Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2020; 81(3); 276-284; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.81.3.276

Histologic changes and gene expression patterns in biopsy specimens from bacteria-inoculated and noninoculated excisional body and limb wounds in horses healing by second intention.

Abstract: To evaluate histologic changes and gene expression patterns in body and limb wounds in horses in response to bacterial inoculation. Methods: Wound biopsy specimens from 6 horses collected on days 7, 14, 21, and 27 after excisional wounds (20 wounds/horse) were created over the metacarpal and metatarsal region and lateral thoracic region (body) and then inoculated or not inoculated on day 4 with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: Specimens were histologically scored for the amount of inflammation, edema, angiogenesis, fibrosis organization, and epithelialization. Quantitative PCR assays were performed to quantify gene expression of 10 inflammatory, proteolytic, fibrotic, and hypoxia-related markers involved in wound healing. Results: Except for gene expression of interleukin-6 on day 27 and tumor necrosis factor-α on day 14, bacterial inoculation had no significant effect on histologic scores and gene expression. Gene expression of interleukin-1β and -6, serum amyloid A, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 was higher in limb wounds versus body wounds by day 27. Gene expression of cellular communication network factor 1 was higher in limb wounds versus body wounds throughout the observation period. Conclusions: The lack of clear markers of wound infection in this study reflected well-known difficulties in detecting wound infections in horses. Changes consistent with protracted inflammation were evident in limb wounds, and gene expression patterns of limb wounds shared similarities with those of chronic wounds in humans. Cellular communication network factor warrants further investigation and may be useful in elucidating the mechanisms underlying poor limb wound healing in horses.
Publication Date: 2020-02-27 PubMed ID: 32101041DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.81.3.276Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores how bacterial inoculation affects gene expression patterns and histologic changes when healing body and limb wounds in horses. The study discovered that bacterial inoculation generally did not significantly affect histologic scores and gene expression, except for interleukin-6 on day 27 and tumor necrosis factor-α on day 14.

Methodology

  • The study involved wound biopsy specimens gathered from six horses on days 7, 14, 21, and 27 after excisional wounds were made over the metacarpal and metatarsal region and lateral thoracic region (body).
  • Some of these wounds were inoculated on day 4 with bacteria.
  • Specimens were examined and scored for inflammation, edema, angiogenesis, fibrosis organization, and epithelialization.
  • Gene expression for ten markers associated with inflammation, proteolysis, fibrotic responses, and hypoxia was quantified via PCR assays.

Key Results

  • Bacterial inoculation generally did not significantly impact histologic scores or gene expression, except for the gene expression of interleukin-6 on day 27 and tumor necrosis factor-α on day 14.
  • Moreover, the gene expression of interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, serum amyloid A, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 was recorded higher in limb wounds than body wounds by day 27.
  • The research also showed that the gene expression of Cellular Communication Network Factor 1 was higher in limb wounds than body wounds throughout the study period.

Conclusions

  • The study found no clear infection markers, which reflects the challenges in detecting wound infections in horses.
  • There were situational changes indicating prolonged inflammation in limb wounds. The gene expression patterns in limb wounds bore resemblance to chronic human wounds.
  • Cellular Communication Network Factor 1’s role may be crucial for further studies and an understanding of the poor healing mechanism common in horse limb wounds.

Cite This Article

APA
J Rgensen E, Hjerpe FB, Hougen HP, Bjarnsholt T, Berg LC, Jacobsen S. (2020). Histologic changes and gene expression patterns in biopsy specimens from bacteria-inoculated and noninoculated excisional body and limb wounds in horses healing by second intention. Am J Vet Res, 81(3), 276-284. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.81.3.276

Publication

ISSN: 1943-5681
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 81
Issue: 3
Pages: 276-284

Researcher Affiliations

J Rgensen, Elin
    Hjerpe, Freja B
      Hougen, Hans P
        Bjarnsholt, Thomas
          Berg, Lise C
            Jacobsen, Stine

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Bacteria
              • Biopsy / veterinary
              • Extremities
              • Horses
              • Humans
              • Intention
              • Wound Healing

              Citations

              This article has been cited 1 times.
              1. Jørgensen E, Bjarnsholt T, Jacobsen S. Biofilm and Equine Limb Wounds. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 27;11(10).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11102825pubmed: 34679846google scholar: lookup