and treatment]. Available online at:. 2022.
  22. Hedberg-Alm Y., Tydén E., Tamminen L.M., Lindström L., Anlén K., Svensson M.. Clinical features and treatment response to differentiate idiopathic peritonitis from non - strangulating intestinal infarction of the pelvic flexure associated with Strongylus vulgaris infection in the horse.. BMC Vet. Res. 2022:1–12.
    pmc: PMC9034621pubmed: 35461295
  23. Hedberg-Alm Y., Halvarsson P., Martin F., Osterman-Lind E., Törngren V., Tydén E.. Demonstration of reduced efficacy against cyathostomins without change in species composition after pyrantel embonate treatment in Swedish equine establishments.. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2023;23:78–86.
    pmc: PMC10690405pubmed: 37979235
  24. Hedberg-Alm Y., Osterman-Lind E., Martin F., Lindfors R., Roepstorff N., Hedenström U., Fredriksson I., Halvarsson P., Tydén E.. Retained efficacy of ivermectin against cyathostomins in Swedish horse establishments practicing selective anthelmintic treatment.. Vet. Parasitol. 2023;322.
    pubmed: 37639919
  25. Herd R.P.. Pasture hygiene – a nonchemical approach to equine endoparasite control.. Mod. Vet. Pract. 1986;67:36–38.
  26. Herd R.P.. Parasite control in horses – pasture sweeping.. Mod. Vet. Pract. 1986;67:893–894.
  27. Jürgenschellert L., Krücken J., Bousquet E., Bartz J., Heyer N., Nielsen M.K., Samson-Himmelstjerna G.v.. Occurrence of strongylid nematode parasites on horse farms in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany with high seroprevalence of Strongylus vulgaris.. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022;9.
    pmc: PMC9226773pubmed: 35754549
  28. Kaplan R.M., Denwood M., Nielsen M.K., Thamsborg S.M., Torgerson P.R., Gilleard J.S., Dobson R.J., Vercruysse J., Levecke B.. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) guidelines for diagnosing anthelmintic resistance using the faecal egg count reduction test in ruminants, horses and swine.. Vet. Parasitol. 2023;318.
    pubmed: 37121092
  29. Kester W.O.. Strongylus vulgaris – the horse killer.. Mod. Vet. Pract. 1975;56:569–572.
    pubmed: 1143279
  30. Kootwijk F.J.v., Wollenberg L.v.d., Sloet van Oldruitenborgh Oosterbaan M.M., Doorn D.C.K.v.. Leidraad Paard en Parasieten. [Horse and Parasites Guide]. Dier en Arts. 2024. https://www.knmvd.nl/app/uploads/2024/11/Leidraad-Paard-en-Parasieten-uitgebreid-met-literatuur-final.pdf. .
  31. Kooyman F.N.J., van Doorn D.C.K., Geurden T., Mughini-Gras L., Ploeger H.W., Wagenaar J.A.. Species composition of larvae cultured after anthelmintic treatment indicates reduced moxidectin susceptibility of immature Cylicocyclus species in horses.. J.A. Vet. Parasitol. 2016;227:77–84.
    pubmed: 27523942
  32. Lawson A.L., Malalana F., Mair T.S.. Larval cyathostominosis: clinicopathological data and treatment outcomes of 38 hospitalised horses (2009–2020). Equine Vet. Educ. 2023;35:424–435.
  33. Lester H.E., Spanton J., Stratford C.H., Bartley D.J., Morgan E.R., Hodgkinson J.E., Coumbe K., Mair T., Swan B., Lemon G., Cookson R., Matthews J.B.. Anthelmintic efficacy against cyathostomins in horses in Southern England.. Vet. Parasitol. 2013;197:189–196.
    pubmed: 23830687
  34. Lightbody K.L., Davis P.J., Austin C.J.. Validation of a novel saliva-based ELISA test for diagnosing tapeworm burden in horses.. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 2016;45(2):335–346.
    pubmed: 27218436
  35. Lightbody K.L., Austin A., Lambert P.A., Samson-Himmelstjerna G.v., Jürgenschellert L., Krücken J., Nielsen M.K., Sallé G., Reigner F., Donnelly C.G., Finno C., Walshe N., Mulcahy G., Housby-Skeggs N., Grice S., Geyer K.K., Austin C.J., Matthews J.B.. Validation of a serum ELISA test for cyathostomin infection in equines.. Int. J. Parasitol. 2024;54:23–32.
    pubmed: 37536388
  36. Louro M., Kuzmina T.A., Bredtmann C.M., Diekmann I., de Carvalho L.M.M., von Samson-Himmelstjerna G., Krücken J.. Genetic variability, cryptic species and phylogenetic relationship of six cyathostomin species based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequences.. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:8245.
