FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Heterospecific Fear and Avoidance Behaviour in Domestic Hors...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(11); 3081; doi: 10.3390/ani11113081

Heterospecific Fear and Avoidance Behaviour in Domestic Horses (Equus caballus).

Abstract: Ridden horses have been reported to be fearful of cows. We tested whether cows could provoke behavioural and cardiac fear responses in horses, and whether these responses differ in magnitude to those shown to other potential dangers. Twenty horses were exposed to cow, a mobile object or no object. The time spent at different distances from the stimulus was measured. In a separate test, heart rate (HR), root mean square of successive differences between heartbeats (RMSSD) and the horses' perceived fear were assessed at various distances from the stimuli. The horses avoided the area nearest to all stimuli. During hand-leading, the cow elicited the highest HR and lowest RMSSD. Led horses' responses to the cow and box were rated as more fearful as the distance to the stimulus decreased. Mares had a higher HR than geldings across all tests. HR positively correlated with the fearfulness rating at the furthest distance from the cow and box, and RMSSD negatively correlated with this rating in cow and control conditions. Our results show that these horses' avoidance response to cows was similar or higher to that shown towards a novel moving object, demonstrating that potentially, both neophobia and heterospecific communication play a role in this reaction.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-10-28 PubMed ID: 34827813PubMed Central: PMC8614530DOI: 10.3390/ani11113081Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper studies whether domestic horses have a specific fear or avoidance for cows as opposed to other potentially scary objects, and further looks into what physiological responses are brought about in horses when exposed to such stimuli.

Research Methodology

  • The study was conducted on twenty horses which were exposed to either a cow or a moving object, or no object at all.
  • The time the horses spent at different distances from the stimulus was measured and recorded.
  • Physiological responses such as heart rate (HR) and root mean square of successive differences between heartbeats (RMSSD) were also monitored at various distances from the stimuli.
  • A separate test was conducted to gauge the horses’ perceived fear towards different stimuli.

Research Findings

  • Horses avoided areas that were in close proximity to all the stimuli, i.e., both the cow and the moving object.
  • When the horses were led by hand towards the stimuli, the presence of a cow triggered the highest heart rate and the lowest RMSSD, indicating a higher level of stress or fear.
  • As the horses were led closer to the stimuli, their response to both the cow and the mobile object were rated as higher on the fear scale and their heart rates increased.
  • It was noted that female horses or mares exhibited a higher heart rate than male horses or geldings across all the tests conducted.
  • There were significant positive correlations between the horses’ heart rates and the levels of fear observed at the furthest distance from both the cow and the box.
  • Similarly, the RMSSD showed a negative correlation with the fear ratings, indicating that higher fear levels corresponded with lower RMSSD, denoting more stress in cow and control conditions.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that horses indeed demonstrated an avoidance response towards cows and the magnitude of this response was similar to, if not greater than, the fear response shown towards an unfamiliar moving object.
  • This suggests that both neophobia (fear of new things or experiences) and heterospecific communication (interaction and communication between different species) have roles to play in these reactions.

Cite This Article

APA
Wiśniewska A, Janczarek I, Wilk I, Tkaczyk E, Mierzicka M, Stanley CR, Górecka-Bruzda A. (2021). Heterospecific Fear and Avoidance Behaviour in Domestic Horses (Equus caballus). Animals (Basel), 11(11), 3081. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113081

