Analyze Diet
Journal of biomechanics2021; 123; 110455; doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110455

How does bone strain vary between the third metacarpal and the proximal phalangeal bones of the equine distal limb?

Abstract: Strain parameters at injury prone sites of the equine third metacarpal (MC3) and proximal phalangeal (P1) bones were investigated with the aim of improving understanding of injury pathogenesis. We hypothesized that dorsal principal and shear strain patterns, magnitudes and directions would differ from proximal-to-distal; and would be similar from medial-to-lateral across each bone. Unilateral limbs from nine equine cadavers were instrumented with rosette strain gauges during limb loading to 10,500 N. Gauges were attached at seven dorsal sites: middle MC3, distal MC3 (medial, middle, lateral) and proximal P1 (medial, middle, lateral). Outcome measures were analysed with repeated measures analysis of variance. Distal MC3 had the greatest, and proximal P1 the smallest magnitude of minimum principal and shear strains. Directions of maximum and minimum principal strain were similar at the middle and distal MC3 sites with a 20-40° direction difference compared to proximal P1. The patterns of strain magnitude and direction were similar from medial-to-lateral on distal MC3 but varied in pattern and magnitude among the P1 sites. Overall, as load reached maximum, direction of minimum principal strain became more axial in orientation, converging from opposite directions between bones, potentially maximising stability of the distal limb. The difference in strain parameters and strain ratio for adjacent anatomic sites on distal MC3 and proximal P1 was not anticipated, in light of the anatomic congruity of the metacarpophalangeal joint. Based on the predominance of shear strain across proximal P1, shear forces are likely the predominant biomechanical contributor to sagittal fractures of P1.
Publication Date: 2021-04-20 PubMed ID: 34004392DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110455Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the difference and pattern of strain, or force-induced deformation, in injury-prone sites of two types of bones in a horse’s lower limb: the third metacarpal (MC3) and the proximal phalangeal (P1) bones.

Research Methodology

  • To study the force strain dynamics, the researchers collected and used limbs from nine equine cadavers (dead horses).
  • The limbs were rigged with rosette strain gauges, instruments specifically designed to measure strain, and put under a load of up to 10,500N (Newtons).
  • The gauges were attached at seven specific dorsal sites: middle and distal (lower) points of the MC3 (with subsections for medial, middle, and lateral), and the upper part of P1 (also with medial, middle, and lateral).
  • The outcomes were then analyzed using a technique called repeated measures analysis of variance, a statistical method for comparing means in a data set to assess if any significant differences exist.

Findings

  • The results showed that distal MC3 experienced the greatest strain, while proximal P1 underwent the smallest magnitude of force-induced deformation.
  • The directions of maximum strain were found to be similar at the middle and lower parts of MC3, but differed noticeably by 20-40° compared to P1.
  • The magnitude and direction of strain remained similar from medial-to-lateral (across each bone) on the lower MC3, but varied in pattern and magnitude amongst different sites of P1.
  • As the load reached its maximum, the orientation of minimum principal strain (the smallest strain in any direction) became more axial (aligned along the axis) in both types of bones. The strains in the MC3 and P1 converged from opposite directions, thereby potentially enhancing the stability of the lower limb under maximum load.
  • The researchers observed significant differences in strain parameters and the strain ratio for adjacent anatomic sites on lower MC3 and upper P1, a finding which was not anticipated due to the expected anatomic congruity of the metacarpophalangeal joint, the joint connecting these bones.
  • High shear strain (perpendicular force) across upper P1 points towards shear forces as the primary biomechanical contributor to sagittal fractures of P1, a common type of bone fracture in horses.

Conclusion

  • This research provides crucial insights into strain patterns in the equine distal limb and can enhance understanding of how injuries occur.
  • The variations in different types of strain underloading could help improve preventive measures and treatments for injuries in horses, particularly around the MC3 and P1 bones in the lower limb.

Cite This Article

APA
Singer E, Garcia T, Stover S. (2021). How does bone strain vary between the third metacarpal and the proximal phalangeal bones of the equine distal limb? J Biomech, 123, 110455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110455

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2380
NlmUniqueID: 0157375
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 123
Pages: 110455
PII: S0021-9290(21)00235-9

Researcher Affiliations

Singer, Ellen
  • E Singer Equine Orthopaedics and Surgery, 14 Brooklands Rd, Parkgate, Neston, Cheshire, CH646SW, UK. Electronic address: singer844@btinternet.com.
Garcia, Tanya
  • JD Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Research Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, USA.
Stover, Susan
  • JD Wheat Veterinary Orthopedic Research Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Extremities
  • Fractures, Bone
  • Horses
  • Metacarpal Bones
  • Metacarpophalangeal Joint

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Lin ST, Foote AK, Bolas NM, Sargan DR, Murray RC. Histological and Histopathological Features of the Third Metacarpal/Tarsal Parasagittal Groove and Proximal Phalanx Sagittal Groove in Thoroughbred Horses with Racing History. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jun 30;14(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14131942pubmed: 38998057google scholar: lookup
  2. Schiavo S, Beccati F, Pokora R, Lin ST, Milmine RC, Bak L, Peter VG, Murray RC. Lesion Distribution in the Metacarpophalangeal and Metatarsophalangeal Region of 341 Horses Using Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jun 25;14(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14131866pubmed: 38997978google scholar: lookup
  3. Nagy A, Dyson S. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Computed Tomographic and Radiographic Findings in the Metacarpophalangeal Joints of 31 Warmblood Showjumpers in Full Work and Competing Regularly. Animals (Basel) 2024 May 9;14(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14101417pubmed: 38791635google scholar: lookup
  4. Faulkner JE, Joostens Z, Broeckx BJG, Hauspie S, Mariën T, Vanderperren K. Follow-Up Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Sagittal Groove Disease of the Equine Proximal Phalanx Using a Classification System in 29 Non-Racing Sports Horses. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 21;14(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14010034pubmed: 38200766google scholar: lookup