Abstract: Equine piroplasmosis remains a major constraint to equine health, productivity, and international movement. In compliance with PRISMA 2020 criteria, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out to estimate the pooled global prevalence of equine piroplasmosis and identify possible sources of risk variables. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Springer Nature, Europe PMC, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, CABI Digital Library, and Google Scholar were searched between 2020 to 2025. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate pooled prevalence estimates. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and publication bias assessments were conducted using RStudio software version 4.6.0. Among the 95 studies included in the analysis, the pooled prevalence of active T. equi infection was 25.21%, while the corresponding seroprevalence was 30.96%. For active B. caballi infection, the pooled prevalence was 4.60%, compared with a seroprevalence of 10.90%. The pooled prevalence of active T. haneyi infection was 12.18%. Substantial heterogeneity (I² > 90%) was identified across all pooled estimates, likely reflecting differences in sampling periods and sample sizes, geographic regions, diagnostic approaches, and host demographics. Meta-regression revealed a significant increasing temporal trend in T. equi prevalence (p 0.05). Equine piroplasmosis remains highly prevalent worldwide, particularly T. equi, with marked heterogeneity driven by methodological factors, geographic region, and host characteristics. These findings underscore the need for standardized surveillance, harmonized diagnostics, and integrated vector control strategies to mitigate the global impact of equine piroplasmosis.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study systematically reviews and analyzes global data from 2020 to 2025 to estimate how common equine piroplasmosis is worldwide and identifies factors influencing its prevalence.
The research highlights the significant presence of different causative agents and the variability across regions, emphasizing the need for better monitoring and control strategies.
Purpose and Background
Equine piroplasmosis is a tick-borne disease affecting horses and related animals, caused primarily by parasites like Theileria equi, Babesia caballi, and Theileria haneyi.
This disease impacts animal health, reduces productivity, and restricts international movement of equines due to its infectious nature.
The study aims to synthesize recent global data to understand the current prevalence, trends, and risk factors associated with the disease.
Methodology
The researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines to ensure transparent and replicable study selection and data synthesis.
Databases searched included major scientific repositories such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and others, covering literature from 2020 to 2025.
A total of 95 studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis.
Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates, accommodating heterogeneity among included studies.
Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions helped explore sources of heterogeneity and temporal trends.
Analyses were conducted using RStudio software (version 4.6.0), with assessments for publication bias to evaluate the robustness of findings.
Key Findings
The pooled prevalence of active infection with Theileria equi was found to be approximately 25.21%, while seroprevalence (evidence of exposure or past infection) for this parasite was higher at 30.96%, suggesting ongoing exposure and infection in populations worldwide.
For Babesia caballi, active infection had a pooled prevalence of 4.60%, with seroprevalence at 10.90%, indicating a less frequent but still significant presence.
Theileria haneyi showed an active infection prevalence of 12.18%, contributing to the disease burden.
All prevalence estimates exhibited substantial heterogeneity (I² > 90%), denoting large variations between study results.
Such heterogeneity likely derives from differences in:
Sampling periods and sample sizes
Geographic locations and regional characteristics
Diagnostic methods employed (e.g., molecular vs. serological tests)
Host demographics such as age, species, and management practices
Meta-regression revealed a statistically significant increasing trend in prevalence of T. equi over time (p < 0.05), highlighting potential worsening or better detection in recent years.
Implications
The persistent and widespread high prevalence of equine piroplasmosis, especially strains caused by T. equi, represents a continued risk for equine health globally.
Marked heterogeneity emphasizes the need for:
Standardized surveillance frameworks to enable comparable epidemiological data collection worldwide
Harmonized and reliable diagnostic protocols to accurately detect and differentiate causative agents
Integrated vector control strategies to reduce tick populations and interrupt transmission
These targeted approaches could improve disease management, reduce economic losses, and facilitate safer international equine movement.
Conclusion
This systematic review and meta-analysis provide comprehensive updated evidence on the global burden of equine piroplasmosis from 2020 to 2025.
Findings reinforce the importance of enhanced monitoring, diagnostic harmonization, and vector control to mitigate the disease’s global impact.
Cite This Article
APA
Firdausy LW, Fikri F, Wicaksono AP, Maslamama ST, Purnama MTE.
(2026).
Global prevalence of equine piroplasmosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from 2020-2025.
Vet J, 106941.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2026.106941
Division of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Health and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia; Research Group of Animal Biomedical and Conservation, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
Fikri, Faisal
Division of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Health and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia; Research Group of Animal Biomedical and Conservation, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
Wicaksono, Arya Pradana
Animal Health Division, Indonesian Horse Veterinarian Association, Indonesia.
Maslamama, Salipudin Tasil
Agricultural Biotechnology Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Türkiye.
Purnama, Muhammad Thohawi Elziyad
Division of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Health and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia; Research Group of Animal Biomedical and Conservation, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia; Department of Biology, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Türkiye. Electronic address: thohawi@fkh.unair.ac.id.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of Competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper Conflict of interest statement None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.