Analyze Diet
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia2026; 53(5); 101286; doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2026.101286

Hoist failure during recovery transfer in an anaesthetised horse: a near miss analysed through a Safety-II lens.

Abstract: A 660 kg, 11-year-old Irish Sport Horse gelding underwent general anaesthesia for an out-of-hours emergency exploratory laparotomy. After approximately 5 hours of anaesthesia, transfer to the recovery box began, using a ceiling-mounted hoist. As the horse crossed the theatre-recovery interface, the hoist failed due to mechanical disengagement. This resulted in loss of electrical power, leaving the anaesthetised horse suspended approximately 150 cm above the floor for approximately 10 minutes. The horse could not be advanced, reversed, or lowered using standard controls. Activity was paused, and clear roles were allocated; the anaesthesia resident maintained anaesthetic depth and ventilation, while the medicine team prepared the operating table beneath the horse. Continuous physiological monitoring could not be maintained during suspension. Only anaesthetic depth and pulse were assessed, and both remained stable. The operating table was raised to support the horse before the hobbles were cut and the horse was transported to an alternative recovery box. Head and tail rope assistance was used during recovery, which occurred without apparent injury. A no-blame morbidity and mortality review involving clinical facilities and management staff classified the episode as a high-risk near-miss patient safety incident and identified latent system factors. These included a single-point dependency on a powered hoist without a manual override, intermittent pre-event malfunctions, limited formal hoist training, and the out-of-hours context. Organisational responses included maintenance review, simulation training, protocol revision, and a proposal for a hoist upgrade. Safety-II analysis, which examines how adaptive performance creates safety under variable conditions, highlighted how team coordination and organisational learning converted a potential adverse outcome into an opportunity for system improvement.
Publication Date: 2026-07-15 PubMed ID: 42551216DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2026.101286Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Case Reports
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Hoist failure during the transfer of an anaesthetised horse created a high-risk near-miss event, which was successfully managed without injury. The incident was analyzed using a Safety-II approach to understand how adaptive team performance and organizational learning contributed to safety and improvement.

Case Description

  • A 660 kg, 11-year-old Irish Sport Horse gelding underwent general anaesthesia for an emergency exploratory laparotomy lasting about 5 hours.
  • During transfer to the recovery area using a ceiling-mounted powered hoist, the hoist failed mechanically and lost electrical power while the horse was suspended 150 cm above the floor.
  • The horse remained suspended for approximately 10 minutes and could not be moved using the hoist’s standard controls.
  • Team activity paused, roles were clarified: the anaesthesia resident maintained anesthetic depth and ventilation, while the medical team prepared an operating table to catch/support the horse.
  • Physiological monitoring was limited to assessment of anaesthetic depth and pulse, which remained stable throughout the suspension.
  • The operating table was raised to support the horse; hobbles were cut, and the horse was transferred to an alternative recovery box where assisted recovery was completed safely without injury.

Incident Analysis and System Factors

  • The case was reviewed via a no-blame morbidity and mortality conference including clinical and management staff.
  • The event was classified as a high-risk near-miss patient safety incident.
  • Latent system vulnerabilities identified:
    • Reliance on a single powered hoist without a manual override mechanism.
    • History of intermittent malfunctions of the hoist prior to the failure.
    • Limited formal training for staff on hoist operation and emergency procedures.
    • Event occurred out-of-hours when support and staffing may be reduced.

Organisational Response

  • Maintenance review and improvements were initiated for hoist reliability.
  • Development and implementation of simulation training for staff on hoist use and emergency protocols.
  • Revision of transfer protocols to include contingencies for equipment failure.
  • Proposal to upgrade the hoist system to include manual override capabilities and improved safety features.

Safety-II Perspective

  • Safety-II focuses on understanding how everyday system flexibility and team adaptability contribute to safety, rather than only investigating failures.
  • This incident highlighted how coordinated teamwork, clear role allocation, and improvisation prevented harm despite equipment failure.
  • The ability of the clinical team to adapt under pressure and the organizational learning that followed transformed a potentially dangerous event into a learning opportunity.
  • The Safety-II lens emphasizes proactive system improvements and resilience rather than just root-cause blame after adverse events.

Cite This Article

APA
Toth IR, Santos LC. (2026). Hoist failure during recovery transfer in an anaesthetised horse: a near miss analysed through a Safety-II lens. Vet Anaesth Analg, 53(5), 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2026.101286

Publication

ISSN: 1467-2995
NlmUniqueID: 100956422
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 53
Issue: 5
Pages: 101286
PII: S1467-2987(26)00100-5

Researcher Affiliations

Toth, Imola R
  • School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK.
Santos, Luiz Cp
  • School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK. Electronic address: luiz.santos@glasgow.ac.uk.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Conflict of interest statement The authors have no conflict to declare.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.