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 11
PII: 3081

Researcher Affiliations

Wiśniewska, Anna
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Janczarek, Iwona
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Wilk, Izabela
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Tkaczyk, Ewelina
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Mierzicka, Martyna
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Stanley, Christina R
  • Animal Behaviour & Welfare Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Chester, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK.
Górecka-Bruzda, Aleksandra
  • Department of Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Cromsigt JP, Kemp YJ, Rodriguez E, Kivit H. Rewilding Europe’s large grazer community: How functionally diverse are the diets of European bison, cattle, and horses?. Rest. Ecol. 2018;26:891–899.
    doi: 10.1111/rec.12661google scholar: lookup
  2. Boissy A. Fear and fearfulness in animals.. Q Rev Biol 1995 Jun;70(2):165-91.
    doi: 10.1086/418981pubmed: 7610234google scholar: lookup
  3. Christensen JW. Fear in Horses. Social Influence, Generalisation and Reactions to Predator Odour. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Copenhagen; Copenhagen, Denmark: University Aarhus; Aarhus, Denmark: 2007; pp. 1–44.
  4. Thomas KE, Annest JL, Gilchrist J, Bixby-Hammett DM. Non-fatal horse related injuries treated in emergency departments in the United States, 2001-2003.. Br J Sports Med 2006 Jul;40(7):619-26.
    doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.025858pmc: PMC2564310pubmed: 16611723google scholar: lookup
  5. McGreevy P, Christensen JW, König von Borstel U, McLean AN. Equitation Science. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; West Sussex, UK: 2018; pp. 1–393.
  6. Górecka-Bruzda A, Jastrzębska E, Muszyńska A, Jędrzejewska E, Jaworski Z, Jezierski T, Murphy J. To jump or not to jump? Strategies employed by leisure and sport horses. J. Vet. Behav. 2013;8:253–260.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2012.10.003google scholar: lookup
  7. Forkman B, Boissy A, Meunier-Salaün MC, Canali E, Jones RB. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses.. Physiol Behav 2007 Oct 22;92(3):340-74.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.016pubmed: 18046784google scholar: lookup
  8. Momozawa Y, Ono T, Sato F, Kikusui T, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y, Kusunose R. Assessment of equine temperament by a questionnaire survey to caretakers and evaluation of its reliability by simultaneous behavior test. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003;84:127–138.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.08.001google scholar: lookup
  9. Le Scolan N, Hausberger M, Wolff A. Stability over situations in temperamental traits of horses as revealed by experimental and scoring approaches.. Behav Processes 1997 Dec;41(3):257-66.
    doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00052-1pubmed: 24896858google scholar: lookup
  10. Christensen JW, Zharkikh T, Ladewig J. Do horses generalise between objects during habituation?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;114:509–520.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.03.007google scholar: lookup
  11. Górecka-Bruzda A, Jaworski Z, Suwała M, Boroń M, Ogłuszka M, Earley B, Sobczyńska M. Longitudinal study on human-related behaviour in horses—Can horses (Equus caballus) be de-domesticated?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;195:50–59.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.05.020google scholar: lookup
  12. Corgan ME, Grandin T, Matlock S. Evaluating the Reaction to a Complex Rotated Object in the American Quarter Horse (Equus caballus).. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 13;11(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051383pmc: PMC8152253pubmed: 34068020google scholar: lookup
  13. Leiner L, Fendt M. Behavioural fear and heart rate responses of horses after exposure to novel objects: Effects of habituation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011;131:104–109.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.02.004google scholar: lookup
  14. Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, Schilder MBH, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, Blokhuis HJ. Quantifying aspects of young horses’ temperament: Consistency of behavioural variables. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001;74:241–258.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00177-0google scholar: lookup
  15. Visser EK, van Reenen CG, van der Werf JT, Schilder MB, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, Blokhuis HJ. Heart rate and heart rate variability during a novel object test and a handling test in young horses.. Physiol Behav 2002 Jun 1;76(2):289-96.
