FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Frontiers in psychology2014; 5; 21; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00021

How accurate are we at assessing others’ well-being? The example of welfare assessment in horses.

Abstract: Healthcare practitioners such as physicians or nurses often underestimate patients' well-being impairment (e.g., pain, anxiety) which may lead to undesirable consequences on treatment decisions. Lack of recognition/identification of signals and over-exposure are two reasons invoked, but a combination of factors may be involved. Studying human decoding of animals' expressions of emotions showed that "identification" to the subject was necessary to decode the other's internal state. In the present study we wanted to compare caretakers' reports on the prevalence of stereotypic or abnormal repetitive behaviors, to ethological observations performed by an experienced observer on the same horses in order to test the impact of these different factors. On the first hand, a questionnaire was given hand to hand to the caretakers. On the other hand, the experienced observer spent 18 h observing the horses in each stable. Here we show that caretakers strongly underestimate horses' expressions of well-being impairment. The caretakers who had a strong concern about their horses' well-being were also those who reported the more accurately SB/ARB's prevalence, showing that "identification" to the subject is a primary factor of bad-being signal's detection. Over-exposure also appeared to be involved as no SB/ARB was reported in stables where most of the horses were performing these abnormal behaviors. Being surrounded by a large population of individuals expressing clear signals of bad-being may change professionals' perceptions of what are behaviors or expressions of well being. These findings are of primary importance as (1) they illustrate the interest of using human-animal relationships to evaluate humans' abilities to decode others' states; (2) they put limitations on questionnaire-based studies of welfare.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2014-01-24 PubMed ID: 24478748PubMed Central: PMC3900850DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00021Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article highlights the discrepancies between caregivers’ perception of horses’ well-being and the actual state of the animals, as observed by an experienced professional. The study suggests that caregivers often underestimate the extent of well-being impairment in horses and that factors, such as the caregiver’s emotional identification with their horses, play a role in this assessment.

Objective and Methods of the Study

  • The research aimed to compare the subjective assessments of horse caretakers regarding the horses’ well-being and an experienced observer’s objective evaluation. The idea was to reveal whether animal caretakers fail to recognize signs of distress in their animals due to over-exposure or lack of adequate identification with them.
  • A two-pronged approach was adopted to collect data. Caretakers were given questionnaires to assess their perspectives, while the observer spent a total of 18 hours observing the horses in their stables to gather a more objective understanding of their wellbeing.

Findings of the Study

  • The study found that caretakers grossly underestimate signals of well-being impairment in their horses. Such underestimation may be due to several factors such as over-exposure to the horses’ normal and abnormal behaviors and a lack of recognition of the animals’ signals expressing distress.
  • The research also discovered that caretakers who demonstrated a strong concern about their horses’ well-being were often more accurate in reporting incidents of stereotypic or abnormal repetitive behaviors (SB/ARB). This situation indicates that emotional identification with the animals plays a significant role in correctly recognizing signals of distress.
  • Another crucial observation was that the prevalence of SB/ARB was not reported in stables where most horses were performing these behaviors. This finding indicates that experiencing an environment saturated with negative signals could affect professional caretakers’ perception of normalcy, leading them to ignore or downplay more serious signs of distress.

Significance of the Research

  • This study helps to understand human capability and limitations in accurately assessing another’s emotional states, using human-animal relationships as a model. The findings put light on the role of emotional identification and exposure level in this assessment.
  • The research asserts the inherent limitations of questionnaire-based studies that often rely on subjective reports, underlining the importance of incorporating objective observations or metrics for a more holistic and accurate understanding of animal welfare.

Cite This Article

APA
Lesimple C, Hausberger M. (2014). How accurate are we at assessing others’ well-being? The example of welfare assessment in horses. Front Psychol, 5, 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00021

Publication

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
NlmUniqueID: 101550902
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 5
Pages: 21
PII: 21

Researcher Affiliations

Lesimple, Clémence
  • Laboratoire d'Éthologie Animale et Humaine EthoS, UMR CNRS 6552, Université de Rennes 1 Rennes Cedex, France.
Hausberger, Martine
  • Laboratoire d'Éthologie Animale et Humaine EthoS, UMR CNRS 6552, Université de Rennes 1 Rennes Cedex, France.

