Analyze Diet
Journal of clinical pathology1968; 21(5); 631-634; doi: 10.1136/jcp.21.5.631

Horse agglutinins in infectious mononueleosis. 3. riterion for differential diagnosis.

Abstract: One hundred infectious mononucleosis and the same number of non-infectious mononucleosis sera were studied to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of horse erythrocytes in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis. Titres of horse agglutinins in infectious mononucleosis sera ranged from 28 to 7,168 with a geometric mean of 550, whereas the corresponding sheep agglutinin titres ranged from less than 7 to 3,584, with a geometric mean of 126. Horse agglutinin titres of non-infectious mononucleosis sera ranged from less than 7 to 896, with a geometric mean of 59. Infectious mononucleosis sera tested with horse erythrocytes before and after absorption with guinea pig kidney and beef erythrocytes showed patterns different from those of non-infectious mononucleosis sera, even when sheep agglutinin titres were too low for satisfactory evaluation. After absorption with guinea pig kidney, horse agglutinin titres of infectious mononucleosis sera were uniformly higher than in the corresponding serum absorbed with beef erythrocytes. This was not the case for non-infectious mononucleosis sera. Results confirm our previously expressed view that horse erythrocytes are preferable to sheep erythrocytes in the serological diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis.
Publication Date: 1968-09-01 PubMed ID: 5697368PubMed Central: PMC473877DOI: 10.1136/jcp.21.5.631Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research examines the sensitivity and specificity of horse erythrocytes in diagnosing infectious mononucleosis compared with non-infectious mononucleosis, concluding that horse erythrocytes are more preferable for this purpose than sheep erythrocytes.

Study Methodology

  • In this study, researchers evaluated 100 samples of infectious mononucleosis and the same number of non-infectious mononucleosis sera. The aim of the study was to measure and compare the reactivity, or agglutinin titres, in both horse and sheep erythrocytes when faced with these two types of mononucleosis.
  • Agglutinins are substances that cause particles to coagulate or clump together. In this case, the researchers were measuring the clumping reaction of infectious and non-infectious mononucleosis sera to horse and sheep erythrocytes (red blood cells).

Study Findings

  • The study found that the reaction of infectious mononucleosis with horse erythrocytes resulted in higher agglutinin titres compared to non-infectious mononucleosis.
  • In addition, researchers observed patterns of interaction between infectious mononucleosis sera and horse erythrocytes, whether tested before or after absorption with guinea pig kidney and beef erythrocytes. These patterns differed from those created by non-infectious mononucleosis sera, even when the corresponding agglutinin titres of sheep were too low for satisfactory evaluation.

Implications of Findings

  • The higher agglutinin titres in infectious mononucleosis sera, prompted by horse erythrocytes, seem to imply that horse red blood cells are more reactive to the pathogen causing infectious mononucleosis, and thus, may be a better biomarker for diagnosing the condition than sheep erythrocytes.
  • This research confirms the previously expressed belief of the research team that horse erythrocytes are indeed preferable to sheep erythrocytes when it comes to serologically diagnosing infectious mononucleosis.

In conclusion, this study puts forward significant findings with implications for improvement in the diagnosis procedure of infectious mononucleosis.

Cite This Article

APA
Lee CL, Zandrew F, Davidsohn I. (1968). Horse agglutinins in infectious mononueleosis. 3. riterion for differential diagnosis. J Clin Pathol, 21(5), 631-634. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.21.5.631

Publication

ISSN: 0021-9746
NlmUniqueID: 0376601
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 5
Pages: 631-634

Researcher Affiliations

Lee, C L
    Zandrew, F
      Davidsohn, I

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Antibodies / analysis
        • Cattle
        • Diagnosis, Differential
        • Erythrocytes / immunology
        • Guinea Pigs
        • Hemagglutination Tests
        • Horses
        • Infectious Mononucleosis / immunology
        • Sheep

        References

        This article includes 3 references
        1. Lee CL, Davidsohn I, Panczyszyn O. Horse agglutinins in infectious mononucleosis. II. The spot test.. Am J Clin Pathol 1968 Jan;49(1):12-8.
          pubmed: 5635266doi: 10.1093/ajcp/49.1.12google scholar: lookup
        2. WILKINSON PC, CARMICHAEL DS. IMMUNOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND SEROLOGIC BEHAVIOR OF ANTIBODIES AGAINST RED CELLS IN INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSIS.. J Lab Clin Med 1964 Oct;64:529-39.
          pubmed: 14233142
        3. Beer P. THE HETEROPHILE ANTIBODIES IN INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSIS AND AFTER THE INJECTION OF SERUM.. J Clin Invest 1936 Nov;15(6):591-9.
          pubmed: 16694432doi: 10.1172/JCI100811google scholar: lookup

        Citations

        This article has been cited 9 times.
        1. Byrne A, Bush R, Johns F, Upadhyay K. Limited Utility of Serology and Heterophile Test in the Early Diagnosis of Epstein-Barr Virus Mononucleosis in a Child after Renal Transplantation. Medicines (Basel) 2020 Apr 22;7(4).
          doi: 10.3390/medicines7040021pubmed: 32331303google scholar: lookup
        2. . Tests for infectious mononucleosis. Br Med J 1980 May 10;280(6224):1153-4.
          pubmed: 6248155
        3. Nikoskelainen J, Leikola J, Klemola E. IgM antibodies specific for Epstein-Barr virus in infectious mononucleosis without heterophil antibodies. Br Med J 1974 Oct 12;4(5936):72-5.
          doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5936.72pubmed: 4370085google scholar: lookup
        4. Joncas JH, Gilker JC, Chagnon A. Limitations of immunofluorescence tests in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis. Can Med Assoc J 1974 Apr 6;110(7):793-4 passim.
          pubmed: 4363398
        5. Horwitz CA, Polesky H, Stillman T, Ward PC, Henle G, Henle W. Persistent haemagglutination for infectious mononucleosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med J 1973 Mar 10;1(5853):591-2.
          doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5853.591pubmed: 4348476google scholar: lookup
        6. Joncas JH. Infectious mononucleosis: current status of candidate virus. Can Med Assoc J 1969 Jul 12;101(1):33-6.
          pubmed: 4186215
        7. Steeper TA, Horwitz CA, Moore SB, Henle W, Henle G, Ellis R, Flynn PJ. Severe thrombocytopenia in Epstein-Barr virus-induced mononucleosis. West J Med 1989 Feb;150(2):170-3.
          pubmed: 2543142
        8. Strickler JG, Movahed LA, Gajl-Peczalska KJ, Horwitz CA, Brunning RD, Weiss LM. Oligoclonal T cell receptor gene rearrangements in blood lymphocytes of patients with acute Epstein-Barr virus-induced infectious mononucleosis. J Clin Invest 1990 Oct;86(4):1358-63.
          doi: 10.1172/JCI114847pubmed: 2170451google scholar: lookup
        9. Lennette ET, Henle G, Henle W, Horwitz CA. Heterophil antigen in bovine sera detectable by immune adherence hemagglutination with infectious mononucleosis sera. Infect Immun 1978 Mar;19(3):923-7.
          doi: 10.1128/iai.19.3.923-927.1978pubmed: 205510google scholar: lookup