Analyze Diet
Journal of anatomy1989; 167; 225-233;

Heart weight and running ability.

Abstract: The weight of the heart as determined by dissection techniques was compared with liveweight and total muscle weight in different types of horses and dogs as adults and during growth. With increasing body size both within and between species, heart weight forms a lesser proportion of liveweight and of total muscle weight. Heart weight forms a greater proportion of liveweight in Thoroughbreds and Greyhounds (breeds noted for high speed running) than in other less fleet members of their species and Greyhounds have greater heart weights relative to total muscle weight than other dogs.
Publication Date: 1989-12-01 PubMed ID: 2630537PubMed Central: PMC1256836
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the correlation between the heart weight and the running ability of different types of horses and dogs as adults and during growth. The findings indicate that heart weight forms a larger proportion of liveweight in Thoroughbreds and Greyhounds, breeds known for their high-speed running prowess, compared to other species.

About the Study

  • The research focuses on studying the heart weight of different species of horses and dogs. The researchers dissected the animals to determine heart size and compared it with the live weight and total muscle weight.
  • The study included adult species and those in the growth phase. The idea was to understand how heart weight changes with the growth of the animal and affects their performance.
  • Species studied were both high-speed runners like Thoroughbreds and Greyhounds and also less fleet members of their respective species.

Findings

  • Initial results revealed that with an increase in body size, both within and among species, the weight of the heart was found to be a smaller proportion of the live weight and the total muscle weight.
  • However, contradicting the initial observation, when the species-specific characteristics were accounted for, Thoroughbreds and Greyhounds (known for high-speed running) showed a greater proportion of heart weight relative to their live weight, compared to other slower members of their species.
  • Among dogs, Greyhounds displayed greater heart weights relative to their total muscle weight as compared to other dog species.

Implications

  • The research gives an interesting insight into the possible linkage between heart weight and running efficiency in different species.
  • The findings suggest that in species known for their speed, the heart forms a more significant proportion of thier liveweight, possibly contributing to their running ability.
  • This could enhance our understanding of the bodily adaptations in swift animals. It may further be used to analyze and enhance the performance of race animals such as racehorses and greyhounds.

Cite This Article

APA
Gunn HM. (1989). Heart weight and running ability. J Anat, 167, 225-233.

Publication

ISSN: 0021-8782
NlmUniqueID: 0137162
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 167
Pages: 225-233

Researcher Affiliations

Gunn, H M
  • Department of Anatomy, University College, Cork, Ireland.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Body Weight
  • Dogs
  • Heart / anatomy & histology
  • Horses
  • Muscles / anatomy & histology
  • Organ Size
  • Running

References

This article includes 15 references
  1. Med J Aust. 1970 Oct 17;2(16):728-30
    pubmed: 5487220
  2. J Physiol. 1954 Apr 28;124(1):44-63
    pubmed: 13163866
  3. Ann Intern Med. 1975 Apr;82(4):521-4
    pubmed: 1119766
  4. N Z Vet J. 1975 Nov;23(11):249-54
    pubmed: 128714
  5. Aust Vet J. 1976 Dec;52(12):561-4
    pubmed: 1021110
  6. Res Vet Sci. 1978 May;24(3):277-82
    pubmed: 674839
  7. Aust Vet J. 1979 Jun;55(6):247-50
    pubmed: 518417
  8. Equine Vet J. 1980 Apr;12(2):81-4
    pubmed: 7371615
  9. Aust Vet J. 1981 Sep;57(9):422-8
    pubmed: 7034709
  10. Equine Vet J. 1982 Jan;14(1):89-90
    pubmed: 7084186
  11. Annu Rev Physiol. 1983;45:169-89
    pubmed: 6221687
  12. Aust Vet J. 1987 Mar;64(3):88-9
    pubmed: 3579758
  13. Virchows Arch. 1951;320(3):197-237
    pubmed: 14877039
  14. Am J Vet Res. 1953 Jan;14(50):62-7
    pubmed: 13031010
  15. Growth. 1972 Sep;36(3):195-208
    pubmed: 4651634