    pmc: PMC8050097pubmed: 33859247
  37. Martin F., Höglund J., Bergström T.F., Lindsjö O.K., Tydén E.. Resistance to pyrantel embonate and efficacy of fenbendazole in Parascaris univalens on Swedish stud farms.. Vet. Parasitol. 2018;264:69–73.
    pubmed: 30503095
  38. Martin F., Halvartsson P., Hedberg-Alm Y., Tydén E.. Occurrence of fenbendazole resistance in Parascaris spp. on breeding farms in Sweden.. Vet. Parasitol. 2024;331.
    pubmed: 39106597
  39. McEvoy A., O'Boyle P., Ellis S., Dalton J.P., Parkinson M., Keane O.M., Machin C.. Comparison of traditional copromicroscopy with image analysis devices for detection of gastrointestinal nematode infection in sheep.. Vet. Parasitol. 2024;329.
    pubmed: 38815364
  40. Nagamori Y., Sedlak R.H., DeRosa A., Pullins A., Cree T., Loenser M., Larson B.S., Smith R.B., Goldstein R.. Evaluation of the VETSCAN IMAGYST: an in-clinic canine and feline fecal parasite detection system integrated with a deep learning algorithm.. Parasites Vectors. 2020;13:346.
    pmc: PMC7353785pubmed: 32653042
  41. Nielsen M.K.. Equine tapeworm infections – disease, diagnosis, and control.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2016;28:388–395.
  42. Nielsen M.K.. Evidence-based considerations for control of Parascaris spp. infections in horses.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2016;28:224–231.
  43. Nielsen M.K.. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: current status and emerging trends.. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2022;20:76–88.
    pmc: PMC9630620pubmed: 36342004
  44. Nielsen M.K.. Apparent treatment failure of praziquantel and pyrantel pamoate against anoplocephalid tapeworms.. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2023;22:96–101.
    pmc: PMC10331019pubmed: 37354849
  45. Nielsen M.K., Peterson D.S., Monrad J., Thamsborg S.M., Olsen S.N., Kaplan R.M.. Detection and semi-quantification of Strongylus vulgaris DNA in equine faeces by real-time quantitative PCR.. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008;38(3–4):443–453.
    pubmed: 17889881
  46. Nielsen M.K., Baptiste K.E., Tolliver S.C., Collins S.S., Lyons E.T.. Analysis of multiyear studies in horses in Kentucky to ascertain whether counts of eggs and larvae per gram of feces are reliable indicators of numbers of strongyles and ascarids present.. Vet. Parasitol. 2010;174:77–84.
    pubmed: 20850927
  47. Nielsen M.K., Vidyashankar A.N., Olsen S.N., Monrad J., Thamsborg S.M.. Strongylus vulgaris associated with usage of selective therapy on Danish horse farms – is it reemerging?. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;189:260–266.
    pubmed: 22703964
  48. Nielsen M.K., Jacobsen S., Olsen S., Bousquet E., Pihl T.H.. Non-strangulating intestinal infarction associated with Strongylus vulgaris in referred Danish equine patients.. Equine Vet. J. 2016;48:376–379.
    pubmed: 25604521
  49. Nielsen M.K., Banahan M., Kaplan R.M.. Importation of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins on a US Thoroughbred farm.. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2020;14:99–104.
    pmc: PMC7548974pubmed: 33022574
  50. Nielsen M.K., Gee E.K., Hansen A., Waghorn T., Bell J., Leathwick D.M.. Monitoring equine ascarid and cyathostomin parasites: evaluating health parameters under different treatment regimens.. Equine Vet. J. 2021;53:902–910.
    pubmed: 33119179
  51. Nielsen M.K., Facison C., Scare J.A., Martin A.N., Gravatte H.S., Steuer A.E.. Diagnosing Strongylus vulgaris in pooled fecal samples.. Vet. Parasitol. 2021;296.
    pubmed: 34130096
  52. Nielsen M.K., Steuer A.E., Anderson H.P., Gavriliuc S., Carpenter A.B., Redman E.M., Gilleard J.S., Reinemeyer C.R., Poissant J.. Shortened egg reappearance periods of equine cyathostomins following ivermectin or moxidectin treatment: morphologic and molecular investigation of efficacy and species composition.. Int. J. Parasitol. 2022;52:787–798.
    pubmed: 36244428
  53. Nielsen M.K., Erskine M., DeNotta S.A.L., French D., Graves E., Kaplan R.M., Reuss S., Swinebroad E.L., Vaala W., Nolen-Walston R.. AAEP parasite control guidelines.www.aaep.org Published online at.. American Association of Equine Practitioners. 2024.
