Analyze Diet
Drug testing and analysis2024; 17(7); 1041-1048; doi: 10.1002/dta.3797

High-Throughput Equine Doping Controls on a Trapped Ion Mobility Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer: Technical Considerations of dia/slice/prmPASEF Applied to the Long-Term Detection of Monoclonal Antibodies.

Abstract: Data-independent acquisition (DIA) methods employing a scanning quadrupole were recently described across multiple platforms. These strategies display remarkable performances in untargeted proteomics studies thanks to rapid duty cycles, leading to ultrashort liquid chromatography gradients while maintaining enough data points per peaks when coupled to fast-scanning mass analyzer. In this article, we perform the evaluation of three data acquisition strategies named diaPASEF,slicePASEF, and prmPASEF on a trapped ion mobility spectrometry quadrupole-time-of-flight (TIMS-Q-TOF) mass spectrometer for high-throughput doping control screening analyses. We report that slicePASEF outperforms diaPASEF and is almost as sensitive as prmPASEF in detecting humanized monoclonal antibodies for several weeks in equine plasma after administration. We observed that diaPASEF is still providing the best performances in untargeted proteomics studies employing high amounts of input materials, which is linked with the high complexity of slicePASEF data and current processing algorithms.
Publication Date: 2024-09-22 PubMed ID: 39307517DOI: 10.1002/dta.3797Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

High-throughput screening methods using advanced mass spectrometry techniques were evaluated to detect monoclonal antibodies in horse plasma for doping control, comparing three data acquisition strategies in terms of sensitivity and performance. The study aimed to improve long-term detection capabilities while balancing speed and complexity in analysis.

Background and Objective

  • Doping control in equine sports requires sensitive and rapid detection methods for prohibited substances, including monoclonal antibodies.
  • Mass spectrometry (MS) coupled with liquid chromatography is widely used for proteomics and doping analyses due to its sensitivity and specificity.
  • Recent developments involve data-independent acquisition (DIA) methods leveraging scanning quadrupoles to improve throughput and data quality.
  • The study focuses on evaluating three DIA-based acquisition strategies—diaPASEF, slicePASEF, and prmPASEF—on trapped ion mobility spectrometry quadrupole-time-of-flight (TIMS-Q-TOF) MS instruments.
  • Objective: To determine which acquisition method best balances sensitivity, throughput, and data complexity for detecting humanized monoclonal antibodies in equine plasma over long periods post-administration.

Overview of Data Acquisition Methods

  • diaPASEF: A DIA method that uses a scanning quadrupole combined with ion mobility for untargeted proteomics. It is optimized for complexity and high sample input.
  • slicePASEF: An advanced DIA approach that slices the ion mobility space for more focused acquisition, aiming to improve sensitivity and throughput.
  • prmPASEF: A parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) technique integrated with ion mobility for targeted, highly sensitive detection.

Experimental Approach

  • Horse plasma samples were collected over several weeks following administration of humanized monoclonal antibodies to mimic doping scenarios.
  • The three DIA methods were applied using a TIMS-Q-TOF mass spectrometer configured for high-throughput screening.
  • Evaluations included sensitivity in antibody detection, data complexity, and suitability for untargeted versus targeted proteomics contexts.

Key Findings

  • slicePASEF demonstrated superior performance to diaPASEF for detecting monoclonal antibodies in equine plasma, nearly matching the sensitivity of prmPASEF.
  • slicePASEF’s improved sensitivity supports its potential for long-term detection in doping control, which is critical for catching illicit administration weeks after treatment.
  • diaPASEF, while less sensitive for monoclonal antibody detection, excels in untargeted proteomics, especially when large amounts of input material are used.
  • The high complexity of slicePASEF data and current limitations of data processing algorithms limit its universal application, particularly for untargeted studies.
  • prmPASEF remains the most sensitive method but is more targeted and may not be ideal for untargeted screening or where broad analyte coverage is needed.

Technical Considerations and Implications

  • Trade-offs exist between sensitivity, throughput, data complexity, and analytical robustness among the methods.
  • slicePASEF offers a promising balance for doping control screening, improving sensitivity while maintaining relatively high throughput.
  • Ongoing improvements in data processing software are necessary to fully exploit slicePASEF’s complex datasets.
  • Selection of methodology should consider the specific goals: broad untargeted proteomics favors diaPASEF, sensitive targeted monitoring favors prmPASEF, and balanced long-term detection benefits from slicePASEF.
  • Using TIMS-Q-TOF technology allows enhanced separation and speed, critical for ultra-short liquid chromatography gradients and rapid analyses.