    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00698-4pubmed: 12044602google scholar: lookup
  16. Lee KE, Kim JG, Lee H, Kim BS. Behavioral and cardiac responses in mature horses exposed to a novel object.. J Anim Sci Technol 2021 May;63(3):651-661.
    doi: 10.5187/jast.2021.e51pmc: PMC8203992pubmed: 34189512google scholar: lookup
  17. Lloyd AS, Martin JE, Bornet-Gauci HLI, Wilkinson RG. Evaluation of a novel method of horse personality assessment: Rater-agreement and links to behavior. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007;105:205–222.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.017google scholar: lookup
  18. Hornblow AR, Kidson MA. The visual analogue scale for anxiety: a validation study.. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1976 Dec;10(4):339-41.
    doi: 10.3109/00048677609159523pubmed: 1071419google scholar: lookup
  19. van Duinen M, Rickelt J, Griez E. Validation of the electronic Visual Analogue Scale of Anxiety.. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2008 May 15;32(4):1045-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.02.002pubmed: 18343008google scholar: lookup
  20. Sutton GA, Dahan R, Turner D, Paltiel O. A behaviour-based pain scale for horses with acute colic: scale construction.. Vet J 2013 Jun;196(3):394-401.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.10.008pubmed: 23141961google scholar: lookup
  21. de Grauw JC, van Loon JP. Systematic pain assessment in horses.. Vet J 2016 Mar;209:14-22.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.07.030pubmed: 26831169google scholar: lookup
  22. von Borell E, Langbein J, Després G, Hansen S, Leterrier C, Marchant J, Marchant-Forde R, Minero M, Mohr E, Prunier A, Valance D, Veissier I. Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals -- a review.. Physiol Behav 2007 Oct 22;92(3):293-316.
    pubmed: 17320122doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.007google scholar: lookup
  23. Malik M. Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use: Task force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 1996;1:151–181.
  24. Lansade L, Bouissou MF, Erhard HW. Fearfulness in horses: A temperament trait stable across time and situations. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;115:182–200.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.06.011google scholar: lookup
  25. Bulens A, Sterken H, Van Beirendonck S, Van Thielen J, Driessen B. The use of different objects during a novel object test in stabled horses. J. Vet. Behav. 2015;10:54–58.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.09.002google scholar: lookup
  26. Christensen JW, Beblein C, Malmkvist J. Development and consistency of fearfulness in horses from foal to adult. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020;232:105106.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105106google scholar: lookup
  27. Grandin T, Shivley C. How Farm Animals React and Perceive Stressful Situations Such As Handling, Restraint, and Transport.. Animals (Basel) 2015 Dec 1;5(4):1233-51.
    doi: 10.3390/ani5040409pmc: PMC4693213pubmed: 26633523google scholar: lookup
  28. Keeling LJ, Jonare L, Lanneborn L. Investigating horse-human interactions: the effect of a nervous human.. Vet J 2009 Jul;181(1):70-1.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.013pubmed: 19394879google scholar: lookup
  29. Scopa C, Contalbrigo L, Greco A, Lanatà A, Scilingo EP, Baragli P. Emotional Transfer in Human-Horse Interaction: New Perspectives on Equine Assisted Interventions.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Nov 26;9(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121030pmc: PMC6941042pubmed: 31779120google scholar: lookup
  30. Schrimpf A, Single MS, Nawroth C. Social Referencing in the Domestic Horse.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jan 18;10(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10010164pmc: PMC7022515pubmed: 31963699google scholar: lookup
  31. Christensen JW. Object habituation in horses: the effect of voluntary versus negatively reinforced approach to frightening stimuli.. Equine Vet J 2013 May;45(3):298-301.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00629.xpubmed: 23009205google scholar: lookup
  32. Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V. Dog-human relationship affects problem solving behavior in the dog. Anthrozoös 1997;10:214–224.
    doi: 10.2752/089279397787000987google scholar: lookup
  33. Nawroth C, Brett JM, McElligott AG. Goats display audience-dependent human-directed gazing behaviour in a problem-solving task.. Biol Lett 2016 Jul;12(7).
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0283pmc: PMC4971169pubmed: 27381884google scholar: lookup