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Ahlers SJ, van der Veen AM, van Dijk M, Tibboel D, Knibbe CA. The use of the Behavioral Pain Scale to assess pain in conscious sedated patients.. Anesth Analg 2010 Jan 1;110(1):127-33.
    doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c3119epubmed: 19897804google scholar: lookup
  2. Als H, Tronick E, Lester BM, Brazelton TB. The Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (BNBAS).. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1977;5(3):215-31.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00913693pubmed: 903518google scholar: lookup
  3. Auret K, Schug SA. Underutilisation of opioids in elderly patients with chronic pain: approaches to correcting the problem.. Drugs Aging 2005;22(8):641-54.
    doi: 10.2165/00002512-200522080-00002pubmed: 16060715google scholar: lookup
  4. Benhajali H, Richard-Yris M A, Ezzaouia M, Charfi F, Hausberger M. Reproductive status and stereotypies in breeding mares: a brief report. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 128 64–68.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.09.007google scholar: lookup
  5. Elfenbein HA, Ambady N. On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysis.. Psychol Bull 2002 Mar;128(2):203-35.
    doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.203pubmed: 11931516google scholar: lookup
  6. Fureix C, Gorecka-Bruzda A, Gautier E, Hausberger M. Coocurrence of yawning and stereotypic behavior in horses (Equus caballus). ISRN Zool. 2011 10.
    doi: 10.5402/2011/271209google scholar: lookup
  7. Hausberger M, Gautier E, Biquand V, Lunel C, Jégo P. Could work be a source of behavioural disorders? A study in horses.. PLoS One 2009 Oct 28;4(10):e7625.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007625pmc: PMC2763287pubmed: 19862328google scholar: lookup
  8. Hausberger M, Gautier E, Müller C, Jégo P. Lower learning abilities in stereotypic horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 107 299–306.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.003google scholar: lookup
  9. Helson H. Adaptation-Level Theory. .
  10. Hirsh AT, Callander SB, Robinson ME. Patient demographic characteristics and facial expressions influence nurses' assessment of mood in the context of pain: a virtual human and lens model investigation.. Int J Nurs Stud 2011 Nov;48(11):1330-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.05.002pmc: PMC3170511pubmed: 21596378google scholar: lookup
  11. Jäggin S, Fürst A, Hässig M, Auer J. [Kick injuries of veterinarians during examination and treatment of horses: a retrospective study in Switzerland].. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 2005 Jul;147(7):289-95.
    pubmed: 16041975doi: 10.1024/0036-7281.147.7.289google scholar: lookup
  12. Kamath AF, O'Connor MI. Breakout session: Gender and ethnic disparities in pain management.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011 Jul;469(7):1962-6.
    doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1788-zpmc: PMC3111772pubmed: 21279485google scholar: lookup
  13. Leach MC, Coulter CA, Richardson CA, Flecknell PA. Are we looking in the wrong place? Implications for behavioural-based pain assessment in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculi) and beyond?. PLoS One 2011 Mar 15;6(3):e13347.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013347pmc: PMC3057975pubmed: 21423605google scholar: lookup
  14. Lidén Y, Olofsson N, Landgren O, Johansson E. Pain and anxiety during bone marrow aspiration/biopsy: Comparison of ratings among patients versus health-care professionals.. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2012 Jul;16(3):323-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2011.07.009pmc: PMC6860970pubmed: 22341718google scholar: lookup
  15. Marquié L, Raufaste E, Lauque D, Mariné C, Ecoiffier M, Sorum P. Pain rating by patients and physicians: evidence of systematic pain miscalibration.. Pain 2003 Apr;102(3):289-296.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00402-5pubmed: 12670671google scholar: lookup
  16. Mason G. Stereotypies: a critical review. Anim. Behav. 41 1015–1037.
    doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80640-2google scholar: lookup
  17. McBride SD, Long L. Management of horses showing stereotypic behaviour, owner perception and the implications for welfare.. Vet Rec 2001 Jun 30;148(26):799-802.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.148.26.799pubmed: 11467606google scholar: lookup
  18. Meagher R. Observer ratings: validity and value as a tool for animal welfare research. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 119 1–14.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.026google scholar: lookup
  19. Mills D S. Repetitive movement problems in the horse. 212–227.
  20. Mills D, Alston R, Rogers V, Longford N. Factors associated with the prevalence of stereotypic behaviours amongst Thoroughbred horses passing through auctioneer sales. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 7 115–124.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00096-5google scholar: lookup
  21. Parker M, Goodwin D, Redhead E S. Survey of breeders’ management of horses in Europe, North America and Australia: comparison of factors associated with the development of abnormal behavior. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 114 206–215.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.02.003google scholar: lookup
  22. Prkachin GC. The effects of orientation on detection and identification of facial expressions of emotion.. Br J Psychol 2003 Feb;94(Pt 1):45-62.
    doi: 10.1348/000712603762842093pubmed: 12648388google scholar: lookup
  23. Prkachin KM, Mass H, Mercer SR. Effects of exposure on perception of pain expression.. Pain 2004 Sep;111(1-2):8-12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.027pubmed: 15327803google scholar: lookup
  24. Rollman GB. Signal detection theory pain measures: empirical validation studies and adaptation-level effects.. Pain 1979 Feb;6(1):9-21.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(79)90136-2pubmed: 424237google scholar: lookup
  25. Thibault P, Bourgeois P, Hess U. The effect of group-identification on emotion recognition: the case of cats and basketball players. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42 676–683.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.006google scholar: lookup
  26. Tomer J. Enduring happiness: integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic approaches. J. Socio Econ. 40 530–537.
    doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2011.04.003google scholar: lookup
  27. Topolovec-Vranic J, Canzian S, Innis J, Pollmann-Mudryj MA, McFarlan AW, Baker AJ. Patient satisfaction and documentation of pain assessments and management after implementing the adult nonverbal pain scale.. Am J Crit Care 2010 Jul;19(4):345-54; quiz 355.
    doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010247pubmed: 20595216google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 24 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,928 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.