Conclusion

  • This study highlights the potential of slicePASEF as a valuable tool for high-throughput equine doping control, with sensitivity close to the targeted prmPASEF method but with greater screening versatility.
  • Continued technological and computational improvements will further enhance detection capabilities and support regulatory applications in equine sports.

Cite This Article

APA
Delcourt V, Pinetre J, Chabot B, Barnabé A, Cacault M, Loup B, Becher F, Fenaille F, Popot MA, Garcia P, Bailly-Chouriberry L. (2024). High-Throughput Equine Doping Controls on a Trapped Ion Mobility Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer: Technical Considerations of dia/slice/prmPASEF Applied to the Long-Term Detection of Monoclonal Antibodies. Drug Test Anal, 17(7), 1041-1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3797

Publication

ISSN: 1942-7611
NlmUniqueID: 101483449
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 17
Issue: 7
Pages: 1041-1048

Researcher Affiliations

Delcourt, Vivian
  • GIE LCH, Laboratoire des Courses Hippiques, Verrières-le-Buisson, France.
Pinetre, Justine
  • GIE LCH, Laboratoire des Courses Hippiques, Verrières-le-Buisson, France.
  • CEA, INRAE, Département Médicaments Et Technologies Pour La Santé (DMTS), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Chabot, Benjamin
  • GIE LCH, Laboratoire des Courses Hippiques, Verrières-le-Buisson, France.
Barnabé, Agnès
  • GIE LCH, Laboratoire des Courses Hippiques, Verrières-le-Buisson, France.
Cacault, Marie
  • GIE LCH, Laboratoire des Courses Hippiques, Verrières-le-Buisson, France.
Loup, Benoit
  • GIE LCH, Laboratoire des Courses Hippiques, Verrières-le-Buisson, France.
Becher, François
  • CEA, INRAE, Département Médicaments Et Technologies Pour La Santé (DMTS), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Fenaille, François
  • CEA, INRAE, Département Médicaments Et Technologies Pour La Santé (DMTS), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Popot, Marie-Agnès
  • GIE LCH, Laboratoire des Courses Hippiques, Verrières-le-Buisson, France.
Garcia, Patrice
  • GIE LCH, Laboratoire des Courses Hippiques, Verrières-le-Buisson, France.
Bailly-Chouriberry, Ludovic
  • GIE LCH, Laboratoire des Courses Hippiques, Verrières-le-Buisson, France.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses / blood
  • Animals
  • Doping in Sports
  • High-Throughput Screening Assays / methods
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / blood
  • Substance Abuse Detection / methods
  • Substance Abuse Detection / veterinary
  • Proteomics / methods
  • Ion Mobility Spectrometry / methods
  • Mass Spectrometry / methods