  34. Lesimple C, Sankey C, Richard MA, Hausberger M. Do horses expect humans to solve their problems?. Front Psychol 2012;3:306.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00306pmc: PMC3426792pubmed: 22936923google scholar: lookup
  35. Górecka A, Bakuniak M, Chruszczewski MH, Jezierski TA. A note on the habituation to novelty in horses: Handler effect. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2007;25:143–152.
  36. Proops L, McComb K, Reby D. Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 Jan 20;106(3):947-51.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809127105pmc: PMC2630083pubmed: 19075246google scholar: lookup
  37. Lansade L, Colson V, Parias C, Trösch M, Reigner F, Calandreau L. Female horses spontaneously identify a photograph of their keeper, last seen six months previously.. Sci Rep 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6302.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62940-wpmc: PMC7156667pubmed: 32286345google scholar: lookup
  38. Millman ST, Duncan IJH. Social Cognition of Farm Animals. In: Keeling LJ, Gonyou HW, editors. Social Behaviour in Farm Animals. CABI Publishing, CAB International; Oxon, UK: 2005; pp. 373–399.
  39. Saslow CA. Factors affecting stimulus visibility for horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;61:273–284.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00205-6google scholar: lookup
  40. McGreevy P. Equine Behavior. Perception. In: McGreevy P, editor. A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine Scientists. Saunders; Philadephia, PA, USA: 2004; pp. 37–54.
  41. Vaina LM, Solomon J, Chowdhury S, Sinha P, Belliveau JW. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11656-61.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.191374198pmc: PMC58785pubmed: 11553776google scholar: lookup
  42. Regolin L, Tommasi L, Vallortigara G. Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure. Anim. Cognit. 2000;3:53–60.
    doi: 10.1007/s100710050050google scholar: lookup
  43. Witzany G. Why Biocommunication of Animals?. In: Witzany G, editor. Biocommunication of Animals. Springer Science + Business Media; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2014; pp. 1–6.
    doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7414-8_1,1google scholar: lookup
  44. Meise K, Franks DW, Bro-Jørgensen J. Alarm communication networks as a driver of community structure in African savannah herbivores.. Ecol Lett 2020 Feb;23(2):293-304.
    doi: 10.1111/ele.13432pmc: PMC6973068pubmed: 31775182google scholar: lookup
  45. Sablik P, Kobak P, Biała M, Matkowski D. Porównanie behawioryzmu udomowionych zwierząt roślinożernych (bydła mięsnego i koni) w naturalnych warunkach bytowania w otulinie przyrodniczego Parku Narodowego “Ujście Warty”. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootech. 2010;9:207–214.
  46. Fenner K, Caspar G, Hyde M, Henshall C, Dhand N, Probyn-Rapsey F, Dashper K, McLean A, McGreevy P. It's all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament.. PLoS One 2019;14(5):e0216699.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216699pmc: PMC6516668pubmed: 31086385google scholar: lookup
  47. Aune A, Fenner K, Wilson B, Cameron E, McLean A, McGreevy P. Reported Behavioural Differences between Geldings and Mares Challenge Sex-Driven Stereotypes in Ridden Equine Behaviour.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Mar 2;10(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10030414pmc: PMC7142782pubmed: 32131444google scholar: lookup
  48. Schmidt A, Aurich J, Möstl E, Müller J, Aurich C. Changes in cortisol release and heart rate and heart rate variability during the initial training of 3-year-old sport horses.. Horm Behav 2010 Sep;58(4):628-36.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.06.011pubmed: 20600048google scholar: lookup
  49. Vandenheede M, Bouissou MF. Sex differences in fear reactions in sheep. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1993;37:39–55.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90069-2google scholar: lookup
  50. Kokras N, Dalla C. Sex differences in animal models of psychiatric disorders.. Br J Pharmacol 2014 Oct;171(20):4595-619.
    doi: 10.1111/bph.12710pmc: PMC4209934pubmed: 24697577google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Wiśniewska A, Janczarek I, Wilk I, Tkaczyk E, Mierzicka M, Stanley CR, Górecka-Bruzda A. Correction: Wiśniewska et al. Heterospecific Fear and Avoidance Behaviour in Domestic Horses (Equus caballus). Animals 2021, 11, 3081.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Aug 10;12(16).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12162026pubmed: 36009750google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.