  54. Nielsen M.K., Bartholdy I.D., Kristensen K.S., Borrye J.C., Meilvang K.S.S., Rendtorff C.E.K., Hjortflod M.D., Fuglbjerg V., Karlsson M., Petersen H.H., Toft K., Thamsborg S.M., Pihl T.H.. Ivermectin performance against equine strongylids: efficacy, egg reappearance periods, and fecal egg counting method comparison.. Vet. Parasitol. 2025;336.
    pubmed: 40215581
  55. Noel M.L., Scare J.A., Bellaw J.L., Nielsen M.K.. Accuracy and precision of Mini-FLOTAC and McMaster techniques for determining equine strongyle egg counts.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;48:182–187.
  56. Osterman-Lind E., Alm Y.H., Hassler H., Wilderoth H., Thorolfsen H., Tydén E.. Evaluation of strategies to reduce equine strongyle infective larvae on pasture and study of larval migration and overwintering in a Nordic climate.. Animals. 2022;12:3093.
    pmc: PMC9686517pubmed: 36428321
  57. Osterman-Lind E., Holmberg M., Grandi G.. Selective anthelmintic treatment in horses in Sweden based on coprological analyses: ten-year results.. Animals. 2023;13:2741.
    pmc: PMC10486379pubmed: 37685005
  58. Pihl T.H., Nielsen M.K., Olsen S.N., Leifsson P.S., Jacobsen S.. Non-strangulating intestinal infarctions associated with Strongylus vulgaris: clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of 30 horses (2008-2016). Equine Vet. J. 2018;50:474–480.
    pubmed: 29112788
  59. Pfister K., van Doorn D.. New perspectives in equine intestinal parasitic disease ‐ insights in monitoring helminth infections.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine. 2018;34:141–153.
    pubmed: 29426708
  60. Proudman C.J., Trees A.J.. Use of excretory/secretory antigens for the serodiagnosis of Anoplocephala perfoliata cestodosis.. Vet. Parasitol. 1996;61(3–4):239–247.
    pubmed: 8720562
  61. Reid S.W., Mair T.S., Hillyer M.H., Love S.. Epidemiological risk factors associated with a diagnosis of clinical cyathostomiasis in the horse.. Equine Vet. J. 1995;27:127–130.
    pubmed: 7607145
  62. Relf V.E., Lester H.E., Morgan E.R., Hodgkinson J.E., Matthews J.B.. Anthelmintic efficacy on UK Thoroughbred stud farms.. Int. J. Parasitol. 2014;44:507–514.
    pubmed: 24746779
  63. Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan M.M., Doorn D.C.K.v., Holland W., Herten J.v., Ploeger H.W., Fink-Gremmels J.. Antiparasitaire middelen en de receptplicht voor paarden.. Tijdschr. Diergeneeskd. 2009;134:288–295.
    pubmed: 19431963
  64. Slusarewicz P., Pagano S., Mills C., Popa G., Chow M., Mendenhall M., Rodgers D.W., Nielsen M.K.. Automated parasite fecal egg counting using fluorescence labeling, smartphone image capture and computational image analysis.. Int. J. Parasitol. 2016;46:485–493.
    pubmed: 27025771
  65. Steuer A., Fritzler J., Boggan S., Daniel I., Cowles B., Penn C., Goldstein R., Lin D.. Validation of Vetscan Imagyst, a diagnostic test utilizing an artificial intelligence deep learning algorithm, for detecting strongyles and Parascaris spp. in equine fecal samples.. Parasites Vectors. 2024;17:465.
    pmc: PMC11558902pubmed: 39533358
  66. Szewc M., De Waal T., Zintl A.. Biological methods for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes.. Vet. J. 2021;268.
    pubmed: 33468301
  67. Tydén E., Enemark H.L., Franko M.A., Höglund J., Osterman-Lind E.. Prevalence of Strongylus vulgaris in horses after ten years of prescription usage of anthelmintics in Sweden.. Vet. Parasitol. X. 2019;2.
    pmc: PMC7458386pubmed: 32904767

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Gentilini F, Ogundipe TG, Turba ME, Romagnoli N, Lambertini C, Pollera C, Cremonesi P, Stancampiano L. Beyond the host: Unveiling the independent microbiome of equine gastrointestinal nematodes. PLoS One 2026;21(2):e0339596.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339596pubmed: 41666179google scholar: lookup
  2. Abbas G, Nielsen MK, E-Hage C, Ghafar A, Beveridge I, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Wilkes EJA, Carrigan P, Cudmore L, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, Jabbar A. Recent advances in intestinal helminth parasites of horses in the Asia-Pacific region: Current trends, challenges and future directions. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2025 Dec;29:100622.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100622pubmed: 41135277google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,000 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.