Grant Funding

  • Institut français du cheval et de l'équitation

References

This article includes 23 references
  1. Pinetre J, Delcourt V, Becher F. High‐Throughput Untargeted Screening of Biotherapeutic Macromolecules in Equine Plasma by UHPLC‐HRMS/MS: Application to Monoclonal Antibodies and fc‐Fusion Proteins for Doping Control. Drug Testing and Analysis 16, no. 2 (2024): 199–209.
  2. Moulard Y, Bailly‐Chouriberry L, Boyer S, Garcia P, Popot M‐A, Bonnaire Y. Use of Benchtop Exactive High Resolution and High Mass Accuracy Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer for Screening in Horse Doping Control. Analytica Chimica Acta 700, no. 1‐2 (2011): 126–136.
  3. Walpurgis K, Thomas A, Dellanna F, Schänzer W, Thevis M. Detection of the Human Anti‐ActRII Antibody Bimagrumab in Serum by Means of Affinity Purification, Tryptic Digestion, and LC‐HRMS. PROTEOMICS–Clinical Applications 12, no. 3 (2018): 1700120.
  4. Leung DKK, Wong ASY, Zhou QL, Wan TSM, Ho ENM. Application of a Non‐Target Variable Data Independent Workflow (VDIA) for the Screening of Prohibited Substances in Doping Control Testing. Drug Testing and Analysis 13, no. 5 (2021): 1008–1033.
  5. Plachká K, Pezzatti J, Musenga A. Ion Mobility‐High Resolution Mass Spectrometry in Doping Control Analysis. Part II: Comparison of Acquisition Modes With and Without Ion Mobility. Analytica Chimica Acta 1175 (2021): 338739.
  6. Timms M, Botteon A, Manos C, Griffin J, Levina V, Steel R. Detection of Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GNRH) and Its Analogues in Equine and Canine Urine by High‐Resolution Data Independent Acquisition (DIA). Drug Testing and Analysis 15, no. 8 (2023): 896–908.
  7. Heil LR, Damoc E, Arrey TN. Evaluating the Performance of the Astral Mass Analyzer for Quantitative Proteomics Using Data Independent Acquisition. Journal of Proteome Research 22 (2023): 3290–3300.
  8. Messner CB, Demichev V, Bloomfield N. Ultra‐Fast Proteomics With Scanning Swath. Nature Biotechnology 39, no. 7 (2021): 846–854.
  9. Szyrwiel L, Sinn L, Ralser M, Demichev V. Slice‐PASEF: Fragmenting All Ions for Maximum Sensitivity in Proteomics. bioRxiv 2022.
    doi: 10.1101/2022.10.31.514544google scholar: lookup
  10. Distler U, Lacki MK, Startek MP. midiaPASEF Maximizes Information Content in Data‐Independent Acquisition Proteomics. bioRxiv 2023.
    doi: 10.1101/2023.01.30.526204google scholar: lookup
  11. Midha MK, Kapil C, Maes M. Vacuum Insulated Probe Heated Electrospray Ionization Source Enhances Microflow Rate Chromatography Signals in the Bruker timsTOF Mass Spectrometer. Journal of Proteome Research 22, no. 7 (2023): 2525–2537.
  12. Skowronek P, Krohs F, Lubeck M. Synchro‐PASEF Allows Precursor‐Specific Fragment Ion Extraction and Interference Removal in Data‐Independent Acquisition. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 22, no. 2 (2023): 100489.
  13. Cloteau C, Dervilly G, Loup B. Validation of a Metabolomics Model to Screen for a Range of Anabolic Doping Agents in Horses. Drug Testing and Analysis 14 (2022): 864–878.
  14. Joré C, Loup B, Garcia P. Liquid Chromatography–High Resolution Mass Spectrometry‐based Metabolomic Approach for the Detection of Continuous Erythropoiesis Receptor Activator Effects in Horse Doping Control. Journal of Chromatography A 1521 (2017): 90–99.
  15. Wong K‐S, Cheung HW, Choi TLS. Label‐Free Proteomics for Discovering Biomarker Candidates for Controlling Krypton Misuse in Castrated Horses (Geldings). Journal of Proteome Research 19, no. 3 (2020): 1196–1208.
  16. Willems S, Voytik E, Skowronek P, Strauss MT, Mann M. AlphaTims: Indexing Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry–TOF Data for Fast and Easy Accession and Visualization. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 20 (2021): 100149.
  17. Harris CR, Millman KJ, Van Der Walt SJ. Array Programming With NumPy. Nature 585, no. 7825 (2020): 357–362.
  18. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods 17, no. 3 (2020): 261–272.
  19. Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J. Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software 4, no. 43 (2019): 1686.
  20. Lazear MR. Sage: An Open‐Source Tool for Fast Proteomics Searching and Quantification at Scale. Journal of Proteome Research 22, no. 11 (2023): 3652–3659.
  21. Consortium U. UniProt: A Worldwide Hub of Protein Knowledge. Nucleic Acids Research 47, no. D1 (2019): D506–D515.
  22. Cox J, Hein MY, Luber CA, Paron I, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Accurate Proteome‐Wide Label‐Free Quantification by Delayed Normalization and Maximal Peptide Ratio Extraction, Termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics 13, no. 9 (2014): 2513–2526.
  23. Demichev V, Messner CB, Vernardis SI, Lilley KS, Ralser M. DIA‐NN: Neural Networks and Interference Correction Enable Deep Proteome Coverage in High Throughput. Nature Methods 17, no. 1 (2020): 41–44.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.